| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
March 5th 04, 11:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message om... (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... Because, BRAIN, it's not about how I address YOU... I say it is. Until you behave yourself, its TAFKARJ!!! Then I'd say you've pretty well proven that I am right about your general lack of character. About what I'd expect from someone who expresses public admiration for a known liar and antagonist. It's about why do YOU address Jim Miccolis with belittling endearments when HE has never addressed YOU as anything except your proper name? Tuff. I'm holding TAFKARJ metaphorically hostage until you straighten your insane a$$ out. My regrets to Jim. I'll send out for Schlottskey's deli. Still haven't answered the question, which in itself I'd say puts you in the "coward" category, but the INSISTENCE on being insulting where no insult was offered puts you solidly in the "scumbag" category, too. Do you often get involved with other people's issues? Only when I see creepy scumbags acting like bullies towards people who have treated them with nothing but respect. You'd be that bully, ergo you'd be that scumbag. I am sure you family line is proud of you. He can. He has. And to a reasonable person, effectively. But TAFKARJ remains in another world. A Ham in a Bubble. So far everything he's said, other than that that he clearly states as opinion, is true. You and Lennie the Liar do not have that reputation. Are YOU that weak minded and foolish? Don't know. I do.... On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the most weak-minded and foolish, how high would you rate me? Ummmm.... a solid 8.5. You ahve the potential to be redeemed, but I doubt it. You occassionally manage to express a vaild opinion without being insulting or dememaning, but your inability to substantiate your claims leaves you wanting pretty badly. He did the same thing with me when he launched into allegations of being a "jack booted thug", "Nazi", "elitist", "Dill Sergeant", etc etc etc, when I had not so addressed him. He is treated and addressed in the same tone and with the same viciousness as he unleashed. Ahem. I hate to be the one to break it to you, Steve, but you are just a wee little bit over the top. Ask ANYone! Perhaps I am...But I refuse to be talked down to, pushed, or otherwise be bullied by cowards and creeps like you and Lennie. Sorry if that hurts your feelings. Perhaps asking yourself how you came to this juncture would be warranted? Is that how you feel? Do YOU need to belittle Jim in order to effectively express yourself when discussing things with/about him? Do you need to belittle me in order to express yourself? Nope. You belittle yourself just fine. But since you deem it necessary to address people the way you do, I just assume that this is the manner in which you find it most effective to communicate. Rhetorical question. I already know the answer. No you don't. You ASSUME that you know an answer. And, no, I don't need to belittle TAFKARJ. Have I done so? THAT was a rhetorical question, Brain. Please do not humiliate yourself by trying to misdirect this question by asking ME about how I address Lennie...I've already answered that. See above. Why do you need to try to belittle ME? Because it seems to be the form of communication that you understand. Stay focused...you were asked a direct, specific question. Which was? Which was obviously not important enough for you to answer like a man. You CAN answer direct, specific questions, can't you? If I can recall them. Obviously you ARE Gene Pool Deficient... Cut and snip to... PS: I will assume any answer to the question that attempts to redirect or obfuscate the response to be "I am unwilling to directly answer the question as I know the truth to be other than what I stated". Simple enough? See above. Questions answered. Now what? No, they weren't...but I am sure that you think that you danced your way around the point. THE POINT is that Brian Burke is not a person of reputable character. Not that we'd expect anything less from a person who publically expresses admiration for a known pathological liar and antagonist. Thanks, Brain...You DO make this easy...You have now admitted to publically lying...not that "we" didn't already know that. Steve, K4YZ Steve, in your own eyes-rolled-back kind of way, I'm sure you really believe what you say. But I don't. I think you're nuts. |
|
#3
March 6th 04, 07:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(William) wrote in message . com...
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... (William) wrote in message om... (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... THE POINT is that Brian Burke is not a person of reputable character. Not that we'd expect anything less from a person who publically expresses admiration for a known pathological liar and antagonist. Thanks, Brain...You DO make this easy...You have now admitted to publically lying...not that "we" didn't already know that. Steve, in your own eyes-rolled-back kind of way, I'm sure you really believe what you say. Of course I do, Brain. Why would a rational person say something he DIDN'T believe? But I don't. Of course you don't, Brain. Probably due tot he fact that it's your failure to understand why YOUR behaviour is the one in question here... YOU claim to have operated as "DX" from an area of the world in which you obviously had no permission to operate from. I say "obviously" since you cannot produce a single bit of evidence that you DID have permission. When asked to provide some documentary evidence of this operation, you cannot provide a single QSL card, a single callsign of somone who can verify they "worked" you, etc. You then follow up THAT act by publically expressing admiration and claiming as your "mentor" a person who ahs been clearly and repeatedly documented as intentionally untruthful and openly spiteful of the very radio service of which you are a licensee. Several folks here have expressed disdain of my poking at you and the Putzy one...Not because you don't deserve it, but because they believe if you are "left alone", you'll go away. I did that for a while and you didn't...Neither did your lying friend. I for one believe when you try to placate bullies and liars, you only serve to embolden them. Just as it is your right to lie and misrepresent, it's my right to challenge and expose your lies and misrepresentations. You and Lennie certainly give me plenty of opportunites to address them. I think you're nuts. If thinking that makes you feel warm and fuzzy and let's you sleep at night, Brain, you go right on ahead and think it. Consider it yours. Steve, K4YZ |
|
#4
March 6th 04, 02:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message . com... (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... (William) wrote in message om... (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... THE POINT is that Brian Burke is not a person of reputable character. Not that we'd expect anything less from a person who publically expresses admiration for a known pathological liar and antagonist. Thanks, Brain...You DO make this easy...You have now admitted to publically lying...not that "we" didn't already know that. Steve, in your own eyes-rolled-back kind of way, I'm sure you really believe what you say. Of course I do, Brain. Why would a rational person say something he DIDN'T believe? He could be: a. lying. b. not rational and doesn't know what he's saying. I think you're not rational (nuts). |
|
#5
March 7th 04, 05:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(William) wrote in message . com...
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... Of course I do, Brain. Why would a rational person say something he DIDN'T believe? He could be: a. lying. b. not rational and doesn't know what he's saying. I think you're not rational (nuts). Of course you do. You (and your "mentor") are the one's with credibility problems here. So.....How do YOU go about "fixing" it...?!?! You do your best to try and put the onus of inpropriety off on anyone BUT yourself. Since I work the hardest to keep your frequent foolishness in the public eye, I catch the flak. No problem. The worst YOU have to suggest is that I am "nuts" or "irrational" for not allowing you and Lennie to get away with bullying and lying. So far, you've failed. Try again...?!?! Steve, K4YZ |
|
#6
March 7th 04, 12:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com...
(William) wrote in message . com... (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... Of course I do, Brain. Why would a rational person say something he DIDN'T believe? He could be: a. lying. b. not rational and doesn't know what he's saying. I think you're not rational (nuts). Of course you do. You (and your "mentor") are the one's with credibility problems here. So.....How do YOU go about "fixing" it...?!?! You do your best to try and put the onus of inpropriety off on anyone BUT yourself. Since I work the hardest to keep your frequent foolishness in the public eye, I catch the flak. No problem. The worst YOU have to suggest is that I am "nuts" or "irrational" for not allowing you and Lennie to get away with bullying and lying. So far, you've failed. Try again...?!?! Steve, K4YZ Whether I've failed or not is immaterial to your being nuts. You would be nuts with or without my presence on rrap. Best of luck. |
|
#7
March 7th 04, 07:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#8
March 9th 04, 07:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(William) wrote in message . com...
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... So far, you've failed. Try again...?!?! Whether I've failed or not is immaterial to your being nuts. You would be nuts with or without my presence on rrap. Best of luck. Luck is not needed here, Brain. That which you call "nuts" is simply your attempt to writhe away from being publically humiliated over and over, Brain. Perhaps if YOU reconsidered YOUR own rhetoric and conduct, that which you consider "nuts" would cease...?!?! I consider anyone who publically expresses admiration for a person who has been thoroughly documented as a liar and antagonist as "nuts". I consider anyone who makes public assertions that they either cannot substantiate or validate via some third party source as "nuts". I consider anyone who's been caught doing those things who then PERSISTS in doing them, contrary to evidence against them, as nuts. All of those things, Brain, would be you... If calling me "nuts" makes you sleep better, or you feel you got your sucker punch in, well then, I hope it makes that warm fuzzy feeling for you. I think the evidence of odd behaviour rests on YOUR shoulders, Brain...not anyone elses. That I (or anyone else) apparently manage to effectively rub your nose in your own errors and foolishness doesn't make me (us) nuts...Just glad for the entertainment you provide. For that I (we) thank you. Steve, K4YZ |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
