| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Alun
writes: Then outside the disaster arena, there's all the marathons, walk-a-thons, bike-a-thons and myriad other public events for which hams routinely provide communications. Our club supports 4 or 5 of these per year. Those are good practice. BTW, I am not intending to call anyone stupid, but I just couldn't resist the title. Some things just "write themselves..." :-) By the way, the Los Angeles Marathon was a success on Sunday, record turn-out, everything run just fine. It can be done very well without any amateur radio help but the ARRL copy scribblers would have a cow about that. :-) LHA / WMD |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
N2EY wrote:
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , Alun writes: Then outside the disaster arena, there's all the marathons, walk-a-thons, bike-a-thons and myriad other public events for which hams routinely provide communications. Our club supports 4 or 5 of these per year. Those are good practice. By the way, the Los Angeles Marathon was a success on Sunday, record turn-out, everything run just fine. What was your finishing time, Len? How were course conditions? It can be done very well without any amateur radio help How do you know? Ever work at a race? I have, in a variety of roles. LA and other major marathons have been using amateur radio operators for race communications for years. A local bike race decided to try using cell phones as an experiment last year. The hams were along, with the knowledge that we might be "redundant in the future. They found out: Every person had to be called separately. When a message had to go to the whole group, everyone had to be called. Those who were out of coverage range did not get the messages. Coverage over the entire course was pretty bad. Using cell phones was an immediate and complete failure. they realized this on the first call that had to go to everyone. Cell phones work for some things, but the idea that they can replace radio operators is best advanced by those that don't really know how that particular job is done. http://www.lamarathon.com/2004/volunteers.php Some hams and ham equipment spotted in the pix. http://www.doitsports.com/volunteer/info.tcl?job_id=488 (sign up for radio operators - only licensed hams need apply) Really? I thunk all you needed was a cell phone and the ability to say "can you hear me now?....how about now? 8^) http://www.cert-la.com/ (scroll down a bit to where it says "ham radio operators wanted") Do you think maybe they put that in as an affirmative action sort of thing? Maybe they just wanted to get the Hams to shut their yap's? ;^) but the ARRL copy scribblers would have a cow about that. :-) "ARRL copy scribblers"? Who are they? You mean folks who write the facts about what actually happened? http://www.arrl.org/news/features/2002/02/28/1/?nc=1 Nice write up about the 2002 LA Marathon Maybe you didn't see the hams, so you just assume they are not there and play no role. That's simply Not True. Capitalization noted, Jim. Do some people think that the hams are suppose to be in the lead vehicle or leading the parade? Heck they are supposed to be behind the scenes. Go figure. - - Mike KB3EIA - |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
N2EY wrote: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , Alun writes: Then outside the disaster arena, there's all the marathons, walk-a-thons, bike-a-thons and myriad other public events for which hams routinely provide communications. Our club supports 4 or 5 of these per year. Those are good practice. By the way, the Los Angeles Marathon was a success on Sunday, record turn-out, everything run just fine. What was your finishing time, Len? How were course conditions? It can be done very well without any amateur radio help How do you know? Ever work at a race? I have, in a variety of roles. LA and other major marathons have been using amateur radio operators for race communications for years. A local bike race decided to try using cell phones as an experiment last year. The hams were along, with the knowledge that we might be "redundant in the future. They found out: Every person had to be called separately. When a message had to go to the whole group, everyone had to be called. Those who were out of coverage range did not get the messages. Coverage over the entire course was pretty bad. Using cell phones was an immediate and complete failure. they realized this on the first call that had to go to everyone. They couldn't figure all that out ahead of time? Sounds to me like the hams were smart enough to simply let them try it and see the problems first-hand. Those same problems surfaced in groups searching for wreckage from the space shuttle disaster last year. Of course cell phones *do* have uses in those situations. Where one specific person needs to talk to another specific person, and both are in the coverage area, they're perfect. Cell phones work for some things, but the idea that they can replace radio operators is best advanced by those that don't really know how that particular job is done. You mean like folks who comment on marathons without ever having been involved in one other than as a spectator? Or like folks who comment on amateur radio without ever having been involved other than as a spectator? http://www.lamarathon.com/2004/volunteers.php Some hams and ham equipment spotted in the pix. Of course. http://www.doitsports.com/volunteer/info.tcl?job_id=488 (sign up for radio operators - only licensed hams need apply) Really? I thunk all you needed was a cell phone and the ability to say "can you hear me now?....how about now? 8^) That's what some "professionals" would have us believe... http://www.cert-la.com/ (scroll down a bit to where it says "ham radio operators wanted") Do you think maybe they put that in as an affirmative action sort of thing? Maybe they just wanted to get the Hams to shut their yap's? ;^) Naw, it's simpler than that. Besides their considerable skills and experience, ham volunteers at events like the LA Marathon provide their own equipment and usually their own transportation and other support. Try hiring 200 "communications professionals" for a day just to supply radio communications and see what happens to the race entry fee. (LA says 200 hams, NYC marathon says 400, but of course NYC is a lot bigger race). but the ARRL copy scribblers would have a cow about that. :-) "ARRL copy scribblers"? Who are they? You mean folks who write the facts about what actually happened? http://www.arrl.org/news/features/2002/02/28/1/?nc=1 Nice write up about the 2002 LA Marathon Maybe you didn't see the hams, so you just assume they are not there and play no role. That's simply Not True. Capitalization noted, Jim. Do some people think that the hams are suppose to be in the lead vehicle or leading the parade? Looks like it. But there are some folks who would deny the participation and contributions of hams no matter what they did. Heck they are supposed to be behind the scenes. Go figure. Of course. It's about the race! 73 de Jim, N2EY Philadelphia Independence Marathon, 1982 and 1983. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
N2EY wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote in message ... N2EY wrote: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , Alun writes: Then outside the disaster arena, there's all the marathons, walk-a-thons, bike-a-thons and myriad other public events for which hams routinely provide communications. Our club supports 4 or 5 of these per year. Those are good practice. By the way, the Los Angeles Marathon was a success on Sunday, record turn-out, everything run just fine. What was your finishing time, Len? How were course conditions? It can be done very well without any amateur radio help How do you know? Ever work at a race? I have, in a variety of roles. LA and other major marathons have been using amateur radio operators for race communications for years. A local bike race decided to try using cell phones as an experiment last year. The hams were along, with the knowledge that we might be "redundant in the future. They found out: Every person had to be called separately. When a message had to go to the whole group, everyone had to be called. Those who were out of coverage range did not get the messages. Coverage over the entire course was pretty bad. Using cell phones was an immediate and complete failure. they realized this on the first call that had to go to everyone. They couldn't figure all that out ahead of time? Amazingly enough, no! Cell phones are seductive little things. After all you can call around the world, send pictures of whatever, and even look up your email on the web with them. So how on earth can such a wonderful instrument *not* be good at running a race? Imagine, each and every participant with their own little radio, ready for direct contact. Any conclusion may be reached with insufficient thought! Sounds to me like the hams were smart enough to simply let them try it and see the problems first-hand. Yup. All of us that had done events before just chuckled and waited. First call for our help came through a couple minutes after the start. Those same problems surfaced in groups searching for wreckage from the space shuttle disaster last year. Of course cell phones *do* have uses in those situations. Where one specific person needs to talk to another specific person, and both are in the coverage area, they're perfect. Sure enough. But when many people need to hear instructions at the same time, or if the area is large and rural, You need a multi-mode system, and not just line of site low power stuff. Cell phones work for some things, but the idea that they can replace radio operators is best advanced by those that don't really know how that particular job is done. You mean like folks who comment on marathons without ever having been involved in one other than as a spectator? Or like folks who comment on amateur radio without ever having been involved other than as a spectator? Well, when you put it *that* way, yup! http://www.lamarathon.com/2004/volunteers.php Some hams and ham equipment spotted in the pix. Of course. http://www.doitsports.com/volunteer/info.tcl?job_id=488 (sign up for radio operators - only licensed hams need apply) Really? I thunk all you needed was a cell phone and the ability to say "can you hear me now?....how about now? 8^) That's what some "professionals" would have us believe... Any conclusion is possible given insufficient......... oh wait, I already said that, didn't I? http://www.cert-la.com/ (scroll down a bit to where it says "ham radio operators wanted") Do you think maybe they put that in as an affirmative action sort of thing? Maybe they just wanted to get the Hams to shut their yap's? ;^) Naw, it's simpler than that. Besides their considerable skills and experience, ham volunteers at events like the LA Marathon provide their own equipment and usually their own transportation and other support. Try hiring 200 "communications professionals" for a day just to supply radio communications and see what happens to the race entry fee. (LA says 200 hams, NYC marathon says 400, but of course NYC is a lot bigger race). The price for professional radio operators would be from 80 to 160 thousand dollars for an 8 hour day, according to my BOE scribbling. - Mike KB3EIA - |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , (N2EY) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , Alun writes: Then outside the disaster arena, there's all the marathons, walk-a-thons, bike-a-thons and myriad other public events for which hams routinely provide communications. Our club supports 4 or 5 of these per year. Those are good practice. By the way, the Los Angeles Marathon was a success on Sunday, record turn-out, everything run just fine. What was your finishing time, Len? How were course conditions? It can be done very well without any amateur radio help How do you know? 1. By reading about it in a respected newspaper. Grit? USA Today, the newspaper for those who haven't the time for CNN's in-depth coverage? 2. By viewing it on broadcast television. You strike me as the kind of guy who has time for lots of things, like watching an entire marathon in order to see if amateur radio is involved or like making numerous lengthy posts to an internet newsgroup which deals with an activity in which you are not a participant. 3. By knowing some details about it from one of its officials. One official. Some details. Yep, that makes you an expert on the L.A. Marathon. Ever work at a race? Not in a foot race. Political race? Why is that important to the "Economy, Stupid?" Allow me to jog your memory. Jim responded to your comments. How did they relate to the "Economy", Stupid? LA and other major marathons have been using amateur radio operators for race communications for years. If you insist...and you WILL insist. You are a Believer. He didn't insist. He provided you with a way to check out details. Have you ever been IN Los Angeles? Have you ever been in Bissau? Have you ever worked IN any volunteer function here? Did you ever worked in any capacity in Bissau? YOU have NO relationship with the city of Los Angeles. I live here. You don't. YOU must BE an EXPERT. YOU live THERE so YOU must KNOW everything which goes on THERE. Reality check: ANY marathon foot race can be done with available non-amateur radio communications readily available in any large urban area. The first Olympic marathon event was done without any amateur radio "help." Several Games after that had NO amateur radio "help" and also succeeded. That's nice. You were provided links to information which seems to disprove your earlier statements. Your "first Olympic marathon" tap dance isn't going to get you on "American Idol". Maybe you didn't see the hams, so you just assume they are not there and play no role. That's simply Not True. I don't care one way or another about "ham radio help in marathons." That's odd. You certainly seemed to care when you decided to take another shot at amateur radio by bringing up the topic. I know a marathon can be run WITHOUT amateur radio help. That's been done many times. A marathon. You brought up the Los Angeles Marathon. Run without amateur radio help? Those links provided by Jim seem to disprove your claims, kindly old gent. You keep insisting amateur radio MUST be there...and that's simply Not True. What's not true is that amateur radio wasn't there. Look at the links. Now go do some DX or gab expertly about The Economy, Kosher Food, or choo-choo trains. Don't they need "ham radio help?" Why, Len? Are you a ham? Dave K8MN |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Dave Heil
writes: In article , (N2EY) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , Alun writes: Then outside the disaster arena, there's all the marathons, walk-a-thons, bike-a-thons and myriad other public events for which hams routinely provide communications. Our club supports 4 or 5 of these per year. Those are good practice. By the way, the Los Angeles Marathon was a success on Sunday, record turn-out, everything run just fine. What was your finishing time, Len? How were course conditions? Go back to your usual participatory rantings. No one has to be IN a race in order to WATCH it. None of the officials who run it have to be IN the race in order to administer it. Have you understood that yet or must you RANT and WHINE some more about not being IN something? Did you get a legal surname change? Try not to respond to certain posts made to others as if they were directed to you. Few care about your imagined personal affronts. Go back to sitting in fromt of your orion and get more oriongasms. LHA / WMD |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | General | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400  June 11, 2004 | Dx | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400  June 11, 2004 | Dx | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1389 – March 26, 2004 | Dx | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | General | |||