Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
N2EY wrote: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , Alun writes: Then outside the disaster arena, there's all the marathons, walk-a-thons, bike-a-thons and myriad other public events for which hams routinely provide communications. Our club supports 4 or 5 of these per year. Those are good practice. By the way, the Los Angeles Marathon was a success on Sunday, record turn-out, everything run just fine. What was your finishing time, Len? How were course conditions? It can be done very well without any amateur radio help How do you know? Ever work at a race? I have, in a variety of roles. LA and other major marathons have been using amateur radio operators for race communications for years. A local bike race decided to try using cell phones as an experiment last year. The hams were along, with the knowledge that we might be "redundant in the future. They found out: Every person had to be called separately. When a message had to go to the whole group, everyone had to be called. Those who were out of coverage range did not get the messages. Coverage over the entire course was pretty bad. Using cell phones was an immediate and complete failure. they realized this on the first call that had to go to everyone. They couldn't figure all that out ahead of time? Sounds to me like the hams were smart enough to simply let them try it and see the problems first-hand. Those same problems surfaced in groups searching for wreckage from the space shuttle disaster last year. Of course cell phones *do* have uses in those situations. Where one specific person needs to talk to another specific person, and both are in the coverage area, they're perfect. Cell phones work for some things, but the idea that they can replace radio operators is best advanced by those that don't really know how that particular job is done. You mean like folks who comment on marathons without ever having been involved in one other than as a spectator? Or like folks who comment on amateur radio without ever having been involved other than as a spectator? http://www.lamarathon.com/2004/volunteers.php Some hams and ham equipment spotted in the pix. Of course. http://www.doitsports.com/volunteer/info.tcl?job_id=488 (sign up for radio operators - only licensed hams need apply) Really? I thunk all you needed was a cell phone and the ability to say "can you hear me now?....how about now? 8^) That's what some "professionals" would have us believe... http://www.cert-la.com/ (scroll down a bit to where it says "ham radio operators wanted") Do you think maybe they put that in as an affirmative action sort of thing? Maybe they just wanted to get the Hams to shut their yap's? ;^) Naw, it's simpler than that. Besides their considerable skills and experience, ham volunteers at events like the LA Marathon provide their own equipment and usually their own transportation and other support. Try hiring 200 "communications professionals" for a day just to supply radio communications and see what happens to the race entry fee. (LA says 200 hams, NYC marathon says 400, but of course NYC is a lot bigger race). but the ARRL copy scribblers would have a cow about that. :-) "ARRL copy scribblers"? Who are they? You mean folks who write the facts about what actually happened? http://www.arrl.org/news/features/2002/02/28/1/?nc=1 Nice write up about the 2002 LA Marathon Maybe you didn't see the hams, so you just assume they are not there and play no role. That's simply Not True. Capitalization noted, Jim. Do some people think that the hams are suppose to be in the lead vehicle or leading the parade? Looks like it. But there are some folks who would deny the participation and contributions of hams no matter what they did. Heck they are supposed to be behind the scenes. Go figure. Of course. It's about the race! 73 de Jim, N2EY Philadelphia Independence Marathon, 1982 and 1983. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Dave Heil
writes: Are we to do as you do or do as you say, Leonard? Not required...but, most readers get the impression that all MUST do, say, act, and everything else as YOU direct. Go back to sulking about long-ago perceived personal affronts. That's your forte'. LHA / WMD |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Dave Heil
writes: In article , (N2EY) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , Alun writes: Then outside the disaster arena, there's all the marathons, walk-a-thons, bike-a-thons and myriad other public events for which hams routinely provide communications. Our club supports 4 or 5 of these per year. Those are good practice. By the way, the Los Angeles Marathon was a success on Sunday, record turn-out, everything run just fine. What was your finishing time, Len? How were course conditions? Go back to your usual participatory rantings. No one has to be IN a race in order to WATCH it. None of the officials who run it have to be IN the race in order to administer it. Have you understood that yet or must you RANT and WHINE some more about not being IN something? Did you get a legal surname change? Try not to respond to certain posts made to others as if they were directed to you. Few care about your imagined personal affronts. Go back to sitting in fromt of your orion and get more oriongasms. LHA / WMD |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
(TAFKARJ on a verbal marathon without end) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , (N2EY) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , Alun writes: Then outside the disaster arena, there's all the marathons, walk-a-thons, bike-a-thons and myriad other public events for which hams routinely provide communications. Our club supports 4 or 5 of these per year. Those are good practice. By the way, the Los Angeles Marathon was a success on Sunday, record turn-out, everything run just fine. What was your finishing time, Len? How were course conditions? Well, Len? You said "everything run just fine". Yes. Everything RAN just fine...using the word "ran" (or "run") as in an adminstrative action or organizing, starting, keeping it going, and finally take-down. You are mighty peevish again, perceiving personal insults at the slightest provocation. Tsk, tsk, tsk...too many endorphins? :-) My marathon PR (personal record) is 3 hours 57 minutes 37 seconds. Have you written the Guiness editors yet? Did you carry along your code key while setting that terrific time? Work any DX while running your foot race? What's your marathon PR, Len? I don't do Public Relations any more, TAFKARJ. League isn't too swift in that department and can't get good penetration of the mass media. Not my problem. Go file a complaint with the two League presidents. Consider that Sports CARS are in Road Races...on roads. Did that once in a sporty '53 Austin Healey two-seater; the aluminum body was a great ground plane for a short CB whip 1959 - 1961. Great make-out vehicle. :-) The L.A. 2004 Marathon was on the STREETS of Los Angeles, on on any "roads." :-) Go back to solving the nation's Economic and Social and Political Problems in this amateur radio policy newsgroup, TAFKARJ. Your ham license and marathon times and morsemanship and ivy-fringed degrees are the "qualifications" for that, are they not? :-) LHA / WMD |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Heil wrote in message ...
Len Over 21 wrote: Profit is defined as pecuniary compensation for services rendered. That'd be incorrect. You'd have to deduct expenditures first. U.S. amateur radio is defined as specifically NOT for pecuniary interest. No kidding? Are you a radio amateur? Really? No kidding? Is that why I said that repeater owners cannot charge for repeater use? Yep, probably. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
(Len Over 21) writes: In article , writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , (N2EY) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , Alun writes: Then outside the disaster arena, there's all the marathons, walk-a-thons, bike-a-thons and myriad other public events for which hams routinely provide communications. Our club supports 4 or 5 of these per year. Those are good practice. By the way, the Los Angeles Marathon was a success on Sunday, record turn-out, everything run just fine. What was your finishing time, Len? How were course conditions? Well, Len? You said "everything run just fine". Yes. What was your finishing time, Len? How were course conditions? Or were you DNS? Everything RAN just fine...using the word "ran" (or "run") as in an adminstrative action or organizing, starting, keeping it going, and finally take-down. How do you know? You are mighty peevish again, perceiving personal insults at the slightest provocation. Not me. You're the one shouting and calling names. My marathon PR (personal record) is 3 hours 57 minutes 37 seconds. Have you written the Guiness editors yet? You sound jealous, Len. What's your marathon PR, Len? I don't do Public Relations any more, Good. Your style here indicates you'd be very bad at it. Consider that Sports CARS are in Road Races...on roads. They're not allowed in the LA Marathon. The L.A. 2004 Marathon was on the STREETS of Los Angeles, on on any "roads." :-) They're called road races, Len. As suspected, you were not involved in the LA Marathon in any way except as a distant spectator. Same as your involvement as in amateur radio. Well, Len, once more you've lived up to your profile and shown us your purpose here. As if there was any doubt. Plonk time again. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
N2EY wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote in message ... N2EY wrote: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , Alun writes: Then outside the disaster arena, there's all the marathons, walk-a-thons, bike-a-thons and myriad other public events for which hams routinely provide communications. Our club supports 4 or 5 of these per year. Those are good practice. By the way, the Los Angeles Marathon was a success on Sunday, record turn-out, everything run just fine. What was your finishing time, Len? How were course conditions? It can be done very well without any amateur radio help How do you know? Ever work at a race? I have, in a variety of roles. LA and other major marathons have been using amateur radio operators for race communications for years. A local bike race decided to try using cell phones as an experiment last year. The hams were along, with the knowledge that we might be "redundant in the future. They found out: Every person had to be called separately. When a message had to go to the whole group, everyone had to be called. Those who were out of coverage range did not get the messages. Coverage over the entire course was pretty bad. Using cell phones was an immediate and complete failure. they realized this on the first call that had to go to everyone. They couldn't figure all that out ahead of time? Amazingly enough, no! Cell phones are seductive little things. After all you can call around the world, send pictures of whatever, and even look up your email on the web with them. So how on earth can such a wonderful instrument *not* be good at running a race? Imagine, each and every participant with their own little radio, ready for direct contact. Any conclusion may be reached with insufficient thought! Sounds to me like the hams were smart enough to simply let them try it and see the problems first-hand. Yup. All of us that had done events before just chuckled and waited. First call for our help came through a couple minutes after the start. Those same problems surfaced in groups searching for wreckage from the space shuttle disaster last year. Of course cell phones *do* have uses in those situations. Where one specific person needs to talk to another specific person, and both are in the coverage area, they're perfect. Sure enough. But when many people need to hear instructions at the same time, or if the area is large and rural, You need a multi-mode system, and not just line of site low power stuff. Cell phones work for some things, but the idea that they can replace radio operators is best advanced by those that don't really know how that particular job is done. You mean like folks who comment on marathons without ever having been involved in one other than as a spectator? Or like folks who comment on amateur radio without ever having been involved other than as a spectator? Well, when you put it *that* way, yup! http://www.lamarathon.com/2004/volunteers.php Some hams and ham equipment spotted in the pix. Of course. http://www.doitsports.com/volunteer/info.tcl?job_id=488 (sign up for radio operators - only licensed hams need apply) Really? I thunk all you needed was a cell phone and the ability to say "can you hear me now?....how about now? 8^) That's what some "professionals" would have us believe... Any conclusion is possible given insufficient......... oh wait, I already said that, didn't I? http://www.cert-la.com/ (scroll down a bit to where it says "ham radio operators wanted") Do you think maybe they put that in as an affirmative action sort of thing? Maybe they just wanted to get the Hams to shut their yap's? ;^) Naw, it's simpler than that. Besides their considerable skills and experience, ham volunteers at events like the LA Marathon provide their own equipment and usually their own transportation and other support. Try hiring 200 "communications professionals" for a day just to supply radio communications and see what happens to the race entry fee. (LA says 200 hams, NYC marathon says 400, but of course NYC is a lot bigger race). The price for professional radio operators would be from 80 to 160 thousand dollars for an 8 hour day, according to my BOE scribbling. - Mike KB3EIA - |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Len Over 21 wrote: In article , Dave Heil writes: Are we to do as you do or do as you say, Leonard? Not required...but, most readers get the impression that all MUST do, say, act, and everything else as YOU direct. I don't believe you. I don't think you've had any input from "most readers". It is interesting that you responded to a question with two distinct choices with "Not required". Do you think most readers have the idea that radio amateurs are supposed to go along with your view of how amateur radio should be regulated? After all, you have nothing to do with amateur radio. Go back to sulking about long-ago perceived personal affronts. That's your forte'. I am forte-laden, Leonard. One of mine is that I'm a radio amateur. You aren't. Dave K8MN |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , Dave Heil writes: In article , (N2EY) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , Alun writes: Then outside the disaster arena, there's all the marathons, walk-a-thons, bike-a-thons and myriad other public events for which hams routinely provide communications. Our club supports 4 or 5 of these per year. Those are good practice. By the way, the Los Angeles Marathon was a success on Sunday, record turn-out, everything run just fine. What was your finishing time, Len? How were course conditions? Go back to your usual participatory rantings. No one has to be IN a race in order to WATCH it. None of the officials who run it have to be IN the race in order to administer it. Have you understood that yet or must you RANT and WHINE some more about not being IN something? Did you get a legal surname change? Try not to respond to certain posts made to others as if they were directed to you. Few care about your imagined personal affronts. Uhhhhhh, Len? You seem to be tangled up in your responses. You're addressing Jim's statement. Go back to sitting in fromt of your orion and get more oriongasms. Do you think that "most readers" get the idea that you're busy telling people what to do? You can buy an Orion too, Leonard. You can think of it as a very expensive SWL receiver. Dave K8MN |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400  June 11, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400  June 11, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1389 – March 26, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | General |