![]() |
|
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: Wrong Again, Len! (Communicator Power) From: (William) Date: 3/27/2004 9:43 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: Wrong Again, Len! (Communicator Power) From: (William) Date: 3/25/2004 6:02 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Poor, Steve. The RRAP Bully now thinks he's being picked on and suckered into looking foolish and behaving badly. It's just so very unfair. I am neither bullying you nor am being "suckered" into anything. But you are. I am showing you to be the liar that I have claimed you to be. What lie have I told? Sorry that you can't see that. It IS rather obvious. The only thing obvious is that you're nuts. That and you behave very badly. |
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , (William) writes: Poor, Steve. The RRAP Bully now thinks he's being picked on and suckered into looking foolish and behaving badly. It's just so very unfair. Isn't it awful? Gosh, he ought to contact the other Steve, Colonel Austin (the one with the bionic VTC), and, with the aid of a ham in Iowa, they can straighten all this out to assure their amateur god-hood. LHA / WMD I don't know if Lee Majors can behave that badly, even if he's just acting. About the other one, I have no doubt. Maybe they can do something with the "Good Cop, Bad Cop" routine, but with ham radio instead of police work. |
In article ,
(William) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: Poor, Steve. The RRAP Bully now thinks he's being picked on and suckered into looking foolish and behaving badly. It's just so very unfair. Isn't it awful? Gosh, he ought to contact the other Steve, Colonel Austin (the one with the bionic VTC), and, with the aid of a ham in Iowa, they can straighten all this out to assure their amateur god-hood. LHA / WMD I don't know if Lee Majors can behave that badly, even if he's just acting. About the other one, I have no doubt. Maybe they can do something with the "Good Cop, Bad Cop" routine, but with ham radio instead of police work. Rumor has it that it will premiere on the Garden Channel as "Lawn Order, SVU (Special VTC Unit)." Variety and Hollywood Reporter newspapers aren't talking...it might be a "Shield" spin- off with the gunnery nurse as another Mackey (they are waiting for the hair loss to be complete). I'll ask around... LHA / WMD |
|
"Len Over 21" wrote ...
"Len Over 21" wrote ... Sheesh, Leonard. We don't use much in the way of milspec electronics anymore. The new theory adopted by the armed services in 1994 relies heavily on commercially available gear. Are you sleeping on your COTS? The day of everything having to be milspec is long gone. Bravo Sierra. Those are still here. So are Military Specifications, abbreviated "Mil Spec" among those of us who still have to use them. The Bravo Sierra is yours, Leonard. Since you don't actually work with the military anymore, you are forced to search things out on the net and hope they are up to date. Actually, I'm working for a company that is contracting to another company who has a contract to supply electronics for the DoD. Not full time. But the MIL STDs of many kinds are in both places with many different dash number "Mil Specs" called out. Then you should know that if the product (or service) cannot be obtained commercially, even the components should be commercial or adapted for military use. As you know, many "commercial" products already meet or exceed what we would commonly refer to as Milspec. Note: "Mil Specs" is an old term for MILITARY STANDARDS of many kinds, informal. They have all sorts of effective dates to them but I'm trusting another to keep them all current and also do all the bookkeeping on checking document call-outs, to see we all have the standard specified on-hand. OTOH, I work IN the system and understand how it ACTUALLY is quite well. Okay, tell us which ring at the Pentagon your office is located and I may get a chance to look you up... I quoted from the FAR and you still sit there and argue with me. What part of FACT don't you get? My organization didn't get that particular document so I can't verify it. :-) The FAR is the Federal Aquisition Regulation (15 and 42) and the DFAR is the defense version. If you are a contractor and or sub-contractor on a government contract, you are required to be familiar with it. Seriously, you might want to tell your employer to supply you a copy since you and I both are bound by what it says. I'm sure that you need only imply you always tell the truth in here and that is the Final Word. :-) Do you know what COTS is? Ask around. Don't sleep on the job. COTS = Commercial Off The Shelf. I'm quite familiar with the term COTS. I didn't respond because it was a moronic question to ask someone who works in the system. Been around for over a decade now. It applies to specialized things such as the three principal ICs found in the R/T for the AN/PRC-119. ITT and GD make a quarter million of those sets between 1989 and 2003. It's the standard small-unit (battalion and down) radio for U.S. military land forces. COR on a 6 million dollar contract. Wow, the "Six Million Dollar Ham!" "...We have the technology, we can rebuild Arnie..." Cut to promo, voice-over "Coming to your favorite channel any day now...!", up exciting music bkgd, take title... Say what you want, but I have the EXPERIENCE with the contract and KNOW what I'm talking about. All you have is an internet search tool, and "Old" knowledge concerning how the aquisition system works. Righto, Col. Steve Austin, your bionics make you superior everywhere. "Millions" in contract awards have been awarded since WW2. The dollar amounts, normalized for the COLA, serve only to indicate the size of a particular project. That's a manager and bean-counter thing; us folks with the dirtier hands concentrate on the works of a project in order to fulfill a contract. And as the COR, I make sure that you do. The COR (Contract Officer Representative or COTR (technical added)) IS the person in the weeds, Leonard. We surveille, inspect, rate, and coordinate with the contractor concerning every aspect of the contract for the CO. The 6 million dollar contract (for which I am still the COR) extends over a period of 2 years. We are only 3 months into it at this point, and have just completed our first quarterly performance rating for them. They did quite well. New stuff, Leonard. Doesn't even remotely resemble what you did in 1955. I gave you the web site to research. What, did the BIG words stump you? "BIG" is also an acronym now? [what will they think of next?] Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious? Antidisestablishmentarianism? I'm working with HEMT, PHEMT, and GaSP devices. For radio purposes...and some of that will bleed over to WiFax, one of the IEEE 802 standard systems for broadband (it ain't "Wi-Fi" but one of the families within the standard). DoD will own the plans per terms of the overall contract, but the techniques and notebook data aren't owned by da gubmint. I bet you a dollar to a donut that the military specific application of that technology is quite proprietary. Now you shoulder your FAR away VTC and bravely defend the Homeland Security by shouting and hollering your magnificence in this newsgrope. That means all of us on the project can finish and get final payment. You don't have the brain power to have any ammo of consequence, Leonard. Whatever you say, Steve Austin. :-) You are the one with morse code expertise and the bionic VTC. We will all sleep safely on our COTS at night knowing the USA is guarded by such knowledgeable superiors. Actually, yes you will. |
"Len Over 21" wrote ...
Isn't it awful? Gosh, he ought to contact the other Steve, Colonel Austin (the one with the bionic VTC), and, with the aid of a ham in Iowa, they can straighten all this out to assure their amateur god-hood. I just have to laugh. This very same technology that you make fun of (I presume because you don''t have a clue) is the same technology that might very well save your butt some day. Arnie - |
Subject: Clarification, was: Wrong Again, Len! (Communicator Power)
From: (Len Over 21) Date: 3/27/2004 11:45 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: In article , (William) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... Besides, the gunnery nurse keeps hollering "HE LIES, HE LIES!" He's nuts. Pay no attention. I don't...but it's like QRM, there, noisy, with no intelligence content and it distracts from real discussions. In the last four years, I have seen you post exactly THREE posts that I would classify as "real discussions", Lennie. The last one being this past week on the importance of filing comments with the FCC on BPL. The rest are your ususal smatterings of rhetorical antagonism, spiced with profanity and "personal perjorative". Same Putzy Lennie... Steve, K4YZ |
ubject: Wrong Again, Len! (Communicator Power)
From: "Arnie Macy" Date: 3/28/2004 2:25 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: "Len Over 21" wrote ... Isn't it awful? Gosh, he ought to contact the other Steve, Colonel Austin (the one with the bionic VTC), and, with the aid of a ham in Iowa, they can straighten all this out to assure their amateur god-hood. I just have to laugh. This very same technology that you make fun of (I presume because you don''t have a clue) is the same technology that might very well save your butt some day. Actually, I hope one of them has an AMI while I am near...Wouldn't THAT be ironic! 73 Steve, K4YZ |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:47 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com