Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Mike Coslo
writes: As long as the cell phones are avaialble, they are obviously the preferred method because anyone so equipped can push 911 and report directly. I think this may be the confusion here also. A cell phone is great for localized small-scale problems. If everyone has one, then of course they will be great for calling 911. An accident happens and likely the next person ther will have a cell phone. One of the best reasons for having one of the otherwise evil little devices. AH, Mike, I see where you're going with this. And I agree! As the scale of problems gets bigger, then they become of less use, their usefulness being inversely proportional to the scale of the problem. Eventually, the cellular concept falls apart because of the massive support structure needed for the instruments use, and that often the same disasters that make emergency comms necessary take out that infrastucture. Even if the infrastructure is largely intact, it can be overwhelmed by the unexpected demand. I recall the pictures from the wildfires in San Diego last year showing people trying to use their cell phones without success. The look on many faces was one of surprise that the things weren't working. Because they'd never encountered that behavior before. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | General | |||
Are GAM SS-2 VHF 35" whip marine antenna 6db performance claims possible? | Antenna | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Policy | |||
WA3MOJ CLAIMS "NEVER SAID I WAS WA3MOJ" | Policy |