On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, Mike Coslo wrote:
Radionews wrote:
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1390 =AD April 2, 2004
...

=09I wonder why they didn't just use their cell phone? ;^)

Idiot. With responders like you, Pasternak will continue to spam this grou=
p
with his drivel. Then again, this whole group is a collection of trolls.

[In case you weren't aware, the guidelines for the rec.radio hierarchy FORB=
ID
his weekly posting on "rec.radio.amateur.policy". The posts are permitted =
on
"rec.radio.info" (because a specific request to do so was granted) and on
"rec.radio.amateur.misc" (because it is not forbidden there), yet the jerk
continues to post here, and it's assholes like you who respond to him (in a=
ny
way) that will further encourage him to post here. Why does he need to pos=
t
this here anyway - it's all up on his website?

In case you're unaware of Bill Pasternak's activities in producing "newslin=
e,"
ask him why it costs $1,000.00/month (on average) to produce the news, whil=
e his
competitors like "This Week in Amateur Radio"'s Community Video Associates =
or
even the ARRL itself can do it for less than $100/month. Here's why: He's
paying himself a salary - it's not a "not for profit" relationship. Then
there's the matter of his clear BIAS in the news. For example, a few years=
ago,
he did a series of stories about a Los Angeles area repeater (BP is in the =
Los
Angeles area) and its problems with a system in Mexico, and Riley
Hollingsworth's enforcement involvement with the interference complaints. =
Half
of what he reported on about the situation was completely wrong, and the ot=
her
half he made up. How do I know this? I know this because I personally kno=
w the
trustees of that (now former) L.A. system, and I observed the disgruntled
Mexicans lying to BP at a local amateur radio convention. BP made NO ATTEM=
PT to
contact the L.A. trustees for their side of the story - he simply made up
"facts" to fit. His "journalism" is right up there with the level expected=
of
the "National Enquirer", the "Weekly World News", and other such tabloids -=
it
is CRAP.]

D. Stussy wrote:
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, Mike Coslo wrote:

Radionews wrote:

Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1390 * April 2, 2004
...

I wonder why they didn't just use their cell phone? ;^)


Idiot. With responders like you, Pasternak will continue to spam this group
with his drivel. Then again, this whole group is a collection of trolls.

[In case you weren't aware, the guidelines for the rec.radio hierarchy FORBID
his weekly posting on "rec.radio.amateur.policy". The posts are permitted on
"rec.radio.info" (because a specific request to do so was granted) and on
"rec.radio.amateur.misc" (because it is not forbidden there), yet the jerk
continues to post here, and it's assholes like you who respond to him (in any
way) that will further encourage him to post here. Why does he need to post
this here anyway - it's all up on his website?


1. If he's doing something wrong, report it to his ISP abuse.

2. Think you are going to convert me to your cause by calling me names?

- Mike KB3EIA -

On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Mike Coslo wrote:
D. Stussy wrote:
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, Mike Coslo wrote:

Radionews wrote:

Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1390 =AD April 2, 2004
...

=09I wonder why they didn't just use their cell phone? ;^)


Idiot. With responders like you, Pasternak will continue to spam this =
group
with his drivel. Then again, this whole group is a collection of troll=
s.

[In case you weren't aware, the guidelines for the rec.radio hierarchy =
FORBID
his weekly posting on "rec.radio.amateur.policy". The posts are permit=
ted on
"rec.radio.info" (because a specific request to do so was granted) and =
on
"rec.radio.amateur.misc" (because it is not forbidden there), yet the j=
erk
continues to post here, and it's assholes like you who respond to him (=
in any
way) that will further encourage him to post here. Why does he need to=
post
this here anyway - it's all up on his website?


=091. If he's doing something wrong, report it to his ISP abuse.

I have been, every week for the past 18 months. His ISP is AOL and they do=
n't
do a damn thing about spammers. I have even quoted the part of the newsgro=
up's
guidelines he violates.

=092. Think you are going to convert me to your cause by calling me names=
?

I doubt it. It hasn't phased anyone else who dares participate here on a d=
aily
basis. Now, the fact that you considered yourself inclusive of "the whole
group" speaks for itself.

Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_Amateur_Radio_Newsline=28tm=29_Repo?=
From: "D. Stussy"
Date: 4/5/2004 4:03 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id: g

On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, Mike Coslo wrote:
Radionews wrote:
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1390 =AD April 2, 2004
...

=09I wonder why they didn't just use their cell phone? ;^)

Idiot. With responders like you, Pasternak will continue to spam this grou=
p
with his drivel. Then again, this whole group is a collection of trolls.

Hey Dieter. Seems to me that you're a regular, if not frequent, poster
here too.

Do you include yourself in that, or are you "above" off topic
conversations of ANY nature?

73

Steve, K4YZ

On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote:
Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_Amateur_Radio_Newsline=28tm=29_Repo?=
From: "D. Stussy"
Date: 4/5/2004 4:03 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id: g

On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, Mike Coslo wrote:
Radionews wrote:
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1390 =AD April 2, 2004
...

=09I wonder why they didn't just use their cell phone? ;^)

Idiot. With responders like you, Pasternak will continue to spam this grou=
p
with his drivel. Then again, this whole group is a collection of trolls.

Hey Dieter. Seems to me that you're a regular, if not frequent, poster
here too.

Do you include yourself in that, or are you "above" off topic
conversations of ANY nature?

You will find that I never start an "off-topic" thread and that most of my posts
do seem to relate back to the original topic, even if the post I'm responding to
is off-topic. I certainly am not a regular in that I don't post 10 times/day
like some of the other characters do - I'm only here once a week at most.