D. Stussy wrote:
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, Mike Coslo wrote:

Radionews wrote:

Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1390 * April 2, 2004
...

I wonder why they didn't just use their cell phone? ;^)


Idiot. With responders like you, Pasternak will continue to spam this group
with his drivel. Then again, this whole group is a collection of trolls.

[In case you weren't aware, the guidelines for the rec.radio hierarchy FORBID
his weekly posting on "rec.radio.amateur.policy". The posts are permitted on
"rec.radio.info" (because a specific request to do so was granted) and on
"rec.radio.amateur.misc" (because it is not forbidden there), yet the jerk
continues to post here, and it's assholes like you who respond to him (in any
way) that will further encourage him to post here. Why does he need to post
this here anyway - it's all up on his website?


1. If he's doing something wrong, report it to his ISP abuse.

2. Think you are going to convert me to your cause by calling me names?

- Mike KB3EIA -

On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Mike Coslo wrote:
D. Stussy wrote:
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004, Mike Coslo wrote:

Radionews wrote:

Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1390 =AD April 2, 2004
...

=09I wonder why they didn't just use their cell phone? ;^)


Idiot. With responders like you, Pasternak will continue to spam this =
group
with his drivel. Then again, this whole group is a collection of troll=
s.

[In case you weren't aware, the guidelines for the rec.radio hierarchy =
FORBID
his weekly posting on "rec.radio.amateur.policy". The posts are permit=
ted on
"rec.radio.info" (because a specific request to do so was granted) and =
on
"rec.radio.amateur.misc" (because it is not forbidden there), yet the j=
erk
continues to post here, and it's assholes like you who respond to him (=
in any
way) that will further encourage him to post here. Why does he need to=
post
this here anyway - it's all up on his website?


=091. If he's doing something wrong, report it to his ISP abuse.

I have been, every week for the past 18 months. His ISP is AOL and they do=
n't
do a damn thing about spammers. I have even quoted the part of the newsgro=
up's
guidelines he violates.

=092. Think you are going to convert me to your cause by calling me names=
?

I doubt it. It hasn't phased anyone else who dares participate here on a d=
aily
basis. Now, the fact that you considered yourself inclusive of "the whole
group" speaks for itself.