Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"garigue" wrote in message news:%Qggc.159983$K91.412790@attbi_s02...
Similarly, it is not appropriate for FISTS to comment on anything other than Morse Code. So why do they do it? Why aren't you addressing this injustice? I agree. FISTS has a hard-line stance in favor of Morse Code testing. The organization is supposed to be dedicated to OPERATING Morse Code, not keeping the Morse Code requirement. The leaders should have either started a new organization dedicated to defending Morse Code requirements or simply filed petitions on behalf of themselves instead of on behalf of FISTS. Jason Hsu, AG4DG Why isn't NCI .......NCTI ....... Should have testing in there as I have read repeatedly that the group is only against testing ...... Oh well Back on 40 CW .... 73 KI3R Tom Popovic Belle Vernon Pa. Why does a Morse/Farnsworth Code advocacy group use a symbol of violence for their name? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why the ARRL proposed upgrading Technicians to General | Policy | |||
Upgrading to from Tech Plus to General, help on a FCC Form 605 question please | General | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio in the 21st Century? | Policy | |||
Tech+ to General upgrade question | Policy |