| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"KØHB" wrote in message . net... "N2EY" wrote It's still very practical to build a simple CW *transceiver* from scratch. Plenty of designs out there, as well as kits. Which you might postulate as an argument to retain the Morse examination, except that knowledge of Morse is not a requirement to heat a soldering iron. Exactly. When I was in college we buit a 10w CW transmitter and tested the results into a dummy load. No knowledge of code was needed or expected. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bill Sohl wrote: "KØHB" wrote in message . net... "N2EY" wrote It's still very practical to build a simple CW *transceiver* from scratch. Plenty of designs out there, as well as kits. Which you might postulate as an argument to retain the Morse examination, except that knowledge of Morse is not a requirement to heat a soldering iron. Exactly. When I was in college we buit a 10w CW transmitter and tested the results into a dummy load. No knowledge of code was needed or expected. hehe, now that sounds like fun! 8^0 - Mike KB3EIA - |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Which you might postulate as an argument to retain the Morse examination, except that knowledge of Morse is not a requirement to heat a soldering iron. Exactly. When I was in college we buit a 10w CW transmitter and tested the results into a dummy load. No knowledge of code was needed or expected. Now, if you used the soldering iron *as* the dummy load, ...... :-) |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|