| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
May 8th 04, 04:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: Who are the FISTS members on RRAP?
From: (William) Date: 5/7/2004 5:53 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: Who are the FISTS members on RRAP? From: (William) Date: 5/6/2004 6:04 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: Why is that, Steve? It's a wonderfully stupid statement. I enjoy attaching it to your name. But YOU keep stating that I am allegedly repeating it. I am not. But you should; it's so wonderfully stupid. And it is the statement (of fact) that got this ball rolling. You back-pedalled and are now soft pedalling a different statement, which was also shown to be wrong. When it comes to "so wonderfully stupid" you DO seem to have a propensity to get in knee deep. You've done it again. I am not "back-peddling" on anything. No Amateur Radio = No MARS. You have yet to disprove this. Otherwise, you just keep trying to dazzle us with your brilliance only to realize it the glare off the baldness of your ignorance. Your problem, not mine. So, if you want vindicated for making such a wonderfully stupid statement, you can look in the Army, Air Force, and Navy regulations, as well as Part 97, Title 47, and give me -any- citation whatsoever where your statement, " Sorry Hans, MARS IS "Amateur Radio", " is substantially true. No Amateur Radio = No MARS. That is sufficient. No, it is not sufficient. Quote A Military Regulation or Title 47 document. Yes, it IS sufficient. Each MARS program is wholly dependent on the Amateur Radio Service to exist. It seems that everyone except you is aware of this. Again, ANOTHER one of your problems. Maybe I ought to copy all this stuff and send it to Mrs. Beeper. Perhaps she can explain it to you. Perhaps she can also explain to US why you have a history of pathological lying and an inate ability to get yourself into corners with your mouth that your bravado can't bull you out of... No, I don't expect Hans to be named in any regulation. That's not what I'm after. Forcus on the part where you said, "MARS IS "Amateur Radio." No Amateur Radio = No MARS. Nope, not sufficient. Why do you keep running away from your statement, " Sorry Hans, MARS IS "Amateur Radio". It's still correct. No Amateur Radio = No MARS. I knew you were qualified to research the DoD and Title 47 regs to back up your statement, " Sorry Hans, MARS IS "Amateur Radio". " The only question now is when you'll post the applicable citation. No need, Brain. Again, it seems everyone knows about teh relationship between the MARS programs and Amateur Radio EXCEPT you. Must be kinda lonely on the outside looking in, huh...?!?! Best of luck in making me eat crow. Hope you enjoy yours. I don't have to "make" you do anything, Brain. YOU continually make assertions you can't/won't substantiate, make assertions of derring-do that are not documented ANYwhere, and you generally keep walking all over your own tail over and over while claiming others to be "nuts". Document this: " Sorry Hans, MARS IS "Amateur Radio". No Amateur Radio = No MARS. I have no crow to eat here or anywhere, Brain. Stop lying in public. Stop making assertions you can't/won't substantiate. Be a man. I am a man. No, you're not. Now you be a man and post any DoD or Title 47 citation whatsoever that substantially says, " Sorry Hans, MARS IS "Amateur Radio", " without the "Sorry Hans" part, of course. "Caw, caw!" Now who's nuts? Steve, I hear your crow calling. You might want to locate some Tobasco sauce. Sorry Brain...That's only your over-active imagination and wishful thinking. No Amateur Radio = No MARS. You can prove differently, of course? Steve, K4YZ |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode
