"JJ" wrote

| NORAD, which is definitely military, does include ham radio in their
| plans,

bs

KØHB wrote:
"JJ" wrote

| NORAD, which is definitely military, does include ham radio in their
| plans,

bs

BS all you want, but just a few weeks ago I sat in a seminar with USN
Rear Admiral Daniel Stone, Director of Logistics and Engineering for
NORAD/USNORTHCOM and he says differently.

JJ wrote:
KØHB wrote:
"JJ" wrote

| NORAD, which is definitely military, does include ham radio in their
| plans,

bs

BS all you want, but just a few weeks ago I sat in a seminar with USN
Rear Admiral Daniel Stone, Director of Logistics and Engineering for
NORAD/USNORTHCOM and he says differently.

Was he laughing when you wouldn't tell him your call sign?

JJ wrote in message ...
KØHB wrote:
"JJ" wrote

| NORAD, which is definitely military, does include ham radio in their
| plans,

bs

BS all you want, but just a few weeks ago I sat in a seminar with USN
Rear Admiral Daniel Stone, Director of Logistics and Engineering for
NORAD/USNORTHCOM and he says differently.

There you go again throwing around other peoples names and titles, but
you don't appear to have one.

No credibility whatsoever.

Subject: Cell phone woes
From: "KØHB"
Date: 4/23/2004 12:33 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id: . net


"JJ" wrote

| NORAD, which is definitely military, does include ham radio in their
| plans,

bs

OK, Hans...Prove him wrong. I say you're running off at the mouth.

Steve, K4YZ

KØHB wrote:

"JJ" wrote

| NORAD, which is definitely military, does include ham radio in their
| plans,

bs


Maybe not for "secret" traffic, but routine stuff would be handled by
hams to
offload the more important communications channels. Or maybe some
"secret" stuff, encrypted and disguised to look like boring routine
traffic, is
handled by hams, but they wouldn't be aware of it.