| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
June 5th 04, 11:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
#3
June 5th 04, 09:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
(William) writes: (Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message .com... (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , "Jim Hampton" writes: The gentleman in question with the antenna may well have been professional; my point is that most inventors are doing something they enjoy. Come to think of it, how many folks are continually involved in something they *don't* like? Irrelevant. Another stressed that the "invention" was because of his being a radio amateur. Solely so, so much that nearly all of the URI news release was omitted. The rest of the post was irrelevent since the antenna itself was not of importance. Oh, my! There was no rant, and the invention/patent is not of importance. According to the University of Rhode Island, an academic institution that includes paid, professional electronic engineers, the whole topic of Small Antennas was the point of the news release. Nursie's interpretation went off into some personal dialect of "ranting" (and raving) when there was no actual rant going on. We know nothing yet on the details of this small antenna with patent pending (?). Actual patent grants might not occur until 1 to 3 years after submission of the application and the patent search information (seprate from the patent application itself). Once the patent is granted it becomes public knowledge, available for a modest fee from the patent office. But, patent applications aren't available for full disclosure so we don't know the details of this "invention." If the patent application is denied, then it is NOT a "new invention." [there is lots of prior art in this field and may have been done by others, therefore making it not patentable] So what we have is is a lie wrapped up in a lack of judgement. Well, I think of it more like a festering (perhaps gangrenous) ego wound from long ago. :-) It must personally hurt a great deal and thus cause a new "rant" to be done. Exactly why did you post anything at all except to troll and flame? That seems to be his reason for being in here. All the angries on display for all to wonder and praise... :-) What WAS of importance was that a non-Amateur Radio media source felt compelled to mention, early on I might add, that the person responsible for this project was a licensed Amateur. People everywhere lack judgement, including those in media. Bless your heart, you're not alone. Thousands and thousands of "news releases" of new technologies appear every year in many, many electronic industry publications. The subscription-free "controlled circulation" periodicals have regular columns containing nothing but them. Academic institutions started on that trend years ago. The POINT being that Sir Scummy of Lanark was once again proven wrong... Wrong? I saw him make no "assertion of fact" for you to refute, and the only ranting is your own. It is...but that isn't the brake for the bulldozer driven levee-breaking. It only adds more diesel to push the bull dozing harder into whatever ground the bull thinks is fun to throw more mud. OHSA needs to be informed about this. :-) [it ought to be "Sir of Sun Valley" to complete the nastygram and be correct with the USPS...very sibilant that way...good for the nastygrammers to hiss between their teeth on reading newsgroups] Amateurs ARE still involved in "advancement of the radio art", and someone felt stongly enouhg about it to emphasize it in a news release. What are you doing in "state of the art?" Bandspanner? Advancing the state of the art in insulting all those without amateur radio licenses. :-) Lennie often raves in this forum about how Amateurs don't do this kind of thing. They do it first as paid employees of someone else. They just happen to be amateurs. Licensed amateur radio operators DO advance some of the radio communication arts. I named Dan Tayloe specifically, plus the several authors of articles in QST on do-it-yourself crystal filter theory-measurement-construction. There are others, such as the various amateur-specific multi-band antennas on the market. My point - lost on the very angry nursie - is that amateurs do NOT get credit for ALL of the radio communications advancements and those few (out of 710K total licensees) who DO innovate and invent are a decided minority among the constantly-advancing state of radio arts just in the HF region. The ARRL's claim of "amateurs advancing the state of the radio arts" is specious in light of ALL the radio advancements done in the last half century. And of course he can't stand it and will spin this into the ground. You're doing a good enough job of that. As usual. Old bitterness of losing newsgroup discussions lingers on. Tsk, tsk, tsk. The evidence is Out There...beyond the ARRL publication dominance for radio amateur information. Too late. The egg's already been cracked and he's wearing it. Insanity. There was no rant, and then you claim the invention was of no importance. You're wearing the egg. He took a trip to Fantasy Island again...without "da blane." Sorry Lennie. Proven wrong by example again. Poor nursie. Tries to rant and rave, can't even copy enough of the news release or give the link to the URL...then claims it "refutes some (nonexistant) rant." Insanity. In another galaxy far, far away... "MARS IS Amateur Radio." I don't think George Lucas has that planned for any future Star Wars sequels-prequels. :-) |
|
#4
June 6th 04, 10:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#5
June 6th 04, 07:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... Nursie's interpretation went off into some personal dialect of "ranting" (and raving) when there was no actual rant going on. Sure there has been, Lennie. Only on nursie's side... :-) [poor person thinks his every utterance is "truth"... ] From my own experience, over six years of assertions of how Amatuers are allegedly NOT involved in any kind of research. Goggle archives attest. No "amatuer" is involved in any kind of research. A few amateurs are. What is a "goggle" other than an eye shield? Do you get little archives on your helmet goggles while flying? Try GOOGLE instead. [no, you don't grow archives in the garden to put on salads...] I don't care about the intimate details of the project. The POINT was (and still is) that Amateurs ARE involved in research and they ARE recognized for thier contributions AS Amateurs by entities OTHER than Amateur Radio-related sources. You "don't care about the intimate details" because you can't get intimate with basic electronics enough to understand what is being talked about. Not the newsgroup's problem...except to to see your blabbering of injured ego... You have asserted on numrous occassions that since no one except ARRL sources routinely report on such things, they obviously don't occur. I don't make a career of such "numrous occasions" but the "research" into radio technology is still, overwhelmingly, done by corporations and academicians...VERY little by licensed radio amateurs. Of course, if the only source of your information is the ARRL, then you will appear thoroughly brainwashed into believing them and that hams are busy, busy, busy "advancing the state of the radio art" all over the place. Yoda asks, "What state of any art has nursie advanced...hmmm?" You were (again) proven wrong. "Wrong?" By a news release from URI that gave NO details on this wondrous new antenna other than more snake-oil sales pitching? Hundreds of those news releases appear every month. Those inventions assume some legitimacy when they appear as papers in known publications or presentations at conferences. The fields on your antenna are crossed but you are still not a Stone's Throw from Antennex. [a pun for those who know Jack...] [nursie won't understand] The rest of your "more smoke = less credibility" spin deleted. I gave up smoking a long time ago. :-) You didn't. Your "hostile actions" claim is still on fire. So is "MARS is amateur radio." Smokey the Bear say, "Only YOU can put out forest fires..." Try again, Grampa Lennie... That's GREAT in front of that to be a "meaningful discussion" thing. Now show us your logs on working Rob Vincent in RI on one of the URI micro-antennas. Remember...No proof = Doesn't exist. |
|
#7
June 9th 04, 02:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
(William) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... Now show us your logs on working Rob Vincent in RI on one of the URI micro-antennas. Remember...No proof = Doesn't exist. Steve. What a "losser." I'll "crap" my hands when he stops posting. Pity he don't live in "Feenix." He could be a columnist in CQ magazine, telling us all about the strife and times of Hashacodey Scrunchy, a "reel ham." Might not last too long, that job. About as long as the "Purchasing Agent" job did. Moeson wouldn't like to be called "putz" when the great gunnery nurse gets a disagreement going. Gotta love all those "meaningful discussions" in here. :-) LHA / WMD |
|
#8
June 9th 04, 02:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Subject: So Much For THAT Rant....
From: (William) Date: 6/8/2004 6:25 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... Now show us your logs on working Rob Vincent in RI on one of the URI micro-antennas. Remember...No proof = Doesn't exist. Steve. What a "losser." I'll "crap" my hands when he stops posting Is that as opposed as to posting your crap with your hands, Brain...?!?! Steve, K4YZ |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Theological Rant | Antenna | |||
| Rant | Homebrew | |||
| Another Self-Humiliating LenniRiffic Rant | Policy | |||
Hybrid Mode
