Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dwight Stewart wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote: I get bit regardless. My Norton's finds a virus here and there despite my running a proxy server, 2 firewalls, and updating the virus def's all the time. Then you must be involved in a high-risk activity (such as downloading illegal software from questionable sources), because I have not seen any of that on my computers. Thanks for the accusation, Dwight, but no, I don't. BTW, the computer doesn't get infected, but Norton's isolates the file, and I have to manually delete it. (snip) I use both PC's and Macs extensively, so I feel I can comment knowledgeably. Using a PC is getting to be operations under siege. What the PC users consider to be normal operations is not what normal operations should be. Meanwhile, I just use my Mac and do the work I need to do without all the fuss and muss. (p.s. - you should see all the cool ham radio software that is out for OSX!) I also use both extensively and feel you're not being entirely forthright. Yup, that's why places have entire staffs of PC jockeys that work full time to beat the things into submission. We who own Macs, at least where I work, have to maintain their own computers. And at least where I work, all the Mac users are artists, not computer jocks (with the exception of me) The Mac is certainly not without its own "fuss and muss." The sheer volume of problem-related questions in the Mac newsgroups is clear testament to that. And the amount and quality of radio related software for a Windows-based computer dwarfs that available for the Macintosh (the same with most any catagory of software, or hardware). Yup, but I wanna run what I need to do my job and hobby. I could care less about the other apps. Sometimes I think PCphiles would insist on only one type of car for the entire world with that mindset. I do agree that there are more ham apps on PC, which is a big reason why I have one at home. I'm likely to pick up an Imac at salvage to try out the new Mac Ham apps tho' If the manufacturers produce software that has gaping security flaws, it is their fault, not mine. Yet my experience suggests users are a large part of the problem - everything from engaging in high-risk activities to not maintaining, and even by-passing, the installed security features. I manage the IT department at a local college. I cannot even count how many computers I've seen with virus problems that also have illegally obtained software installed and security features disabled to allow the download of that software. I won't deny that under the current state of affairs, people should practice safe computing. And if a person is running illegal software their ass should be busted. My point is that the crap software is so insecure that the bad situation comes about anyhow. Glad I go an IT pro here, as I have been wondering something for a while. Isn't it possible to find these infected devils and isolate them somehow? Might be a naive question, but I'm not an IT person, just a program jock. - Mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
CERT says to stop using IE and some shit heads listened! That'sbecause they have shit for brains! | General | |||
CERT says to stop using IE, but will the shit heads listen? | General | |||
CERT says to stop using IE, but will the shit heads listen? | Policy |