Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , JJ
writes: Carl R. Stevenson wrote: Follows, for anyone who's interested, my response to the insulting, inaccurate press release (and comments to the FCC) from the UPLC: Good work!! Hope you will post any reply you receive....if you get one. The BPL folks really have their heads in the sand. Yes, very good work, Carl. Thanks for posting. Perhaps we should all write to UPLC. One thing to remember, though: It makes a sort of twisted sense that the BPL folks would simply 'stonewall', saying there is no harmful interference, their systems are clean, Part 15 supports them, blah, blah, blah. If they start admitting that yes, the interference is real, that power lines do radiate, that the signals carry for many miles, etc., then they've set themselves up to be shut down, or have their systems modified to the point of unusability. Thanks again, Carl 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BPL - UPLC ->Repeat the lie three times and claim it for truth | Policy | |||
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
UPLC on BPL: ignore armchair amateurs who still use vacuum tubetransmitters | Policy | |||
BPL - act today to save our HF bands | Antenna | |||
IMPORTANT! FCC OET extends Reply Comment Period on BPL | Policy |