About Us

July 2nd 04, 11:50 PM

In article , PAMNO
(N2EY) writes:

In article , Mike Coslo writes:

Even if a person is completely ignorant of how BPL works, wouldn't the
average person get a little suspicious when we are told that it doesn't
interfere, and then a few lines later, we are told of mitigation
methods? If it doesn't interfere, there is no need for interference
mitigation.

You would think so, but that's not how it works.

Take cell phones. How many "average people" really know the most basic things
about how they work? I'm not talking about CDMA or even analog vs. digital,
but
just the idea that they are little radio transceivers? Look at the people
opposing cell towers as "sources of radiation" - yet demanding perfect
coverage, and holding the dern things next to their heads for many minutes per
day. Note how the solutions that have evolved have included disguised sites,
and the use of more cells with reduced coverage. "Inverse square law"?
Puhleeze!

Why do you think the 'phone folks revived the term "wireless"?

Because the "'phone folks" did NOT "revive" it.

The term "wireless" of modern use came from the LAN people,
those who design and make Local Area Networks. The first
LANs were WIRED. Wiring can be expensive and cumbersome in
most areas so the LAN folks brought in low-power RF linking, or
"wireless LANs." That was popular and grew.

"Wireless" as the word is used now is almost anything not needing
wires to connect audio, video, or data over short distances.

An automobile was once referred to as a "horseless buggy." That
kind of description hasn't been in use much in either today's
society nor even that of my childhood. For the same reason,
modern society does NOT think of "wireless' as anything like the
old 1920s term of radio.

If the "'phone folks" called cellular anything, it was "mobile."
It still is and many industry folks refer to it as "mobile,"
synonymous with "cell" and "cellular."

[count on another argument and ignitor of potential flame wars
concerning the above...some folks don't stop at mere facts in
here when it comes to wanting to fight...:-) ]

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
BPL - UPLC ->Repeat the lie three times and claim it for truth	King Zulu	Policy	213	July 17th 04 12:31 AM
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC	John Walton	Homebrew	0	July 2nd 04 01:26 PM
UPLC on BPL: ignore armchair amateurs who still use vacuum tubetransmitters	JJ	Policy	2	June 30th 04 02:41 AM
BPL - act today to save our HF bands	Rob Kemp	Antenna	9	August 14th 03 01:27 PM
IMPORTANT! FCC OET extends Reply Comment Period on BPL	Carl R. Stevenson	Policy	21	August 7th 03 10:08 PM

Menu

About Us