Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Mike Coslo writes:
More spectrum is simply the reward system in use. It was chosen in large part because it's easy to enforce. Another thought is that at HF frequencies, a inexperienced or poor operator can propagate their signal over the whole world. Under the right conditions, yes. If I were to be making a training ground for amateurs, it would be using line of sight type signals I disagree! The greatest sustained period of growth in US amateur history was from the end of WW2 until the mid-to-late 1980s. From 60,000 hams on VJ day to about 600,000 40 or so years later. And this included a period of almost no growth in the mid 1960s. Through most of that time, the training ground for new US amateurs was predominantly HF. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1366  October 17 2003 | Dx | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |