Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Robert Casey
writes: And that is perhaps the most telling point, Steve. If a 9 year old kid can pass the Extra, there is no reason to make tests easier. I don't doubt that the child is a bit exceptional, but there are the Technician and General licenses, which are certainly easier. Odds are that kid was in the top 2 percentile of the population. I'd guess more like top 20% but the important thing is: Isn't that the percentile we're trying to attract? Maybe we need an age limit to keep such young wippersnappers under control... ;-) Maybe not ;-) The ones who commit the most violations are a lot older. Maybe the new license class' test should be something that 9 year old kids in the top 20 percentile can pass, that 15 year olds at 50 percentile can pass, and that Beavis and Butthead at 25 years old can pass.... Interesting concept. BTW, let's make sure that an upgrade from the new class to tech doesn't take away priveledges, like if you went from Novice to Tech used to do. Pretty much a given. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1412 Â September 3, 2004 | General | |||
Why the caste system? was: NCVEC files license restructuringdepends | Policy | |||
NCVEC files license resstructuring proposal | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||
NCVEC Position on Code | Policy |