| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
August 19th 04, 01:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation
From: (William) Date: 8/19/2004 7:34 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Brian Kelly) writes: "KØHB" wrote in message thlink.net... "N2EY" wrote - No CW-only subbands There never have been any "CW-only" subbands on HF. That's true - but there should be! Odd, when I was first licensed I could only use CW on 80, 40, 15, and 10M. Wonder what kind of subbands those were? Narrow band modes, Brainless Twerp, in as much as Conditionals, Generals, Advanced and Extras could STILL exercise the full breadth of thier privileges there. The NOVICES may ahve been limited to using only CW, however NONE of those "subbands" was restricted to CW only. Never. btw, anybody who says "CW is dead" should take a look at the ARRL 160 m contest scores. 73 de Jim, N2EY What was your score? What was YOURS? (More logbooks locked away, no doubt........) Steve, K4YZ |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | General | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
Threaded Mode
