Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 04:53:44 -0600, Graybyrd wrote:
Yet, maybe even the FCC would grant ARRL Field Day a "free ride" ... it serves no purpose as an emergency exercise, no information of any value whatsoever is exchanged, and sufficient equipment is knocked out of service to ensure less QRM in the weeks and months following. On this last point in your post, it is now I who beg to differ. Field Day serves no useful purpose as an emergency exercise? Personal experience here would seem to indicate otherwise. No information of any value is exchanged? Maybe not between two distant stations on the air, but every year at Field Day the newer members of our club get the chance to come out and see how lots of things are done that they haven't seen done before. They see the equipment chosen by more experienced hams who are involved in the emergency communications aspect of amateur radio. They see how those hams pack up that equipment for safe transport. They see how it is set up and used, how it is powered, how antennas are erected and connected. That's all valuable information. of course, this assumes that the club in question makes an effort to get those new guys to come out and participate. ours does. Your mileage may vary. Finally, if your equipment gets knocked out at Field Day, that in itself is some valuable information gained, namely that someone needs to reconsider their choice of equipment for emergency use. If that equipment gets knocked out during an exercise, how well do you think it is going to stand up during a *real* emergency? John Kasupskim Tonawanda, New York Amateur Radio (KC2HMZ), SWL/Scanner Monitoring (KNY2VS) Member of ARES/RACES, ARATS, WUN, ARRL http://www.qsl.net/kc2fng E-Mails Ignored, Please Post Replies In This Newsgroup |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|