Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 Sep 2004 06:41:43 -0700, William wrote:
This is just another case where the FCC fell on it's face in the rules making department. They tried to write a rule where only the ARRL would qualify. Legislators do this all the time. The U S Tax Code is loaded with exemption clauses like "this does not apply to corporations incorporated before 1930 for the purpose of transporting lumber products along the Columbia River whose gross income is more than one million dollars per annum...." Let us not forget the famous Arizona law which makes it illegal to buy an "Indian" a drink, which was intended for a particular "Indian" but had to be broadly stated to escape Constitutional challenge, albeit it was never broadly enforced. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|