Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Mr Ham Radio wrote:
K1MAN's schedule is also widely known, and is within the bounds of the rules. So if I make a "schedule" trhat is exactly the same time and frequency as K1MAN's, then I am legal and okay? - Mike KB3EIA - And I ain't shutting up. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 18:08:25 -0400, "Mr Ham Radio"
wrote: K1MAN's schedule is also widely known, and is within the bounds of the rules. Your understanding is incorrect, as usual. If W1AW can "broadcast", so can K1MAN. If you don't like the content of K1MAN's broadcast, start your own. But for now, SHUT THE HELL UP. I refuse to be drawn into a flame war, sir. Ovbiously I know enough about Part 97 of the RULES to know that K1MAN is violating them. I supposed I shall have to take the time here to bolster my opinion with a few cold hard facts as stated in the commission rules. §97.113(b) states "An amateur station shall not engage in any form of broadcasting, nor may an amateur station transmit one-way communications except as specifically provided in these rules; nor shall an amateur station engage in any activity related to program production or news gathering for broadcasting purposes, except that communications directly related to the immediate safety of human life or the protection of property may be provided by amateur stations to broadcasters for dissemination to the public where no other means of communication is reasonably available before or at the time of the event." Is K1MAN violating this section of the rules...According to Riley, that's a yes. The commission rules also state that frequencies are open to all licensed amateurs, correct? No one has the right to demand someone depart the frequency because a person wished to use it. Standard amateur practice ssays that an Amateur liosten to the frequency and make a short question asking if the freq is in use. Does K1MAN bother or just say "Get off MY frequency!" §97.111(b) states "(b) In addition to one-way transmissions specifically authorized elsewhere in this Part, an amateur station may transmit the following types of one-way communications: (1) Brief transmissions necessary to make adjustments to the station; (2) Brief transmissions necessary to establishing two-way communications with other stations; (3) Telecommand; (4) Transmissions necessary to providing emergency communications; (5) Transmissions necessary to assisting persons learning, or improving proficiency in, the international Morse code; (6) Transmissions necessary to disseminate information bulletins; (7) Transmissions of telemetry. " W1AW falls under Sub-Paragraphs 5 and 6 in that they issue daily code practice runs as well as weekly bulletins or even relays the word that the FCC is suspending the rules due to an emergency situation. Tat's covered under sub-paragraph 4. All done in accordance with the rules. buddy. Does K1MAN do daily code practice sessions? Does K1MAN relay information bulleting? and does K1MAN engage in transmissions to aid emergency communications? From what FCC is saying. the answer to all three is "No", but, he stays just far enough below the FCC "radar" that nothing's being done that people would want done. Now...I've made the case here. Find a reason to knock it down...if you dare. -- Dan, KD8AGU Please remove ".nospam" to reply via email. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Splinter" wrote in message ... On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 21:33:16 -0400, "Mr Ham Radio" wrote: K1MAN's program is GOOD, and should be left alone. If he has to go, so does W1AW. Enough said, I have spoken. This is the way it WILL be. I beg to differ. ARRL is within the guidelines of Part 97 of the Commission's rules and. last I checked, knows that the frequency is clear before starting their programs. Also, it's widely known and accepted that W!AW has scheduled "All Station" announcements as well as Code practice. All within the bounds of the rules. K1MAN, as I understand it, doesn't care about if the frequency is is use and walks over everyone in an attempt to gain financially from selling his equipment over the air. -- Dan, KD8AGU Please remove ".nospam" to reply via email. You have in basically correct Dan. K1MAN, is a radio bully. He seems to think that whatever he does, thinks, or wants to do takes priority over everyone and everything else. Case in point... For a period of about 2 years K1MAN vacated the frequency of 14.275. During that time several stations began operating there. One day up comes Glen Baxter and he tells us to get off because it is time for his broadcast. He didn't ask, he didn't even attempt to be polite. He just decided it was time to resume his trashcasting on ''HIS" frequency. A major fight erupted and the latest FCC action against him is the result of it. Recently he decided to finally move off of the GA Sideband net frequency of 3975, he moved up the band a bit and ordered the UFO network to get off his frequency. Same same from Baxter boy. Several years before he had a major fight with the 3975 crowd. Unfortunatly the rebels capitulated. Mr. Baxter is 'real popular' with the AM crowd in New England. Ask them about his ''full carrier AM'' signal on 3890 nightly. Dan/W4NTI |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message news "Splinter" wrote in message ... On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 21:33:16 -0400, "Mr Ham Radio" wrote: K1MAN's program is GOOD, and should be left alone. If he has to go, so does W1AW. Enough said, I have spoken. This is the way it WILL be. I beg to differ. ARRL is within the guidelines of Part 97 of the Commission's rules and. last I checked, knows that the frequency is clear before starting their programs. Also, it's widely known and accepted that W!AW has scheduled "All Station" announcements as well as Code practice. All within the bounds of the rules. K1MAN, as I understand it, doesn't care about if the frequency is is use and walks over everyone in an attempt to gain financially from selling his equipment over the air. -- Dan, KD8AGU Please remove ".nospam" to reply via email. You have in basically correct Dan. K1MAN, is a radio bully. He seems to think that whatever he does, thinks, or wants to do takes priority over everyone and everything else. Case in point... For a period of about 2 years K1MAN vacated the frequency of 14.275. During that time several stations began operating there. One day up comes Glen Baxter and he tells us to get off because it is time for his broadcast. He didn't ask, he didn't even attempt to be polite. He just decided it was time to resume his trashcasting on ''HIS" frequency. A major fight erupted and the latest FCC action against him is the result of it. Recently he decided to finally move off of the GA Sideband net frequency of 3975, he moved up the band a bit and ordered the UFO network to get off his frequency. Same same from Baxter boy. Several years before he had a major fight with the 3975 crowd. Unfortunatly the rebels capitulated. Mr. Baxter is 'real popular' with the AM crowd in New England. Ask them about his ''full carrier AM'' signal on 3890 nightly. Dan/W4NTI Dan - Glenn has been running over nets and broadcasting inappropriate junk so long (in 1998 he was wiping out the Sunday morning Bermuda Net on 14.275mHz) that I begin to wonder if current FCC people realize that it has been 17 years or more since the FCC was first going to fix the problem. Baxter is not only a domestic problem, but an international embarrassment. Hams in other countries are incredulous that the FCC cannot or will not do something about him. ak |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|