In article , Mike Coslo writes:

Okay folks,

We have a few posters here that are anonymous.

I decided to look into the N2EY-Quitefine connection

What is your evidence for Jim being Quitefine?


Most of Jim's posts - interestingly enough with his callsign - are
posted from google, whereas Quitefine's are all posted from AOL. A small
number of Jim's are posted from AOL, although from the headers,
Quitefine could also be Steve too.

But I doubt it is either of them.

More importantly, it is of interest that some of the people that are so
concerned about these anonymii are more concerned about that anonymity.
not either one is engaging in name calling, although Blackguard seems a
bit coarser.

Can't you guys handle it?


I am -
at least
I think I am -

- Mike KB3EIA -

I think! ;^)

You put Descarte before de horse... :-)

Oh, and the anonymousies are anonymous because they can't
handle it under their own identity. Think of that. :-)

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article , Mike Coslo writes:


Okay folks,

We have a few posters here that are anonymous.

I decided to look into the N2EY-Quitefine connection

What is your evidence for Jim being Quitefine?


Most of Jim's posts - interestingly enough with his callsign - are
posted from google, whereas Quitefine's are all posted from AOL. A small
number of Jim's are posted from AOL, although from the headers,
Quitefine could also be Steve too.

But I doubt it is either of them.

More importantly, it is of interest that some of the people that are so
concerned about these anonymii are more concerned about that anonymity.
not either one is engaging in name calling, although Blackguard seems a
bit coarser.

Can't you guys handle it?


I am -
at least
I think I am -

- Mike KB3EIA -

I think! ;^)


You put Descarte before de horse... :-)

Oh, and the anonymousies are anonymous because they can't
handle it under their own identity. Think of that. :-)

Dunno. I don't see anything either of them have posted that is
particularly "non-handlable".

Perhaps answers to their questions fit better into that category.

- Mike KB3EIA -

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

Oh, and the anonymousies are anonymous because they can't
handle it under their own identity. Think of that. :-)

Dunno. I don't see anything either of them have posted that is
particularly "non-handlable".

Both are NOT INVOLVED!

No ID, nothing.

Follow der uber-oberst's commands given in here. He is PCTA extra.

:-)

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:


Oh, and the anonymousies are anonymous because they can't
handle it under their own identity. Think of that. :-)

Dunno. I don't see anything either of them have posted that is
particularly "non-handlable".


Both are NOT INVOLVED!

No ID, nothing.

Follow der uber-oberst's commands given in here. He is PCTA extra.

Since when does "der uber-oberst's" commands affect me? Or you for that
matter?

For an ostensibly smart fella, you fall into categorization pretty
easily. I'll post what I want, and if you don't post because of some
"command" given by someone else here, you are the victim. But since you
do post whatever you want, it shows the fallacy of your statement, so
why do you keep posting that?

Of course you know! ;^)

I am,

The fifth wheel
of the four Morsemen
of the Apocalypse *80)

- Mike KB3EIA -

"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
news
[snip]

I am,

The fifth wheel
of the four Morsemen
of the Apocalypse *80)

- Mike KB3EIA -


So who are the "four Morsemen of the Apocalypse?"

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

Dee D. Flint wrote:

"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
news
[snip]

I am,

The fifth wheel
of the four Morsemen
of the Apocalypse *80)

- Mike KB3EIA -



So who are the "four Morsemen of the Apocalypse?"


If my memory serves me right, the four Morsemen we

Larry Roll
Dave Hiel
Dick Carroll
Jim Micollis

Lenover21 would know exactly - he coined it.

- Mike KB3EIA -

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

If my memory serves me right, the four Morsemen we

Larry Roll
Dave Hiel
Dick Carroll
Jim Micollis

Lenover21 would know exactly - he coined it.

I would have told Dee...but she never reads my posts (what she said
in here). :-)

Scratch tRoll...he probably drove his bus somewhere bad...

Scratch Carroll...he probably crossed over to the other side of life.

Include Kellie the Katapult King.

Jim Kehler, KH2D, is the leader of the pack but is ailing in the
USA somewhere. Call him "morseman imperator" with his
leadership emeritus.

Toss in the gunnery nursie, graduated from a little yipping dog
on the heels of the former morsemen to getting saddle sore.

There's a bunch of anonymousies but they are NOT INVOLVED,
have NO ID and therefore don't count.

ARS = Archaic Radiotelegraphy Service.

Anything more? :-)

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

Oh, and the anonymousies are anonymous because they can't
handle it under their own identity. Think of that. :-)

Dunno. I don't see anything either of them have posted that is
particularly "non-handlable".

Both are NOT INVOLVED!

No ID, nothing.

Follow der uber-oberst's commands given in here. He is PCTA extra.

Since when does "der uber-oberst's" commands affect me? Or you for that

matter?

All the PCTA extras in here stick together.

Like crazy glue. :-)

For an ostensibly smart fella, you fall into categorization pretty
easily.

"Ostensibly?" :-)

Categorization is the name of the game with the PCTA extras here.

All those who aren't "ostensibly" as good as they are categorized
as "uninvolved" or something else horribly wrong. :-)

I'll post what I want, and if you don't post because of some
"command" given by someone else here, you are the victim.

I am a "victim" now? Of what? :-)

But since you
do post whatever you want, it shows the fallacy of your statement, so
why do you keep posting that?

Tsk. I am NOT a PCTA extra.

I call 'em as I see 'em...and one cannot possibly miss seeing those
PCTA extra commands and epistles. :-)

Of course you know! ;^)

I know more than you care to admit. :-)

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:


Len Over 21 wrote:


In article , Mike Coslo
writes:


Oh, and the anonymousies are anonymous because they can't
handle it under their own identity. Think of that. :-)

Dunno. I don't see anything either of them have posted that is
particularly "non-handlable".

Both are NOT INVOLVED!

No ID, nothing.

Follow der uber-oberst's commands given in here. He is PCTA extra.

Since when does "der uber-oberst's" commands affect me? Or you for that


matter?


All the PCTA extras in here stick together.

Like crazy glue. :-)


For an ostensibly smart fella, you fall into categorization pretty
easily.

"Ostensibly?" :-)

Yeah, like apparently, like to all outward appearances. It is a perfect fit.


Categorization is the name of the game with the PCTA extras here.

All those who aren't "ostensibly" as good as they are categorized
as "uninvolved" or something else horribly wrong. :-)

Noun sands! I'm a nickle extra, 5wpm and the new tests, I've only been a
ham for 5 years, and an Extra for a couple. Ostensibly, I would be one
of their targets PCTA or not.

I'll post what I want, and if you don't post because of some
"command" given by someone else here, you are the victim.

I am a "victim" now? Of what? :-)


But since you
do post whatever you want, it shows the fallacy of your statement, so
why do you keep posting that?


Tsk. I am NOT a PCTA extra.

I call 'em as I see 'em...and one cannot possibly miss seeing those
PCTA extra commands and epistles. :-)


Of course you know! ;^)


I know more than you care to admit. :-)

- mike KB3EIA -

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

But since you
do post whatever you want, it shows the fallacy of your statement, so
why do you keep posting that?

Tsk. I am NOT a PCTA extra.

Double tsk. You are NOT a NCTA Exta despite your "right out of the box"
brag. You aren't a radio amateur at all.

I call 'em as I see 'em...and one cannot possibly miss seeing those
PCTA extra commands and epistles. :-)

Only you can read a sentence like, "Leonard Anderson is not a radio
amateur" and find a command in it. St. Leonard's epistles to the
anti-code test believers read like the work of some pulp magazine hack
who is being paid at a nickel a word.

Of course you know! ;^)

I know more than you care to admit. :-)

....and yet less than *you* care to admit. :-)

Dave K8MN