Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 15th 04, 06:53 PM
Len Over 21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

William wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote in message

...

William wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote in message

...


There is a difference between civil anonymity and non-civil anonymity.
To not get that is to not get it.

- Mike KB3EIA -


Incorrect.

If there is no disagreement, then anonymity is just peachy.

But it is their anonymity that is -attacked- when there is a
disagreement, i.e., Steve calls them cowardly scum for hiding behind a
mask.

But I am not Steve!

What a broad paintbrush we paint with.

- Mike KB3EIA -



You tolerate it, even condone it.

What a broad zone of tolerance you have for the PCTA, and how narrow it

gets...

I tolerate Leo too.

Tolerance isn't in fashion much these days. Too bad.


Why do you state the obvious?

PCTA don't allow a single bit of tolerance for those who do not love,
honor, and cherish the beloved morse code.

A few might blow air-kisses at NCTA in an attempt to demonstrate
their "tolerance," but that is just lip-service.

ARS = Archaic Radiotelegraphy Society to the PCTA.




  #2   Report Post  
Old September 15th 04, 08:07 PM
Mike Coslo
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , Mike Coslo
writes:


William wrote:


Mike Coslo wrote in message


...

William wrote:


Mike Coslo wrote in message

...


There is a difference between civil anonymity and non-civil anonymity.
To not get that is to not get it.

- Mike KB3EIA -


Incorrect.

If there is no disagreement, then anonymity is just peachy.

But it is their anonymity that is -attacked- when there is a
disagreement, i.e., Steve calls them cowardly scum for hiding behind a
mask.

But I am not Steve!

What a broad paintbrush we paint with.

- Mike KB3EIA -


You tolerate it, even condone it.

What a broad zone of tolerance you have for the PCTA, and how narrow it


gets...

I tolerate Leo too.

Tolerance isn't in fashion much these days. Too bad.



Why do you state the obvious?


Sometimes the obvious needs stated. You clearly know that.


PCTA don't allow a single bit of tolerance for those who do not love,
honor, and cherish the beloved morse code.


Uh huh.

A few might blow air-kisses at NCTA in an attempt to demonstrate
their "tolerance," but that is just lip-service.


How do you *know* that?

- Mike KB3EIA -

  #3   Report Post  
Old September 16th 04, 12:57 AM
Len Over 21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Mike Coslo writes:

Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

William wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote in message

...

William wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote in message

...


There is a difference between civil anonymity and non-civil

anonymity.

To not get that is to not get it.

- Mike KB3EIA -

Incorrect.

If there is no disagreement, then anonymity is just peachy.

But it is their anonymity that is -attacked- when there is a
disagreement, i.e., Steve calls them cowardly scum for hiding behind a
mask.

But I am not Steve!

What a broad paintbrush we paint with.

- Mike KB3EIA -

You tolerate it, even condone it.

What a broad zone of tolerance you have for the PCTA, and how narrow it

gets...

I tolerate Leo too.

Tolerance isn't in fashion much these days. Too bad.


Why do you state the obvious?


Sometimes the obvious needs stated. You clearly know that.


It's quite obvious there is little (nearly zero) tolerance of NCTAs by
the PCTA. In here.

You knew that...but, lacking a good comeback, you mumble into
your keyboard a lot of null sentence content. :-)

PCTA don't allow a single bit of tolerance for those who do not love,
honor, and cherish the beloved morse code.


Uh huh.


Well, that's how it is with the ARS [Archaic Radiotelegraphy Society]

If the code test goes, the PCTA extras lose their main bragging
right statement. Tsk.

A few might blow air-kisses at NCTA in an attempt to demonstrate
their "tolerance," but that is just lip-service.


How do you *know* that?


Observation. With open eyes. :-)

Take in all, don't bury head in sand to avoid hearing independent thoughts.

Let the ARRL by your radio hobby "Miss Manners" and Tell You What
You Should Do, implant all the "correct" thoughts you should think.
They've done that for many years. Lots of hams follow their lead to the
letter. [in psywar circles that is termed "brainwashing"]

Always reject "improper" thoughts expressed by anyone else. League
would like that. Follow them like lemmings.

Not me. Been in real communications radio on HF and am open to
all ideas, not those that were "official" back before I was born.

Independent thinking is not for the faint of heart...or those who feel
they get their "chops busted" when someone rejects their "official"
opinions.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ARS License Numbers N2EY Policy 833 February 3rd 06 01:27 AM
Ping Quitefine Blackguard Policy 26 September 9th 04 12:17 PM
Another D-H* NCVEC proposal Alun Policy 104 August 26th 04 12:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017