| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#13
October 4th 04, 05:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , PAMNO (N2EY) writes: In article , Mike Coslo writes: N2EY wrote: Mike Coslo wrote in message ... Len Over 21 wrote: In article , Mike Coslo writes: Len Over 21 wrote: In article , Mike Coslo Perhaps Len just wants all opposing opinions squelched. No "perhaps," "sweetums" (a Kellie-ism). ....a frank admission on your part, Leonard. Because we see the value of the code and the code test. The Holy Grail of the Church of St. Hiram. Still bitter as the Holy Grail continues to elude you? What next? "The Amateur's Code" transformed to The Ark of the Covenant? Ohhhhh noooooo. Haven't you been keeping up? We have the Arc of the Quenched Gap. Talk about blowing their own shofar...! Shofar, shogood. Now - did the US Army not use any morse code after 1952? How about the US Navy? COast Guard? Air Force? Marines? Of course they did. And Jimmie and Mikey were THERE to prove it! [gotta love it] It wasn't necessary for them to prove it. Enough archived records exist to confirm the facts. Tsk. Jimmie and Mikey ought to look beyond the ARRL phrases and ask the military what is actually used. One on-line source is the USAF's free download "From Flares to Satellites," available at the USAF Communications Command website. An informative small book. I've mentioned that before in here. Matters not to Jimmie and Mikey because they WERE THERE and KNOW? Riiiight...in their dreams they were... Were you in the Air Force too, Len? I've pointed out all sorts of references and sources of information for quite a while in here on the REST of the radio world and what is used there...but "that does not apply." The PCTA still think that morsemanship is a required skill in the U.S. military and that radiotelegraphers are "still needed!" Wrong, of course, but it seems that the PCTA extras just don't believe it...it defies their Belief System. But the facts contradict what you've stated. The scenario is much like my having provided you urls desribing synthesizer phase noise and spurs. The facts disprove what you've told us here. You still think the term "phase noise" became a buzz word after cellular phones were introduced. Has the internet replaced amateur radio? Note the lack of answers... Tsk, you demand IMMEDIATE answers to YOUR questions! :-) Poor baby...stamping your little feet and having a tantrum? Take your time, Leonard. I'm sure that all these things will be revealed in due course. It'll be like waiting for your "Extra right out of the box". I'm a patient man. By the way, I must have missed the "demand". When did that take place? What it's "about" in here is a bunch of PCTA extras wanting to beat up NCTAs about the morse code test. :-) Pity the aged piranha. :-) Dave K8MN |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Money just for posting | Digital | |||
| Money just for posting | Digital | |||
| Who peed in the pool? | Policy | |||
| Guidelines for posting to this newsgroup? | Boatanchors | |||
| rsgb now posting their fantastic $2 membership offer | Antenna | |||
Threaded Mode
