Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Dave Heil
writes: USING modern equipment is NOT involving development or anything else. Try not to run off at the mouth/keyboard so hastily. Try not to nit-pick like nits over minor phrases in postings so that you have an "excuse" to cuss and snarl at NCTAs. It makes you look like nursie's cousin. :-) NOT USING modern equipment but attempting to spout off like you have some knowledge of what is being discussed is making you look like N0IMD's antenna advisor. That would be Kellie...whose only "engineering expertise" seems involved with antenna support structures. Kellie not know much of the innards of frequency control subsystems in a modern radio so he tries to misdirect onto his mechanical thing. Do I have knowledge of modern frequency control subsystems of radios? Yes, considerable. Such applies to all radios, not what a designer-maker has labeled "amateur" as (as you imply) being somehow different than other radios. No amateur radio license is required to acquire knowledge of radio-electronics technology. No amateur radio license will let you legally radiate RF outside of amateur bands (beyond the incidental/low-power government limits). In most U.S. radio services no federal license is required to use those radios. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? | Policy | |||
US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? | Policy | |||
US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? | Policy | |||
New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
My restructuring proposal | Policy |