In article , Dave Heil
writes:


No, I've developed the same number of marketable ham transceivers you
have, Leonard--none. Then again, I was aware of the synthesizer phase
noise and spurs. You weren't. You attempted to spoon feed us crap.

I "wasn't aware?" :-)

Wow, Marconi Jr., you best run to GE and have them cancel out
a bunch of RCA archives with my name on it. They were very
much concerned with spurious output (noise is a spurious output).
Real technical papers, published and all that after being checked
by staff folks.

What "crap" did you get in your feeding spoon tonight?

Did it give you terrible heartburn to having an NCTA demonstrate
some inside knowledge of frequency control? I'll bet it did.

There's all kinds of antacids on the shelf. Avail yourself of them.


Weren't you the guy who wrote something of nit-picking? When did you
think those subbands came into existence?

The first ones were in 1934...birth of the FCC. :-)


Authors. You know, who writes something. I've had a number of bylines
in amateur radio magazines.

Wow. Yeah! Ham Radio Horizons...aimed for the beginner in
radio.

Go for it! Famous Author Davie! You ought to publish a book.

Be careful, you'll end up looking like Brian Burke in his A-1 Op Club gaffe.

...or any other NCTA you want to destroy. :-)


Do us a favor and note that this newsgroup is rec.radio.amateur.policy.
I'm not impressed with your frequent touting of your past professional
status.

Awww. We don't impress you? How sad.

Many radio amateurs are current or past professionals in
communications or electronics.

So? You demand "showing papers" at train stations too?

That black leather overcoat is in style, I suppose. The jack
boots aren't...

Tooting your horn about your past work
and attempting to use it as a substitute for an amateur license in an
amateur radio newsgroup isn't likely to win you any points among hams.

Tsk. This is a "points count?"

Poor Davie...still stuck on enforced licensing just to advocate some
freeding into getting into licensing. Tsk.

Who says the PCTA abrogate the First Amendment? Nearly all...


Oh! Didn't you know? Jim's a licensed amateur radio operator. Maybe
you could take up amateur radio.

Toss out the code test and I'll think about it.

Maybe you could take up "civil discourse," Davie?

Then you wouldn't look like second cousin to nursie yell-yell.


I'm guessing that Jim and everyone else here was already aware of that
factoid. Jim likely realizes that you didn't invent radio or all of the
circuits and systems in modern ready-built radios. That makes you even.

No problem. You sure as hell didn't invent much. :-)

Didn't St. Hiram invent radio? And then form a religious order around
it? :-)

Why did you grab all the A-1 sauce? :-)

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article , Dave Heil
writes:

No, I've developed the same number of marketable ham transceivers you
have, Leonard--none. Then again, I was aware of the synthesizer phase
noise and spurs. You weren't. You attempted to spoon feed us crap.

I "wasn't aware?" :-)

Well, if you were aware, what was the reason you posted erroneous
information?

Wow, Marconi Jr., you best run to GE and have them cancel out
a bunch of RCA archives with my name on it. They were very
much concerned with spurious output (noise is a spurious output).
Real technical papers, published and all that after being checked
by staff folks.

What did you recently tell us about synthesizer phase noise, Mr.
Marconi's uncle? If you keep repeating it, GE may black out your name
on all the RCA archives without a request from me.

What "crap" did you get in your feeding spoon tonight?

You didn't post it "tonight". It was posted several days ago. Would
you like a good googling?

Did it give you terrible heartburn to having an NCTA demonstrate
some inside knowledge of frequency control? I'll bet it did.

I never believed that morse code testing was necessary for "inside"
knowledge of frequency control. However, you made a number of factual
errors. Ever get around to looking at any of the material for which I
posted urls?

There's all kinds of antacids on the shelf. Avail yourself of them.

I'm not the person in a dilemma over having posted the factual errors.
You know where the shelf is, I take it?

Weren't you the guy who wrote something of nit-picking? When did you
think those subbands came into existence?

The first ones were in 1934...birth of the FCC. :-)

Yeah " :-) "

Beats having to eat your words, doesn't it?

Authors. You know, who writes something. I've had a number of bylines
in amateur radio magazines.

Wow. Yeah! Ham Radio Horizons...aimed for the beginner in
radio.

Are you denigrating beginners in radio? those who write for them?
Are you forgetting CQ?

Go for it! Famous Author Davie! You ought to publish a book.

I am preparing to publish a book. Would you like to place an order for
an advance copy, Former Famous Author Lennie?

Be careful, you'll end up looking like Brian Burke in his A-1 Op Club gaffe.

...or any other NCTA you want to destroy. :-)

I dunno, Len, does setting the record straight on something destroy you
or "William"?

Do us a favor and note that this newsgroup is rec.radio.amateur.policy.
I'm not impressed with your frequent touting of your past professional
status.

Awww. We don't impress you? How sad.

No, not sad, just factual. When did you become plural?

Many radio amateurs are current or past professionals in
communications or electronics.

So? You demand "showing papers" at train stations too?

You equate the statment of a fact with a demand to show papers? That
doesn't make sense.

That black leather overcoat is in style, I suppose. The jack
boots aren't...

This must be the point at which you realize that you've lost an
argument.

Tooting your horn about your past work
and attempting to use it as a substitute for an amateur license in an
amateur radio newsgroup isn't likely to win you any points among hams.

Tsk. This is a "points count?"

Don't you know? You are the fellow who often writes of "message
points".

Poor Davie...still stuck on enforced licensing just to advocate some
freeding into getting into licensing. Tsk.

Huh?

Who says the PCTA abrogate the First Amendment? Nearly all...

If you're still posting, your First Amendment rights are intact. What
you seem to desire is your rights to post but suppression of my right to
disagree with you, to correct you or to issue catcalls at your sillier
ideas.

Oh! Didn't you know? Jim's a licensed amateur radio operator. Maybe
you could take up amateur radio.

Toss out the code test and I'll think about it.

I thought you told us that you had no interest in obtaining such a
license.

Maybe you could take up "civil discourse," Davie?

Are you the course instructor (or the coarse instructor)?

Then you wouldn't look like second cousin to nursie yell-yell.

What! Has the course (coarse) begun already. Wait a minute--I want to
make notes.

I'm guessing that Jim and everyone else here was already aware of that
factoid. Jim likely realizes that you didn't invent radio or all of the
circuits and systems in modern ready-built radios. That makes you even.

No problem. You sure as hell didn't invent much. :-)

Wow! Now the THREE of us are even.

Didn't St. Hiram invent radio? And then form a religious order around
it? :-)

Hang on--I want to make sure this part gets into my notes on the civil
discourse (discoarse) session.

Why did you grab all the A-1 sauce? :-)

Is this the discourse (discoarse) class or a cooking class? :-) :-)

Dave K8MN