| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
October 1st 04, 11:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Heil wrote in message ...
Len Over 21 wrote: In article , (Brian Kelly) writes: (N2EY) wrote in message Wrong. Incorrect. Not true at all in the real world of HF radio. Len has just demonstrated, once more, that he just doesn't get it. You expected anything else?? "Real world of HF radio?" The one that goes from 3 MHz to 30 MHz? Amateur activity is concerned only with a fraction of that. That's right. That portion of the radio spectrum used by radio amateurs. That's the portion of the spectrum of concern to those in this newsgroup. Amateur licenses aren't legal for out-of-amateur band transmission even if one has a four-on-the-floor extra license. Right again. We all knew that. It hasn't bothered us in the least. Has nothing to do with the subject at hand, which is HF amateur radio. Spank. Kellie has a spanking fetish? Not particularly Sweetums but there was this quirky little redhead I ran into a number of years ago and spanking was one of her . . . Oops: Off topic again. Knowing how important staying on topic is to you and all that. Apologies. The SUBJECT AT HAND is "US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? Look at the subject line in the message header. Try to get your subject threads in a row, ducks. Wouldn't you just love to know the last date on which you commented on the topic in that header? Shall I google it up for you? As far as on-off keyed radiotelegraphy, your mention of "phase noise" as being "crud" in synthesizer frequency control is akin to making a big case for gold-plated music system speaker wires. :-) Wrong again, Len. What a goofball . . . Where was all the noise about phase noise BEFORE the cellular equipment expansion? There were oscillators around then, even PLL frequency control systems. You didn't read about it; therefore, it could not have taken place. Izzat about it? Phase noise was NOT an important buzzword then. Now it is, coincidental with the cell phone equipment and component makers using it in their advertisements. Your facts are wrong. Conclusion: Too many hams get their "technical expertise" by memorizing advertisement copy instead of theory texts. And if your facts are wrong, you end up with a wrong conclusion. How many points did Len get with it in the last CQWW? Or even the last SS or Field Day? Or in RRAP. Tsk. Jimmie and Kellie avoid answering or discussing. Misdirection is all they can do...but that is traditional in Usenet since before it was split from the ARPANET. Saw it then, still see it now...all the self-professed "experts" making like renowned gurus, dissing and cussing anyone who disagrees with their immortal words. I dunno, Len...That sounds an awfully lot like you. However, I HAVE had experience in civilian and military radio communications, radionavigation equipment (TACAN, DME, VOR, Localizer, Glideslope), IFF transponders, radars (search, weather, target acquisition and tracking), earlier air-to-air missle systems (principally the first Hughes Aircraft GARs 1 through 4), and the strange McDonnel decoy drone that could imitate formations of B-52s to Russky radar...using a TWT as a broadband mixer covering many octaves. You just had to get him started again, eh Brian? Of course. He's just like my brother's big Labrador retriever, I toss bones down the yard for Gunther to gnaw on and I toss bones out around here for Sweetums to gnaw on. The only significant difference between the two being that Gunther doesn't know his way around a keyboard. Sweetums is a perfect example of these windbags. "Windbags?" :-) That pretty well sums it up. Kellie and Jimmie want "my scores from the last Field Day" as one loaded "challenge." :-) Not all amateurs participate in "Field Day" and no non-amateur-licensee can possibly operate legally. Groan, I doan believe it . . ! You're not only flat out dead wrong *again* but 180 degrees wrong. Fact is Sweetums that at FD sites non-licensed folk are *encouraged* to operate. At least you're amazingly consistent. An example of a NON-challenge, already-known answer disguised as a sort-of (sort off, really) "civil discourse" question. No non-amateur-licensee can possibly operate legally on Field Day? I'd think you'd get one right once in a great while, Leonard. That response would be wrong. Dave K8MN w3rv |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? | Policy | |||
| US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? | Policy | |||
| US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? | Policy | |||
| New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
| My restructuring proposal | Policy | |||
Hybrid Mode
