| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain...
Subject: ARS License Numbers
From: (William) Date: 10/6/2004 9:15 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: ARS License Numbers From: (William) Date: 10/5/2004 10:50 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Hey Len, I've been holding the fort down for a few days - with one hand tied behind my back. I can't believe how easy it's been. Steve drags his wife into this, Dave thinks CQ is a membership organization, and Kelly want to get me on the air so he can bend me over. Maybe I'll postpone pulling a Cecil for a little while longer. Then the comment about Brian Kelly wanting to "bend you over" on the air. What a hoot. Hmmm? I don't recall the "on the air part." Please correct your statement or post where I said that. Brain, you're an idiot. There, re-quoted for your OWN edification, is exactly what YOU posted. Feel free to follow the headers backwards if you don't "trust" what I quoted above. Like I said...You don't even have the skills to keep your own stories straight. Thanks for once again making my "job" here so simple. Perhaps you should get Mrs Brain to un-tie that hand you said you told Lennie you had tied behind your back. Steve, K4YZ PS: BBBWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! |
|
Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain...
From: PAMNO (N2EY) Date: 10/7/2004 12:55 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Brain, you're an idiot. Then why do you respond to him the way you do, Steve? If you really do believe that "bb" is an idiot, then his behavior isn't his fault. Sure it's his fault. He's aware enough of his actions and potential consequences to be able to take charge of his own affairs. Like I said...You don't even have the skills to keep your own stories straight. If that's true, why not just point out the errors without all the name-calling? Who's calling him names, Jim? He won't sign his name to his posts. Would it make any difference than calling him Rumplestiltskin? His choice. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain...
From: (William) Date: 10/7/2004 3:42 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: ARS License Numbers From: (William) Date: 10/6/2004 9:15 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: ARS License Numbers From: (William) Date: 10/5/2004 10:50 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Hey Len, I've been holding the fort down for a few days - with one hand tied behind my back. I can't believe how easy it's been. Steve drags his wife into this, Dave thinks CQ is a membership organization, and Kelly want to get me on the air so he can bend me over. Maybe I'll postpone pulling a Cecil for a little while longer. Then the comment about Brian Kelly wanting to "bend you over" on the air. What a hoot. Hmmm? I don't recall the "on the air part." Please correct your statement or post where I said that. Brain, you're an idiot. There, re-quoted for your OWN edification, is exactly what YOU posted. Feel free to follow the headers backwards if you don't "trust" what I quoted above. Like I said...You don't even have the skills to keep your own stories straight. Thanks for once again making my "job" here so simple. Perhaps you should get Mrs Brain to un-tie that hand you said you told Lennie you had tied behind your back. Steve, K4YZ PS: BBBWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! Hi, hi! Wrong again. See the part, "Hey Len, I've been...." That was my comment. I did not make the "... on the air" comment. Hi, hi!!! You can retract your lies at any time, and this is the proper forum to do so. Why? You RE-QUOTED the VERY SAME PARAGRAPH in which YOUR original assertion was made, Brain! QUOTE: "...and Kelly want to get me on the air so he can bend me over".... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ For the third time, Your Dimwittedness, there's YOUR words, requoted with header. Idiot. Steve, K4YZ |
PAMNO (N2EY) wrote in message ...
In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Brain, you're an idiot. Then why do you respond to him the way you do, Steve? If you really do believe that "bb" is an idiot, then his behavior isn't his fault. Like I said...You don't even have the skills to keep your own stories straight. If that's true, why not just point out the errors without all the name-calling? 73 de Jim, N2EY It's not my errors that he's really interested in correcting. It's the opportunity for him to be an ass and somehow make it my fault. |
In article , (Steve
Robeson K4CAP) writes: Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain... From: PAMNO (N2EY) Date: 10/7/2004 12:55 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Brain, you're an idiot. Then why do you respond to him the way you do, Steve? If you really do believe that "bb" is an idiot, then his behavior isn't his fault. Sure it's his fault. Not if he really *is* an idiot. He's aware enough of his actions and potential consequences to be able to take charge of his own affairs. How do you really know? Like I said...You don't even have the skills to keep your own stories straight. If that's true, why not just point out the errors without all the name-calling? Who's calling him names, Jim? "Brain"..."Goofball"...."Idiot"... sure sounds like namecalling to me. He won't sign his name to his posts. Would it make any difference than calling him Rumplestiltskin? Yes, it does. His choice. Yours, too! Responding in kind lowers you to your opponent's level. It blurs the distinction between you and your opponent. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain...
From: (William) Date: 10/7/2004 8:28 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Brain, you're an idiot. Then why do you respond to him the way you do, Steve? If you really do believe that "bb" is an idiot, then his behavior isn't his fault. Like I said...You don't even have the skills to keep your own stories straight. If that's true, why not just point out the errors without all the name-calling? 73 de Jim, N2EY It's not my errors that he's really interested in correcting. It's the opportunity for him to be an ass and somehow make it my fault. If it's YOUR words I am quoting, how does that make me "an ass"...?!?! And if YOU wrote them, do you not take responsibility for them? Do you really NOT mean what you say...?!?! The fact is that you don't like having YOUR nose rubbed in your knee-deep errors, falsehoods, deceit and deceptions, Brain, but YOU KEEP DOING IT! You see, I have the strength of conviction in what I say to sign my name to my posts and to not call other people an "ass" when they prove me wrong. I say "you were right", or "I stand corrected", or other words to the effect that what I said was wrong, and then move on. You don't. Sucks to be you. Steve, K4YZ |
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain... From: (William) Date: 10/7/2004 3:42 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: ARS License Numbers From: (William) Date: 10/6/2004 9:15 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: ARS License Numbers From: (William) Date: 10/5/2004 10:50 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Hey Len, I've been holding the fort down for a few days - with one hand tied behind my back. I can't believe how easy it's been. Steve drags his wife into this, Dave thinks CQ is a membership organization, and Kelly want to get me on the air so he can bend me over. Maybe I'll postpone pulling a Cecil for a little while longer. Then the comment about Brian Kelly wanting to "bend you over" on the air. What a hoot. Hmmm? I don't recall the "on the air part." Please correct your statement or post where I said that. Brain, you're an idiot. There, re-quoted for your OWN edification, is exactly what YOU posted. Feel free to follow the headers backwards if you don't "trust" what I quoted above. Like I said...You don't even have the skills to keep your own stories straight. Thanks for once again making my "job" here so simple. Perhaps you should get Mrs Brain to un-tie that hand you said you told Lennie you had tied behind your back. Steve, K4YZ PS: BBBWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! Hi, hi! Wrong again. See the part, "Hey Len, I've been...." That was my comment. I did not make the "... on the air" comment. Hi, hi!!! You can retract your lies at any time, and this is the proper forum to do so. Why? You RE-QUOTED the VERY SAME PARAGRAPH in which YOUR original assertion was made, Brain! QUOTE: "...and Kelly want to get me on the air so he can bend me over".... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ For the third time, Your Dimwittedness, there's YOUR words, requoted with header. Idiot. Steve, K4YZ Then kindly quote me saying it, not someone else saying it to me. Best of Luck. Thanks, bb |
PAMNO (N2EY) wrote in message ...
In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain... From: PAMNO (N2EY) Date: 10/7/2004 12:55 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Brain, you're an idiot. Then why do you respond to him the way you do, Steve? If you really do believe that "bb" is an idiot, then his behavior isn't his fault. Sure it's his fault. Not if he really *is* an idiot. He's aware enough of his actions and potential consequences to be able to take charge of his own affairs. How do you really know? Like I said...You don't even have the skills to keep your own stories straight. If that's true, why not just point out the errors without all the name-calling? Who's calling him names, Jim? "Brain"..."Goofball"...."Idiot"... sure sounds like namecalling to me. He won't sign his name to his posts. Would it make any difference than calling him Rumplestiltskin? Yes, it does. His choice. Yours, too! Responding in kind lowers you to your opponent's level. It blurs the distinction between you and your opponent. 73 de Jim, N2EY Jim, Or it lowers me to Steve's level when I call him "Yell, Yell" after years of abusing people on RRAP. I guess I should stay on the high road. Thanks for the encouragement. And what's up with that guy nurse in Pennsylvania? |
Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain...
From: (William) Date: 10/8/2004 5:48 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: Jim, Or it lowers me to Steve's level when I call him "Yell, Yell" after years of abusing people on RRAP. Only those who blatantly lie, deceive or otherwise try to be less than honest as a matter of routine. You. Lennie. Mark Morgan. Vipul. Some circle of friends you run with. I guess I should stay on the high road. Thanks for the encouragement. You will never be "on the high road", Brain, except when you make a wrong turn. You are as much a creature of habit as any of us, and you cannot stand to NOT be what you are used to being...In your case it is mistruthful and deceitful. And what's up with that guy nurse in Pennsylvania? Still with the guys, eh, Brain...?!?! Your wife in on your "alternative lifestyle"...?!?! Sheeeeesh. Steve, K4YZ |
In article , (Steve
Robeson K4CAP) writes: Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain... From: (William) Date: 10/7/2004 8:28 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Brain, you're an idiot. Then why do you respond to him the way you do, Steve? If you really do believe that "bb" is an idiot, then his behavior isn't his fault. Like I said...You don't even have the skills to keep your own stories straight. If that's true, why not just point out the errors without all the name-calling? 73 de Jim, N2EY It's not my errors that he's really interested in correcting. It's the opportunity for him to be an ass and somehow make it my fault. If it's YOUR words I am quoting, how does that make me "an ass"...?!?! If that's all you do, no, it doesn't. But when name-calling is added.... And if YOU wrote them, do you not take responsibility for them? Maybe not... Do you really NOT mean what you say...?!?! We've seen examples of that... The fact is that you don't like having YOUR nose rubbed in your knee-deep errors, falsehoods, deceit and deceptions, Brain, but YOU KEEP DOING IT! So why the name-calling? You see, I have the strength of conviction in what I say to sign my name to my posts and to not call other people an "ass" when they prove me wrong. I say "you were right", or "I stand corrected", or other words to the effect that what I said was wrong, and then move on. You don't. True. But all that can get obscured by the shouting and name-calling. Most of all, you *know* that you're being intentionally baited. (I recall a post where "billy" said he intentionally insults you). By responding the way the other side expects, you lower yourself to their level. Which is what they want. 73 de Jim, N2EY Sucks to be you. If you really believe that, why not have a little pity? |
In article , PAMNO
(N2EY) writes: In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain... From: (William) Date: 10/7/2004 8:28 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Brain, you're an idiot. Then why do you respond to him the way you do, Steve? If you really do believe that "bb" is an idiot, then his behavior isn't his fault. Like I said...You don't even have the skills to keep your own stories straight. If that's true, why not just point out the errors without all the name-calling? 73 de Jim, N2EY It's not my errors that he's really interested in correcting. It's the opportunity for him to be an ass and somehow make it my fault. If it's YOUR words I am quoting, how does that make me "an ass"...?!?! If that's all you do, no, it doesn't. But when name-calling is added.... And if YOU wrote them, do you not take responsibility for them? Maybe not... Do you really NOT mean what you say...?!?! We've seen examples of that... The fact is that you don't like having YOUR nose rubbed in your knee-deep errors, falsehoods, deceit and deceptions, Brain, but YOU KEEP DOING IT! So why the name-calling? He LIKES to do that. You see, I have the strength of conviction in what I say to sign my name to my posts and to not call other people an "ass" when they prove me wrong. I say "you were right", or "I stand corrected", or other words to the effect that what I said was wrong, and then move on. You don't. True. But all that can get obscured by the shouting and name-calling. Most of all, you *know* that you're being intentionally baited. (I recall a post where "billy" said he intentionally insults you). By responding the way the other side expects, you lower yourself to their level. Which is what they want. Tsk, tsk. Nursie "lowers" everyone else to HIS level with the constant stream of saying everything is a "lie" and then calling others cute little Yiddish pejoratives such as "putz." 73 de Jim, N2EY Sucks to be you. If you really believe that, why not have a little pity? "Pity?" Hi hi. |
In article ,
(William) writes: (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Brain, you're an idiot. Then why do you respond to him the way you do, Steve? If you really do believe that "bb" is an idiot, then his behavior isn't his fault. Like I said...You don't even have the skills to keep your own stories straight. If that's true, why not just point out the errors without all the name-calling? 73 de Jim, N2EY It's not my errors that he's really interested in correcting. It's the opportunity for him to be an ass and somehow make it my fault. PCTA extra Double Standard. Another PCTA extra obviously guilty of bad conduct faults is slapped on the wrist with a damp hankie and any NCTA commenting on that is guilty of a capital crime. :-) |
PAMNO (N2EY) wrote in message ...
In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain... From: (William) Date: 10/7/2004 8:28 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Brain, you're an idiot. Then why do you respond to him the way you do, Steve? If you really do believe that "bb" is an idiot, then his behavior isn't his fault. Like I said...You don't even have the skills to keep your own stories straight. If that's true, why not just point out the errors without all the name-calling? 73 de Jim, N2EY It's not my errors that he's really interested in correcting. It's the opportunity for him to be an ass and somehow make it my fault. If it's YOUR words I am quoting, how does that make me "an ass"...?!?! If that's all you do, no, it doesn't. But when name-calling is added.... Indeed. It would appear that Jim is one "...?!?!" away from telling Steve that he's making an ass of himself. And if YOU wrote them, do you not take responsibility for them? Maybe not... Indeed I did not! Steve read the attributions incorrectly. Hi, hi! Do you really NOT mean what you say...?!?! We've seen examples of that... Where have all the anon poster gone? The fact is that you don't like having YOUR nose rubbed in your knee-deep errors, falsehoods, deceit and deceptions, Brain, but YOU KEEP DOING IT! So why the name-calling? Yes. Why? You see, I have the strength of conviction in what I say to sign my name to my posts and to not call other people an "ass" when they prove me wrong. I say "you were right", or "I stand corrected", or other words to the effect that what I said was wrong, and then move on. You don't. True. Not true. We can start with Steve's wrongness wrt MARS. And being a bully requires only the strength of conviction that others are beneath you. Work on that. But all that can get obscured by the shouting and name-calling. You think? Most of all, you *know* that you're being intentionally baited. (I recall a post where "billy" said he intentionally insults you). And Steve unintentionally threatens them? Good grief! Talk about enablers. By responding the way the other side expects, you lower yourself to their level. Nope. He lowers himself to the lowest level that -he- can acheive. And it gets lower all the time. His choice. Which is what they want. 73 de Jim, N2EY I want others to condemn his despicable behavio[u]r; the homosexual and pedophile inuendo, and the suggestion that if you don't agree with him that bricks may fly, tires may be slashed, and wives may be terrorized. Sucks to be you. If you really believe that, why not have a little pity? Because Steve's a bully? He has no compassion or empathy. |
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , PAMNO (N2EY) writes: In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain... From: (William) Date: 10/7/2004 8:28 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Brain, you're an idiot. Then why do you respond to him the way you do, Steve? If you really do believe that "bb" is an idiot, then his behavior isn't his fault. Like I said...You don't even have the skills to keep your own stories straight. If that's true, why not just point out the errors without all the name-calling? 73 de Jim, N2EY It's not my errors that he's really interested in correcting. It's the opportunity for him to be an ass and somehow make it my fault. If it's YOUR words I am quoting, how does that make me "an ass"...?!?! If that's all you do, no, it doesn't. But when name-calling is added.... And if YOU wrote them, do you not take responsibility for them? Maybe not... Do you really NOT mean what you say...?!?! We've seen examples of that... The fact is that you don't like having YOUR nose rubbed in your knee-deep errors, falsehoods, deceit and deceptions, Brain, but YOU KEEP DOING IT! So why the name-calling? He LIKES to do that. You see, I have the strength of conviction in what I say to sign my name to my posts and to not call other people an "ass" when they prove me wrong. I say "you were right", or "I stand corrected", or other words to the effect that what I said was wrong, and then move on. You don't. True. But all that can get obscured by the shouting and name-calling. Most of all, you *know* that you're being intentionally baited. (I recall a post where "billy" said he intentionally insults you). By responding the way the other side expects, you lower yourself to their level. Which is what they want. Tsk, tsk. Nursie "lowers" everyone else to HIS level with the constant stream of saying everything is a "lie" and then calling others cute little Yiddish pejoratives such as "putz." 73 de Jim, N2EY Sucks to be you. If you really believe that, why not have a little pity? "Pity?" Hi hi. The people that Steve views as his "peers" enable his sickness. So he goes on with his vision of himself as the Avenging Angel of Amateur Radio, slashing and purging the RRAP ranks of those he thinks are not worthy. Madness. |
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , (William) writes: (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Brain, you're an idiot. Then why do you respond to him the way you do, Steve? If you really do believe that "bb" is an idiot, then his behavior isn't his fault. Like I said...You don't even have the skills to keep your own stories straight. If that's true, why not just point out the errors without all the name-calling? 73 de Jim, N2EY It's not my errors that he's really interested in correcting. It's the opportunity for him to be an ass and somehow make it my fault. PCTA extra Double Standard. Another PCTA extra obviously guilty of bad conduct faults is slapped on the wrist with a damp hankie and any NCTA commenting on that is guilty of a capital crime. :-) Did you see his incorrect attribution? His whole argument hinges on the very thing that he got wrong, and somehow I'm an idiot. Then Jim comes in and pats him on the back. |
|
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain... From: (William) Date: 10/8/2004 5:48 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: Jim, Or it lowers me to Steve's level when I call him "Yell, Yell" after years of abusing people on RRAP. Only those who blatantly lie, deceive or otherwise try to be less than honest as a matter of routine. You. Lennie. Mark Morgan. Vipul. Some circle of friends you run with. I guess I should stay on the high road. Thanks for the encouragement. You will never be "on the high road", Brain, except when you make a wrong turn. You are as much a creature of habit as any of us, and you cannot stand to NOT be what you are used to being...In your case it is mistruthful and deceitful. And what's up with that guy nurse in Pennsylvania? Still with the guys, eh, Brain...?!?! Your wife in on your "alternative lifestyle"...?!?! Sheeeeesh. Steve, K4YZ No, no, it's not about being gay. It's about people dying. Lots of 'em. Hey, didn't you deny making homosexual inuendo? Just another Robeson lie? Of course. |
Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain...
From: (Quitefine) Date: 10/11/2004 5:34 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: In article , (William) writes: I want others to condemn his despicable behavio[u]r; the homosexual and pedophile inuendo, and the suggestion that if you don't agree with him that bricks may fly, tires may be slashed, and wives may be terrorized. Only *his* despicable behaviour? What about similar despicable behaviour by others? Or are they immune, for some reason? If you truly believe what you write, William, why do you respond to him? Because he "can't help himself". And it's a LACK of conviction that is Brian Burke's undoing. Steve, K4YZ |
Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain...
From: (William) Date: 10/11/2004 7:03 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain... From: (William) Date: 10/8/2004 5:48 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: Jim, Or it lowers me to Steve's level when I call him "Yell, Yell" after years of abusing people on RRAP. Only those who blatantly lie, deceive or otherwise try to be less than honest as a matter of routine. You. Lennie. Mark Morgan. Vipul. Some circle of friends you run with. I guess I should stay on the high road. Thanks for the encouragement. You will never be "on the high road", Brain, except when you make a wrong turn. You are as much a creature of habit as any of us, and you cannot stand to NOT be what you are used to being...In your case it is mistruthful and deceitful. And what's up with that guy nurse in Pennsylvania? Still with the guys, eh, Brain...?!?! Your wife in on your "alternative lifestyle"...?!?! Sheeeeesh. Steve, K4YZ No, no, it's not about being gay. It's about people dying. Lots of 'em. Hey, didn't you deny making homosexual inuendo? Just another Robeson lie? Of course. It's not "innuendo" if it's true, Brain. YOU asked about him, not me. Sucks to be you. Steve, K4YZ |
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain... From: (William) Date: 10/11/2004 7:03 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain... From: (William) Date: 10/8/2004 5:48 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: Jim, Or it lowers me to Steve's level when I call him "Yell, Yell" after years of abusing people on RRAP. Only those who blatantly lie, deceive or otherwise try to be less than honest as a matter of routine. You. Lennie. Mark Morgan. Vipul. Some circle of friends you run with. I guess I should stay on the high road. Thanks for the encouragement. You will never be "on the high road", Brain, except when you make a wrong turn. You are as much a creature of habit as any of us, and you cannot stand to NOT be what you are used to being...In your case it is mistruthful and deceitful. And what's up with that guy nurse in Pennsylvania? Still with the guys, eh, Brain...?!?! Your wife in on your "alternative lifestyle"...?!?! Sheeeeesh. Steve, K4YZ No, no, it's not about being gay. It's about people dying. Lots of 'em. Hey, didn't you deny making homosexual inuendo? Just another Robeson lie? Of course. It's not "innuendo" if it's true, Brain. YOU asked about him, not me. He's gay? |
(Quitefine) wrote in message ...
In article , (William) writes: I want others to condemn his despicable behavio[u]r; the homosexual and pedophile inuendo, and the suggestion that if you don't agree with him that bricks may fly, tires may be slashed, and wives may be terrorized. Only *his* despicable behaviour? What about similar despicable behaviour by others? Or are they immune, for some reason? Deiter says "one spammer at a time." I like that plan. I say that no one else on here is making threats to harm others, so I'll deal with that one first. Any objections? |
Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain...
From: (William) Date: 10/11/2004 7:28 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain... From: (William) Date: 10/11/2004 7:03 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain... From: (William) Date: 10/8/2004 5:48 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: Jim, Or it lowers me to Steve's level when I call him "Yell, Yell" after years of abusing people on RRAP. Only those who blatantly lie, deceive or otherwise try to be less than honest as a matter of routine. You. Lennie. Mark Morgan. Vipul. Some circle of friends you run with. I guess I should stay on the high road. Thanks for the encouragement. You will never be "on the high road", Brain, except when you make a wrong turn. You are as much a creature of habit as any of us, and you cannot stand to NOT be what you are used to being...In your case it is mistruthful and deceitful. And what's up with that guy nurse in Pennsylvania? Still with the guys, eh, Brain...?!?! Your wife in on your "alternative lifestyle"...?!?! Sheeeeesh. Steve, K4YZ No, no, it's not about being gay. It's about people dying. Lots of 'em. Hey, didn't you deny making homosexual inuendo? Just another Robeson lie? Of course. It's not "innuendo" if it's true, Brain. YOU asked about him, not me. He's gay? I'll be darned if I know...YOU are the one asking the questions about him. Steve, K4YZ |
Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain...
From: (William) Date: 10/11/2004 7:33 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Quitefine) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: I want others to condemn his despicable behavio[u]r; the homosexual and pedophile inuendo, and the suggestion that if you don't agree with him that bricks may fly, tires may be slashed, and wives may be terrorized. Only *his* despicable behaviour? What about similar despicable behaviour by others? Or are they immune, for some reason? Deiter says "one spammer at a time." I like that plan. I say that no one else on here is making threats to harm others, so I'll deal with that one first. Who's making threats, Brain. Please quote the post wherein someone made a threat. Any objections? Sounds like a bit of arrogant defiance. Brain, are you finally getting a spine of your OWN...??? Steve, K4YZ |
|
In article ,
(William) writes: (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain... From: (William) Date: 10/7/2004 8:28 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Brain, you're an idiot. Then why do you respond to him the way you do, Steve? If you really do believe that "bb" is an idiot, then his behavior isn't his fault. Like I said...You don't even have the skills to keep your own stories straight. If that's true, why not just point out the errors without all the name-calling? 73 de Jim, N2EY It's not my errors that he's really interested in correcting. It's the opportunity for him to be an ass and somehow make it my fault. If it's YOUR words I am quoting, how does that make me "an ass"...?!?! If that's all you do, no, it doesn't. But when name-calling is added.... Indeed. It would appear that Jim is one "...?!?!" away from telling Steve that he's making an ass of himself. "Nevah hoppen." :-) Members of the Archaic Radiotelegraphy Society have to stick together through thick and thin. [it has gotten very "thick" in here from some of them] And if YOU wrote them, do you not take responsibility for them? Maybe not... Indeed I did not! Steve read the attributions incorrectly. Hi, hi! Nursie will never, ever admit that. :-) Hi hi. Do you really NOT mean what you say...?!?! We've seen examples of that... Where have all the anon poster gone? Dinna wurra, laddie. Quitfun will be back in pseudopstyle even though all can see Jimmie's personna shing through all the indents. The fact is that you don't like having YOUR nose rubbed in your knee-deep errors, falsehoods, deceit and deceptions, Brain, but YOU KEEP DOING IT! So why the name-calling? Yes. Why? PCTA extra Double Standard alive and well, illustrated daily. PCTAs *never* call anyone names...according to them. :-) PCTAs claim they are "telling the 'truth'" when describing NCTAs. Nursie has done that several times. [Jimmie wants "references" to that on any comeback...as if it never appeared in public...:-) ] NCTAs are required to love, honor, respect, and obey all PCTAs because PCTA are morsemen and therefore superior (according to at least one PCTA of the arrogant persuasion). You see, I have the strength of conviction in what I say to sign my name to my posts and to not call other people an "ass" when they prove me wrong. I say "you were right", or "I stand corrected", or other words to the effect that what I said was wrong, and then move on. You don't. True. Not true. We can start with Steve's wrongness wrt MARS. ...and continue with his claim that his "licensure" is good enough to be able to "report" anyone he considers crazy to "authorities" who will right away come out to fetch them and cart the "crazies" to some asylum. :-) ...and one shouldn't forget the wonderful nursie use of cute little Yiddish pejorative "Putz" signed off on hundreds of messages. And being a bully requires only the strength of conviction that others are beneath you. Work on that. Bullies are like that...they show contempt for all who do not agree with them. They want to personalize discussions by attacks on a communicator's person...for daring to speak back to the bullies! Hi hi. :-) But all that can get obscured by the shouting and name-calling. You think? Tsk. The PCTAs don't recognize all the shouting and name-calling by one of their own kind. Most of all, you *know* that you're being intentionally baited. (I recall a post where "billy" said he intentionally insults you). And Steve unintentionally threatens them? Good grief! Talk about enablers. Label them enablers, even if the enable lables are libelous... :-) By responding the way the other side expects, you lower yourself to their level. Nope. He lowers himself to the lowest level that -he- can acheive. And it gets lower all the time. His choice. True. But...PCTA don't see that. Nursie be one of Them and therefore cannot possibly, ever, do anything despicable. Which is what they want. 73 de Jim, N2EY I want others to condemn his despicable behavio[u]r; the homosexual and pedophile inuendo, and the suggestion that if you don't agree with him that bricks may fly, tires may be slashed, and wives may be terrorized. ...and those are just the latest of the nasty statements used! Sucks to be you. If you really believe that, why not have a little pity? Because Steve's a bully? He has no compassion or empathy. Such is condoned by morsemen. Apparently that is some kind of action to get more of their kind into the ARS to support them? Sort of tosses "live and let live" into the dumpster along with all the "gentlemanly" credos of the old Amateur's Code. Not a good picture of U.S. amateur radio in this new millennium. Morsemen seem to have only a singular credo, "Do code or die." |
In article ,
(William) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Brain, you're an idiot. Then why do you respond to him the way you do, Steve? If you really do believe that "bb" is an idiot, then his behavior isn't his fault. Like I said...You don't even have the skills to keep your own stories straight. If that's true, why not just point out the errors without all the name-calling? 73 de Jim, N2EY It's not my errors that he's really interested in correcting. It's the opportunity for him to be an ass and somehow make it my fault. PCTA extra Double Standard. Another PCTA extra obviously guilty of bad conduct faults is slapped on the wrist with a damp hankie and any NCTA commenting on that is guilty of a capital crime. :-) Did you see his incorrect attribution? Heh. Impossible to ignore. I don't think the other PCTA extras are able to see it, though... His whole argument hinges on the very thing that he got wrong, and somehow I'm an idiot. Then Jim comes in and pats him on the back. Nursie's newsgroup technique is simply to personalize each and every thread and discussion with insults heaped on everyone who doesn't agree with him. Doesn't really matter what the subject is, it must boil down to his anger and antagonism against everyone else. Gets tiring very quick. |
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , (William) writes: And being a bully requires only the strength of conviction that others are beneath you. Work on that. Bullies are like that...they show contempt for all who do not agree with them. They want to personalize discussions by attacks on a communicator's person...for daring to speak back to the bullies! But Leonard, that is precisely the kind of behavior exhibited here by *you*! Hi hi. :-) Hi de ho :-) :-) Dave K8MN |
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
Nursie's newsgroup technique is simply to personalize each and every thread and discussion with insults heaped on everyone who doesn't agree with him. Doesn't really matter what the subject is, it must boil down to his anger and antagonism against everyone else. Gets tiring very quick. Welp, he continues to shoot his mouth off. I never stopped to consider just how many stinkers were in amateur radio, yet each time one shows up, he's usually wearing the 20WPM badge very prominently. I did notice the loud one pining for an Elecraft kit with the 160M/SSB option. Hi, hi! I wonder if the rubberband man will notify him that 160M is for CW, as he did me? No, no, of course not. He cracks me up though. He needs his wife to get off of her purse so he can buy one. I thought he had both a nurses paycheck and a disability check every month? Kind of obvious who really wears the flight suit in that cockpit. |
(Quitefine) wrote in message ...
In article , (William) writes: I say that no one else on here is making threats to harm others, so I'll deal with that one first. Who is making threats to harm others? George Bush is threatening to kill terrorists. References? I have a New Collegiate Dictionary. I refer to it often. Any objections? Perhaps you are mistaken. Perhaps you are objecting. |
In article ,
(William) writes: (Quitefine) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: I say that no one else on here is making threats to harm others, so I'll deal with that one first. Who is making threats to harm others? George Bush is threatening to kill terrorists. Not here. References? I have a New Collegiate Dictionary. I refer to it often. Any objections? Perhaps you are mistaken. Perhaps you are objecting. Your answers are nonresponsive. Since you cannot produce any examples of someone threatening another here, here are some possible ones for consideration: "Feel free to walk around this area shouting your "JUNK!" epithets. If you do, make sure you have life insurance..." "Some one-by-twos need a two-by-four harshly applied to them..." "Let's see...modern fighting tools (since at least 1700s) allow "just a few ounces of finger pressure" to allow reaching out and touching someone supersonically. No need for physical confrontation up close and personal." "Danny boy, consider that you make a big target. Fills the sight picture very nicely. Just a few ounces of pressure..... [not talking about radio at all but then Danny boy wasn't doing that, either]" |
Subject: Ya Screwed Up Again, Brain...
From: (Quitefine) Date: 10/15/2004 5:24 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: In article , (William) writes: (Quitefine) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: I say that no one else on here is making threats to harm others, so I'll deal with that one first. Who is making threats to harm others? George Bush is threatening to kill terrorists. Not here. References? I have a New Collegiate Dictionary. I refer to it often. Any objections? Perhaps you are mistaken. Perhaps you are objecting. Your answers are nonresponsive. Since you cannot produce any examples of someone threatening another here, here are some possible ones for consideration: "Feel free to walk around this area shouting your "JUNK!" epithets. If you do, make sure you have life insurance..." "Some one-by-twos need a two-by-four harshly applied to them..." "Let's see...modern fighting tools (since at least 1700s) allow "just a few ounces of finger pressure" to allow reaching out and touching someone supersonically. No need for physical confrontation up close and personal." "Danny boy, consider that you make a big target. Fills the sight picture very nicely. Just a few ounces of pressure..... [not talking about radio at all but then Danny boy wasn't doing that, either]" You forgot to remind Brainless who uttered THOSE words. Or did you do it just to keep from breaking his heart? Steve, K4YZ |
(Quitefine) wrote in message ...
In article , (William) writes: (Quitefine) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: I say that no one else on here is making threats to harm others, so I'll deal with that one first. Who is making threats to harm others? George Bush is threatening to kill terrorists. Not here. They might be hiding in here. References? I have a New Collegiate Dictionary. I refer to it often. Any objections? Perhaps you are mistaken. Perhaps you are objecting. Your answers are nonresponsive. Perhaps you are objecting. Since you cannot produce any examples of someone threatening another here, here are some possible ones for consideration: "Feel free to walk around this area shouting your "JUNK!" epithets. If you do, make sure you have life insurance..." "Some one-by-twos need a two-by-four harshly applied to them..." "Let's see...modern fighting tools (since at least 1700s) allow "just a few ounces of finger pressure" to allow reaching out and touching someone supersonically. No need for physical confrontation up close and personal." "Danny boy, consider that you make a big target. Fills the sight picture very nicely. Just a few ounces of pressure..... [not talking about radio at all but then Danny boy wasn't doing that, either]" Hmmmm? You ask who is making threats, then you make a list. But your list is Quiteonesided. Perhaps you aren't Quitetruthful. Now be a good little caped-boy and finish the list. |
William wrote:
(Quitefine) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: (Quitefine) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: I say that no one else on here is making threats to harm others, so I'll deal with that one first. Who is making threats to harm others? George Bush is threatening to kill terrorists. Not here. They might be hiding in here. References? I have a New Collegiate Dictionary. I refer to it often. Any objections? Perhaps you are mistaken. Perhaps you are objecting. Your answers are nonresponsive. Perhaps you are objecting. Since you cannot produce any examples of someone threatening another here, here are some possible ones for consideration: "Feel free to walk around this area shouting your "JUNK!" epithets. If you do, make sure you have life insurance..." "Some one-by-twos need a two-by-four harshly applied to them..." "Let's see...modern fighting tools (since at least 1700s) allow "just a few ounces of finger pressure" to allow reaching out and touching someone supersonically. No need for physical confrontation up close and personal." "Danny boy, consider that you make a big target. Fills the sight picture very nicely. Just a few ounces of pressure..... [not talking about radio at all but then Danny boy wasn't doing that, either]" Hmmmm? You ask who is making threats, then you make a list. But your list is Quiteonesided. Perhaps you aren't Quitetruthful. Now be a good little caped-boy and finish the list. So it is okay to "threaten" another as long as they were "threatened"? Quite frankly Brian. If anyone threatened me in here, legitimately and identifiably, I would be to the proper authorities so quickly that the person threatening me would know about it in a few minutes. Otherwise why waste the time? And that is Quitethetruth! - Mike KB3EIA - |
In article ,
(William) writes: (Quitefine) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: (Quitefine) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: I say that no one else on here is making threats to harm others, so I'll deal with that one first. Who is making threats to harm others? George Bush is threatening to kill terrorists. Not here. They might be hiding in here. References? I have a New Collegiate Dictionary. I refer to it often. Any objections? Perhaps you are mistaken. Perhaps you are objecting. Your answers are nonresponsive. Perhaps you are objecting. Since you cannot produce any examples of someone threatening another here, here are some possible ones for consideration: "Feel free to walk around this area shouting your "JUNK!" epithets. If you do, make sure you have life insurance..." "Some one-by-twos need a two-by-four harshly applied to them..." "Let's see...modern fighting tools (since at least 1700s) allow "just a few ounces of finger pressure" to allow reaching out and touching someone supersonically. No need for physical confrontation up close and personal." "Danny boy, consider that you make a big target. Fills the sight picture very nicely. Just a few ounces of pressure..... [not talking about radio at all but then Danny boy wasn't doing that, either]" Hmmmm? You ask who is making threats, then you make a list. But your list is Quiteonesided. Perhaps you aren't Quitetruthful. Now be a good little caped-boy and finish the list. Tsk, tsk. Jimmie can't get his alternate personality in line. :-) Too much shrink-rapping going on in here (by those needing a shrink). |
In article ,
(William) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... Nursie's newsgroup technique is simply to personalize each and every thread and discussion with insults heaped on everyone who doesn't agree with him. Doesn't really matter what the subject is, it must boil down to his anger and antagonism against everyone else. Gets tiring very quick. Welp, he continues to shoot his mouth off. I never stopped to consider just how many stinkers were in amateur radio, yet each time one shows up, he's usually wearing the 20WPM badge very prominently. I did notice the loud one pining for an Elecraft kit with the 160M/SSB option. Hi, hi! I wonder if the rubberband man will notify him that 160M is for CW, as he did me? No, no, of course not. He cracks me up though. He needs his wife to get off of her purse so he can buy one. I thought he had both a nurses paycheck and a disability check every month? Kind of obvious who really wears the flight suit in that cockpit. Kind of puts the "command pilot" wings on a different uniform... :-) I still get a kick out of "pilot in command"...for a little two-seater single-engine general-aviation aircraft... :-) Gosh, with all the "state of the art" expertise floating around in here (outgassed by the PCTA), it should be an easy snap to come up with a "unique, one-of-a-kind" world-beating on-off keyed CW rig on a weekend...and then spend another weekend making a glorious personal web page trumpeting the Nobel-level achievement. :-) |
Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
William wrote: (Quitefine) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: (Quitefine) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: I say that no one else on here is making threats to harm others, so I'll deal with that one first. Who is making threats to harm others? George Bush is threatening to kill terrorists. Not here. They might be hiding in here. References? I have a New Collegiate Dictionary. I refer to it often. Any objections? Perhaps you are mistaken. Perhaps you are objecting. Your answers are nonresponsive. Perhaps you are objecting. Since you cannot produce any examples of someone threatening another here, here are some possible ones for consideration: "Feel free to walk around this area shouting your "JUNK!" epithets. If you do, make sure you have life insurance..." "Some one-by-twos need a two-by-four harshly applied to them..." "Let's see...modern fighting tools (since at least 1700s) allow "just a few ounces of finger pressure" to allow reaching out and touching someone supersonically. No need for physical confrontation up close and personal." "Danny boy, consider that you make a big target. Fills the sight picture very nicely. Just a few ounces of pressure..... [not talking about radio at all but then Danny boy wasn't doing that, either]" Hmmmm? You ask who is making threats, then you make a list. But your list is Quiteonesided. Perhaps you aren't Quitetruthful. Now be a good little caped-boy and finish the list. So it is okay to "threaten" another as long as they were "threatened"? Mike, I merely asked for a -complete- list. Quite frankly Brian. If anyone threatened me in here, legitimately and identifiably, I would be to the proper authorities so quickly that the person threatening me would know about it in a few minutes. Otherwise why waste the time? And that is Quitethetruth! - Mike KB3EIA - Quiteright. |
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , (William) writes: (Quitefine) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: (Quitefine) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: I say that no one else on here is making threats to harm others, so I'll deal with that one first. Who is making threats to harm others? George Bush is threatening to kill terrorists. Not here. They might be hiding in here. References? I have a New Collegiate Dictionary. I refer to it often. Any objections? Perhaps you are mistaken. Perhaps you are objecting. Your answers are nonresponsive. Perhaps you are objecting. Since you cannot produce any examples of someone threatening another here, here are some possible ones for consideration: "Feel free to walk around this area shouting your "JUNK!" epithets. If you do, make sure you have life insurance..." "Some one-by-twos need a two-by-four harshly applied to them..." "Let's see...modern fighting tools (since at least 1700s) allow "just a few ounces of finger pressure" to allow reaching out and touching someone supersonically. No need for physical confrontation up close and personal." "Danny boy, consider that you make a big target. Fills the sight picture very nicely. Just a few ounces of pressure..... [not talking about radio at all but then Danny boy wasn't doing that, either]" Hmmmm? You ask who is making threats, then you make a list. But your list is Quiteonesided. Perhaps you aren't Quitetruthful. Now be a good little caped-boy and finish the list. Tsk, tsk. Jimmie can't get his alternate personality in line. :-) Too much shrink-rapping going on in here (by those needing a shrink). The leotard part of his caped uniform is much too tight. Cutting off circulation, getting numb. bb |
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , (William) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... Nursie's newsgroup technique is simply to personalize each and every thread and discussion with insults heaped on everyone who doesn't agree with him. Doesn't really matter what the subject is, it must boil down to his anger and antagonism against everyone else. Gets tiring very quick. Welp, he continues to shoot his mouth off. I never stopped to consider just how many stinkers were in amateur radio, yet each time one shows up, he's usually wearing the 20WPM badge very prominently. I did notice the loud one pining for an Elecraft kit with the 160M/SSB option. Hi, hi! I wonder if the rubberband man will notify him that 160M is for CW, as he did me? No, no, of course not. He cracks me up though. He needs his wife to get off of her purse so he can buy one. I thought he had both a nurses paycheck and a disability check every month? Kind of obvious who really wears the flight suit in that cockpit. Kind of puts the "command pilot" wings on a different uniform... :-) Wonder if he got a pair of coveralls for her? I still get a kick out of "pilot in command"...for a little two-seater single-engine general-aviation aircraft... :-) Shouts "Clear!" before switching on the ignition, and makes airplane noises while he's driving his car. Chopped his radio to get on CAP frequencies while "flying" around town. Gosh, with all the "state of the art" expertise floating around in here (outgassed by the PCTA), it should be an easy snap to come up with a "unique, one-of-a-kind" world-beating on-off keyed CW rig on a weekend...and then spend another weekend making a glorious personal web page trumpeting the Nobel-level achievement. :-) Hi! I recall another "state of the art" Extra trying to finish up his Worked All States. I wish them all the very best of luck in extending the radio arts. I wonder what the history of ARRL's WAS program is? Were the first WAS certificates for 48 states or fewer? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:20 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com