Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
N2EY wrote:
In article . net, robert casey writes: A big reason for SSB is that, in a pile up, the receiving station can make out people's voices without carrier heterodyne whistles. Not just in a pileup, either. Also no wasted power transmitting carriers. Take a listen to a crouded CB channel sometime and hear all those heterodyne whistles. I'll take your word for it ;-) The biggest reasons for SSB displacing AM on the ham bands, IMHO, a 1) Allows more simultaneous QSOs in a given amount of spectrum 2) Greater "talk power" from a given rig (all the power is in the sidebands on SSB vs. ~2/3 of it in the carrier on AM) 3) High power SSB can be less expensive to build and operate than high power AM. RTTY: 1.5% FM/NBFM: 0.3% NBFM might have been better than SSB except it's wider bandwidth... No, NBFM was even worse than AM in terms of "talk power". At the narrow deviations allowed for hams below 29 MHz, an NBFM transmitter was roughly equivalent to an AM transmitter running one-fourth the power. OTOH heterodynes were much reduced - capture effect meant you heard the strongest signal and little else. Other modes: 0.6% VHF/UHF (all modes): 12.1% Even back then, half the hams perferred voice (phone) modes (AM, SSB, FM). Compared to a bit over 1/3 perferring CW. Yep - despite the fact that in those days the spectrum available for US hams to use HF 'phone was much less than today. And the rig-cost differential was much greater. No WARC bands back then, and 160 wasn't included in the survey. It should be remembered that in 1961: - only ~8 years had passed since Generals and Conditionals got access to HF 'phone on the ham bands between 2 and 25 MHz - only ~7 years had passed since 'phone was allowed on 40 meters, and 15 meters was opened to hams - there were less than a quarter million US hams - VHF/UHF repeaters were almost unknown on the ham bands. RTTY meant an electromechanical teleprinter in the shack, whose cost new exceeded the cost of many hams' entire stations. It would be interesting to see how the mode and band use would break down today. 73 de Jim, N2EY |