Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 19th 04, 08:25 PM
N2EY
 
Posts: n/a
Default Earthlink Tells FCC BPL "Not Commercially Viable"

http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/12/16/3/



73 de Jim, N2EY
  #2   Report Post  
Old December 19th 04, 11:02 PM
Alun
 
Posts: n/a
Default

PAMNO (N2EY) wrote in news:20041219152539.00252.00000331@mb-
m17.aol.com:

http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/12/16/3/

Let's hope they are right.

I would like broadband, but not at the expense of HF. I have no real
expectation of either DSL or cable Internet ever being available on this
side of our street as long as we are the only house on this side, but BPL
would doubtless wipe out HF, as the power lines run across the front of
our lot.

A friend suggested that we should try linking into our neighbour's
wireless LAN on the other side of the road to piggyback onto their
broadband. It just might work, too. We would do it with their consent, of
course (the neighbour, not their ISP!).
  #3   Report Post  
Old December 20th 04, 01:41 AM
JAMES HAMPTON
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"N2EY" wrote in message
...
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/12/16/3/



73 de Jim, N2EY


Hello, Jim

This may be a hot button for some time to come, but the reality is that BPL
is not going to offer the rural areas service any more than DSL. You need a
substantial number of subscribers in a given area to make something like
broadband "commercially viable".


Best regards from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA


  #4   Report Post  
Old December 20th 04, 04:41 AM
robert casey
 
Posts: n/a
Default



This may be a hot button for some time to come, but the reality is that BPL
is not going to offer the rural areas service any more than DSL. You need a
substantial number of subscribers in a given area to make something like
broadband "commercially viable".


If you get enough customers in some small rural town to
make it pay, thing is that all those customers are going to
have to split whatever bandwidth BPL over one set of power
wires (the 3 phase around 25KV distribution wires on the
poles running into town) all among them. Say a hundred
customers downloading mp3s at the same time. Dial up will
look better....
  #5   Report Post  
Old December 20th 04, 12:21 PM
N2EY
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "JAMES HAMPTON"
writes:

"N2EY" wrote in message
...
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/12/16/3/



73 de Jim, N2EY


Hello, Jim


Greetings Jim

This may be a hot button for some time to come, but the reality is that BPL
is not going to offer the rural areas service any more than DSL. You need a
substantial number of subscribers in a given area to make something like
broadband "commercially viable".


Of course - and that's true of most broadband technologies. But the alleged
rural aspect of BPL is one of the selling points, so they're not going to admit
it's a puffball.

It is my understanding that the main limitation of DSL techniques is the length
of copper pair between the customer and the "office". So telcos have been
installing copper to fiber transitions out in the field - I believe they are
called "extenders". Main limitations are, of course, financial.

Meanwhile Ambient names ARRL as the chief opponent of BPL (that's really a
compliment, in a way) and claims ARRL is manipulating Earthlink...

Surreal.

Of course the fact that this administration supports BPL despite the facts
should come as no surprise.

73 de Jim, N2EY


  #6   Report Post  
Old December 20th 04, 06:12 PM
JAMES HAMPTON
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"N2EY" wrote in message
...
In article , "JAMES HAMPTON"
writes:

"N2EY" wrote in message
...
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/12/16/3/



73 de Jim, N2EY


Hello, Jim


Greetings Jim

This may be a hot button for some time to come, but the reality is that

BPL
is not going to offer the rural areas service any more than DSL. You

need a
substantial number of subscribers in a given area to make something like
broadband "commercially viable".


Of course - and that's true of most broadband technologies. But the

alleged
rural aspect of BPL is one of the selling points, so they're not going to

admit
it's a puffball.

It is my understanding that the main limitation of DSL techniques is the

length
of copper pair between the customer and the "office". So telcos have been
installing copper to fiber transitions out in the field - I believe they

are
called "extenders". Main limitations are, of course, financial.

Meanwhile Ambient names ARRL as the chief opponent of BPL (that's really a
compliment, in a way) and claims ARRL is manipulating Earthlink...

Surreal.

Of course the fact that this administration supports BPL despite the facts
should come as no surprise.

73 de Jim, N2EY


Hello, Jim

Heck, if all of the active hams dug deep into their pockets, I doubt we
could make a serious ding into Earthlink, let alone the ARRL ... LOL


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Attention Earthlink users: Earthlink invests another US$3.5M in BPL Brenda Ann General 6 March 23rd 04 10:39 PM
Attention Earthlink users: Earthlink invests another US$3.5M in BPL Brenda Ann Policy 5 March 23rd 04 10:39 PM
Attention Earthlink users: Earthlink invests another US$3.5Min BPL Dave Bushong General 0 March 23rd 04 10:37 PM
Attention Earthlink users: Earthlink invests another US$3.5Min BPL Dave Bushong Policy 0 March 23rd 04 10:37 PM
Attention Earthlink users: Earthlink invests another US$3.5M in BPL Maximus Policy 0 March 23rd 04 03:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017