| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 22:36:02 +1100, Barry OGrady wrote:
I see that as of January 1, the ARRL VEC-coordinated Amateur Radio examination sessions fee will rise from $12 to $14. The VE teams may retain up to $6 of this fee to reimburse the out-of-pocket test expenses. Is this appropriate? No. The FCC should do the tests. How in hell did you get this one right for a change? I agree with you 100% but it isn't going to happen, not in our lifetime and beyond. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
How in hell did you get this one right for a change? I agree with you 100% but it isn't going to happen, not in our lifetime and beyond. Even an "F" student gets a few answers right. How many versions of the tests did the FCC have at any one time? The rules used to say "No retests within 30 days" so that would mean that they changed the versions every 30 days. Now, if they only had two versions, one could wait 60 days and see the exact same test they had before. I don't suppose the examiners had kept track to see if anyone actually did that. Or more likely they didn't worry about it. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:31:48 GMT, robert casey wrote:
How many versions of the tests did the FCC have at any one time? The rules used to say "No retests within 30 days" so that would mean that they changed the versions every 30 days. Not so. There were 4 or 5 different versions of the same element, randomly given out so the person next to you would usually have a different version from the one that you had (most serious multiple- guess tests work that way too). Thirty days was enough of a break in time that examinees who didn't know their stuff cold would forget what the questions and suggested answers were, and the exam rooms were not overloaded with applicants (except for Friday after Thanksgiving and during spring and winter breaks when the place resembled the Istanbul Bazzar...) This of course was before Dick Bash. (ooo, did I open the can of worms again ??) I don't suppose the examiners had kept track to see if anyone actually did that. Or more likely they didn't worry about it. All the examiners whom have known over the years were pretty laid back except for catching overt cheating. The engineers (supervisors) would also randomly stroll up and down the aisles usually to see what the latest "exam aids" were. ggg -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| PSK baud rates on HF | Digital | |||
| Ultra low bit rates | Digital | |||
| Ultra low bit rates | Digital | |||
| Parabolic dish gives weak performance increase | Antenna | |||
| PSK baud rates on HF | Digital | |||