| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
February 9th 05, 05:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Len Anderson wrote: In article , PAMNO (N2EY) writes: In article , (Lenof21) writes: Ever notice how Len avoids direct questions? Ever notice how Miccolis does? I do every day. Yes, Brian and Len do avoid direct questions - every day. No one is obliged to answer loaded questions. BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Getting Lennie to answer "loaded questions" like "when are you going to get that "Extra lite out of the box" is a LOADED question...?!?!?! It was YOUR assertion, Lennie! And how about other questions like "What evidence do you have of "dishonesty" of the ARRL BoD? Which radio service is created by the FCC for "purely recreational pursuits"? Nor do we have a "retraction" or other acknowledgement of your errors (yes..ERROR(S)) of Part 97... BBWBWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! However, J.P. has avoided a direct answer to HOW he "serves his country" in the near-same way someone has in the military. So has the coslonaut. All are supposed to "figure that out." Direct question avoided, sidestepped, disguised by mis- direction onto other things. He's answered those several times over. So far, there is absolutely ZERO "direct" answer from YOU Careful, Brian...remember that J.P. "serves his country" (by being a super-special amateur morseman). Well, if you think so. I don't recall ever claiming that. So...how DO you "serve your country in other ways?" How do YOU serve, Lennie...?!?! You make a point of asking others, but where's YOUR evidence of having done ANYthing since 1956...?!?! We pose valid arguments but you avoid them. Tsk. FALSE. ERRONEOUS. Your arguments in favor of retaining the morse code test have been proven false. No, they have not. You refuse to acknowledge that replies have truth in them. You misdirect by the disguised ad hominem of saying the PCTAs "are full of errors." To the contrary. Jim has repeatedly acknowledged what he thought were "valid points" in your arguments. So far all YOU have done is call him names, attempt to disparge his character and experience, and avoid answering the same questions when put to you! Do we call you names? Tell you to shut up? Call you "anal-retentive" or "Republican"? Yes, you do. In another post you've named me as a "liberal." Used that appelation as a pejorative as if only the political conservatives were the good guys. Adding, in that unique (but transparent) disguise of an ad hominem attack cum troll bait. No bait. No troll. Not when it's true. Or is that *your* game? No "game." Seeing that reasonable discourse evaporated long ago amidst the virtual snowstorm of all-subjects-are-suitable-for- posting blog content in here, all that seems to continue is the usual PCTA "superiority" pejoratives on the person of NCTAs. The "reasonable discourse" disappeared in a vail of smoke from profanities and name calling delivered from the keyboard of Leonard H. Anderson. Google refers. In other words, you are receiving "return fire." Seeing as you have "served your country in other ways," you should recognize such military terms...shouldn't you? Ahhhhhhh! Lennie hoping no one remembers his "under fire" and "under threat of the Russian Bear" posts. The only "fire" Lennie was under was some Tiki lights of some Japanese sushi bar just outside his rear area radio staion base. Poor baby. Can't take it, can you? Suggestion: Fire up that state-of-the-art Type 7 and "work" some contacts. Get on the air. Have fun with ham radio. Try to avoid "resonable discourse" of the one-way kind by disguised ad hominems in here...it is tough on conservative morsemen trying to be oh-so-superior to NCTAs in here. PCTA feelings get hurt easily. Here's something for YOUR feelings, Lennie.... LEONARD H. ANDERSON IS A KNOWN CHRONIC LIAR AND PROPRIETARY THIEF. Putz. Putz. Steve, K4YZ |
|
#3
February 10th 05, 01:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Len Anderson wrote: In article , PAMNO (N2EY) writes: In article , (Lenof21) writes: Ever notice how Len avoids direct questions? Ever notice how Miccolis does? I do every day. Yes, Brian and Len do avoid direct questions - every day. No one is obliged to answer loaded questions. You and Brian avoid unloaded questions as well. You avoid any question that might prove you to be mistaken about something. You've done it time and again. Therefore, no one should feel any obligation to answer *your* questions. However, J.P. Who is "J.P.", Len? No one here uses those initials as a screen name or signature. has avoided a direct answer to HOW he "serves his country" in the near-same way someone has in the military. You can't be talking about me, then, because I've never claimed to ""serves [our] country" in the near-same way someone has in the military." What I *have* asked is whether uniformed military service is the only way someone can serve our country. So has the coslonaut. Who is that, Len? Is there something wrong with you - some sort of mental illness, perhaps - that prevents you from calling people by their first names and/or callsigns? Or are you just behaving like a jackass? Or is there some other reason? Tell us why you make up insulting names for people who only address you as "Len" or "Mr. Anderson". All are supposed to "figure that out." Direct question avoided, sidestepped, disguised by mis- direction onto other things. We have all seen how you make fun of and denigrate others' *military* service if they disagree with you. One need only look at your classic "sphincter post" to see the lack of regard you have for a military radio operator's service to our country. So there's no reason for others to open themselves up to your insults. Careful, Brian...remember that J.P. "serves his country" (by being a super-special amateur morseman). Well, if you think so. I don't recall ever claiming that. So...how DO you "serve your country in other ways?" :-) We have all seen how you make fun of and denigrate others' *military* service if they disagree with you. One need only look at your classic "sphincter post" to see the lack of regard you have for a military radio operator's service to our country. So there's no reason for others to open themselves up to your insults. We pose valid arguments but you avoid them. Tsk. FALSE. ERRONEOUS. Nope. Absolutely true. Your arguments in favor of retaining the morse code test have been proven false. By whom? Where? Certainly not by you, and certainly not here. You refuse to acknowledge that replies have truth in them. Of course they have some truth in them. They also have mistakes, errors and omissions. You misdirect by the disguised ad hominem of saying the PCTAs "are full of errors." :-) I don't recall ever saying that PCTAs are full of errors. Do we call you names? Tell you to shut up? Call you "anal-retentive" or "Republican"? Yes, you do. Where? What names have you been called? In another post you've named me as a "liberal." Is it true or not? Your postings here indicate you are. Perhaps I'm mistaken, and you're just a liberal on some issues. Let's start with the basics. Who did you vote for in the US presidential elections of 2000 and 2004? Used that appelation as a pejorative as if only the political conservatives were the good guys. That's your impression. Not my meaning at all. Adding, in that unique (but transparent) disguise of an ad hominem attack cum troll bait. Are you insulted by being called a liberal? Or is that *your* game? No "game." Seems to be. Seeing that reasonable discourse evaporated long ago amidst the virtual snowstorm of all-subjects-are-suitable-for- posting blog content in here, all that seems to continue is the usual PCTA "superiority" pejoratives on the person of NCTAs. There's plenty of reasonable discourse here on a variety of subjects. But you and Brian exclude yourselves from it by your behavior. In other words, you are receiving "return fire." You return fire without being fired upon. Seeing as you have "served your country in other ways," you should recognize such military terms...shouldn't you? :-) Poor baby. Can't take it, can you? It seems you are the one who cannot stand reasonable discourse and simple, direct questions. Suggestion: Fire up that state-of-the-art Type 7 and "work" some contacts. Get on the air. Have fun with ham radio. I do all those things. Except I've never claimed that the Southgate Type 7 is "state of the art". Whatever that marketing phrase is supposed to mean. Try to avoid "resonable discourse" of the one-way kind by disguised ad hominems in here...it is tough on conservative morsemen trying to be oh-so-superior to NCTAs in here. What *are* you babbling about, Len? Since you consider "morsemen" to be "conservative", that makes you an ultraliberal, does it not? |
|
#4
February 10th 05, 02:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#6
February 14th 05, 03:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
bb wrote: wrote: You and Brian avoid unloaded questions as well. Brian Who? Exactly. Now see, if we'd kept it at "Brain", you would have been telling us who "Brian" is. You have some real situational awareness issues, Brian. Get them fixed. Steve, K4YZ |
|
#7
February 15th 05, 12:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: wrote: You and Brian avoid unloaded questions as well. Brian Who? Exactly. Now see, if we'd kept it at "Brain", you would have been telling us who "Brian" is. Jim has never engaged me as "Brain." That is a purely Avenging Angle affectation. You have some real situational awareness issues, Brian. Get them fixed. Indeed. I once hallucinated that I was involved in seven hostile actions. Bad clams or something. |
|
#8
February 15th 05, 05:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: wrote: You and Brian avoid unloaded questions as well. Brian Who? Exactly. Now see, if we'd kept it at "Brain", you would have been telling us who "Brian" is. Jim has never engaged me as "Brain." That is a purely Avenging Angle affectation. Who is "Avenging Angle"...??? And if you're refering to me, Brain, I was not the first to call you "Brain". You have some real situational awareness issues, Brian. Get them fixed. Indeed. I once hallucinated that I was involved in seven hostile actions. Bad clams or something. No doubt you have many excuses, Brian. Get your problems fixed...soon. Steve, K4YZ |
|
#9
February 16th 05, 02:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: wrote: You and Brian avoid unloaded questions as well. Brian Who? Exactly. Now see, if we'd kept it at "Brain", you would have been telling us who "Brian" is. Jim has never engaged me as "Brain." That is a purely Avenging Angle affectation. Who is "Avenging Angle"...??? And if you're refering to me, Brain, I was not the first to call you "Brain". True. It was an unusually bright third grader. You follow in fine tradition. You have some real situational awareness issues, Brian. Get them fixed. Indeed. I once hallucinated that I was involved in seven hostile actions. Bad clams or something. No doubt you have many excuses, Brian. Get your problems fixed...soon. Steve, K4YZ Nurse, heal thyself. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| PSK baud rates on HF | Digital | |||
| Ultra low bit rates | Digital | |||
| Ultra low bit rates | Digital | |||
| Parabolic dish gives weak performance increase | Antenna | |||
| PSK baud rates on HF | Digital | |||
Hybrid Mode
