Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
wrote:
K4YZ babbled his usual libelous filth on Feb 19, 9:10 am, to wit: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: I have spoke with persons in California about issues that peripherally involve you. You can insist that I haven't, but you are big about denial of your own. You "have spoke?" Does that mean you are a wheel? Angwy widdle Stevie is babbling again in generalities, nothing specific. Who are these "persons in California?" Are they groups or individuals? What identification can you give about them? Are you going to refuse to identify them again? What are the "issues?" What do they involve? How do they "involve" me? Widdle Stevie is BLUFFING again. Nothing specific was said by him, yet he wants to imply badness of some kind. No one can confirm or deny something that isn't identified. It is "K4YZ" babbling a lot of libelous filth at anyone who he feels gives him opposition to whatever "K4YZ" has posted. It's only "libelous" if it's not true. Nearly all of what widdle Stevie posts claiming others are "lying" is itself a LIE. It's not "libelous" or a "falsehood" if it's true. Widdle Stevie's libelous charges are untrue, false, nothing more than uncontrolled temper tantrums from someone who cannot concentrate on subjects but must hurl trash at the person of those opposing his opinions. It's not about "opinions". In reality it is. Stevie should understand that his fantasyworld ideas and rules do NOT apply to reality. His "definitions" of "right and wrong" are NOT universal and are purely defensive reflexes on his part against those who disagree with him. Leonard H Anderson has uttered dozens of untruthful statements in this forum. They have been archived. Poor baby. Still angwy at discovering that PCTA extras can NOT hurl libelous filth at NCTAs or those that disagree with your concept of "right and wrong?" Tsk, there ought to be LAW, ey? :-) Oh, my, but what widdle Stevie thinks is a "comeback" is going to come back and bite him...HARD. Stevie's libelous filth outpourings against others are ALSO archived! Sunnuvagun! Leonard H Anderson has uses dozens of hateful, demeaning epithets agains all others who oppose HIS "opinions" then cries "foul" when done back to him. Poor baby Stevie. Can't handle it on newsgroups? :-) No problem to widdle Stevie...he's a PCTA *extra* and can do anything he wants in here! Call others names (like "Putz") and say those are "true" (when they aren't)! Tsk, tsk, tsk...an alleged ex-marine who can't handle "hostile (verbal) action!" Temper fry... I don't have a "Licensed Practical Nurse certificate". No longer? Tennessee take yours away? Aw, too bad... It's not libelous if it's true. It's not true. Ergo, it is LIBEL. You are not a licensed Radio Amateur. Never claimed to be one. :-) You could have been a positive contributer to the Amateur Radio community. That would be a change...from all the negative contributors who insist on keeping U.S. amateur radio in some kind of time stasis circa 1930's standards and practices. :-) But, I'd feel safe in predicting that widdle Stevie would continue to throw tantrums and hurl libelous filth at all who oppose his opinions in here. :-) You claim it's a meaningful pursuit, but you obviously hate everything about it and anyone connected with it. Sigh...poor widdle self-righteous Stevie thinking that all of amateur radio agrees with Stevie's concept of ham radio. Anyone "hating Stevie" MUST "hate all of ham radio!" :-) You authored a few articles in a quasi-engineering level Amateur Radio journal many years ago. None of those articles ever produced a single bit of professional recognition. BwahahahahahahahahahHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Poor widdle emotional Stevie...thinks it is all about "recognition" and respect and, most of all, adoration! :-) "Professional recognition." Professionalism is about doing work for pecuniary compensation. (those with poor vocabularies can substitute 'monetary' for 'pecuniary') Tsk, tsk, tsk...all of the publications I was printed in (there are 9 of them) "recognized" it as such and I was PAID for them. Not only that, but the IRS and California Franchise Tax Board also "recognized" it as such! Sunnuvagun! You've contributed nothing to the technical development of Amateur Radio. I haven't? :-) What has widdle Stevie "contributed to the technical development of amateur radio? Sitting in ham newsgroups and hurling libelous filth against all who oppose him? :-) Define "technical development" in radio, oh mighty radio guru! Show us your work, your brilliant developments of buying ready- built equipment and building "weekender" projects from articles in ham magazines...no doubt all full of amazing technology never before seen, ey? :-) These are statements of fact. Unless you can produce some documentary evidence to the contrary? "Documentary evidence?" You mean like information printed at a rate of 50,000 copies a month in some periodical? Or be a footnote or endnote in some other paper or document? Imagine poor widdle Stevie ending up as a mere footnote in some article. [a podiatric medical journal would be suitable?] Then if we use YOUR above statement/logic verbatim, why are YOU in THIS forum? Does widdle Stevie have both short-term and long-term memory loss? :-) I'm here as part of an advocacy to remove the morse code test from U.S. amateur radio license examinations. As part of that, there are all those other libelous filth-hurlers best identified as a group known as the "PCTA extras" who want to silence me. As a result, most of my replies are in regards to refuting all that libelous filth tossed at my person. :-) You are not a licensed Amateur. You cannot, therefore, be any kind of a judge of what Amateurs should do or how they should do it. NOBODY can tell widdle Stevie what to do in ham radio! Nobody! :-) with one of them since that retirement began. "K4YZ" has never revealed "his source's" name. He can't. He doesn't exist. I can, but I won't. BLUFF. Bull****. You fabricated that "source." A LIE. You left a very negative impression on persons who ARE engineers and ARE qualified to judge. I know the other person. I've never known him to utter a single untruthful comment. Tsk. Must have been one of your other personalities! :-) Which one of those was it? You are an antagonist. Yes. I dislike the existance of the morse code test! Did you finally come to that conclusion, Stevie Einstein? :-) You make statements that are not true or that you will not substantiate with valid references. Poor widdle Stevie...he MUST have long-term memory loss also! He forgets a short list of professional employers made in here more than once, the names and callsigns of licensed amateurs whom I know, the links and other third-party references made in here to documents, directives, and regulations. Poor Stevie, all confused again as to what is "right or wrong" and personal fantasy versus reality. Thinks all who oppose his opinions are "wrong," "liars," "untruthful," etc., etc. Widdle Stevie is nutso. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
PSK baud rates on HF | Digital | |||
Ultra low bit rates | Digital | |||
Ultra low bit rates | Digital | |||
Parabolic dish gives weak performance increase | Antenna | |||
PSK baud rates on HF | Digital |