| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
January 10th 05, 12:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 15:24:07 -0500, Mike Coslo
wrote: Leo wrote: On 09 Jan 2005 04:51:35 GMT, (Lenof21) wrote: In article , Leo writes: On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 15:36:59 -0800 (PST), "Phil Kane" wrote: On 08 Jan 2005 21:31:53 GMT, N2EY wrote: Lenof21 wrote: snip Some even enter a batch of posts on a variety of subjects, apparently hoping to get sonething on the hook.......what's the word for that again...?  To imagine anyone on Usenet would do that. 8^) ......found it - "Trolling" - that's the word I was looking for! snip Note: All those wonderful braggarts are PCTA extra. They can say anything, write anything, do anything in here and are absolved from ANY criticism. Should they be taken to task, the task-taker is soundly objected to with endearing personal perjoratives having little to do with the subject. Ipso facto, with a few exceptions - there are several OMs here who are quite civil, knowledgeable and conversational, and do not possess the NetNanny gene..... It's a plain simple fact that all NCTA in here are always wrong, no matter what they write on anything. No one who is of the NCTA persuasion should bother debating the subject in here. The matter is closed and all NCTA are forever wrong, incorrect, and probably have underarm odor. .....and skinned knuckles! Here's a challenge, Leo, if you're up to it. Name the PCTA's in here (active) that have called NCTA's by such names. I'll give you a start: Steve is pretty famous for name calling. Great idea! - that would certainly get a nice warm flamefest going, wouldn't it? Request respectfully declined. And since this subthread turned into a Mike and Jim "tag-team" thing, where do our names show up in that list? When have I called anyone a nasty name? I don't think Jim ever has either. note: I will admit the one time I called Len "Lennie". No insult was intended, but he didn't like it, so I stopped. Hmmm - maybe you're one of the exceptions? Your pal was doing just fine too, until he decided to start using profanities in his posts. To claim that another is speaking "bull$#!+" is to directly infer that they are a "bull$#!+ter". Acgeed that this example does not meet your specification of "PCTA vs NCTA", but as I said earlier it's more about personalities than it is about affiliation. And character. YMMV. snip - Mike KB3EIA - 73, Leo |
Threaded Mode
