About Us

January 13th 05, 08:48 PM

In article , PAMNO
(N2EY) writes:

Do you still think that it's perfectly legal for *all* amateurs to operate
with
expired-but-in-the-grace-period licenses?

"Operate" what? :-)

Tsk. Operate on a patient? [need lots of qualifications from government
on that, but not from FCC]

Operate a motor vehicle? [need a state driver's license to do that legally]

Operate a high-power broadcast transmitter? [most broadcast stations
don't need any FCC-tested licensed radio operators nowadays and the
amateur radio license didn't apply to that anyway...]

Operate a small boat radio transceiver? [you need to check Part 90
of Title 47 C.F.R. - include the HF bands - before opening your
keyboard...some licensing required but it isn't amateur radio kind]

Operate any RF emitter of high or low power while in the performance
of a Department of Defense contract? [civilian radio operator license
does not apply there]

Tsk. Jimmie, you best go back and read ALL of what was written
and try, try very hard, to discern when someone is using sarcasm
or pulling your leg. :-)

Tsk, tsk. Do you have a valid Expounding-Guru license valid for
giving us all the gracious benefit of "cures" to modern national
socio-poliitcal problems? You do that all the time in this amateur
radio policy forum. Those Guru opinions aren't even close to being
about amateur radio...not even when you shake your fists and
stamp your feet saying "they apply! they apply!" :-)

You haven't even figured out what "401 Alarm" means yet or where
it is from... :-)

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Menu

About Us