|
Len's terms of endearments list
In article . com, "K4YZ"
writes: What's with you, Your Scumminess? Didn't they teach you radio rules at professional radio school? What "professional radio school?" That's my point, Lennie. You don't have the training. Tsk, tsk. Such an ignorant addition to having stated that the University of Illinois is just a "correspondence school." :-) Well, let's see... none of the classes I took at UCLA, CSUN, Loyola, or even L.A.Trade-Tech were called "professional radio school." A BSEE does not stand for "professional radio school." Practical, on-the-job training with the U.S. Army Signal Corps, Hughes Aircraft Company, Ramo-Wooldridge Corporation, RCA Corporation and Teledyne (Electronics Division) did not involve "professional radio school." [just some examples, not all] The DCAS (Defense Contract Administrative Services) listings didn't have me with any "professional radio school." Neither did the FBI, CIA, DIA, FCC, FAA, IRS or Franchise Tax Board of California...all of whom were informed of my schooling and professional job experience. [I'm not sure if the DoE did any investigating directly for my clearances there (Atomics International) since they had enough to go on from other agencies' information] Nope, never filled out one of those "school" applications as given on back pages of Popular Mechanics or the Police Gazette. That means I must be some kind of "wash out" in schooling? :-) Ah, yes, I have "no experience in radio!" Poor Stebie, going into a fit of rage because I didn't spend 8 hours per for years doing ham radio activity like he did in the murine copse or in the hospital. [the ONLY radio is amateur radio? :-) ] Maybe I'll write MIT or Harvard and see if I can sign up for one of their "correspondence courses" in "professional radio school?" On completion they will award me a pretty certificate suitable for framing? There ya go! :-) "People who live in glass houses should make love in the basement." - Terry Moran |
Len Anderson wrote: In article . com, "K4YZ" writes: What's with you, Your Scumminess? Didn't they teach you radio rules at professional radio school? What "professional radio school?" That's my point, Lennie. You don't have the training. Tsk, tsk. Such an ignorant addition to having stated that the University of Illinois is just a "correspondence school." Oh Lennie! I NEVER stated that U of I is "just a correspondence school". Yet ANOTHER lie from one who finds it sooooooooooooooo easy to lie! Maybe I'll write MIT or Harvard and see if I can sign up for one of their "correspondence courses" in "professional radio school?" On completion they will award me a pretty certificate suitable for framing? If they have correspondence courses, I am sure they will if you flash the right amount of green or acceptable plastic. And then you too will have a pretty certificate suitable for framing. Just like the rest of us. Until then, you're still a liar. You're stil a cheat. You're still deciteful. You're still not licensed nor experienced in the Amateur Radio Service. There ya go! Yep. There ya go! "People who live in glass houses should make love in the basement." - Terry Moran "People who make up stories about thier careers shouldn't give the names of places and dates when those bits of information can be corroborated." - Steve Robeson |
K4YZ wrote: "People who make up stories about thier careers shouldn't give the names of places and dates when those bits of information can be corroborated." - Steve Robeson Steve, that reminds me of a guy who slipped up and claimed involvement in seven hostile actions. |
bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: "People who make up stories about thier careers shouldn't give the names of places and dates when those bits of information can be corroborated." - Steve Robeson Steve, that reminds me of a guy who slipped up and claimed involvement in seven hostile actions. Different circumstances. I once slipped up and thought I could trust a guy that I sent mail to in confidence, however he took stuff I sent him and disucssed it in open forum dispite having been told the material was sensitive. Some trust, eh? Can't even trust a fellow Vet any more...That's sad. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: "People who make up stories about thier careers shouldn't give the names of places and dates when those bits of information can be corroborated." - Steve Robeson Steve, that reminds me of a guy who slipped up and claimed involvement in seven hostile actions. Different circumstances. I once slipped up and thought I could trust a guy that I sent to in confidence, however he took stuff I sent him and disucssed it in open forum dispite having been told the material was sensitive. Some trust, eh? Can't even trust a fellow Vet any more...That's sad. 73 Steve, K4YZ In other words, no hostile actions. |
bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: "People who make up stories about thier careers shouldn't give the names of places and dates when those bits of information can be corroborated." - Steve Robeson Steve, that reminds me of a guy who slipped up and claimed involvement in seven hostile actions. Different circumstances. I once slipped up and thought I could trust a guy that I sent to in confidence, however he took stuff I sent him and disucssed it in open forum dispite having been told the material was sensitive. Some trust, eh? Can't even trust a fellow Vet any more...That's sad. 73 Steve, K4YZ In other words, no hostile actions. In other words, you're wrong. Brian, we've gotten along very well, lately...even shared some mutually complimentary words. But if you want to reopen the flood gate, hey, I've got my snorkle and fins right here... It's up to you. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: "People who make up stories about thier careers shouldn't give the names of places and dates when those bits of information can be corroborated." - Steve Robeson Steve, that reminds me of a guy who slipped up and claimed involvement in seven hostile actions. Different circumstances. I once slipped up and thought I could trust a guy that I sent to in confidence, however he took stuff I sent him and disucssed it in open forum dispite having been told the material was sensitive. Some trust, eh? Can't even trust a fellow Vet any more...That's sad. 73 Steve, K4YZ In other words, no hostile actions. In other words, you're wrong. Brian, we've gotten along very well, lately...even shared some mutually complimentary words. But if you want to reopen the flood gate, hey, I've got my snorkle and fins right here... It's up to you. 73 Steve, K4YZ Steve, you're right as always. ""People who make up stories about thier careers shouldn't give the names of places and dates when those bits of information can be corroborated." - Steve Robeson" We're back to it Brian...last chance to suck it up and keep things gentlemanly..... Otherwise tell us about your undocumented, illegal operation from Somalia. It was OK, supposedly, becasue some butter bar gave you the nod, but your butter bar was not a representitive of the UN officers who were in charge at the time. After that you can get around to providing us the links that corroborate your "Unlicensed devices play a major role in emergency comms" assertion. Then you can provided us some sort of verification of your claim of having worked the equivilent of DXCC a couple times over. Those are radio-related issues that you claim expertise, experience or otherwise are knowledgeable of. So far you've provided us absolutely nothing, and those are just the RADIO related issues. And if your nose isn't bruised and bloodied enough after that, there are some other issues I will be glad to regurgitate for NG consumption, but we'll wait and see if you decide to exercise some So...You up to getting your NG butt whupped again, or do you just want to forget that you re-opened a can of worms that folks were just now starting to forget? Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: "People who make up stories about thier careers shouldn't give the names of places and dates when those bits of information can be corroborated." - Steve Robeson Steve, that reminds me of a guy who slipped up and claimed involvement in seven hostile actions. Different circumstances. I once slipped up and thought I could trust a guy that I sent to in confidence, however he took stuff I sent him and disucssed it in open forum dispite having been told the material was sensitive. Some trust, eh? Can't even trust a fellow Vet any more...That's sad. 73 Steve, K4YZ In other words, no hostile actions. In other words, you're wrong. Brian, we've gotten along very well, lately...even shared some mutually complimentary words. But if you want to reopen the flood gate, hey, I've got my snorkle and fins right here... It's up to you. 73 Steve, K4YZ Steve, you're right as always. ""People who make up stories about thier careers shouldn't give the names of places and dates when those bits of information can be corroborated." - Steve Robeson" We're back to it Brian...last chance to suck it up and keep things gentlemanly..... Things are gentlemanly. If you wish to change the situation, it's on you. Best of Luck. Otherwise tell us about your undocumented, illegal operation from Somalia. It was OK, supposedly, becasue some butter bar gave you the nod, but your butter bar was not a representitive of the UN officers who were in charge at the time. Obviously you weren't there, or you'd be able to make reference to 8 hostile actions. And I don't reall a single LT, butter bar or not. We tend to deploy with our experienced people. I did see one reserve Staff Sargeant, but that was about the lowest rank I saw. He wasn't in the UN either. After that you can get around to providing us the links that corroborate your "Unlicensed devices play a major role in emergency comms" assertion. Go get a better quote. Then you can provided us some sort of verification of your claim of having worked the equivilent of DXCC a couple times over. Go get a quote for that one, too. Those are radio-related issues that you claim expertise, experience or otherwise are knowledgeable of. So far you've provided us absolutely nothing, and those are just the RADIO related issues. My statements can stand on their own. And if your nose isn't bruised and bloodied enough after that, there are some other issues I will be glad to regurgitate for NG consumption, but we'll wait and see if you decide to exercise some "Bruised and bloody." Interesting choice of words. Are you doing some kind of violence? So...You up to getting your NG butt whupped again, or do you just want to forget that you re-opened a can of worms that folks were just now starting to forget? Steve, K4YZ Steve, I don't believe you've ever given anyone else a "butt whooping." Perhaps in some fantasy kind of way. Anyway, when are you going to tell us your 7 war stories? |
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy
From: "bb" - Find messages by this author Date: 9 Feb 2005 17:13:05 -0800 Local: Wed, Feb 9 2005 5:13 pm Subject: Len's terms of endearments list Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: "People who make up stories about thier careers shouldn't give the names of places and dates when those bits of information can be corroborated." - Steve Robeson Steve, that reminds me of a guy who slipped up and claimed involvement in seven hostile actions. Different circumstances. I once slipped up and thought I could trust a guy that I sent to in confidence, however he took stuff I sent him and disucssed it in open forum dispite having been told the material was sensitive. Some trust, eh? Can't even trust a fellow Vet any more...That's sad. 73 Steve, K4YZ In other words, no hostile actions. In other words, you're wrong. Brian, we've gotten along very well, lately...even shared some mutually complimentary words. But if you want to reopen the flood gate, hey, I've got my snorkle and fins right here... It's up to you. 73 Steve, K4YZ Steve, you're right as always. ""People who make up stories about thier careers shouldn't give the names of places and dates when those bits of information can be corroborated." - Steve Robeson" We're back to it Brian...last chance to suck it up and keep things gentlemanly..... Things are gentlemanly. If you wish to change the situation, it's on you. Best of Luck. Poor Stebe. He fantasizes his opponents as all being wrong, all lying, all unlawful. Otherwise tell us about your undocumented, illegal operation from Somalia. It was OK, supposedly, becasue some butter bar gave you the nod, but your butter bar was not a representitive of the UN officers who were in charge at the time. Obviously you weren't there, or you'd be able to make reference to 8 hostile actions. And I don't reall a single LT, butter bar or not. We tend to deploy with our experienced people. I did see one reserve Staff Sargeant, but that was about the lowest rank I saw. He wasn't in the UN either. Stebe has ultimate authority in ham radio. Everywhere. If He says you be illegal, you are illegal. In his tunnel vision, that is. After that you can get around to providing us the links that corroborate your "Unlicensed devices play a major role in emergency comms" assertion. Go get a better quote. Stebe hasn't done much "emergency comms" stuff, obviously. But His imagination has! :-) Then you can provided us some sort of verification of your claim of having worked the equivilent of DXCC a couple times over. Go get a quote for that one, too. Those are radio-related issues that you claim expertise, experience or otherwise are knowledgeable of. So far you've provided us absolutely nothing, and those are just the RADIO related issues. My statements can stand on their own. Doesn't matter whether or not anyone provides bona fide references for Stebe. If'n he say you be wrong, you be wrong! :-) And if your nose isn't bruised and bloodied enough after that, there are some other issues I will be glad to regurgitate for NG consumption, but we'll wait and see if you decide to exercise some "Bruised and bloody." Interesting choice of words. Are you doing some kind of violence? Stebe is Conan the Barbarian in here, master of wanting to do violence. So...You up to getting your NG butt whupped again, or do you just want to forget that you re-opened a can of worms that folks were just now starting to forget? Steve, K4YZ Steve, I don't believe you've ever given anyone else a "butt whooping." Perhaps in some fantasy kind of way. Ackshully, Stebe said "whupped." Das a TN word which I think means Stebe's imagination filled out his dream desire for gory glory and the Prince of Barbarians, conquering all who stand in his way! Anyway, when are you going to tell us your 7 war stories? I think those were "hostile actions." Stebe will say those are all "classified" or somesuch since he can't talk about them in public. :-) It's the same way with his NOT talking about all those military radios he supposedly used while in the military. He's not mentioned but one and that is really an old commercial rig (which he probably saw briefly at some base MARS station). Stebe said (a long time ago) that all that radio information was "secret" or words to that effect, therefore he "couldn't talk about them in public." :-) Never mind that nearly ALL of those military radios have been public knowledge for years, information available from many, many public sources. Geez, even before Stebe mumbled his "secret radio" thing, I'd given the link to Army Field Manual FM 24-24 that's been in public dissemination status since 1994. [24-24 is a directory of Signal Devices and similar links are available on various ham radio Internet sites. Wait a minute. Maybe Soldier of Fortune magazine is going to publish this great war hero's story? In that case, there's prolly a Non-Disclosure Agreement mandating he can't talk about it! Yeah, that's it. Stebe can't talk about it because of the NDA! Wow. Funny Fiction time again! :-) |
|
bb wrote: wrote: Poor Stebe. He fantasizes his opponents as all being wrong, all lying, all unlawful. Somethings wrong with that guy. But I'd still like to hear his 7 adventure stories. Maybe over beers at the American Legion. I wonder why he ever shot off his mouth about "seven hostile actions" if he is so adamant about not talking about it? Nothing wrong. Just not appropriate to this forum. And I didn't "shoot my mouth off", Brian. Now...back to those T5/KH/HL logs and the DXCC several times over comments YOU made. Those ARE germane to Amateur Radio even though it's apparent you can't seem to get your "facts" right. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: I once slipped up and thought I could trust a guy that I sent mail to in confidence, however he took stuff I sent him and disucssed it in open forum dispite having been told the material was sensitive. Poor Stebe. Thought he could get away with some bragging. :-) "Sensitive info." That's terminology of the DoD in regards to information that is not discussed in public. So...it is "okay" to mention some vague generalities of claimed military experience but the "details are sensitive!" :-) In other words, no hostile actions. In other words, you're wrong. Tsk, tsk. "In other words," Stebe was just plain LYING. :-) Steve, you're right as always. ""People who make up stories about thier careers shouldn't give the names of places and dates when those bits of information can be corroborated." - Steve Robeson" We're back to it Brian...last chance to suck it up and keep things gentlemanly..... Tsk, tsk. Things "suck" on agreeing with Steve. :-) Poor Stebe. He fantasizes his opponents as all being wrong, all lying, all unlawful. Somethings wrong with that guy. But I'd still like to hear his 7 adventure stories. Maybe over beers at the American Legion. I wonder why he ever shot off his mouth about "seven hostile actions" if he is so adamant about not talking about it? Well, Brian, you and me and everyone else reading in here know that Stebe left the safety off and shot out that brag statement. He can't admit to being wrong (ever) for fear of losing his self esteem (in his own eyes) so he keeps pressing and pressing and pressing on his alleged "rightness" of that claim. If and only if those "seven hostile actions" were really "sensitive," then he should NOT have admitted any such thing under the DoD information release guidelines. Just admitting he "took part" in some "sensitive" activity is a direct violation of policy. In all probability, he never took part in any "sensitive" hostile actions that he "cannot talk about." He is just making up stories. LYING. In his latest reply to the quoted above exchanges, he tries to misdirect the thread into his charges of your "unlawful operation" on amateur bands while serving in the USAF in a foreign country. Stebe has NO authority of any kind to "charge" you with anything in that regard. If he had, then he should have contacted the Judge Advocate General office of the USAF and lodged a formal complaint...which would be ridiculous since he has NO evidence of any wrongdoing by you. He did not. Had he done so, he would have been laughed at (a terrible no-no to him). But, "face" is everything to him, it seems. He must keep up his ruff and tuff behavior to prove he is "superior" and therefore will never ever admit to wrongdoing of HIS claims. It is always the OTHER person who "did wrong." :-) In one way, it is quite funny that he keeps on trying to claim such "hostile action" experience without any evidence of his participation. It gets more hilarious when he says (in another posting) that "it has nothing to do with amateur radio!" Tsk, tsk, if it has nothing to do with amateur radio, why does he keep posting on that in here? :-) He ought to just "suck it up" and forget about it. :-) Well, back to "amateur radio subjects" about discussions of national economy, national politics, and retirement plans. A valid amateur radio license must be held to access the newsgroup? :-) The ham Chat Room is picking up steam... |
K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: wrote: Poor Stebe. He fantasizes his opponents as all being wrong, all lying, all unlawful. Somethings wrong with that guy. But I'd still like to hear his 7 adventure stories. Maybe over beers at the American Legion. I wonder why he ever shot off his mouth about "seven hostile actions" if he is so adamant about not talking about it? Nothing wrong. Just not appropriate to this forum. And I didn't "shoot my mouth off", Brian. Some see it that way. Now...back to those T5/KH/HL logs and the DXCC several times over comments YOU made. Those ARE germane to Amateur Radio even though it's apparent you can't seem to get your "facts" right. Steve, K4YZ My amateur operation in Somalia is none of your concern. 1. you weren't there. 2. you were not my commanding officer. 3. the United Nations was not in my chain of cammand. 4. you are not in my logs. 5. you weren't even a bystander. Apparently, Somalia is one hostile action that you missed out on. Best of luck next time. |
wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: I once slipped up and thought I could trust a guy that I sent mail to in confidence, however he took stuff I sent him and disucssed it in open forum dispite having been told the material was sensitive. Poor Stebe. Thought he could get away with some bragging. :-) "Sensitive info." That's terminology of the DoD in regards to information that is not discussed in public. So...it is "okay" to mention some vague generalities of claimed military experience but the "details are sensitive!" :-) He forgot the golden rule of story telling. A fairy tale starts out, "Once upon a time..." A war story starts out, "This is no ****..." He should have started out with the "Once upon a time..." version. Maybe the gloved one will offer him a respite at never-never land. In other words, no hostile actions. In other words, you're wrong. Tsk, tsk. "In other words," Stebe was just plain LYING. :-) Could be. Probably. Who knows? Probably not even Steve. Maybe he's referring to being fitted for a white dinner jacket. Seven times. Steve, you're right as always. ""People who make up stories about thier careers shouldn't give the names of places and dates when those bits of information can be corroborated." - Steve Robeson" We're back to it Brian...last chance to suck it up and keep things gentlemanly..... Tsk, tsk. Things "suck" on agreeing with Steve. :-) Indeed. By "gentlemanly" he means that you must be intimidated "or else." Poor Stebe. He fantasizes his opponents as all being wrong, all lying, all unlawful. Somethings wrong with that guy. But I'd still like to hear his 7 adventure stories. Maybe over beers at the American Legion. I wonder why he ever shot off his mouth about "seven hostile actions" if he is so adamant about not talking about it? Well, Brian, you and me and everyone else reading in here know that Stebe left the safety off and shot out that brag statement. He can't admit to being wrong (ever) for fear of losing his self esteem (in his own eyes) so he keeps pressing and pressing and pressing on his alleged "rightness" of that claim. Two wrong "rightnesses" don't make a right. Neither does two dozen. If and only if those "seven hostile actions" were really "sensitive," then he should NOT have admitted any such thing under the DoD information release guidelines. Just admitting he "took part" in some "sensitive" activity is a direct violation of policy. Maybe he's waiting for someone to make that "phone call." In all probability, he never took part in any "sensitive" hostile actions that he "cannot talk about." He is just making up stories. LYING. Maybe. Probably. Who knows? Probably not even Steve. In his latest reply to the quoted above exchanges, he tries to misdirect the thread into his charges of your "unlawful operation" on amateur bands while serving in the USAF in a foreign country. Yep. He took his gentilemans gloves off. Such a putz. Stebe has NO authority of any kind to "charge" you with anything in that regard. Perhaps it serves to recharge his lithium? If he had, then he should have contacted the Judge Advocate General office of the USAF and lodged a formal complaint...which would be ridiculous since he has NO evidence of any wrongdoing by you. He did not. Had he done so, he would have been laughed at (a terrible no-no to him). But, but, but... the phone is ringing somewhere. But, "face" is everything to him, it seems. He must keep up his ruff and tuff behavior to prove he is "superior" and therefore will never ever admit to wrongdoing of HIS claims. It is always the OTHER person who "did wrong." :-) The Corps didn't teach him that. Prolly why he got discharged. In one way, it is quite funny that he keeps on trying to claim such "hostile action" experience without any evidence of his participation. But he participates in amateur radio. Makes everything else he says legit. It gets more hilarious when he says (in another posting) that "it has nothing to do with amateur radio!" Tsk, tsk, if it has nothing to do with amateur radio, why does he keep posting on that in here? :-) Low intelligence? He ought to just "suck it up" and forget about it. :-) He does look like he's got enough belly to suck up a lot misdirection. Well, back to "amateur radio subjects" about discussions of national economy, national politics, and retirement plans. A valid amateur radio license must be held to access the newsgroup? :-) Ayup. How's the SS holding out? Has the gov't attached any new taxes to the payout? Have you had to "means test" yet? The ham Chat Room is picking up steam... Toot toot. |
|
K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: wrote: The ham Chat Room is picking up steam... Toot toot. Somehow the vision of you sitting in a tub of Mr Bubble pushing a toy tugboat around going "toot toot" seems to fit. Why am I not surprised? Steve, K4YZ You're not suprised because it is your little vision. It has nothing to do with me. |
bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: wrote: The ham Chat Room is picking up steam... Toot toot. Somehow the vision of you sitting in a tub of Mr Bubble pushing a toy tugboat around going "toot toot" seems to fit. Why am I not surprised? Steve, K4YZ You're not suprised because it is your little vision. It has nothing to do with me. It has EVERYTHING to do with you, Brian. It has to do with your childish adherence to lies you've been caught in and your misplaced loyalty to a known pathological liar, cheat and proprietary thief. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: wrote: The ham Chat Room is picking up steam... Toot toot. Somehow the vision of you sitting in a tub of Mr Bubble pushing a toy tugboat around going "toot toot" seems to fit. Why am I not surprised? Steve, K4YZ You're not suprised because it is your little vision. It has nothing to do with me. It has EVERYTHING to do with you, Brian. It has to do with your childish adherence to lies you've been caught in and your misplaced loyalty to a known pathological liar, cheat and proprietary thief. Steve, K4YZ No, Steve, it doesn't. I've never played out your little fantasy of tugboats in the bathtub. Saying that I have makes you the liar. Get a grip before you lose yourself in a fit of rage then go catatonic on us. Best of luck. |
bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: wrote: The ham Chat Room is picking up steam... Toot toot. Somehow the vision of you sitting in a tub of Mr Bubble pushing a toy tugboat around going "toot toot" seems to fit. Why am I not surprised? Steve, K4YZ You're not suprised because it is your little vision. It has nothing to do with me. It has EVERYTHING to do with you, Brian. It has to do with your childish adherence to lies you've been caught in and your misplaced loyalty to a known pathological liar, cheat and proprietary thief. Steve, K4YZ No, Steve, it doesn't. I've never played out your little fantasy of tugboats in the bathtub. Saying that I have makes you the liar. I didn't say you have, Brian, and you are more than welcome to repost the comments wherein you think I said you DID... I said the "VISION" of you doing it made sense. It still does. Get a grip before you lose yourself in a fit of rage then go catatonic on us. Speaking of a "fit of rage", you really need to go back and read your own post there, Skippy. There's no "rage" in my part. Just overt laughter at the idea of you playing with your little tugboat going "toot toot". Best of luck. No luck needed. You supplied everthing I needed...Again. Thanks. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: wrote: The ham Chat Room is picking up steam... Toot toot. Somehow the vision of you sitting in a tub of Mr Bubble pushing a toy tugboat around going "toot toot" seems to fit. Why am I not surprised? Steve, K4YZ You're not suprised because it is your little vision. It has nothing to do with me. It has EVERYTHING to do with you, Brian. It has to do with your childish adherence to lies you've been caught in and your misplaced loyalty to a known pathological liar, cheat and proprietary thief. Steve, K4YZ No, Steve, it doesn't. I've never played out your little fantasy of tugboats in the bathtub. Saying that I have makes you the liar. I didn't say you have, Brian, and you are more than welcome to repost the comments wherein you think I said you DID... I said the "VISION" of you doing it made sense. How can you have vision of something that doesn't exist? It still does. Get a grip before you lose yourself in a fit of rage then go catatonic on us. Speaking of a "fit of rage", you really need to go back and read your own post there, Skippy. And we complain about " Len's terms of endearment." Hi! There's no "rage" in my part. Just overt laughter at the idea of you playing with your little tugboat going "toot toot". Best of luck. No luck needed. You supplied everthing I needed...Again. Thanks. Steve, K4YZ You need lots of luck. You see things that aren't there. |
bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: I said the "VISION" of you doing it made sense. How can you have vision of something that doesn't exist? The same way the Wright Brothers saw an airplane fly. It still does. Get a grip before you lose yourself in a fit of rage then go catatonic on us. Speaking of a "fit of rage", you really need to go back and read your own post there, Skippy. And we complain about " Len's terms of endearment." Hi! Oh...no complaint. Just an observation. You delve into the same "Nursie" and other "endearments" that your Chief String Puller uses, so you can benefit from his trailblazing. And I thought we were moving along nicely until you reopened this can of worms. I knew you wouldn't be able to keep a civil tounge long... There's no "rage" in my part. Just overt laughter at the idea of you playing with your little tugboat going "toot toot". Best of luck. No luck needed. You supplied everthing I needed...Again. Thanks. Steve, K4YZ You need lots of luck. You see things that aren't there. It's called an "imagination", Brain... The same "imagination" you used to create all those DXploits you've tried to embellish your Amateur career with. And I still don't need any luck to deal with you. Ever. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: I said the "VISION" of you doing it made sense. How can you have vision of something that doesn't exist? The same way the Wright Brothers saw an airplane fly. They built that airplane. It existed. It still does. Get a grip before you lose yourself in a fit of rage then go catatonic on us. Speaking of a "fit of rage", you really need to go back and read your own post there, Skippy. And we complain about " Len's terms of endearment." Hi! Oh...no complaint. Just an observation. You delve into the same "Nursie" and other "endearments" that your Chief String Puller uses, so you can benefit from his trailblazing. Nope. You are Steve. Ungentlemanlike Steve. Steve is a nurse. I referred to him as a nurse. Get a grip. And I thought we were moving along nicely until you reopened this can of worms. I knew you wouldn't be able to keep a civil tounge long... You were the one shooting off your mouth about other people's claims. I merely asked you about your claims. There's no "rage" in my part. Just overt laughter at the idea of you playing with your little tugboat going "toot toot". Best of luck. No luck needed. You supplied everthing I needed...Again. Thanks. Steve, K4YZ You need lots of luck. You see things that aren't there. It's called an "imagination", Brain... Indeed. You have a very active one. The same "imagination" you used to create all those DXploits you've tried to embellish your Amateur career with. What embellishment? And I still don't need any luck to deal with you. Ever. Steve, K4YZ More imagination. |
bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: I said the "VISION" of you doing it made sense. How can you have vision of something that doesn't exist? The same way the Wright Brothers saw an airplane fly. They built that airplane. It existed. They built that airplane from...A kit? Plans in Mechanic's Illustrated? Ordered it from Sears and Roebuck? Oh...no complaint. Just an observation. You delve into the same "Nursie" and other "endearments" that your Chief String Puller uses, so you can benefit from his trailblazing. Nope. You are Steve. Ungentlemanlike Steve. Steve is a nurse. I referred to him as a nurse. Get a grip. My grip is quite firm, Brian. I warned you where this would go if you continued with your course of action a couple days ago. And your reference ot me as "Nurse" is situational. You've mimiced Lennie's "nursie" on several occassions. And I thought we were moving along nicely until you reopened this can of worms. I knew you wouldn't be able to keep a civil tounge long... You were the one shooting off your mouth about other people's claims. I merely asked you about your claims. And your other untruthful misrepresentations. Again. There's no "rage" in my part. Just overt laughter at the idea of you playing with your little tugboat going "toot toot". Best of luck. No luck needed. You supplied everthing I needed...Again. Thanks. Steve, K4YZ You need lots of luck. You see things that aren't there. It's called an "imagination", Brain... Indeed. You have a very active one. Indeed I do. And I can see you sitting in the tub with a rubber tugboat going "toot toot". The same "imagination" you used to create all those DXploits you've tried to embellish your Amateur career with. What embellishment? Start off with your "Somalia operation". Follow that up with your insistence that you worked the equivilent of DXCC several times over. Then we can go on to your "experiences" in "emergency comms" and how unlicensed devices play a "major role". And I still don't need any luck to deal with you. Ever. Steve, K4YZ More imagination. Fact, actually. You make it just too easy to do. Why do you insist on subjecting yourself to such self-humiliation? Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: I said the "VISION" of you doing it made sense. How can you have vision of something that doesn't exist? The same way the Wright Brothers saw an airplane fly. They built that airplane. It existed. They built that airplane from...A kit? Plans in Mechanic's Illustrated? Ordered it from Sears and Roebuck? Mechanical drawings. Their mechanical drawings. Oh...no complaint. Just an observation. You delve into the same "Nursie" and other "endearments" that your Chief String Puller uses, so you can benefit from his trailblazing. Nope. You are Steve. Ungentlemanlike Steve. Steve is a nurse. I referred to him as a nurse. Get a grip. My grip is quite firm, Brian. But you grasp the wrong things. I warned you where this would go if you continued with your course of action a couple days ago. Yup. You're back to your natural form, calling people names, calling people liars. And your reference ot me as "Nurse" is situational. You've mimiced Lennie's "nursie" on several occassions. Then I apologize. And I thought we were moving along nicely until you reopened this can of worms. I knew you wouldn't be able to keep a civil tounge long... You were the one shooting off your mouth about other people's claims. I merely asked you about your claims. And your other untruthful misrepresentations. Again. So how 'bout some war stories? There's no "rage" in my part. Just overt laughter at the idea of you playing with your little tugboat going "toot toot". Best of luck. No luck needed. You supplied everthing I needed...Again. Thanks. Steve, K4YZ You need lots of luck. You see things that aren't there. It's called an "imagination", Brain... Indeed. You have a very active one. Indeed I do. And I can see you sitting in the tub with a rubber tugboat going "toot toot". Which I have not done. Again you persist once you've been corrected. I believe that is your own definition of a liar. The same "imagination" you used to create all those DXploits you've tried to embellish your Amateur career with. What embellishment? Start off with your "Somalia operation". No embellishment. I operated from Somalia. Follow that up with your insistence that you worked the equivilent of DXCC several times over. I'd like to see that requoted. I've worked more than 100 DXCC entities from the CONUS, and many more than that from Guam. I had little time to operate from HL9 and T5 and was not even close to 100 entities from Somalia. Had I worked for the UN, I might have left there with 40,000 QSOs like some other relief workers that you see in QST. ;^) Then we can go on to your "experiences" in "emergency comms" and how unlicensed devices play a "major role". Are military comms licensed? And I still don't need any luck to deal with you. Ever. Steve, K4YZ More imagination. Fact, actually. You live in a Water Mitty kind of world. Seven hostile actions? Hi! You make it just too easy to do. Why do you insist on subjecting yourself to such self-humiliation? Steve, K4YZ Steve, the more you type the more people see that you're nuts. Best of Luck. |
bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: I said the "VISION" of you doing it made sense. How can you have vision of something that doesn't exist? The same way the Wright Brothers saw an airplane fly. They built that airplane. It existed. They built that airplane from...A kit? Plans in Mechanic's Illustrated? Ordered it from Sears and Roebuck? Mechanical drawings. Their mechanical drawings. And those "mechanical drawings" came from...WHERE...??? Oh...no complaint. Just an observation. You delve into the same "Nursie" and other "endearments" that your Chief String Puller uses, so you can benefit from his trailblazing. Nope. You are Steve. Ungentlemanlike Steve. Steve is a nurse. I referred to him as a nurse. Get a grip. My grip is quite firm, Brian. But you grasp the wrong things. Hardly. You're a fool. You have been archived in errors over and over. You compound your errors by refusing to acknowledge them even when pointed out to you over and over. I warned you where this would go if you continued with your course of action a couple days ago. Yup. You're back to your natural form, calling people names, calling people liars. But you ARE a liar, Brain. Been archived as such in Google and deja-News before it. Your choice...Not mine. And your reference ot me as "Nurse" is situational. You've mimiced Lennie's "nursie" on several occassions. Then I apologize. Accepted. It's only been five years. And I thought we were moving along nicely until you reopened this can of worms. I knew you wouldn't be able to keep a civil tounge long... You were the one shooting off your mouth about other people's claims. I merely asked you about your claims. And your other untruthful misrepresentations. Again. So how 'bout some war stories? Why? Are they pertinent to this forum? Do they relate to Amateur Radio? Do you want me to make up stories to impress you like you've made up to impress us? There's no "rage" in my part. Just overt laughter at the idea of you playing with your little tugboat going "toot toot". Best of luck. No luck needed. You supplied everthing I needed...Again. Thanks. Steve, K4YZ You need lots of luck. You see things that aren't there. It's called an "imagination", Brain... Indeed. You have a very active one. Indeed I do. And I can see you sitting in the tub with a rubber tugboat going "toot toot". Which I have not done. Again you persist once you've been corrected. I believe that is your own definition of a liar. "Brian Burke sits in a bathtub playing with a rubber tugboat"...THAT would be a lie. (...or at least I assume so...) "I can see you..." or "I can envision..." expresses imagination The same "imagination" you used to create all those DXploits you've tried to embellish your Amateur career with. What embellishment? Start off with your "Somalia operation". No embellishment. I operated from Somalia. Illegally if you did at all. Follow that up with your insistence that you worked the equivilent of DXCC several times over. I'd like to see that requoted. I may very well dig it out sometime...The fact is that othr posters here have called you on it before. I've worked more than 100 DXCC entities from the CONUS, and many more than that from Guam. I had little time to operate from HL9 and T5 and was not even close to 100 entities from Somalia. Had I worked for the UN, I might have left there with 40,000 QSOs like some other relief workers that you see in QST. You very well may have. But then you would have had valid permission to do so and DXCC recognition for your operation. As it is presently, you have neither. You were a bootlegger. Illegal. Then we can go on to your "experiences" in "emergency comms" and how unlicensed devices play a "major role". Are military comms licensed? Is this a military forum? Nice try to redirect, Brian. It's only been 18 months now...You just now figuring out how to try and dodge this? The topic was Part 95 and part 15 devices. And military units HAVE authorization to operate, even on FCC-administered allocations from time to time...Even in emergencies. (Read Part 97 lately?) And I still don't need any luck to deal with you. Ever. Steve, K4YZ More imagination. Fact, actually. You live in a Water Mitty kind of world. I am sure you'd like to think so. Seven hostile actions? Yep. All of them before you even knew where Somalia was... You make it just too easy to do. Why do you insist on subjecting yourself to such self-humiliation? Steve, K4YZ Steve, the more you type the more people see that you're nuts. Just "nuts" for spending so much time holding the mirror up for ya, Brian...But then you keep waltzing out in public half naked all the time. Best of Luck. Thanks, but you keep stacking the deck in my favor. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: I said the "VISION" of you doing it made sense. How can you have vision of something that doesn't exist? The same way the Wright Brothers saw an airplane fly. They built that airplane. It existed. They built that airplane from...A kit? Plans in Mechanic's Illustrated? Ordered it from Sears and Roebuck? Mechanical drawings. Their mechanical drawings. Of course. After doing years of research deriving their own physical characteristics of aerodynamics, trying many kinds of physical prototypes, even building their own wind tunnel to test lift of various curvatures of wing surfaces. None of modern-day aerodynamics principles were available to them and there was no such thing as "airplane engineering" and thus no school in that from which to receive a pretty certificate (suitable for framing). Steven James has pretty certificates (suitable for framing) but no vision, save for the extreme tunnel vision of those who are Believers in the everlasting fantasy of olde-tyme hamme raddio continuing well into the new millennium. Oh...no complaint. Just an observation. You delve into the same "Nursie" and other "endearments" that your Chief String Puller uses, so you can benefit from his trailblazing. Nope. You are Steve. Ungentlemanlike Steve. Steve is a nurse. I referred to him as a nurse. Get a grip. My grip is quite firm, Brian. But you grasp the wrong things. Poor Steven James, grasping at the straws so he can suck up more of his libelous filth to spit on his opponents. Actually, grasping some leather conditioner and rubbing it into his grip would improve their carrying ability on long trips with many baggage handlers. :-) I warned you where this would go if you continued with your course of action a couple days ago. Yup. You're back to your natural form, calling people names, calling people liars. Brian, think of it as "consistency." He hasn't deviated from that. That he has deviated from civil comportment is obvious, though, and his "go" has the consistency of libelous filth. :-) And your reference ot me as "Nurse" is situational. You've mimiced Lennie's "nursie" on several occassions. Then I apologize. Brian, there should be no apologies necessary. Certainly not by you. Steven James had previously said you were a "pedophile" because of leading some boy scouts. Steven James has called you "liar" so many times that all those added up wouldn't require you to apologize to him. The other way around. At least in other venues. Common civil courtesy may not exist in this newsgroup. The PCTA Double Standard is operative here. You need lots of luck. You see things that aren't there. It's called an "imagination", Brain... Indeed. You have a very active one. Indeed I do. And I can see you sitting in the tub with a rubber tugboat going "toot toot". Which I have not done. Again you persist once you've been corrected. I believe that is your own definition of a liar. Brian, poor Steven James can't focus. When he does, it is only inwards to his own imagination. Tsk, tsk. In a previous posting, instead of the salutory "beep, beep" I've sometimes written (to annoy the morsemen), I wrote "toot, toot." :-) Steven James then takes a simple onomatopoetic word pair and manufactures a cute little fantasy involving a bathtup and little toy tugboat, claiming first that I do such things (I do not)...and now yourself. He is losing his grip on the reality. Fantasy is more preferable to him? The preference for fantasy is a neurosis in full flower. He can no longer differentiate between right and wrong in the real world, instead placing all on the "rules" within his own fantasy concoction. No one else lives in that fantasy world but that makes no difference to Steven James. The same "imagination" you used to create all those DXploits you've tried to embellish your Amateur career with. What embellishment? Start off with your "Somalia operation". No embellishment. I operated from Somalia. Steven James has worked that up from your casual mention to some full-fledged imaginary "claim of your own greatness." That's another sickness syndrome in evidence. His, not yours, Brian. :-) Steven James has not operated anything from Somalia. It makes him angry that others have done things he hasn't done. He seems to think that everyone else is in some "contest" as to who has done more, accomplished more, a sort of "men's locker-room brag session" when few in here (other than himself) engage in that. Then we can go on to your "experiences" in "emergency comms" and how unlicensed devices play a "major role". Are military comms licensed? Steven James should know they are not licensed in the civilian sense of things. However, lacking his definitive claims of actually doing military communications (other than normal small-unit HT use), he cannot claim any sort of experience of direct assignment to communications. He will, as was done in the past, say a lot of indefinite things of a general nature to avoid answering in any detail. I believe he does understand the difficulty he would place himself in if he tried some lying about equipment and protocol. He does embellish his memory considerably in regards to "unlicensed devices playing any sort of role" in civilian emergency communications. That's part of his general pattern of misdirecting others to think that you are the one "at fault" when you were not. It's not an uncommon trick in computer-modem communications and he likes it...puts others on the defensive and takes away (he thinks, mistakenly) taints put on him by others. You live in a Water Mitty kind of world. Seven hostile actions? Hi! Agreed. "Hi" squared. :-) Steven James cannot possibly admit at this time that he made a small brag phrase in a somewhat long-ago message. It is a brag and not a truth since he cannot reveal the When or Where of any of those "actions." The best he could do is say it is some kind of "classified" operation or of some "sensitive" nature that cannot be revealed publicly. :-) Further lying about those "seven hostile actions" will do no good since U.S. military history is rather an open book with all service branches having access to the Internet and with agencies supplying public information in archives open to all. On the other hand, denial of original wrong-doing on his part will cause him to lose self-esteem (what Japanese refer to as "face" to the public). Never mind that others see the deception of brag claims, he must continue to support his own self-esteem. His fantasyworld beliefs demand it. You make it just too easy to do. Why do you insist on subjecting yourself to such self-humiliation? Steve, the more you type the more people see that you're nuts. Another technique I would call "remote transference." Steven James doesn't like to be humiliated (in any way) and thinks that all who don't believe him should themselves be humiliated. He wants to transfer his own feelings of inferiority to others and make them "suffer" as he apparently does. Therefore, he states that others "humiliate themselves." That's not true and others as well as non-posting readers can see that. Steven James cannot. The outpouring of libelous filth against all who disagree with him will continue until he receives some helpful mental therapy. Until then, this newsgroup will continue as an outlet for his personal frustrations and continue to lose relevance as a forum for discussion about subjects, not the personalities of individuals.. |
|
wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: I warned you where this would go if you continued with your course of action a couple days ago. Yup. You're back to your natural form, calling people names, calling people liars. Brian, think of it as "consistency." He hasn't deviated from that. That he has deviated from civil comportment is obvious, though, and his "go" has the consistency of libelous filth. :-) He is a broken man. Blames the world. Singles out a couple of people. And your reference ot me as "Nurse" is situational. You've mimiced Lennie's "nursie" on several occassions. Then I apologize. Brian, there should be no apologies necessary. Certainly not by you. Steven James had previously said you were a "pedophile" because of leading some boy scouts. I hold myself to a higher standard. I do not recall calling Steve "Nursie" but if I have, then I am sorry for that. But it truly is a stretch to compare being called "Nursie" with having been called a homosexual and a pedophile. Nor have I suggested that anyone on this group be visited by thugs who "throw rocks through windows, slask tires, and terrorize people's wives." Steve is truly dispicable. I don't have to live with that kind of public behavio[u]r. He does. My conscience is clean. Steven James has called you "liar" so many times that all those added up wouldn't require you to apologize to him. The other way around. At least in other venues. I can't keep count. Honestly. Suffice it to say that he will forever be known as the "Ham that cried 'Liar, liar, pants on fiar'" or wolf or something like that. Common civil courtesy may not exist in this newsgroup. The PCTA Double Standard is operative here. I don't believe much courtesy exists here. Funny because it is sticky sweet on the air, and all these fb gentlemen claim to be hams. You need lots of luck. You see things that aren't there. It's called an "imagination", Brain... Indeed. You have a very active one. Indeed I do. And I can see you sitting in the tub with a rubber tugboat going "toot toot". Which I have not done. Again you persist once you've been corrected. I believe that is your own definition of a liar. Brian, poor Steven James can't focus. When he does, it is only inwards to his own imagination. Tsk, tsk. If he looks inside he must truly hate himself. In a previous posting, instead of the salutory "beep, beep" I've sometimes written (to annoy the morsemen), I wrote "toot, toot." :-) Steven James then takes a simple onomatopoetic word pair and manufactures a cute little fantasy involving a bathtup and little toy tugboat, claiming first that I do such things (I do not)...and now yourself. He is losing his grip on the reality. Fantasy is more preferable to him? Many of the PCTA do make frequent references to the male anatomy. It would be no stretch at all that they have visions of men in the bath tub. The preference for fantasy is a neurosis in full flower. He can no longer differentiate between right and wrong in the real world, instead placing all on the "rules" within his own fantasy concoction. No one else lives in that fantasy world but that makes no difference to Steven James. Steve has visions. Might be a medication issue? The same "imagination" you used to create all those DXploits you've tried to embellish your Amateur career with. What embellishment? Start off with your "Somalia operation". No embellishment. I operated from Somalia. Steven James has worked that up from your casual mention to some full-fledged imaginary "claim of your own greatness." That's another sickness syndrome in evidence. His, not yours, Brian. :-) He did admit jealousy of the locations that I've operated from. I can see that turning into rage. Steven James has not operated anything from Somalia. It makes him angry that others have done things he hasn't done. He seems to think that everyone else is in some "contest" as to who has done more, accomplished more, a sort of "men's locker-room brag session" when few in here (other than himself) engage in that. Guys like him are always keeping score, and in this case, I can guess that he thinks he just doesn't measure up. What makes him even more furious is that I just don't care. Then we can go on to your "experiences" in "emergency comms" and how unlicensed devices play a "major role". Are military comms licensed? Steven James should know they are not licensed in the civilian sense of things. However, lacking his definitive claims of actually doing military communications (other than normal small-unit HT use), he cannot claim any sort of experience of direct assignment to communications. Again he keeps score, and sees that he just doesn't measure up. He will, as was done in the past, say a lot of indefinite things of a general nature to avoid answering in any detail. I believe he does understand the difficulty he would place himself in if he tried some lying about equipment and protocol. He a wiley coyote. He does embellish his memory considerably in regards to "unlicensed devices playing any sort of role" in civilian emergency communications. That's part of his general pattern of misdirecting others to think that you are the one "at fault" when you were not. It's not an uncommon trick in computer-modem communications and he likes it...puts others on the defensive and takes away (he thinks, mistakenly) taints put on him by others. Attack, attack, attack. Tora, tora, tora. But it's no surprise. No December 7. It's everyday. You live in a Water Mitty kind of world. Seven hostile actions? Hi! Agreed. "Hi" squared. :-) Steven James cannot possibly admit at this time that he made a small brag phrase in a somewhat long-ago message. It is a brag and not a truth since he cannot reveal the When or Where of any of those "actions." The best he could do is say it is some kind of "classified" operation or of some "sensitive" nature that cannot be revealed publicly. :-) That's the usual MO for military fakers. Surprised he hasn't claimed to be a Navy Seal, a sniper, or Medal of Honor winner, though he does trot out a box of medals that he didn't earn. Further lying about those "seven hostile actions" will do no good since U.S. military history is rather an open book with all service branches having access to the Internet and with agencies supplying public information in archives open to all. On the other hand, denial of original wrong-doing on his part will cause him to lose self-esteem (what Japanese refer to as "face" to the public). Never mind that others see the deception of brag claims, he must continue to support his own self-esteem. His fantasyworld beliefs demand it. Instead of accepting "loss of face," he commits "tora, tora, tora." Mas misdirection. You make it just too easy to do. Why do you insist on subjecting yourself to such self-humiliation? Steve, the more you type the more people see that you're nuts. Another technique I would call "remote transference." Steven James doesn't like to be humiliated (in any way) and thinks that all who don't believe him should themselves be humiliated. A better tactic would be to keep his mouth shut. He wants to transfer his own feelings of inferiority to others and make them "suffer" as he apparently does. He does suffer. It's no longer an excuse for his behavio[u]r, if it ever was. Therefore, he states that others "humiliate themselves." That's not true and others as well as non-posting readers can see that. Steven James cannot. Because he believes his own lies. The outpouring of libelous filth against all who disagree with him will continue until he receives some helpful mental therapy. Until then, this newsgroup will continue as an outlet for his personal frustrations and continue to lose relevance as a forum for discussion about subjects, not the personalities of individuals.. My guess is bi-polar. |
K4YZ wrote: wrote: Majority of self-promoting, pontificating buffoonery deleted. The outpouring of libelous filth against all who disagree with him will continue until he receives some helpful mental therapy. What "libelous filth", Lennie? It's not "libelous" if it's true. Until then, this newsgroup will continue as an outlet for his personal frustrations and continue to lose relevance as a forum for discussion about subjects, not the personalities of individuals. Applies word-for-word to your presence in this forum, Your Scumminess. Putz. Steve, K4YZ There's the lying, the name calling, and the yiddish reference to the male anatomy again. You're fixated on the male genitalia. Back to civil discourse. Sayonara. |
From: "bb"
Date: 20 Feb 2005 18:56:15 -0800 Local: Sun, Feb 20 2005 6:56 pm Subject: Len's terms of endearments list wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: I warned you where this would go if you continued with your course of action a couple days ago. That he has deviated from civil comportment is obvious, though, and his "go" has the consistency of libelous filth. :-) He is a broken man. Blames the world. Singles out a couple of people. Poor guy must think we are responsible for his condition. Tsk, tsk. :-) He's so far up denial that he must get out of the water and do portage. Brian, there should be no apologies necessary. Certainly not by you. Steven James had previously said you were a "pedophile" because of leading some boy scouts. I hold myself to a higher standard. I do not recall calling Steve "Nursie" but if I have, then I am sorry for that. But it truly is a stretch to compare being called "Nursie" with having been called a homosexual and a pedophile. Nor have I suggested that anyone on this group be visited by thugs who "throw rocks through windows, slask tires, and terrorize people's wives." Steve is truly dispicable. I don't have to live with that kind of public behavio[u]r. He does. My conscience is clean. Well, two more things are operative there. Firstly, he may not be aware of the differences in his vile name-calling...it seems to all the same with him...he probably doesn't realize it. Secondly, he could be sociopathic and simply doesn't care about what he says in here...it vents his rages and so he feels better. The second syndrome is the worst of the two for everyone else. Either way, he presents an undesireable image of U.S. amateur radio to everyone else. Steven James has called you "liar" so many times that all those added up wouldn't require you to apologize to him. The other way around. At least in other venues. I can't keep count. Honestly. Suffice it to say that he will forever be known as the "Ham that cried 'Liar, liar, pants on fiar'" or wolf or something like that. Well, he does have a lack of social interaction skills. :-) Common civil courtesy may not exist in this newsgroup. The PCTA Double Standard is operative here. I don't believe much courtesy exists here. Funny because it is sticky sweet on the air, and all these fb gentlemen claim to be hams. Some of the newsgroup correspondents just haven't learned to handle themselves in newsgroups or public boards or whatever. Some of them feel immune to criticsm becasue no one can reach out through time and space to physically harm them, so they toss civility out the window. That's fairly common on all computer-modem venues. Brian, poor Steven James can't focus. When he does, it is only inwards to his own imagination. Tsk, tsk. If he looks inside he must truly hate himself. Or, he may see things that aren't there! :-) Many of the PCTA do make frequent references to the male anatomy. It would be no stretch at all that they have visions of men in the bath tub. Well, perhaps that turns them on? :-) Steve has visions. Might be a medication issue? Maybe he tokes peyote? :-) No embellishment. I operated from Somalia. Steven James has worked that up from your casual mention to some full-fledged imaginary "claim of your own greatness." That's another sickness syndrome in evidence. His, not yours, Brian. :-) He did admit jealousy of the locations that I've operated from. I can see that turning into rage. He typically goes into outrage at anyone having experiences he doesn't have. Envy cubed. He can't stand it! Guys like him are always keeping score, and in this case, I can guess that he thinks he just doesn't measure up. What makes him even more furious is that I just don't care. I don't think he understands that. He gets all tangled up between people, what they said, etc., then says they were "showing off" when a simple casual mention of personal experience was stated. An example is my mention of doing real HF communications in the Army a half century ago in regards to the Army (and other branches) NOT using "CW" in long-haul message traffic. The Lost Action Hero morphed that mention into some kind of "bragging" of mine...not understanding that I actually did what I said and can prove it with personal references. :-) He isn't reading these postings with rose-colored glasses. His eyes are red with rage and cannot discern what was written. :-) He just can't come to terms with some of us have more experiences and/or more unique experiences than he had. That makes him defensive. In defense he tries a misdirection attack, trying to shift a thread direction...or he fabricates things which he never did. Attack, attack, attack. Tora, tora, tora. But it's no surprise. No December 7. It's everyday. It's his notable posting manner. Uncivil but characteristic. Steven James cannot possibly admit at this time that he made a small brag phrase in a somewhat long-ago message. It is a brag and not a truth since he cannot reveal the When or Where of any of those "actions." The best he could do is say it is some kind of "classified" operation or of some "sensitive" nature that cannot be revealed publicly. :-) That's the usual MO for military fakers. Surprised he hasn't claimed to be a Navy Seal, a sniper, or Medal of Honor winner, though he does trot out a box of medals that he didn't earn. Perhaps one of his personalities actually did the things you mention! Although not for real...the action must be hot and heavy in Stevieworld. :-) Further lying about those "seven hostile actions" will do no good since U.S. military history is rather an open book with all service branches having access to the Internet and with agencies supplying public information in archives open to all. On the other hand, denial of original wrong-doing on his part will cause him to lose self-esteem (what Japanese refer to as "face" to the public). Never mind that others see the deception of brag claims, he must continue to support his own self-esteem. His fantasyworld beliefs demand it. Instead of accepting "loss of face," he commits "tora, tora, tora." Mas misdirection. Si. :-) Another technique I would call "remote transference." Steven James doesn't like to be humiliated (in any way) and thinks that all who don't believe him should themselves be humiliated. A better tactic would be to keep his mouth shut. You know that, I know that, nearly everyone else who reads all these moronic mumblings of the Lost Action Hero know it. Poor Stevie can't bear to admit wrongdoing. Loss of face thing to admit weakness of any kind. He wants to transfer his own feelings of inferiority to others and make them "suffer" as he apparently does. He does suffer. It's no longer an excuse for his behavio[u]r, if it ever was. Makes no never mind on his side of the screen. He is alone with the monitor and feels invulnerable...no one can touch him! So, he goes ballistic with all the libelous filth he can type as a "response" to someone with an opinion opposite to his. He HATES some folks. Really HATES them. Tsk. Therefore, he states that others "humiliate themselves." That's not true and others as well as non-posting readers can see that. Steven James cannot. Because he believes his own lies. Then he has a worse personal problem, the inability to understand that reality is NOT that of his fantasy Stevieworld. The outpouring of libelous filth against all who disagree with him will continue until he receives some helpful mental therapy. Until then, this newsgroup will continue as an outlet for his personal frustrations and continue to lose relevance as a forum for discussion about subjects, not the personalities of individuals.. My guess is bi-polar. Hmmm...I don't think we can talk "bi" anything. Coslonaut says that on-off keying CW doesn't have just two states, but many many of them. Therefore it isn't "binary." With his multiple personalities, the Lost Action Hero could be classified as "MULTI-polar!" :-) Just the same, the Lost Action Hero is an example of modern U.S. amateur radio extra class licensee. If the general public bothers to look in here, they would think extras are fruitcake. |
bb wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: That he has deviated from civil comportment is obvious, though, and his "go" has the consistency of libelous filth. :-) He is a broken man. Blames the world. Singles out a couple of people. Oh No, Brian...I didn't "single out" anyone. The two of you STAND out like the only two white guys in the audience of the Apollo. Many of the PCTA do make frequent references to the male anatomy. It would be no stretch at all that they have visions of men in the bath tub. Then you had better redirect some of that "references to the male anatomy" to Lennie, Brian. Anytime anyone uses the word "we" when pointing out that he is in a very, VERY small minority, he accuses them of "shaking your "we-we in public". Steven James has worked that up from your casual mention to some full-fledged imaginary "claim of your own greatness." That's another sickness syndrome in evidence. His, not yours, Brian. :-) He did admit jealousy of the locations that I've operated from. I can see that turning into rage. Oh no, Brian...I NEVER said ANYthing about "jealousy"...Not by a long stretch. Steven James has not operated anything from Somalia. It makes him angry that others have done things he hasn't done. He seems to think that everyone else is in some "contest" as to who has done more, accomplished more, a sort of "men's locker-room brag session" when few in here (other than himself) engage in that. Guys like him are always keeping score, and in this case, I can guess that he thinks he just doesn't measure up. What makes him even more furious is that I just don't care. Sure you do...or you wouldn't be constantly trying to insist that what you did was legal or proper. Then we can go on to your "experiences" in "emergency comms" and how unlicensed devices play a "major role". Are military comms licensed? Steven James should know they are not licensed in the civilian sense of things. However, lacking his definitive claims of actually doing military communications (other than normal small-unit HT use), he cannot claim any sort of experience of direct assignment to communications. Again he keeps score, and sees that he just doesn't measure up. It's not about me, Brian. So far, it's you and Lennie who are (still) short of the mark. Lennie has absolutely NO experience in ANY form of emergency communications (save for cellphones and CB Channel 9). Your's is a bit more plausible, but I doubt it. Another technique I would call "remote transference." Steven James doesn't like to be humiliated (in any way) and thinks that all who don't believe him should themselves be humiliated. A better tactic would be to keep his mouth shut. I am sure you'd rather I stopped rubbing your collective noses in your NG droppings...but the PROBLEM is that you keep dropping it! Sorry! Better on your nose than my shoes! Therefore, he states that others "humiliate themselves." That's not true and others as well as non-posting readers can see that. Steven James cannot. Because he believes his own lies. What lies? The two of you ARE humiliations...Lennie to porfessional engineers and US Army veterans, Brian to former USAF and Amateur Radio types. Just stop lying. No amount of re-direct (ie: the post I am responding to today) will hide what the two of you have perpetrated. The outpouring of libelous filth against all who disagree with him will continue until he receives some helpful mental therapy. Until then, this newsgroup will continue as an outlet for his personal frustrations and continue to lose relevance as a forum for discussion about subjects, not the personalities of individuals.. My guess is bi-polar. So far, the "personalities" of TWO of the "individuals" are chronic liars who have no self respect or dignity. They would be Leonard H. "Lennie" Anderson and Brian P "The Brain" Burke. And a "guess" would be your best offering, Brian...Your lack of knowledge and skill as a "DXer" is only exceeded by your lack of knowledge and skill in the healthcare profession. Steve, K4YZ |
bb wrote: wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: I warned you where this would go if you continued with your course of action a couple days ago. Yup. You're back to your natural form, calling people names, calling people liars. Brian, think of it as "consistency." He hasn't deviated from that. That he has deviated from civil comportment is obvious, though, and his "go" has the consistency of libelous filth. :-) He is a broken man. Not a broken bone here. Blames the world. For what? Where? Please cite the post wherein you think I did this, otherwise you've just added yet one more mistruth to the heap, Brian. Singles out a couple of people. Oh no, Brian...I didn't single out ANYone! You two stand out! Common civil courtesy may not exist in this newsgroup. The PCTA Double Standard is operative here. I don't believe much courtesy exists here. Funny because it is sticky sweet on the air, and all these fb gentlemen claim to be hams. No...I claim to be a Radio Amateur. In a previous posting, instead of the salutory "beep, beep" I've sometimes written (to annoy the morsemen), I wrote "toot, toot." :-) Steven James then takes a simple onomatopoetic word pair and manufactures a cute little fantasy involving a bathtup and little toy tugboat, claiming first that I do such things (I do not)...and now yourself. He is losing his grip on the reality. Fantasy is more preferable to him? Many of the PCTA do make frequent references to the male anatomy. As does Lennie H, Brain. "...PCTA shaking thier "we-we" in public...." It would be no stretch at all that they have visions of men in the bath tub. Not men, Brain. You. There's a difference. Men tell the truth, acknowledge their errors and have no reason to make up stories to impress anyone. So that leaves you pretty much out. Steven James has worked that up from your casual mention to some full-fledged imaginary "claim of your own greatness." That's another sickness syndrome in evidence. His, not yours, Brian. :-) He did admit jealousy of the locations that I've operated from. I can see that turning into rage. Jealous...?!?! Where did I EVER say I was JEALOUS of ANYthing you ever alleged to do, Brain...?!?! BBWWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Steven James has not operated anything from Somalia. It makes him angry that others have done things he hasn't done. He seems to think that everyone else is in some "contest" as to who has done more, accomplished more, a sort of "men's locker-room brag session" when few in here (other than himself) engage in that. Guys like him are always keeping score, and in this case, I can guess that he thinks he just doesn't measure up. What makes him even more furious is that I just don't care. Sure you care, Brain. I keep rubbing your nose in your blatant lies and make you face up to your lies. That's GOT to hurt. Now...if you'd STOP lying, I'd have less to do and you'd feel a lot better about yourself on several different levels. Again he keeps score, and sees that he just doesn't measure up. Are you on Lennie's "messaging points", program, Brain? I'm sure not. That's the usual MO for military fakers. Surprised he hasn't claimed to be a Navy Seal, a sniper, or Medal of Honor winner, though he does trot out a box of medals that he didn't earn. There's an other difference between you and I, Brain.... I admit the "medals in the box" are just that...unearned trophies. You try to claim your "medals" (operation in Somalia, "emergency comms" experience) are valid. That's why I have no reservation about calling you a liar in a public forum. Because you ARE a liar. Me? I just collect memorabillia and know the difference between them. Another technique I would call "remote transference." Steven James doesn't like to be humiliated (in any way) and thinks that all who don't believe him should themselves be humiliated. A better tactic would be to keep his mouth shut. Why? You only want me to "keep (my) mouth shut" because i frequently rub your nose in YOUR newsgroup droppings. If you'd stop lying, I'd have nothing to rub your nose in. The outpouring of libelous filth against all who disagree with him will continue until he receives some helpful mental therapy. Until then, this newsgroup will continue as an outlet for his personal frustrations and continue to lose relevance as a forum for discussion about subjects, not the personalities of individuals.. What "personalities of individuals" are you refering to, Lennie? Yours? Brain's? You're both archived liars and deceivers. If there's any "frustration", I am sure it's yours from having your nose rubbed in your misconducts. Your problem. My guess is bi-polar. And a "guess" would be all you'd be able to offer, Brain. Your "knowledge and experience" in healthcare is even less than your "knowledge and experience" as a "DXer". Steve, K4YZ |
wrote: From: "bb" been called a homosexual and a pedophile. Nor have I suggested that anyone on this group be visited by thugs who "throw rocks through windows, slask tires, and terrorize people's wives." Steve is truly dispicable. I don't have to live with that kind of public behavio[u]r. He does. My conscience is clean. Brain, if your "conscience is clean", you truly have low standards for yourself and your ethics. Well, two more things are operative there. Firstly, he may not be aware of the differences in his vile name-calling...it seems to all the same with him...he probably doesn't realize it. Secondly, he could be sociopathic and simply doesn't care about what he says in here...it vents his rages and so he feels better. The second syndrome is the worst of the two for everyone else. Actually, Lennie, the "sociopathic" here would be the guy who keeps posting in a forum in which he has no vested interest or risk. Either way, he presents an undesireable image of U.S. amateur radio to everyone else. To whom? You? Steven James has called you "liar" so many times that all those added up wouldn't require you to apologize to him. The other way around. At least in other venues. I can't keep count. Honestly. Suffice it to say that he will forever be known as the "Ham that cried 'Liar, liar, pants on fiar'" or wolf or something like that. Well, he does have a lack of social interaction skills. As opposed to YOUR "social interaction skills", Lennie? You're a liar. It's been proven. It's been archived. No matter He typically goes into outrage at anyone having experiences he doesn't have. Envy cubed. He can't stand it! I'd ask you to provide a quote that substantiates that, but you're so far behind that it would be useless. Guys like him are always keeping score, and in this case, I can guess that he thinks he just doesn't measure up. What makes him even more furious is that I just don't care. I don't think he understands that. He gets all tangled up between people, what they said, etc., then says they were "showing off" when a simple casual mention of personal experience was stated. An example is my mention of doing real HF communications in the Army a half century ago in regards to the Army (and other branches) NOT using "CW" in long-haul message traffic. The Lost Action Hero morphed that mention into some kind of "bragging" of mine...not understanding that I actually did what I said and can prove it with personal references. Oh, I NEVER said you were "showing off" over your alleged Army service, Lennie. What I HAVE said is that the MOS's that YOU have provided support my contention that you have NO "operating" experience, Army or otherwise. Oh, you may have "keyed up" a transmitter for testing purposes, but you were never an "operator" in any stretch of the imagination. You were a radio mechanic. Period. He isn't reading these postings with rose-colored glasses. His eyes are red with rage and cannot discern what was written. I read them just fine, Lennie. You've made numerous claims that your own subsequent posts undermined, including your claim of passing 1.2 million messages... He just can't come to terms with some of us have more experiences and/or more unique experiences than he had. That makes him defensive. In defense he tries a misdirection attack, trying to shift a thread direction...or he fabricates things which he never did. And I have experiences that YOU don't have, Lennie...Like a LIFELONG background in HF radio communications. And emergency communications. And health and welfare communications. And contesting communications. And aeronautical communications. It's his notable posting manner. Uncivil but characteristic. Coming from you, I take that as a compliment. You are, afterall, the King of Uncivil Newsgroup Posting. Another technique I would call "remote transference." Steven James doesn't like to be humiliated (in any way) and thinks that all who don't believe him should themselves be humiliated. A better tactic would be to keep his mouth shut. You know that, I know that, nearly everyone else who reads all these moronic mumblings of the Lost Action Hero know it. Poor Stevie can't bear to admit wrongdoing. Loss of face thing to admit weakness of any kind. When I make mistakes, Lennie, I acknowledge them and take responsibility for them. Still waiting on YOUR acknowldgement of your errors on Part 97 and your misrepresentations of dishonesty of the ARRL. He does suffer. It's no longer an excuse for his behavio[u]r, if it ever was. Makes no never mind on his side of the screen. He is alone with the monitor and feels invulnerable...no one can touch him! So, he goes ballistic with all the libelous filth he can type as a "response" to someone with an opinion opposite to his. He HATES some folks. Really HATES them. Tsk. If there is any "invunerability", Lennie, it comes from knowing that if you wanted to try and persue some legal recourse to try and stop it, that I'd simply bring copies of your postings to court with me. "It's not libelous if it's true" Just the same, the Lost Action Hero is an example of modern U.S. amateur radio extra class licensee. If the general public bothers to look in here, they would think extras are fruitcake. And perhaps they'd read a bit further and ask themselves why an octogenarian with no vested interest in the Newsgroup he frequents insists on reproving his dishonesty and deceitfulness. I certainly do. Steve, K4YZ |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com