![]() |
Scott Slack wrote:
Proposal: Make 11 meters available to to HAMs as secondary use. Power restricted to 100 Watts. Then the HAMs can have QSOs with CBers. -Scott Why would hams want to operate on 11 meters and talk to cbers? |
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
Scott Slack wrote: Proposal: Make 11 meters available to to HAMs as secondary use. Power restricted to 100 Watts. Then the HAMs can have QSOs with CBers. -Scott Why would hams want to operate on 11 meters and talk to cbers? Is that a valid email addy JJ, or are you using a valid domain without permission? |
Proposal: Make 11 meters available to to HAMs as secondary use. Power
restricted to 100 Watts. Why restrict Hams to what would be QRP level on that band? g QRP is defined as 5 watts or less. Then the HAMs can have QSOs with CBers. We already can, QSL? I have a CB in my vehicle. A stock TRC-451 with an Astatic 636-L and a 2x455 box that talks as far as I can hear with a full size antenna. I also have a 2 meter and sometimes 440 as well. I left the CB in because it was already there and when you want to find out why traffic stopped, there's nothing like 19, for a minute or two. With almost total lack of any enforcement there, who's to know, or care if Hams do that now? Only Riley will know... |
Steveo wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: Scott Slack wrote: Proposal: Make 11 meters available to to HAMs as secondary use. Power restricted to 100 Watts. Then the HAMs can have QSOs with CBers. -Scott Why would hams want to operate on 11 meters and talk to cbers? Is that a valid email addy JJ, or are you using a valid domain without permission? Switch noted.. are you getting this snow in Denver too JJ? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com