| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"N9OGL" wrote in message oups.com... Dee, I'll go a little farther, No where in the rules does it state that an information bulletin can be opinionated. The only thing the rules state is that an information bulletin must be "amateur radio related". Thus, anything outside that scope would be consider broadcasting. For example, if someone one was to run an information bulletin about what he thinks is a good antenna for DX and how to set up; it would fall under the scope. But if Someone was to run an information bulletin about what they think about the presidents economic plan, then it would fall outside the scope of an inforamtion bulletin and fall into the range of broadcasting. I not a gambler but I would bet the federal courts would see it that way too. Todd N9OGL Everyone would agree that information on what is a good antenna for DX or or government rulings on antennas would be within the scope of Part 97. And everyone would agree that a piece on the president's economic plan is outside the scope. No one has ever said otherwise. However an editorial on what you think hams should be doing quite possibly may not classify as information. There's little in an editorial piece that is of use to hams. Although editorials are derived from facts, they themselves are not intended to convey information. The other item that makes things look bad is that from your posts, it appears as if you are using the ham bands because you were turned down for a broadcast license. Even if you restrict your content to Part 97 to keep it legal, it looks as if your interest is broadcasting rather than ham radio. So why bother? It's too limiting for your objective of being a broadcaster. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would disagree with you on that, Information is 50% facts and 50%
opinions; You can get information from facts as well as from opinions. like I said until I see a ruling or a rule that states information bulletins can not be opinonated in my humble opinion they are legal. Why bother what?? I did understand that last part. Todd n9ogl |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | Broadcasting | |||
| Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1400 Â June 11, 2004 | General | |||
| 209 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (04-APR-04) | Shortwave | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | Dx | |||