K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
A simple search on Google turned up more than 8 pages of articles
on K1MAN.

Snip to...

The full commission dismissed it.....here's a an article from 2004:


ENFORCEMENT: FCC AGAIN WRITES TO K1MAN

The FCC has again written to Glenn Baxter, K1MAN, and the
commissions
note
has both good and bad news for the Belgrade Lakes, Maine radio
amateur.
On
the positive side, the April 14th letter informs K1MAN that a
review
of
his
transmissions indicates that he is complying with the Amateur
Service
regulations
regarding broadcasting and bulletins and station control.

The negative? The FCC alleges that K1MAN is in violation of rules
regarding use
of his Amateur station for pecuniary interest and those regarding
deliberate
interference to ongoing communications.

Also, the letter again told Baxter that his "felony affidavit
complaints" will not be
accepted by the regulatory agency. He was also reminded that all
frequencies in
the Amateur Radio Service are shared. No frequency is assigned for
the

exclusive use of any station, and that Baxter's station has no
greater rights to a
frequency at any particular time than does any other Amateur
station.

NEWSLINE ~ 2004

So try again....

And your own cite once again is your undoing, Toddie...

Read it again...

The negative? The FCC alleges that K1MAN is in violation of rules
regarding use
of his Amateur station for pecuniary interest and those regarding
deliberate
interference to ongoing communications.

I specifically stated that K1MAN has a track record of
misconduct issues to warrant reconsideration of a renewal in October
2005.

YOUR post simply acknowldeged what I said...he's got a track
record of misbehaviour that continues today.


Interference has nothing to do with his "content"(as I've repeat over
and over his content except Pecuniary interest is LEAGAL!. The same go
mine, as long as it's amateur related it don't matter if it's
opinionated or not it's legal.) and as for Pecuniary Interest, all he
has to do is stop advertising his website. But I think your missing the
point here...these are NOT NAL or Final "ORDER" from the FCC they are
only warning letters, which basically don't mean ****.
Todd N9OGL


Other threads in this NG have also that he's returned to his
previous patterns of "operation".

Just like I said.

Steve, K4YZ

HERE'S ANOTHER.......



April 14, 2004


Mr. Glenn A. Baxter
RR 1 Box 776
Belgrade Lakes, ME 04918


Amateur Radio license K1MAN


Dear Mr. Baxter:


This letter explains in what ways your Amateur station has come into
compliance with Commission rules since our letter to you of January 29,
2002; and notifies you of two areas of operation that, if not
corrected, will lead to enforcement action against your license and/or
designation of your renewal application for a hearing.


By letter dated January 29, 2002, the Commission notified you that your
understanding of various Amateur Radio Service rules was incorrect. We
outlined your apparent misconceptions regarding station control,
publishing a transmitting schedule and how that related to
interference, threats made to licensee complainants, including threats
made with so-called "felony complaint affidavits", broadcasting and
broadcasting of tape recordings and telephone conversations.


The January 29 letter detailed complaints received by the Commission,
and explained that your method of station control, i.e., "a timer from
Radio Shack", did not achieve compliance with the Commission's Rules
when you were not present at the control point for your station and,
therefore, did not satisfy the Commission's Rules regarding automatic
control of a station. We explained to you that to comply with the
Commission's Rules you must be at the transmitter, or at the
transmitter control point, every moment your station is transmitting
when your station is locally or remotely controlled; and that if the
station is controlled by telecommand from the control point using a
radio link, the frequencies used for telecommand must comply with the
Section 97.201 requirements for an auxiliary station (may transmit only
on the 1.25 m and shorter wavelength bands, except 219-220,
222-222.150, 431-433 and 435-438 MHz segments).


By letter dated March 4, 2003, the Commission's Boston Office notified
you that Commission monitoring and numerous complaints filed with the
Commission indicated that the problems outlined in January 2002 had not
been corrected. The letter stated that your Amateur station was
apparently being used for broadcasting various programs having nothing
to do with Amateur Radio; and that transmissions from your station were
being used for deliberate interference and for communications in which
you apparently had a pecuniary interest. The Boston Office letter
stated that transmissions started and ended erratically, were sometimes
repetitive and abruptly ended with no identification as required by
Commission rules, and that such operation indicated that the
transmissions were not under proper control of a licensed operator. The
letter noted also that you continually broadcast notices of so-called
"felony complaint affidavits " that you claimed to have filed with the
United States Justice Department against other Amateur Radio licensees
whom you perceived to have interfered with your broadcasts, or refused
to relinquish their operating frequency to you.


The Boston Office's letter stated that transmissions from your Amateur
station included references to a degree program and directed listeners
to your website that advertised an "American Radio School Technician
Degree in Electronics" for "$299.95". On that web site you solicited
donations for radio equipment, advertised a credit card, and solicited
donations and advertised for "IARN" and "AARA". The letter from the
Boston office pointed out that such use of your station was in apparent
violation of Section 97.113(a)(3) of the Commission's rules, which
prohibits "Communications for hire or for material compensation, direct
or indirect...." and "Communications in which the station licensee or
control operator has a pecuniary interest..."


The letter from the Boston Office requested that you provide
substantial additional information about the operation of your station,
including submission of a log detailing the information on a weekly
basis until further notice. In January 2004, the Boston office notified
you that you could discontinue the log submissions, and referred the
case to this office.


We have reviewed the information you submitted, as well as numerous
complaints filed against your station. Additionally we have reviewed
tape recordings made by Commission personnel of your transmissions at
various times during 2003 and 2004 subsequent to the Boston Office
letter of March 3, 2003.


It is the finding of this office that you are, with some exceptions,
generally in compliance with the Commission's rules in the Amateur
Service related to broadcasting and information bulletins, and we
explain as follows. Broadcasting is prohibited in the Amateur Radio
Service, with some exceptions. Section 97.3(a)(10) defines broadcasting
as "transmissions intended for reception by the general public, either
direct or relayed." One-way transmissions are limited in the Amateur
service, but an exception is allowed in Section 97.111(b)(6) for
"Transmissions necessary to disseminate information bulletins."


Information bulletins are defined by Section 97.3(a)(26) as messages
"directed only to Amateur operators consisting solely of subject matter
of direct interest to the Amateur service." There are no specific time
limits placed upon information bulletins by Commission rules. A review
of your programs at random times since March 3, 2003 indicates that
your transmissions were directed to Amateur Radio operators, not to the
general public, and that the individual bulletins were related to the
Amateur Radio Service. The only notable exception was the offering of a
reward for information leading to the identity of parties making
threatening telephone calls to you.


The station control problems outlined to you in warnings from the
Commission appear, with minor exceptions, to have been corrected.
During the monitoring period your station abruptly ended transmission
with no identification in one instance, and started transmissions in
mid-sentence in another instance.


There are, however, two areas in the operation of your Amateur station
that must be corrected in order to avoid enforcement action and/or a
designation of your renewal application for hearing to determine if you
are qualified to remain a licensee. These a 1) deliberate
interference resulting from your commencing operation on top of ongoing
communications, in violation of Section 97.101(a) and (d); and 2) use
of your Amateur station for pecuniary interests, in violation of
Sections 97.113(a)(2)and (3).


Regarding deliberate interference, we receive continuing complaints,
and our monitoring verifies, that your transmissions start up on top of
existing communications of individual licensees as well as nets such as
the Salvation Army Team Emergency Radio Network. Such operation
constitutes deliberate interference. Stations engaging in ongoing
communications are not obligated to stop transmitting when K1MAN wants
to start transmitting on a frequency, and complainants are so advised
by the Commission. You appear to believe that the publication of a
transmission schedule gives you the right to begin transmitting on a
certain frequency at a certain time, even if the frequency is occupied.
It does not.


All frequencies in the Amateur Radio Service are shared--no frequency
is assigned for the exclusive use of any station, and your Amateur
station has no greater rights to a frequency at any particular time
than any other Amateur station. Section 97.101(d) of the rules
prohibits an Amateur station from willfully or maliciously interfering
with any radio communication or signal. Moreover, publishing a schedule
is merely one of the several conditions necessary for the control
operator of a club station to accept compensation for transmitting
information bulletins, pursuant to Section 97.113(d) of the
Commission's rules. Your station K1MAN, however, is not a club station.



Regarding use of an Amateur station for pecuniary interest, we note
that your Amateur Radio program transmissions regularly advertise your
web page at www.K1man.com, and on those pages you advertise items for
sale by the American Amateur Radio Association (AARA), including T
shirts, hats and a "Technician Degree Diploma". You advertise the sales
commissions and "overrides" that your State Directors and Section
Managers can receive, and detail ways in which your Section Managers
can earn money by recruiting members, selling hats, name badges or T
shirts.


Section 97.113(a)(2) prohibits communications for hire or for material
compensation, direct or indirect, paid or promised. Section
97.113(a)(3) prohibits communications in which the station licensee or
control operator has a pecuniary interest.


We remind you that any attempts to threaten or intimidate Amateur radio
licensees operating on the Amateur bands will reflect adversely upon
your qualifications to remain a Commission licensee, and would be the
subject of a license revocation or renewal hearing. By letter dated
December 11, 2001, you were warned against the sending of your
so-called "felony complaint affidavits" to various Amateur Radio
licenses that you perceive to either cause interference to your station
or which do not relinquish to you the frequency on which they are
operating.


Complainants were advised by the Commission to forward any such
"affidavits" they received to the Commission, and that they could
otherwise be ignored. The United States Attorney for your jurisdiction
also warned you that the mailing of such "affidavits" is contrary to
law. Apparently you have discontinued those threats. We also remind you
that, in regard to the taping and broadcasting of telephone calls, you
must comply with applicable state laws.


In conclusion, failure to correct the deliberate interference caused by
K1MAN, and the continued use of K1MAN for pecuniary interests, will
lead to enforcement action against your license. Either would be
sufficient to designate your renewal application for an evidentiary
hearing to determine if you are qualified to remain a Commission
licensee.


An adverse finding in regard to threats to complainant licensees, or
violation of state law regarding recording and broadcasting telephone
conversations, would lead to enforcement action against your license
and would be sufficient to designate your renewal application for an
evidentiary hearing to determine if you are qualified to remain a
Commission licensee. You would have the burden of proof in such a
proceeding.


You should be aware that in 1990, the Commission revised its character
qualifications policy, expanding the types of non-FCC-related
misconduct that it would consider as bearing on licensee or applicant
character qualifications (Policy Regarding Character Qualifications in
Broadcast Licensing, Policy Statement and Order, 5 FCC RCD 3252 (1990)
(Character Policy Statement), recon. granted in part, denied in part, 6
FCC Rcd 3448 (1991), further recon. granted, 7 FCC Rcd 6564 (1992). The
Commission concluded that "a propensity to comply with the law
generally is relevant to the Commission's public interest analysis, and
that an applicant's or licensee's willingness to violate other laws,
and, in particular, to commit felonies, also bears on our confidence
that an applicant or licensee will conform to FCC rules and policies.
The 1990 Character Policy Statement applies to Amateur Radio licensees
just as it does to all other FCC licensees ( See, e.g., Herbert L.
Schoenbohm, Decision, 13 FCC Rcd 15028 (1998), recon. denied, 13 FCC
Rcd 23774 (1998), aff'd in part, dismissed in part sub nom. Schoenbohm
v. FCC, 204 F.3d 243 (2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 405 (2000);
Leslie D. Brewer, Order to Show Cause, Notice of Order of Suspension,
Notice of Opportunity for Hearing, and Notice of Apparent Liability for
a Forfeiture, 16 FCC Rcd 5671, licenses revoked, 16 FCC Rcd 12878
(2001).

Accordingly, we will continue to review the operation of K1MAN in light
of the issues outlined above.


CC: FCC Northeastern Regional Director
FCC Boston Office District Director
Honorable Paula D. Silsby, United States Attorney, US Department of
Justice, District of Maine
Timothy D. Wing, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U. S. Department of Justice,
District of Maine

N9OGL wrote:
HERE'S ANOTHER.......

April 14, 2004

Mr. Glenn A. Baxter
RR 1 Box 776
Belgrade Lakes, ME 04918

Amateur Radio license K1MAN

BUNCH OF STUFF SNIPPED:

In conclusion, failure to correct the deliberate interference caused
by
K1MAN, and the continued use of K1MAN for pecuniary interests, will
lead to enforcement action against your license. Either would be
sufficient to designate your renewal application for an evidentiary
hearing to determine if you are qualified to remain a Commission
licensee.


An adverse finding in regard to threats to complainant licensees, or
violation of state law regarding recording and broadcasting telephone
conversations, would lead to enforcement action against your license
and would be sufficient to designate your renewal application for an
evidentiary hearing to determine if you are qualified to remain a
Commission licensee. You would have the burden of proof in such a
proceeding.


You should be aware that in 1990, the Commission revised its
character
qualifications policy, expanding the types of non-FCC-related
misconduct that it would consider as bearing on licensee or applicant
character qualifications (Policy Regarding Character Qualifications
in
Broadcast Licensing, Policy Statement and Order, 5 FCC RCD 3252
(1990)
(Character Policy Statement), recon. granted in part, denied in part,
6
FCC Rcd 3448 (1991), further recon. granted, 7 FCC Rcd 6564 (1992).
The
Commission concluded that "a propensity to comply with the law
generally is relevant to the Commission's public interest analysis,
and
that an applicant's or licensee's willingness to violate other laws,
and, in particular, to commit felonies, also bears on our confidence
that an applicant or licensee will conform to FCC rules and policies.
The 1990 Character Policy Statement applies to Amateur Radio
licensees
just as it does to all other FCC licensees ( See, e.g., Herbert L.
Schoenbohm, Decision, 13 FCC Rcd 15028 (1998), recon. denied, 13 FCC
Rcd 23774 (1998), aff'd in part, dismissed in part sub nom.
Schoenbohm
v. FCC, 204 F.3d 243 (2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 405 (2000);
Leslie D. Brewer, Order to Show Cause, Notice of Order of Suspension,
Notice of Opportunity for Hearing, and Notice of Apparent Liability
for
a Forfeiture, 16 FCC Rcd 5671, licenses revoked, 16 FCC Rcd 12878
(2001).

Accordingly, we will continue to review the operation of K1MAN in
light
of the issues outlined above.


CC: FCC Northeastern Regional Director
FCC Boston Office District Director
Honorable Paula D. Silsby, United States Attorney, US Department of
Justice, District of Maine
Timothy D. Wing, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U. S. Department of
Justice,
District of Maine

My claims substantiated by Todd's work.

Thanks, Todd! You may be an idiot, but I certainly can't call you
a SELFISH idiot...

Steve, K4YZ

Interfernce is one thing but the content of the station is
another....1. I'm not interferning with any station, 2. I'm not
recording any telephone calls, and 3. I'm not doinbg anything of a
Pecuniary Interest, my programsm are only directed to the amateur radio
service and thus, legal!!
Todd N9OGL

K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
HERE'S ANOTHER.e......

April 14, 2004

Mr. Glenn A. Baxter
RR 1 Box 776
Belgrade Lakes, ME 04918

Amateur Radio license K1MAN

BUNCH OF STUFF SNIPPED:

In conclusion, failure to correct the deliberate interference
caused
by
K1MAN, and the continued use of K1MAN for pecuniary interests, will
lead to enforcement action against your license. Either would be
sufficient to designate your renewal application for an evidentiary
hearing to determine if you are qualified to remain a Commission
licensee.


An adverse finding in regard to threats to complainant licensees,
or
violation of state law regarding recording and broadcasting
telephone
conversations, would lead to enforcement action against your
license
and would be sufficient to designate your renewal application for
an
evidentiary hearing to determine if you are qualified to remain a
Commission licensee. You would have the burden of proof in such a
proceeding.


You should be aware that in 1990, the Commission revised its
character
qualifications policy, expanding the types of non-FCC-related
misconduct that it would consider as bearing on licensee or
applicant
character qualifications (Policy Regarding Character Qualifications
in
Broadcast Licensing, Policy Statement and Order, 5 FCC RCD 3252
(1990)
(Character Policy Statement), recon. granted in part, denied in
part,
6
FCC Rcd 3448 (1991), further recon. granted, 7 FCC Rcd 6564 (1992).
The
Commission concluded that "a propensity to comply with the law
generally is relevant to the Commission's public interest analysis,
and
that an applicant's or licensee's willingness to violate other
laws,
and, in particular, to commit felonies, also bears on our
confidence
that an applicant or licensee will conform to FCC rules and
policies.
The 1990 Character Policy Statement applies to Amateur Radio
licensees
just as it does to all other FCC licensees ( See, e.g., Herbert L.
Schoenbohm, Decision, 13 FCC Rcd 15028 (1998), recon. denied, 13
FCC
Rcd 23774 (1998), aff'd in part, dismissed in part sub nom.
Schoenbohm
v. FCC, 204 F.3d 243 (2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 405 (2000);
Leslie D. Brewer, Order to Show Cause, Notice of Order of
Suspension,
Notice of Opportunity for Hearing, and Notice of Apparent Liability
for
a Forfeiture, 16 FCC Rcd 5671, licenses revoked, 16 FCC Rcd 12878
(2001).

Accordingly, we will continue to review the operation of K1MAN in
light
of the issues outlined above.


CC: FCC Northeastern Regional Director
FCC Boston Office District Director
Honorable Paula D. Silsby, United States Attorney, US Department of
Justice, District of Maine
Timothy D. Wing, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U. S. Department of
Justice,
District of Maine

My claims substantiated by Todd's work.

Thanks, Todd! You may be an idiot, but I certainly can't call
you
a SELFISH idiot...

Steve, K4YZ

This by the way is a warning letter.

Todd N9OGL

N9OGL wrote: (I added the attributes since Todd doesn't know how...)

K4YZ wrote
My claims substantiated by Todd's work.

Thanks, Todd! You may be an idiot, but I certainly can't call
you
a SELFISH idiot...

Interfernce is one thing but the content of the station is
another....1. I'm not interferning with any station, 2. I'm not
recording any telephone calls, and 3. I'm not doinbg anything of a
Pecuniary Interest, my programsm are only directed to the amateur
radio
service and thus, legal!!

So how do you know you are not interfering with anyone since you
are making one-way transmissions?

And what are you doing about collecting a rebate for the English
portions of your soon-to-be-finished "college" education?

This by the way is a warning letter.

Yep. It sure was. And it was proof of exactly what I had been
saying about Baxter's track record of misconduct on the air and his
frequent run-in's with the FCC.

At some point in time the camel's back will have exceeded it's
load carrying capability...then plop...straw all over the place...

So far your rants have only substantiated EXACTLY what I have said
about parallels between you and Baxter.

Why aren't you paying attention?

Steve, K4YZ

So true, because as you said
"If I had my radio hooked up I would check in...."
so you can't get on the lib net,and you can't cause Interfernce! Your
radio's not hooked up, you inventions aren't listed, you're here all day
posting bs. Why not just get an FRS radio and do your brodcast on it?

N9OGL wrote:
Interfernce is one thing but the content of the station is
another....1. I'm not interferning with any station, 2. I'm not
recording any telephone calls, and 3. I'm not doinbg anything of a
Pecuniary Interest, my programsm are only directed to the amateur radio
service and thus, legal!!
Todd N9OGL

K4YZ wrote:

N9OGL wrote:

HERE'S ANOTHER.e......

April 14, 2004

Mr. Glenn A. Baxter
RR 1 Box 776
Belgrade Lakes, ME 04918

Amateur Radio license K1MAN

BUNCH OF STUFF SNIPPED:


In conclusion, failure to correct the deliberate interference

caused

by

K1MAN, and the continued use of K1MAN for pecuniary interests, will
lead to enforcement action against your license. Either would be
sufficient to designate your renewal application for an evidentiary
hearing to determine if you are qualified to remain a Commission
licensee.


An adverse finding in regard to threats to complainant licensees,

or

violation of state law regarding recording and broadcasting

telephone

conversations, would lead to enforcement action against your

license

and would be sufficient to designate your renewal application for

an

evidentiary hearing to determine if you are qualified to remain a
Commission licensee. You would have the burden of proof in such a
proceeding.


You should be aware that in 1990, the Commission revised its

character

qualifications policy, expanding the types of non-FCC-related
misconduct that it would consider as bearing on licensee or

applicant

character qualifications (Policy Regarding Character Qualifications

in

Broadcast Licensing, Policy Statement and Order, 5 FCC RCD 3252

(1990)

(Character Policy Statement), recon. granted in part, denied in

part,

6

FCC Rcd 3448 (1991), further recon. granted, 7 FCC Rcd 6564 (1992).

The

Commission concluded that "a propensity to comply with the law
generally is relevant to the Commission's public interest analysis,

and

that an applicant's or licensee's willingness to violate other

laws,

and, in particular, to commit felonies, also bears on our

confidence

that an applicant or licensee will conform to FCC rules and

policies.

The 1990 Character Policy Statement applies to Amateur Radio

licensees

just as it does to all other FCC licensees ( See, e.g., Herbert L.
Schoenbohm, Decision, 13 FCC Rcd 15028 (1998), recon. denied, 13

FCC

Rcd 23774 (1998), aff'd in part, dismissed in part sub nom.

Schoenbohm

v. FCC, 204 F.3d 243 (2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 405 (2000);
Leslie D. Brewer, Order to Show Cause, Notice of Order of

Suspension,

Notice of Opportunity for Hearing, and Notice of Apparent Liability

for

a Forfeiture, 16 FCC Rcd 5671, licenses revoked, 16 FCC Rcd 12878
(2001).

Accordingly, we will continue to review the operation of K1MAN in

light

of the issues outlined above.


CC: FCC Northeastern Regional Director
FCC Boston Office District Director
Honorable Paula D. Silsby, United States Attorney, US Department of
Justice, District of Maine
Timothy D. Wing, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U. S. Department of

Justice,

District of Maine

My claims substantiated by Todd's work.

Thanks, Todd! You may be an idiot, but I certainly can't call

you

a SELFISH idiot...

Steve, K4YZ


This by the way is a warning letter.

Todd N9OGL

So how do you know you are not interfering with anyone since you
are making one-way transmissions?

I pick a unused frequency and ask three times if the frequency is in
use? if no one answers I uses it, Unlike K1MAN and W1AW who just begins
transmitting. If you don't answer or I don't hear then then too bad,
I'm using the frequency.

Yep. It sure was. And it was proof of exactly what I had been
saying about Baxter's track record of misconduct on the air and his
frequent run-in's with the FCC

It seems to me that you 1. don't really know what an warning letter is
or 2. don't know how the FCC process works.

So far your rants have only substantiated EXACTLY what I have said
about parallels between you and Baxter.


Why aren't you paying attention?

In what way???? The FCC if you didn't read stated:

"It is the finding of this office that you are, with some exceptions,
generally in compliance with the Commission's rules in the Amateur
Service related to broadcasting and information bulletins, and we
explain as follows. Broadcasting is prohibited in the Amateur Radio
Service, with some exceptions. Section 97.3(a)(10) defines broadcasting

as "transmissions intended for reception by the general public, either
direct or relayed." One-way transmissions are limited in the Amateur
service, but an exception is allowed in Section 97.111(b)(6) for
"Transmissions necessary to disseminate information bulletins."


Information bulletins are defined by Section 97.3(a)(26) as messages
"directed only to Amateur operators consisting solely of subject matter

of direct interest to the Amateur service." There are no specific time
limits placed upon information bulletins by Commission rules. A review
of your programs at random times since March 3, 2003 indicates that
your transmissions were directed to Amateur Radio operators, not to the

general public, and that the individual bulletins were related to the
Amateur Radio Service. The only notable exception was the offering of a

reward for information leading to the identity of parties making
threatening telephone calls to you."

you can't get it through you dumb**** head that my Information
Bulletins ae LEGAL!!!!!!!!

First off I have better things to do then talk on the radio....unlike
you I HAVE A LIFE!!! Secondly who said I was going to interfer???
Finally, as for my Inventions I DON'T HAVE TO SHOW YOU OR PROVE TO YOU
****
I keep my information bulletins on the ham bands thank you very much!

todd n9ogl

Toddy has a real gift - He meets the needs of the ham community by
providing informational bulletin shows of great importance, just like
K1MAN.

N9OGL wrote:

First off I have better things to do then talk on the radio....unlike
you I HAVE A LIFE!!!

You are the one who says their life is to broadcast, but I guess your
"better things to do are hang out here all day and post BS.

Secondly who said I was going to interfer???

Well I said you can't interfere if your radio isn't hooked up!

Finally, as for my Inventions I DON'T HAVE TO SHOW YOU OR PROVE TO YOU
****

You're correct you don't have to prove **** to anybody, BUT to quote you

"For your information you redneck, I've started another page where I
plan to post all my idea's and inventions........my question to you is,
what the have you ever invented.....Answer NOTHING, because like all
the other licensed CB operators on here you don't have the brains to
invent, only to badmouth people on and off the air.

Todd N9OGL

http://n9oglinvents.blogspot.com/ "

I think your CAPS LOCK key got stuck in mid-sentance!

I keep my information bulletins on the ham bands thank you very much!

How? Your radio isn't hooked up!

todd n9ogl

You know todd, I was on your side for a while, but I see you are nothing
but an uneducated, illiterate, racist, braggart who is full of BS. Make
the world a better place and go away!