Dee Flint wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote in message
ups.com...

N9OGL wrote:

WELL YOU ####ING ##### IF THEY WOULD OF CONSIDER MY APPLICATION
AND
WAIVER LIKE THEIR SUPPOSE TOO THEN I WOULDN'T OF DID WHAT I DID,
WHY
SHOULD I CONTINUE TO SPEND THE TIME AND MONEY YOU %%%%ING &&&HOLE
ON
APPLYING FOR A LICENSE???

By the way, Todd...It's illegal to do another illegal act just
because you don't like the way things are going. There is
absolutely no
legal justification for going ahead and breaking the law to do what
you
were told "no" for in the first place.

IT'S NOT FICTICIOUS YOU ****ING &&&&.

To quote Mr. Spock..."Nothing unreal exists..."

It's just NOT your legal name. It's an alias. An "AKA" to law
enforcement. It, like your claim to operating a broadcast station,
both on TV, FM-broadcast, and Amateur Radio frequencies, has no
legal
standing.

Personally, I think you're just acting silly.

If he really wanted to, he could file a form (in most states) for DBA
(doing
business as). Then it has legal standing for a lot of activities. I
don't
know whether it applies to radio and licensing though.

The key phrase there, Dee, is " doing 'business' as "...There's
no valid reason for him to file an Amateur Radio application with a
DBA.

Now....M A Y B E if he got a DBA and convieniently forgot to
mention it WAS a DBA, he'd slide in under the FCC's noses and get that
license he's whining about...But I doubt it...

73

Steve, K4YZ