Mike Coslo wrote:
Mel A. Nomah wrote:
Chubby Nursie,

I've been valiantly trying to follow this one-sided thread about
threats
made on you by some anonymous person (or maybe not) in some
private(?) email
exchange (how do you exchange emails with someone anonymous?).
I've come to
the conclusion that

a) you're making it up, or
b) you're corresponding with a phantom who is invisible to the rest
of us
here on rrap, or
c) you've found a miraculous way of exchanging email with anonymous
senders

If the answer is a) then shame on you.
If the answer is b) then seek mental counseling
If the answer is c) then consult a patent attorney because you've a
gold
mine on your hands.

73,

M.A.N.

--
"I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O
Lord,
make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it."
- Voltaire

The other poster is real, Mel.

- Mike KB3EIA -

Do you and Robeson share an e-mail account?

bb wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote:

Mel A. Nomah wrote:

Chubby Nursie,

I've been valiantly trying to follow this one-sided thread about

threats

made on you by some anonymous person (or maybe not) in some

private(?) email

exchange (how do you exchange emails with someone anonymous?).

I've come to

the conclusion that

a) you're making it up, or
b) you're corresponding with a phantom who is invisible to the rest

of us

here on rrap, or
c) you've found a miraculous way of exchanging email with anonymous

senders

If the answer is a) then shame on you.
If the answer is b) then seek mental counseling
If the answer is c) then consult a patent attorney because you've a

gold

mine on your hands.

73,

M.A.N.

--
"I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O

Lord,

make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it."
- Voltaire

The other poster is real, Mel.

- Mike KB3EIA -


Do you and Robeson share an e-mail account?

Nope. but the person involved emailed me also. And since it was private
email, I won't divulge the name.

As for the content of Steve's post, a person can either take it to mean
that an attractive person used in an advertisement is a successful
tactic ala "must be selling something", or that an attractive person in
an advertisement is selling sex. I chose to read it as being a
successful tactic, because most ads with attractive people are selling
other things.

Too bad, that. Otherwise I might have a career as a supermodel......... ;^)

- Mike KB3EIA -

Mike Coslo wrote:
bb wrote:


Do you and Robeson share an e-mail account?

Nope. but the person involved emailed me also. And since it was
private
email, I won't divulge the name.

As for the content of Steve's post, a person can either take it to
mean
that an attractive person used in an advertisement is a successful
tactic ala "must be selling something", or that an attractive person
in
an advertisement is selling sex. I chose to read it as being a
successful tactic, because most ads with attractive people are
selling
other things.

But that requires a patient, mature mind, Mike...Not one ready to
jump to conclusions or always scratching for a fight.

Too bad, that. Otherwise I might have a career as a
supermodel......... ;^)

You and me both, Brother...You and me both!...!

73

Steve, K4YZ

It get's more confusing every morning Brian. Now it appears this "private"
real but anonymous person has threatened both Steve and Mike but doesn't
have the decency to do it in public, forcing them into the embarassing
position of publicly exposing their victimization without knowing who
threatened them.

Strangerer and strangerer!

M.A.N.
--
"I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O Lord,
make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it."
- Voltaire

Mel A. Nomah wrote:
It get's more confusing every morning Brian. Now it appears this
"private"
real but anonymous person has threatened both Steve and Mike but
doesn't
have the decency to do it in public, forcing them into the
embarassing
position of publicly exposing their victimization without knowing who
threatened them.

Strangerer and strangerer!

M.A.N.
--
"I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O Lord,
make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it."
- Voltaire

Strangereer indeed.

You know, Mel, if that real but anonymous person had suggested in
his/her quasi-"private" email with CC's to Mike and who knows else,
that brick would fly through windows, tires would be slashed, and wives
terrorized, I could see Steve Robeson/K4YZ characterizing the email as
a threat. But the person merely indicated that Steve's publicly made
inuendo would reach the person to whom he made the comments about. I
see no threat. I see Robeson posturing and pretending to be a victim
himself. At best he's merely a #1 jerk who may have once worn a marine
uniform. At worst he needs to seek counseling.

bb wrote:

Strangereer indeed.

You know, Mel, if that real but anonymous person had suggested in
his/her quasi-"private" email with CC's to Mike and who knows else,
that brick would fly through windows, tires would be slashed, and
wives
terrorized, I could see Steve Robeson/K4YZ characterizing the email
as
a threat.

Glad you brought that up, Brian.

You've claimed that I have made such threats.

I have asked you over and over to quote the posts wherein I
allegedly made such threats, but all you do is continue to make the
insinuation.

Of course you and I both know the threats were never made...I just
enjoy rubbing your nose in your frequent retelling of already disposven
lies.

But the person merely indicated that Steve's publicly made
inuendo would reach the person to whom he made the comments about.

The statement was made that this was an "attack", and
characterised as such. The respondant was asked to demonstrate where
the "attack" was. S/he did not...COULD not, since one was not made.

I see no threat.

Claiming to be ready to tell third parties that they were
"attacked" in a public forum when no auch attack occured could be a
threat...However no such "attack" was ever made.

I see Robeson posturing and pretending to be a victim himself.

I'm not a victim. I refuse to be one. That's why YOU can't get
away with your misrepresentations about Amateur Radio. I AM a
licensed Amateur, and such misrepresentations necessarilly include me.

I refuse to allow you to lie about me.

At best he's merely a #1 jerk who may have once worn a marine
uniform.

"May have"...?!?!

At worst he needs to seek counseling.

Still waiting for you to ante up those healthcare licenses or
certifications, Brian.

Try again.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:

Strangereer indeed.

You know, Mel, if that real but anonymous person had suggested in
his/her quasi-"private" email with CC's to Mike and who knows else,
that brick would fly through windows, tires would be slashed, and
wives
terrorized, I could see Steve Robeson/K4YZ characterizing the email
as
a threat.

Glad you brought that up, Brian.

Doesn't make me happy or sad. It's just a fact that you posted just
those scenarios. Maybe you thought you were giving some "friendly
advice."

You've claimed that I have made such threats.

If you view someone saying that they were going to forward your
comments to the very person that you made the comments about as a
"THREAT," I can only wonder how you might have reacted had that person
suggested that you might have your tires slashed, windows broken, and
wife terrorized (by other people, of course) all because your shot off
your big mouth?

Claiming to be ready to tell third parties that they were
"attacked" in a public forum when no auch attack occured could be a
threat...However no such "attack" was ever made.

So how is Jim? As it is only Mike stands with you. I wonder when he
will fade away, too.

I see Robeson posturing and pretending to be a victim himself.

I'm not a victim. I refuse to be one.

Bully for you (however misguided you may be).

That's why YOU can't get
away with your misrepresentations about Amateur Radio. I AM a
licensed Amateur, and such misrepresentations necessarilly include
me.

And I am a licensed amateur. My comments especially included you.

I refuse to allow you to lie about me.

That could only work if I were lying.

Mel A. Nomah wrote:

It get's more confusing every morning Brian. Now it appears this "private"
real but anonymous person has threatened both Steve and Mike

No one threatened me, Mel. I was just cc'd in the reply the person made
to Steve.


but doesn't
have the decency to do it in public, forcing them into the embarassing
position of publicly exposing their victimization without knowing who
threatened them.

Strangerer and strangerer!

And how!

M.A.N.
--
"I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O Lord,
make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it."
- Voltaire

I do like that quote........

- Mike KB3EIA -

Mel A. Nomah wrote:
It get's more confusing every morning Brian. Now it appears this
"private"
real but anonymous person has threatened both Steve and Mike but
doesn't
have the decency to do it in public, forcing them into the
embarassing
position of publicly exposing their victimization without knowing who
threatened them.

Neither of us were vicitimized. The person making the "threats"
didn't have the "stuff" to make the threat he claimed he would. And if
s/he carried out the intended threat, s/he would have looked sillier
than the quotes s/he was claiming to be inappropriate.

And if you had paid attention to previous posts, YOU would know
that we know exactly who the third person is. The comments were
discussed here since they related to an on-going post.

Just as I expected, no one perceived the same "impropriety" that
the un-named author did.

Steve, K4YZ

"K4YZ" wrote in message
ps.com...

:
: And if you had paid attention to previous posts, YOU would know
: that we know exactly who the third person is.
:

Sorry, I missed that, and going back over the thread history I now see that
you have identified the anonymous person who privately threatened you.

Which raises the question as to why you and Mike (I'm still confused as to
how Mike is involved) didn't just reply to her (him?) instead of bore us
here with your one-sided diatribe. I thought the fact that she (he?) has
blocked your email must be the reason you need to use this medium to
communicate, but on examination that block seems after the fact. Maybe you
just needed to vent.

On the other hand, I still haven't ruled out the notion that she (he?) is a
phantom and you're just staging an entertainment for us here.

73,

M.A.N.
--
"I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O Lord,
make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it."
- Voltaire