From: "bb" on Mon,Apr 11 2005 8:09 pm

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
wrote:


No doubt that inadequacy is at the root of his hatred for you.

You continue to insist that I ahte Lennie. I don't. I
understand him better than he accepts tht I do, and therefore make
sure that OTHERS understand him too.

Just like I do you, Brian.

You hate me too? OK, Mr Obvious.

:-) Stebie HATES everyone who stands up to him. :-)

Tsk. He probably calls Amelia "putz" as a term
of affection? :-)


Welp, The Amateur Formerly Known As Reverend Jim doesn't seem to
mind.

Wondering who THAT is becasue there's never been an Amateur
KNOWN as "Reverend Jim" That I am aware of, other than in Lennie's
imagination.

You know, the guy that trims out "W5TIT" but leaves in "Putz."

:-) Poor Stebie...still can't see others making
fun of him. The same thing is true for Jimmie, but
then he might be taking those testosterone
supplements...


Steve has single handedly given thes rra.misc idiots a home on
rrap. Thank you Steve.

They'll soon move on and you and Lennie will have it all back
to
yourselves...And it wasn't my doings, Brian...It was Toiddie's
cross-posted rantings, not me, that brought them here.

Please try to keep your "facts" (snickersnicker)straight.

Without you bringing him back for more with your incessant "demanding
of facts" etc, Todd would have dried up and blown away a long time
ago.

Quite true again. Stebie has to antagonizingly PRESS on
"everyone ELSE is always wrong" in the famous "big lie"
technique he learned from "Mein Kampf."



I started counting his new lies last week. He absolutely hates
it.

I "absolutely hate" that you further humilate yourself counting
nothing, Brian. You have never substantiated the first alleged lie.

Sooooooo.....Zero is still zero....

Lie #12?

...plus a thousand more before it... :-)



retired (from regular hours) electronic engineer person

Oooh! You gonna get Steve all worked up over that last comment.

Why? He (Lennie) still has yet to provide us with so much as
one
professional paper with his name on it. So Lennie's claim to having
been a "professional engineer" is vaporware.

Steve, K4YZ

Is that more of your "facts," Steve? An electronic engineer must have
published papers. Hi! Be sure to tell that to Congress before they
let hundreds of thousands more of them immigrate to the USA.

Stebie KNOWS ALL ABOUT ENGINEERING, Brian. After all, he
did work as a purchasing agent for less than half a year.
"real close" to those who were actually doing engineering.
:-)

Poor Stebie hasn't bothered to check the references I posted
in here, hasn't even checked with the hams I've named in here,
hasn't done a literature search other than ham publications.
I could digitize some of those papers and send them out in
private mail attachments...but Stebie would REJECT that just
as he did with my commercial first 'phone license scan. :-)
That's a waste of time. Tsk...I put up some memorabilia on
communications and radio relay on another's website, put
the web address in here, and NO ONE bothered to look.
Dave said it was a waste of time and couldn't be bothered.

Just so's w3rv doesn't chime in with that false argument
again, I am NOT a state-registered Professional Engineer.
I AM an electronics design engineer who works for money
and that makes me a professional person. I am a Life Member
of the IEEE, a professional association. I don't HAVE to
get up and go to work every working day...that's called
"retirement." :-) [sometimes that really ****es off
those who still have a mortgage and loans to pay off, etc.,
but we are NOT all in the same working situation]

Stebie is really working overtime on manufacturing LIES
about me and you and Todd and anyone else who crosses
him in here. Not surprising to me.

Welp, we always did know that you don't know what you're talking
about.
And them's the facts.

That's stating the obvious. :-)

wrote:
From: "bb" on Mon,Apr 11 2005 8:09 pm

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
wrote:


No doubt that inadequacy is at the root of his hatred for you.

You continue to insist that I ahte Lennie. I don't. I
understand him better than he accepts tht I do, and therefore make
sure that OTHERS understand him too.

Just like I do you, Brian.

You hate me too? OK, Mr Obvious.

:-) Stebie HATES everyone who stands up to him. :-)

Snip of usual regurgitated LennieStuff to:

Stebie is really working overtime on manufacturing LIES
about me and you and Todd and anyone else who crosses
him in here. Not surprising to me.

There's nothing "manufactured" about you, Lennie....Everything
that's been said here has been a direct result of information YOU
provided.

Sorry if that's a problem, but you did provide it.

You do lie, both about Amateur Radio in general and many of us who
are practitioners of that art. You've told us of things you'd do and
of things you've done, yet NO PROOF.

You taught Brian well...Just keep pouring the lies in to try and
further dilute the already muddled pool...Except that some of us can
stay ahead of your silliness and THAT is what YOU hate.

Leonard H. Anderson is a known chronic liar.

Steve, K4YZ

From: K4YZ on Apr 12, 6:04 am

wrote:
From: "bb" on Mon,Apr 11 2005 8:09 pm
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
wrote:


No doubt that inadequacy is at the root of his hatred for you.

You continue to insist that I ahte Lennie. I don't. I
understand him better than he accepts tht I do, and therefore
make
sure that OTHERS understand him too.

Just like I do you, Brian.

You hate me too? OK, Mr Obvious.

:-) Stebie HATES everyone who stands up to him. :-)

Snip of usual regurgitated LennieStuff to:

Poor baby...lil Stebie just CAN'T handle it...tsk, tsk.

Stebie is really working overtime on manufacturing LIES
about me and you and Todd and anyone else who crosses
him in here. Not surprising to me.

There's nothing "manufactured" about you, Lennie....Everything
that's been said here has been a direct result of information YOU
provided.

Tsk, tsk. You're going to say it is "all LIES" again,
aren't you? :-)

Is that all you "ahve?" :-)


Sorry if that's a problem, but you did provide it.

Provide WHAT? :-)

Poor baby...you couldn't STAND a short-form resume',
you thought it all some kind of "brag" exercise.
Tsk, it wasn't. It made you resentful and that
prompted your anger, hatred, and in-group attacks.

I've provided names and callsigns of those who know
me, but you have NOT contacted them. Instead, you
MANUFACTURE some person at NADC that claims to know
me...a decade after I'd been there and a PhD to boot
but NOBODY (but you) knows the name. :-)

I sent you a scan of my first 'phone license (the
very first one) and you would NOT look at it! :-)
Instead you manufactured a clear-libel "personal
page" on AOL damning me in no uncertain terms.
Fortunately for all concerned (except yourself), AOL
took it down as soon as they were informed. :-)

You do lie, both about Amateur Radio in general and many of us
who
are practitioners of that art. You've told us of things you'd do and
of things you've done, yet NO PROOF.

Tsk, tsk, tsk. Here's the way things go down in
the rational world:

"Proof" is provided in the form of unalterable
third-party sources...things like employers, friends
(preferrably those that aren't within easy driving
distance to avoid collusion), publications, local
and national governmental records archives, some
place that is relatively easy to get at such as
Internet sites. [I've given you ALL those "links"
in here] The next step is for YOU to check out those
third-party references...or anyone else to do it, as
they want. That "proof" remains unalterable except
when a personal reference passes on (none of mine
have yet).

NO ONE MUST give YOU any "proof" of what they WILL
do. NO ONE can predict the future. :-)

In any event, you are NOT some kind of "judge" to
hand out any "ruling" on anyone, certainly not your
e-opponents. :-) You keep crowing that you ARE
one, but that is YOUR OWN LIE that you tell the
world. A LIE anywhichway it goes.

Now you MUST tell all about this former NADC
employee who claims to know me a decade after I
was there. You have NOT done so. You LIE.

You haven't told the Where or When of those famous
"seven hostile actions" you claim but won't reveal.
Tsk. You LIE and then give yourself a pat on the
back for imagining that to be "truth!" :-)

You have NOT acknowledged that the DoD directs and
supervises MARS, even when informed of the website
and full link details of the directive by DoD (as I
did in here).

In short, sweetums, like the infamous Colonel
Jessup of the film "A Few Good Men," you just can't
handle the truth! You LIE with impunity and then
accuse others of "lying" when they give details
and references. Tsk, tsk, tsk.

You taught Brian well...Just keep pouring the lies in to try and
further dilute the already muddled pool...Except that some of us can
stay ahead of your silliness and THAT is what YOU hate.

You poor psychoed-to-the-max thing. Brian is a
rational human being who can think for himself.
I didn't "teach" him anything in regards to being
rational. We've both observed you in detail and
came to the same agreement...you're some kind of
sick psycho who CAN'T STAND being opposed in
anything.

Leonard H. Anderson is a known chronic liar.

Tsk, tsk, tsk. Not at all. You are SICK,
sweetums, and all you can do is make all those
personal attacks on everyone who disagrees with
you. You NEED some personal mental counseling
but you've obviously not gotten any. That's a
danger to yourself and your immediate family, not
to mention cutting down on all the hate and anger
your actions ignite in this newsgroup.

Try to keep focussed on the FACT that this
newsgroup is SUPPOSED to be about amateur radio
policy. It is NOT some kind of kiddie sandbox
that was created for Stebie to show his courage
in personal attacks on everyone who disagrees
with him.

wrote:
From: K4YZ on Apr 12, 6:04 am

I've provided names and callsigns of those who know
me, but you have NOT contacted them. Instead, you
MANUFACTURE some person at NADC that claims to know
me...a decade after I'd been there and a PhD to boot
but NOBODY (but you) knows the name.

Let's see....I "contact" some beer drinking buddy of yours who
you've already briefed on what to say and he'll tell me...what?

And The person I knew at NADC was an acquaintance of
mine...certainly no one who owed me any favor or would make up
something.

He has a REAL Doctorate in Electrical Engineering and HAS been
published. He has credentials that I trust. You don't.

I sent you a scan of my first 'phone license (the
very first one) and you would NOT look at it!

No, You did not.

You sent me a picute of a person "mooning" in the nose of an A-26.

It was among your many lies.

Instead you manufactured a clear-libel "personal
page" on AOL damning me in no uncertain terms.

It wasn't libel. The truth is never libel.

You sent an e-mail professing to be one thing, but it wasn't what
you said it was.

Your "shot" at gaining trust was itself "shot".

Fortunately for all concerned (except yourself), AOL
took it down as soon as they were informed.

The only one "fortunate" was you, Lennie. But then I've had
several years of rubbing your nose in your lies, deceit and mistruths
here to make up for it.

Nothing lost for me. Lot's lost for you. Like any chance at ever
being accepted for what you THINK you should be....

You do lie, both about Amateur Radio in general and many of us
who
are practitioners of that art. You've told us of things you'd do
and
of things you've done, yet NO PROOF.

Tsk, tsk, tsk. Here's the way things go down in
the rational world:

"Proof" is provided in the form of unalterable
third-party sources...things like employers, friends
(preferrably those that aren't within easy driving
distance to avoid collusion), publications, local
and national governmental records archives, some
place that is relatively easy to get at such as
Internet sites.

I had all the "proof" I need, Lennie.

A third party with no allegience to protect. A man with a
professional reputation that I can bank on.

Unlike you.

In any event, you are NOT some kind of "judge" to
hand out any "ruling" on anyone, certainly not your
e-opponents. You keep crowing that you ARE
one, but that is YOUR OWN LIE that you tell the
world. A LIE anywhichway it goes.

I have never claimed to be a "judge", and I have very specifically
stated that you are not an "opponent". Ranking you as an "opponent"
would suggest you are at some level. You can only "best" me in
chronological years.

Now you MUST tell all about this former NADC
employee who claims to know me a decade after I
was there. You have NOT done so. You LIE.

He didn't know you "a decade after (you were) there". He knew you
WHEN you were there.

And I do not name him because I protect his privacy at his
request.

I have no reason to doubt his assessment or opinion. Your own
conduct, language, demeanor and conduct herein certainly give credence
to his assessment.

You haven't told the Where or When of those famous
"seven hostile actions" you claim but won't reveal.
Tsk. You LIE and then give yourself a pat on the
back for imagining that to be "truth!"

Nope. I take great pleasure in watching you run in circles with
it, Lennie. Very effective. Between that and trying to bite off more
than you can chew over MARS, you really have nothing left to do.

You have NOT acknowledged that the DoD directs and
supervises MARS, even when informed of the website
and full link details of the directive by DoD (as I
did in here).

Sure I have. I've said it several times over.

And I have ALSO said, and it reamins true today, that without the
Amateur Radio Service volunteers that flesh out it's ranks, none of the
three branches of MARS would exist in it's present form.

Without the "Amateur" component, there is no one to be
"Affiliated" with.

You taught Brian well...Just keep pouring the lies in to try
and
further dilute the already muddled pool...Except that some of us can
stay ahead of your silliness and THAT is what YOU hate.

You poor psychoed-to-the-max thing. Brian is a
rational human being who can think for himself.
I didn't "teach" him anything in regards to being
rational. We've both observed you in detail and
came to the same agreement...you're some kind of
sick psycho who CAN'T STAND being opposed in
anything.

There is nothing "rational" about adult males repeatedly and
adamandtly lying in public, Lennie. but the two of you keep doing it.

Leonard H. Anderson is a known chronic liar.

Tsk, tsk, tsk. Not at all.

See what I mean...There's another one.

You are SICK,
sweetums, and all you can do is make all those
personal attacks on everyone who disagrees with
you.

You call me "sick" and "sweetums" in the same sentence,
Lennie...?!?!

That is sick!

And P L E A S E tell us ALL ABOUT "personal attacks"....

Would that be like the one you slung at Jim Miccolis in the "Lest
We Forget" thread this same date?

You NEED some personal mental counseling
but you've obviously not gotten any. That's a
danger to yourself and your immediate family, not
to mention cutting down on all the hate and anger
your actions ignite in this newsgroup.

You continue to infer that you have adequate training or education
in mental health issues to make such referals, however requests for
your credentials go unanswered.

And the only "hate and anger" my "actions ignite" in this
newsgroup are from folks who deem it necessary to chronically lie or
make up scanrios that don't exist.

For the most part, that's you and Brian. Todd has joined in
lately, but he's just a developmentally delayed adult with an attitude
and a computer.

Try to keep focussed on the FACT that this
newsgroup is SUPPOSED to be about amateur radio
policy.

I am glad to see that after all these years you have at LEAST
stopped trying to insist that this group is SOLELY for discussing the
Morse Code Test issue.

Now...You are still NOT a licensed Amateur with ANY practical
experience (other than this NG) in actual Amateur Radio policy issues,
which begs the question as to what YOU think you're doing here!

(Please don't recite the same lie about only being interested in
"debating the morse code TEST issue"...You wore that out years ago)

It is NOT some kind of kiddie sandbox
that was created for Stebie to show his courage
in personal attacks on everyone who disagrees
with him.

But that is ALL that YOU have used this group for, Lennie.

Why do you always make "rules" that YOU clearly violate,
Lennie...???

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
From: K4YZ on Apr 12, 6:04 am

I've provided names and callsigns of those who know
me, but you have NOT contacted them. Instead, you
MANUFACTURE some person at NADC that claims to know
me...a decade after I'd been there and a PhD to boot
but NOBODY (but you) knows the name.

Let's see....I "contact" some beer drinking buddy of yours who
you've already briefed on what to say and he'll tell me...what?

Like the time Hans contacted the ARRL...? Or was that the FCC?

And The person I knew at NADC was an acquaintance of
mine...certainly no one who owed me any favor or would make up
something.

But you would certainly "make up something."

From: "K4YZ" on Wed,Apr 13 2005 1:16 am

wrote:
From: K4YZ on Apr 12, 6:04 am

I've provided names and callsigns of those who know
me, but you have NOT contacted them. Instead, you
MANUFACTURE some person at NADC that claims to know
me...a decade after I'd been there and a PhD to boot
but NOBODY (but you) knows the name.

Let's see....I "contact" some beer drinking buddy of yours who
you've already briefed on what to say and he'll tell me...what?

And The person I knew at NADC was an acquaintance of
mine...certainly no one who owed me any favor or would make up
something.

He has a REAL Doctorate in Electrical Engineering and HAS been
published. He has credentials that I trust. You don't.

You are getting way too deep in your psychosis.

Regardless of how much you "believe" the above to be
true, for the purposes of argument in here you must reveal
the name of that person or PUT IT AWAY. I was visiting NADC
34 years ago as an employee of RCA Corporation and stayed
there a total of three months. The former Naval Air
Development Center, NOT NAS Warminster across the road.
I had daily contact with only three NADC engineers in
that group and NONE of them would be "your acquaintence."


The only one "fortunate" was you, Lennie. But then I've had
several years of rubbing your nose in your lies, deceit and mistruths
here to make up for it.

You are living in some fantasy again. Reset.

Nothing lost for me. Lot's lost for you. Like any chance at ever
being accepted for what you THINK you should be....

Tsk, tsk. The ONLY thing I've "lost" is thinking you
might be rational. I'm way too optimistic. You aren't
rational.



I had all the "proof" I need, Lennie.

A third party with no allegience to protect. A man with a
professional reputation that I can bank on.

You have BOGUS "proof." Non-existant. That "acquaintence"
doesn't exist. You made him up.


He didn't know you "a decade after (you were) there". He knew
you
WHEN you were there.

And I do not name him because I protect his privacy at his
request.

1. You can't name him because he doesn't exist.

2. The ONLY thing you are protecting is your own
bragging LIE about that fantasy individual.

3. "Protecting privacy" is totally bogus. Rationalization
expressed to attempt masking your own LIE.


I have no reason to doubt his assessment or opinion.

You probably believe your own fantasy. To you it is
"truth." To everyone else it is just your fantasy.



There is nothing "rational" about adult males repeatedly and
adamandtly lying in public, Lennie. but the two of you keep doing it.

Then you are your own worst enemy since you are describing
YOURSELF.

The only way you can clear your LYING is to name this
supposed person in order to actually prove something.
Your "word" that he exists is also bogus. He doesn't
exist anywhere except in your own psychotic imagination.
Your "word" is therefore meaningless.

Provide this "name." Without it you have a bogus
"reference" that means nothing.

You are SICK and need help. Go get some.

wrote:
From: "K4YZ" on Wed,Apr 13 2005 1:16 am

wrote:
From: K4YZ on Apr 12, 6:04 am

I've provided names and callsigns of those who know
me, but you have NOT contacted them. Instead, you
MANUFACTURE some person at NADC that claims to know
me...a decade after I'd been there and a PhD to boot
but NOBODY (but you) knows the name.

Let's see....I "contact" some beer drinking buddy of yours who
you've already briefed on what to say and he'll tell me...what?

And The person I knew at NADC was an acquaintance of
mine...certainly no one who owed me any favor or would make up
something.

He has a REAL Doctorate in Electrical Engineering and HAS been
published. He has credentials that I trust. You don't.

You are getting way too deep in your psychosis.

Regardless of how much you "believe" the above to be
true, for the purposes of argument in here you must reveal
the name of that person or PUT IT AWAY. I was visiting NADC
34 years ago as an employee of RCA Corporation and stayed
there a total of three months. The former Naval Air
Development Center, NOT NAS Warminster across the road.
I had daily contact with only three NADC engineers in
that group and NONE of them would be "your acquaintence."

Your freedom of speech allows you to verbalize any statement you
care to make, Lennie.

Saying it does not make it true.

You were useless to them. Period. Now suck it up and move along,
old man! You ran your mouth off about all your hot jobs. You happened
to drop one name where I had an "in". I found you out.

Sucks to be you.

The only one "fortunate" was you, Lennie. But then I've had
several years of rubbing your nose in your lies, deceit and
mistruths
here to make up for it.

You are living in some fantasy again. Reset.

Reset yourself, old man. About 50 years worth.

Nothing lost for me. Lot's lost for you. Like any chance at
ever
being accepted for what you THINK you should be....

Tsk, tsk. The ONLY thing I've "lost" is thinking you
might be rational. I'm way too optimistic. You aren't
rational.

Sure I am.

That you try and redirect from YOUR misfortunes by making such
claims is ludicrous and transparent.

I had all the "proof" I need, Lennie.

A third party with no allegience to protect. A man with a
professional reputation that I can bank on.

You have BOGUS "proof." Non-existant. That "acquaintence"
doesn't exist. You made him up.

Nope.

What I TRULY know is that YOU find it hard to believe that there
really are people in the world who didn't develop a life-long devotion
to your wisdom, knowledge and skill.

He didn't know you "a decade after (you were) there". He knew
you
WHEN you were there.

And I do not name him because I protect his privacy at his
request.

1. You can't name him because he doesn't exist.

I WON'T name him becasue I promised.

2. The ONLY thing you are protecting is your own
bragging LIE about that fantasy individual.

That is not a truthful statement. And no matter how many more
times you repeat it, Lennie, it STILL will NOT be true.

3. "Protecting privacy" is totally bogus. Rationalization
expressed to attempt masking your own LIE.

No rationalization. A promise to a friend.

I have no reason to doubt his assessment or opinion.

You probably believe your own fantasy. To you it is
"truth." To everyone else it is just your fantasy.

Again, Lennie, you may repeate that over and over if you think it
will salve your ego...But the bottom line is that people at NADC did
not find you very effective.

There is nothing "rational" about adult males repeatedly and
adamandtly lying in public, Lennie. but the two of you keep doing
it.

Then you are your own worst enemy since you are describing
YOURSELF.

Nope.

The only way you can clear your LYING is to name this
supposed person in order to actually prove something.
Your "word" that he exists is also bogus. He doesn't
exist anywhere except in your own psychotic imagination.
Your "word" is therefore meaningless.

My "word" is bogus to YOU since claiming it is so is the ONLY way
you have of escaping the fact that you ran your mouth off one time too
many.

Provide this "name." Without it you have a bogus
"reference" that means nothing.

Here's a name that is bogus and means nothing: Leonard H.
Anderson.

You are SICK and need help. Go get some.

I am quite well, thank you. You, on the otherhand, still have
issues to deal with. Accepting that not everyone thinks you're the
genius and expert YOU think you are is one of them.

You're outted, Lennie. Get over it.

Steve, K4YZ

From: "K4YZ" on Thurs,Apr 14 2005 2:40 am

wrote:
From: "K4YZ" on Wed,Apr 13 2005 1:16 am
wrote:
From: K4YZ on Apr 12, 6:04 am

Regardless of how much you "believe" the above to be
true, for the purposes of argument in here you must reveal
the name of that person or PUT IT AWAY. I was visiting NADC
34 years ago as an employee of RCA Corporation and stayed
there a total of three months. The former Naval Air
Development Center, NOT NAS Warminster across the road.
I had daily contact with only three NADC engineers in
that group and NONE of them would be "your acquaintence."

Your freedom of speech allows you to verbalize any statement you
care to make, Lennie.

Saying it does not make it true.

You were useless to them. Period.

Tsk, tsk, tsk. You don't know anything about what took
place on three successive R&D jobs where NADC was the test
agency for evaluation of SECANT (the RCA acronym for the
anti-collision system back then).

At NO time was I doing anything "for" NADC. NADC was the
federal test agency for that project and a similar one of
Minneapolis-Honeywell. My employer was RCA and that remained
so until 1975. As a field engineer I was representing RCA
for technical support of RCA equipment under test. NADC had
the aircraft and air crews available in 1971 and were directed
by Naval Air System Command to perform the testing of RCA's
and Minny-Honey's systems. USN was requested by the U.S.
government to do the testing (as a disinterested third-
party) and the USN passed that to Systems who passed it to
NADC.

SECANT (SEparation and Control of Aircraft by Non-
synchronous Techniques) performed well on the air-to-air
testing, as did the Minneapolis-Honeywell system. The data
acquisition and data-reduction by NADC was deemed costly (to
NADC) so that group was directed to employ tape-recording
of data instead of using the old-style (at the time) of
phototheater recording on synchronized motion-picure film.
The government and USN suggested some slight alterations in
threat logic used to provide avoidance manuever warnings as
well and both corporations agreed to do a second generation
of collision avoidance equipment to be tested in 1973. This
generation included bring-outs of signals and logic states
to be tape-recorded in a multi-channel tape unit. That
second generation equipment was successfully flight-tested
but I was spared having to be the on-site field engineer.
I did participate in some of the design on that generation
and did work with the principal NADC engineering crew that
visited Van Nuys (twice) before 2nd gen testing began.

Based on the results of that 2nd gen flight test, RCA was
requested to and awarded a contract for a third generation,
this time representing a "preproduction" airborne version.
A "prepro" is as close as can be to a final production
prototype and includes as many specialized circuits as
would be considered for a production model. That was done
by mid-1975 and I was responsible for the 8-channel (pulse)
receiver, front-end to video out (1.6 GHz RF band then) plus
co-designer of the (non-flyable) checkout set which presented
simulated air-traffic signals to evaluate crowded conditions.
Jim Hall, KD6JG, was immediate group manager and Al Walston,
W6MJN, was both my office cubicle sharer and the designer on
the transmitter (pulse) portion. Packaging shrunk from 3
full-ATR cases of generation 1 to the quarter-ATR single-case
of the 3rd generation. Three 3rd generation SECANTs were
done and checked out, ready for shipment to PA, when the
U.S. government (likely through FAA) canceled any further
work or testing on a new aircraft anti-collision system.
The government decided on adopting a relatively untried
hodge-podge system devised by MIT which supposedly fit
inside the RF spectrum of present-day ATCRBS frequencies.

Now suck it up and move along,
old man! You ran your mouth off about all your hot jobs.

Wasn't a "hot" job. Was an everyday kind of design job.

It was "hot" only in the SAW filters used to make it
possible to have "brick-wall" response matched filters
in a terribly small size in the 50 to 65 MHz region.
RCA corporate back east funded one of the labs there to
do the design and aluminum deposition on quartz plates
(first time I ever put a purchase order in on BLANK
quartz...kind of a novelty). In 1974 that was truly
state of the art. Once they were shipped in to Van Nuys
I had to mount them on something...RTV on epoxy PCB with
compression-bonding wires connecting aluminum film
contact ends to PCB lands. Luckily, Van Nuys had a
good thin-film lab at the time. Skirt response on the
filters was (to me) unbelievable...50 db drop in less
than 100 KHz at the edges, very nearly flat across the
top in the mid-VHF range.

You happened
to drop one name where I had an "in". I found you out.

Steve Robeson was *NEVER* "in" on either the RCA or
Minneapolis-Honeywell aircraft anti-collision systems.
Steve Robeson wan't even AT NADC in 1971 to 1975. He
was a jarhead who never got beyond Warminster NAS on
the other side of the road A DECADE LATER.


You are living in some fantasy again. Reset.

Reset yourself, old man. About 50 years worth.

No, just two hours worth...had a good sandwich for lunch
and it tasted like more. I'll settle for another cup of
coffee, though. :-)

Tsk. I have a copy of the FINAL report on SECANT. I
helped write it (name is on the cover). NOWHERE in there
is any mention of any "Steve Robeson" as part of the
government personnel at NADC. The document identifier is
VNES-74-TR-001 and was then marked "company confidential."
It's somewhere in the General Electric archives now.
Considering it is 31 years later, I doubt that presence
of the revealed document number is going to hurt the
RCA Corporation. :-)


That you try and redirect from YOUR misfortunes by making such
claims is ludicrous and transparent.

Tsk. Lil Stevie can't name detail one on what went down
at NADC, has NO knowledge of the SECANT or Minny-Honey
System testing. You can't even name the military aircraft
at the NAS or which ones were used for anti-collision
testing. [one was shared with NAVSTAR...which would later
become GPSS...:-) ] Tsk, tsk, tsk.


I had all the "proof" I need, Lennie.

A third party with no allegience to protect. A man with a
professional reputation that I can bank on.

You have BOGUS "proof." Non-existant. That "acquaintence"
doesn't exist. You made him up.

Nope.

What I TRULY know is that YOU find it hard to believe that there
really are people in the world who didn't develop a life-long devotion
to your wisdom, knowledge and skill.

Tsk, tsk, tsk. :-) The only person "devoted to me" is my
wife...as I am devoted to her. Nothing else is requested in
life. The only "credential" needed is that marriage
certificate. :-)

He didn't know you "a decade after (you were) there". He knew
you
WHEN you were there.

Amazing. After a total of six trips to NADC and a total
time there of about three months, this (fantasy) person
"knows" me? 34 years AFTER the fact?!? :-)

Incredulosity uber alles! :-)


And I do not name him because I protect his privacy at his
request.

1. You can't name him because he doesn't exist.

I WON'T name him becasue I promised.

Total BULL****, bluffmeister! :-)


2. The ONLY thing you are protecting is your own
bragging LIE about that fantasy individual.

That is not a truthful statement. And no matter how many more
times you repeat it, Lennie, it STILL will NOT be true.

Sweetums, NOBODY can "prove" the non-existance of a
non-existant entity. NOBODY. :-)

All you have is a BLUFF. A LIE. :-)

3. "Protecting privacy" is totally bogus. Rationalization
expressed to attempt masking your own LIE.

No rationalization. A promise to a friend.

QUIT bull****ting us, Little Big Man. You tried a BLUFF.
You CANNOT BACK IT UP. :-)

Name the department this (fantasy) "friend" worked in at
NADC. Name some DETAILS that ONLY an NADC worker would
know. You have NOT revealed a thing.

I have no reason to doubt his assessment or opinion.

You probably believe your own fantasy. To you it is
"truth." To everyone else it is just your fantasy.

Again, Lennie, you may repeate that over and over if you think it
will salve your ego...But the bottom line is that people at NADC did
not find you very effective.

No problem! I WILL "repeate" it (better, I'll just repeat
it) that I could care less how "that [sic] people at NADC
did not find..." I never worked for NADC, never worked for
the USN as a civilian, never even applied for any job at
NADC. :-) I was an employee of RCA Corporation at the time
and REMAINED an employee until the RCA shut-down of the Van
Nuys, CA, Electromagnetic and Aviation Systems Division's
Position Locating Systems Group in November, 1975.

My "word" is bogus to YOU since claiming it is so is the ONLY way
you have of escaping the fact that you ran your mouth off one time too
many.

Your "word" is bogus. Period. You can't name a thing about
that (fantasy) "reference" individual...not a thing about
what went on at NADC in 1971-1975, not a thing about any
other projects under Naval Air Systems Command then.

You are FABRICATING a falsity. You have NO references
except what I reveal. YOU can't describe a damn thing
except your bogus "outrage" at "not being believed." :-)

Provide this "name." Without it you have a bogus
"reference" that means nothing.

Here's a name that is bogus and means nothing: Leonard H.
Anderson.

Tsk, tsk, tsk. Emotionalism and name-calling.

Not to worry. Your buddies Jimmie Miccolis and Davie Heil
will support you. PCTA extra Double Standard MUST be
operative to you and them! :-)

You are SICK and need help. Go get some.

I am quite well, thank you. You, on the otherhand, still have
issues to deal with.

No "issues to deal with." Haven't submitted any
manuscripts to any publications having "issues" in the
last year. Not expecting any proofs on those. :-)

Accepting that not everyone thinks you're the
genius and expert YOU think you are is one of them.

Poor baby. Getting all petulant and snoddy again?

I COULD CARE LESS. :-)

Electrons, fields and waves don't much care for human
emotions like "love" or "personal desire." One works
by THEIR laws, not yours, not by somebody else's ideas.

Similarly, when trying to "prove" someone "wrong," you
have to REALLY PROVE them by REAL references, details,
information, VERIFIABLE sources. Trying to use some
unspecified, unnamed imaginary person is just bluffing
BULL****. Quit doing that. You will be better off
doing so.

You're outted, Lennie. Get over it.

Tsk. I was out this morning. Nice day. Still is.
Tomorrow will be a repeat of that. I will not "get
over it," since I like that kind of weather. :-)

Let me just repeat what your buddie Jimmie Miccolis
used to write in he "It ain't bragging if ya done
it!" Okay, I did it.

Not only that, I KNOW what was done and have valid
references as to what I did there. Not a problem to me.
Seems to be a helluva problem to you, though, and you
have your psychotic imagination in afterburner and you
can't get off the ground. Tsk, tsk.

Get some mental help. You need it.