Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: From: "K4YZ" on Thurs,Apr 14 2005 2:40 am wrote: From: "K4YZ" on Wed,Apr 13 2005 1:16 am wrote: From: K4YZ on Apr 12, 6:04 am Regardless of how much you "believe" the above to be true, for the purposes of argument in here you must reveal the name of that person or PUT IT AWAY. I was visiting NADC 34 years ago as an employee of RCA Corporation and stayed there a total of three months. The former Naval Air Development Center, NOT NAS Warminster across the road. I had daily contact with only three NADC engineers in that group and NONE of them would be "your acquaintence." Your freedom of speech allows you to verbalize any statement you care to make, Lennie. Saying it does not make it true. You were useless to them. Period. Tsk, tsk, tsk. You don't know anything about what took place on three successive R&D jobs where NADC was the test agency for evaluation of SECANT (the RCA acronym for the anti-collision system back then). It doesn't matter, Lennie. I know what happened on ONE of them. At NO time was I doing anything "for" NADC...(SNIP) But you were there and your performance was lackluster. You got a bad "fit rep". Oh well. We can't all be "100%" 100% of the time. Deal with it. One of my first fitreps in the Corps was less than what it could have been. Not bad, but certainly a wake-up call. I took my "spanking", did what I needed to do to correct the shortcomings, and moved on. No big deal. SECANT (SEparation and Control of Aircraft by Non- synchronous Techniques) performed well...(SNIP Has nothing to do with Amateur Radio policy or that you were deemed less than adequate at NADC. Based on the results of that 2nd gen flight test...(SNIP) Twenty one lines of non-relevent story telling. Now suck it up and move along, old man! You ran your mouth off about all your hot jobs. Wasn't a "hot" job. Was an everyday kind of design job. One you didn't do well at. Oh well. It was "hot" only in the SAW filters...(SNIP) Great. Ohhhhhhhhhhh...Ahhhhhhhhhhhh....Stuff that extend's an engineer's slide rule, I am sure. Of no relevence to Amateur Radio policy at ANY level or you behaviour herein. You happened to drop one name where I had an "in". I found you out. Steve Robeson was *NEVER* "in" on either the RCA or Minneapolis-Honeywell aircraft anti-collision systems. Steve Robeson wan't even AT NADC in 1971 to 1975. He was a jarhead who never got beyond Warminster NAS on the other side of the road A DECADE LATER. Nope...wasn't in those programs. I did have an "in" with a gentleman who was, however. Outted you nicely. You are living in some fantasy again. Reset. Reset yourself, old man. About 50 years worth. No, just two hours worth...had a good sandwich for lunch and it tasted like more. I'll settle for another cup of coffee, though. Perhaps all that coffee is your undoing, Lennie. At your age more thyan one cup a day is a sure bet for premature cardiac demise. Tsk. I have a copy of the FINAL report on SECANT...(SNIP) I am sure the Anderson household is ripe with files of old projects that have absolutely nothing to do with Amateur Radio. Fifteen more lines of non-relevent stuff snipped for brevity. That you try and redirect from YOUR misfortunes by making such claims is ludicrous and transparent. Tsk. Lil Stevie can't name detail one on what went down at NADC, has NO knowledge of the SECANT or Minny-Honey System testing. You can't even name the military aircraft at the NAS or which ones were used for anti-collision testing. [one was shared with NAVSTAR...which would later become GPSS...:-) ] Tsk, tsk, tsk. And not a bit of it relvent to the fact that Leonard H. Anderson was at NADC, was a less than stellar performer, and when I asked around about him, I got a "hit"... I've not once "challenged" that any of that occured at NADC, nor have I "challenged" that you were there. I KNOW you were there, Lennie. What I TRULY know is that YOU find it hard to believe that there really are people in the world who didn't develop a life-long devotion to your wisdom, knowledge and skill. Tsk, tsk, tsk. :-) The only person "devoted to me" is my wife...as I am devoted to her. Nothing else is requested in life. The only "credential" needed is that marriage certificate. A marriage certificat is NO guarnatee of devotion, Lennie. It was only legal permission for the two of you to get maried. An old high school acquaintence of mine has been "cohabitating" with his high school sweetheart for over 25 years now. No marriage. They are as devoted as any couple I've ever known. He didn't know you "a decade after (you were) there". He knew you WHEN you were there. Amazing. After a total of six trips to NADC and a total time there of about three months, this (fantasy) person "knows" me? 34 years AFTER the fact?!? Actaully at the time I found you out it was only 20-some years, and no, he didn't "know" you off the top of his head. He did some research, however, on contractors who had been there. You were there. You weren't the best "engineer" in their estimation. I WON'T name him becasue I promised. Total BULL####, bluffmeister! No "BS", Lennie....I won't name him. No bluff intended. 2. The ONLY thing you are protecting is your own bragging LIE about that fantasy individual. That is not a truthful statement. And no matter how many more times you repeat it, Lennie, it STILL will NOT be true. Sweetums, NOBODY can "prove" the non-existance of a non-existant entity. NOBODY. Who's "sweetums"...?!?! All you have is a BLUFF. A LIE. Nope. 3. "Protecting privacy" is totally bogus. Rationalization expressed to attempt masking your own LIE. No rationalization. A promise to a friend. QUIT bull####ting us, Little Big Man. You tried a BLUFF. You CANNOT BACK IT UP. Name the department this (fantasy) "friend" worked in at NADC. Name some DETAILS that ONLY an NADC worker would know. You have NOT revealed a thing. I have revealed that you were less than spectacular at atleast ONE of your "jobs". And there will be no further "details" forthcomimg. You can't squeal and whine all you like, Lennie, but just like your promises to us, that's all you'll get from me on this subject. I have no reason to doubt his assessment or opinion. You probably believe your own fantasy. To you it is "truth." To everyone else it is just your fantasy. Again, Lennie, you may repeate that over and over if you think it will salve your ego...But the bottom line is that people at NADC did not find you very effective. No problem! I WILL "repeate" it (better, I'll just repeat it) that I could care less how "that [sic] people at NADC did not find..." I never worked for NADC, never worked for the USN as a civilian, never even applied for any job at NADC. I was an employee of RCA Corporation at the time and REMAINED an employee until the RCA shut-down of the Van Nuys, CA, Electromagnetic and Aviation Systems Division's Position Locating Systems Group in November, 1975. And the people at NADC that had to evaluate the performace of the contract weren't impressed with YOU, Lennie. Rant all you care to. It really is THAT simple. My "word" is bogus to YOU since claiming it is so is the ONLY way you have of escaping the fact that you ran your mouth off one time too many. Your "word" is bogus. Period. You can't name a thing about that (fantasy) "reference" individual...not a thing about what went on at NADC in 1971-1975, not a thing about any other projects under Naval Air Systems Command then. And I could care less about them, Lennie. I inquired about YOU, and YOU are what I got answers about. You are FABRICATING a falsity. Nope. You have NO reference except what I reveal. Your "refrences" where what lead me to find out what I did. Thanks. YOU can't describe a damn thing except your bogus "outrage" at "not being believed." Oh, Lennie, I am farrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr from "outraged"! YOU, old man, are the one with the outrage issues!. To the tune of thousands of lines of irrelevent rhetoric over the last several years meant only to blunt the damage of what I discovered. Too late! Shudda kept your mouth shut! Provide this "name." Without it you have a bogus "reference" that means nothing. Here's a name that is bogus and means nothing: Leonard H. Anderson. Tsk, tsk, tsk. Emotionalism and name-calling. Nope. Fact. Established by YOUR track record of lying, deceit, misconduct and dishonesty. Not to worry. Your buddies Jimmie Miccolis and Davie Heil will support you. PCTA extra Double Standard MUST be operative to you and them! "Jimmie" Miccolis? Jim has a little son? Whether or not N2EY or K8MN "support" me is also irrelevent. I know what I know because YOU shot your mouth off and I just happened to know someone in a postion to verify it. You are SICK and need help. Go get some. I am quite well, thank you. You, on the otherhand, still have issues to deal with. No "issues to deal with." Haven't submitted any manuscripts to any publications having "issues" in the last year. Not expecting any proofs on those. How can you expect a "proof" on something that doesn't exist? On the otherhand, the foregoing rant and spin-doctoring you just hit us with IS evidence of your "issues" with your own condcut. Accepting that not everyone thinks you're the genius and expert YOU think you are is one of them. Poor baby. Getting all petulant and snoddy again? I COULD CARE LESS. Liar, liar, pants on fire! Several YEARS worth of YOUR rantings reveal otherwise! You're outted, Lennie. Get over it. Tsk. I was out this morning. Nice day. Still is. Tomorrow will be a repeat of that. I will not "get over it," since I like that kind of weather. :-) Let me just repeat what your buddie Jimmie Miccolis used to write in he "It ain't bragging if ya done it!" Okay, I did it. Not only that, I KNOW what was done and have valid references as to what I did there. Not a problem to me. Seems to be a helluva problem to you, though, and you have your psychotic imagination in afterburner and you can't get off the ground. Tsk, tsk. Get some mental help. You need it. No, I don't. You, on the otherhand, have honesty issues to get straightened out. Still. Still The Putz Today That You Were Yesterday And Will Be Tomorrow. Steve, K4YZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #665 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #662 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #662 | Dx | |||
OPDX Special Bulletin #660.1 | Dx | |||
OPDX Special Bulletin #660.1 | Dx |