Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Rick Prather wrote: K4YZ wrote: Rick Prather wrote: I came here tonight wondering how far I would have to go in to the discussion before N9OGL popped up. Well, only took me one thread. Right on top "blah blah N9OGL" Can't we get past this, ignore all this troll bait and just have a productive Ham Radio discussion forum? If not, 73! Hi Rick. This forum long-since lost any pretense of being a truly viable forum for the discussion of valid issues. It's solely for mudwrestling. Of course QRZ and eHam DO have open forums that are very productive and don't tend to tolerate the likes of some of our own ner-do-wells. That's where I go when I want to read/participate in anything remotely approaching a "productive Ham Radio discussion forum". 73 Steve, K4YZ Steve, Thanks for the heads-up. I guess what I suspected is true. I'll try QRZ and eHam and move on. I almost hate to ask this because the idiots will probably come out of the woodwork but what is it, do you suppose, that motivates people to hang out on a Newsgroup or forum for the sole purpose of starting a flame? Well...I have to honestly claim a partial "guilty" here, Rick. I did enter here for the same reasons you have, but after butting my head against the wall for so long, I realized that nothing was getting accomplished. I consider this to be the least common denominator of "discussion". Witness N9OGL, N0IMD, et al. They just make it so easy to do when they make assertions that are so easily refuted by publically accessible resources. If you go to a Mac group there are the PC/Linux dudes telling everyone what fools they are to use a Mac. On the Ham Radio groups there are a bunch of jerks telling everyone what idiots hams are, the higher the license class the bigger the idiot! Must be some of the same DNA in a lot of the folks here. We have one antagonist in particular who was an Army radio mechanic in the 50's and held a GROL (but never an Amateur license) who spends inordinate amounts of time trying to tell us how to be Amateurs. Go figure. If they aren't interested in the things being discussed on a given forum why do they read it and then feel compelled to jump in? Most of the folks who do that here are the Anonymous Cowards. Those who have enough intestinal fortitude to sign their names at least comment about the subject, even if it's skewed. My guess is that on the Radio groups the troublemakers are mostly the ones that can't cut it and they have to take it out on the ones that can. The aforementioned antagonist being one of them. He's gone as far as suggesting in official comments to the FCC that there should be a minimum age for Amateur licensure despite the fact he's in his 70's and he's never raised kids. Never one bit of documentation that "kids" have been "discipline" problems at Gettysburg either. On the Mac (or whatever) groups they feel they have made the only "right" decision and they must tell everyone how superior their logic is and what cretins the rest are for not seeing the world their way. Or they start in with the "Nazi", "thugs", "elitists", etc. Of course that's relatively mild to the ####head, ###hole, mother####er, etc that eminates from the keyboard of N9OGL and company. Oh the sadness of what I call "digital thinking" I hear ya brother...I hear ya... 73 Steve, K4YZ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
197 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (23-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | General |