From: "K4YZ" on Mon,Apr 18 2005 2:26 am

wrote:
From: "bb" on Sun,Apr 17 2005 4:37 pm

Case in point is others' opinions. Robeson labels those
as "LIES," perhaps even "deceit" even though those are
just personal opinions. Apparently, in Stevieworld,
only Stevie Robeson has the "truth." Ergo, in the logic
of Stevieworld, ALL contrary (to Robeson's) opinions
are "LIES" as well as "errors" and "deceit."

That's quite sick. Irrational. Opinions are just
opinions.

Opinions are just opinions when they start off "My opinion on the
subject is..." Or "I think it would be better if..." THOSE are
opinions.

Stop blabbering like a petulant child. Get with the program
in computer-modem communications. YOU DON'T DO WHAT YOU
YOU JUST COMMANDED.

You are NOT a "commander" of a damn thing in here. You can't
control yourself or your angry, petulant, emotional outbursts.

Lies and deceit are things like "The ARRL BoD is dishonest" or
"ARES won't be able to respond becasue their members are too old and
oover obligated

"...oover obligated..." Finish what you write.

Those are OPINIONS. No "law" requires prefacing "every"
OPINION with your orders of the day. Kiss off.


Quite true, but Robeson hasn't learned to communicate
with rational people yet. He simply drives home a
blunt point that HE IS RIGHT with no proof or other
reference that it IS right.

(A) Neither Leonard H Anderson or Brian P Burke are rational.
They both make statements in public forum contrary to the presence of
data that contradicts their assertions.

WHAT "data?" Robeson has presented NO "data."

(B) Nice try on the "no proof" assertions, Lennie....And only
MORE proof that I am correct in calling you a liar.

Robeson has NO "proof." All Robeson has is a seemingly
unending list of personal insults against all those who
disagree with him.

Your marionette is presently avoiding answering questions about
his assertions of the viability of ARES in the face of NUMEROUS news
releases to the contrary.

NO ONE is any "marionette."

Your (usual) petulant outburst in another demonstrated
fit of anger shows you have little "proof" of anything
but your own anger and hatred of anyone saying the least
negative thing about your own opinions.

Huge snip of ususal obnxious verbosity to.....

Other Amateur Extras seem unable to take any strong
action to stop his pollution of all threads in this
newsgroup. All threads eventually turn into Robeson's
insults of all his "opponents" in any discussion.
A few have made negative comments to his style, notably
Hans Brakob. Responses to those by Robeson were less
than civil and uncomplimentary.

While I have no doubt that not everyone approves of my "up in
your
face" methology of dealing with the two of you, I DO notice that NONE
of them, other than to acknowledge your "First Amendment Right" to do
so, "support" YOUR presence here, Lennie.

Tsk. Robeson should have all kinds of "doubt." :-)

Robeson not only acts like the sociopath but has a
monstrous EGO thinking that his "in your face" insult-
fest is "approved" by those that count. :-)

It dosen't take one of those "inquiring minds" to know why....

You are both liiars.

What is a "liiar?" List the "LIES" supposedly said in here.

You don't do what you'll say you'll do.

Robeson has yet to "do what he says he will do." :-)

Namely PROVE the existance of this imaginary "fitrep"
person he says evaluated me at NADC 34 years ago. :-)

Robeson has yet to acknowledge that the Department of
Defense DOES DIRECT MARS...even when given the link to the
latest document issued by the DoD.

Robeson has yet to state the WHEN and WHERE of his mighty
"hostile action" experiences.

They're tired of the same "Back in 1953...." war satories.

Well, regardless of the anger-induced typos ("satories"),
I did work big-time HF communications for three straight
years beginning in 1953. Robeson has NOT done anything
close to that. Robeson has NEVER worked in electronics
engineering as either civilian or military member, yet
presumes to be "knowledgeable" about engineering after a
very short-term job as a purchasing agent!

You'e deceitful.

Present the "proof." Describe the WHY where ALL MUST
do exactly what they (allegedly) "promised" years ago.

Robeson does little else but hurl personal insults at
those who do not agree with him. That gets him the
attention he seems to be desperately seeking. Robeson
manages to turn EVERY thread in this newsgroup into his
own "FIGHT" with all those who disagree with him.

It really is THAT simple.

Robeson IS "that simple."

Robeson is an EXAMPLE of a modern U.S. Amateur Extra.

wrote:
From: "K4YZ" on Mon,Apr 18 2005 2:26 am

That's quite sick. Irrational. Opinions are just
opinions.

Opinions are just opinions when they start off "My opinion on
the
subject is..." Or "I think it would be better if..." THOSE are
opinions.

Stop blabbering like a petulant child. Get with the program
in computer-modem communications. YOU DON'T DO WHAT YOU
YOU JUST COMMANDED.

I didn't "COMMAND" anything, Lennie.

You are NOT a "commander" of a damn thing in here.

Whoa! Profantiy! I am so impressed, Lennie! You are so strong
when you start hurling profanity in a fitful rage!

You can't
control yourself or your angry, petulant, emotional outbursts.

You insist I am in an angry, petulant mode, Lennie, but from
what...?!?! "Expressing my opinion"...?!?!

That "NCTA" double standard sneaking in???

Lies and deceit are things like "The ARRL BoD is dishonest" or
"ARES won't be able to respond becasue their members are too old and
oover obligated

"...oover obligated..." Finish what you write.

That was it, Lennie.

Those are OPINIONS. No "law" requires prefacing "every"
OPINION with your orders of the day. Kiss off.

OH! Now THAT was a COMMAND, Lennie! And one that even further
endears you to the ones you would seek to dominate and rule.

Too bad were on to you, eh,...?!?!

(A) Neither Leonard H Anderson or Brian P Burke are rational.
They both make statements in public forum contrary to the presence
of
data that contradicts their assertions.

WHAT "data?" Robeson has presented NO "data."

Sure I have!

Brian insisted ARES's usefulness and ability to respond to calls
was "overblown".

In the last week alone I have provided no fewer than four
references that absolutely disprove his assertion, and all of those
from news releases within DAYS of his comments.

(B) Nice try on the "no proof" assertions, Lennie....And only
MORE proof that I am correct in calling you a liar.

Robeson has NO "proof." All Robeson has is a seemingly
unending list of personal insults against all those who
disagree with him.

There's no "unending list of personal insults", Lennie.

All I have to do is recite what YOU have said and what YOU have
said you'd do then point out that you've not done it to make my point.

Your marionette is presently avoiding answering questions about
his assertions of the viability of ARES in the face of NUMEROUS news
releases to the contrary.

NO ONE is any "marionette."

Brain P Burke is. He's yours, as a matter of fact.

But he may get jealous...You've started tossing affectionate
sounding conversation in Todd's direction...We may be ringside for a
cat fight soon!

Your (usual) petulant outburst in another demonstrated
fit of anger shows you have little "proof" of anything
but your own anger and hatred of anyone saying the least
negative thing about your own opinions.

No outburst. That's your imagination running amok, Lennie.

While I have no doubt that not everyone approves of my "up in your
face" methology of dealing with the two of you, I DO notice that
NONE
of them, other than to acknowledge your "First Amendment Right" to
do
so, "support" YOUR presence here, Lennie.

Tsk. Robeson should have all kinds of "doubt."

But why?

Robeson not only acts like the sociopath but has a
monstrous EGO thinking that his "in your face" insult-
fest is "approved" by those that count.

Lennie, you ARE the complete idiot I suggest you are.

In the very paragraph YOU quoted, I stated very clearly that I
"have no doubt" about who does or doesn't approve of my methodology of
dealing with you.

Why would you then make so assinine an assertion as to suggest
that I have some ego to suggest I believe it's "approved"...?!?!

Another snip of ususal pejorative laden rhetoric (that he claims
is only used AGAINST him...)....

Robeson IS "that simple."

Not as "simple" as the alleged ex-radio engineer who makes
assinine assertions based upon quotes that clearly undermine it.

Robeson is an EXAMPLE of a modern U.S. Amateur Extra.



And the IEEE should sue to get you to stop using an IEEE address in
public. You're a humiliation to one and all.

Steve, K4YZ

wrote:
From: "K4YZ" on Mon,Apr 18 2005 2:26 am

Your marionette is presently avoiding answering questions about
his assertions of the viability of ARES in the face of NUMEROUS news
releases to the contrary.

NO ONE is any "marionette."

Robeson is shamed that he could not write a valid schedule with fewer
than the required number of volunteers. He is angry that my opinion
turned out to be correct, as proved by his very own works.