Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dan/W4NTI wrote: Good plan Jim. Too good. It will never get passed the ARRL executive committee. Why? Because it makes sense. If enough of us say that it's what should be done, maybe they will listen. Imagine if the committee is deluged with folks promoting my plan, or a version of it? In any event, the main target is the FCC. Because *they* make the rules. ARRL has a good idea and a bad implementation, that's all. 73 de Jim, N2EY Dan/W4NTI wrote in message oups.com... wrote: This nonsense needs to be killed FAST and killed NOW. It represents gross overregulation. It's HQ trying to fix a system which isn't broken. Again. It's time to rise up against it en masse. Well, I don't know about that. First off, what, exactly, does the proposal recommend? If I read it correctly, it would subdivide the CW/data bands by signal bandwidth, rather than having anything allowed anywhere, as it pretty much is today. PSK31 on 7003 is legal right now. So is 850 Hz shift RTTY on 14010. It would also allow the development and use of modes that are now not allowed, or relegated to the 'phone bands. For example, you can't legally use digital voice outside the voice bands, even if you figure out how to do it in a 500 Hz bandwidth. There's also a rather arcane limit on the symbol rate allowed, regardless of the bandwidth used. The whole robot/Winlink thing is a related but distinct issue. The way I see it, the best solution is to have the following: - Part of the band that's Take 80 meters: 3500-3575: CW only 3575-3625: "Narrow" data and CW - but no robots 3625-3675: "Wide or narrow" data and CW - but no robots. 3675-3725: All data and CW modes - including robots, Winlink, etc. What's the dividing line between "wide" and "narrow" data? I'd say 1000 Hz - if it's narrower than 1000 Hz it's "narrow". Otherwise it's "wide". Existing Generals, Advanceds and Extras keep what they have. Novices and Techs with HF get 3525 to 3725 CW, at the same power level they're currently allowed. Other bands would be similar. The 40 meter problems will improve as hams outside Region 2 get more kHz - the US should set up its plan for the future (worldwide 7000-7300 exclusive amateur) Why not? 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Policy | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | General | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx |