Userbeam Remailer wrote:
In article
.net
Dave Heil wrote:


Sure, you have. You were the short fellow with the Stephen

King mask.

No, I haven't.

You haven't what?

Your tour was shorter. You fled.

No, since I never have been there.

Oh! Have it your way: Roger fled.

Guess you don't get out much.

Are you asking me for a date?


No,I hear you only go out with Bertie.

Are you jealous of Bert? Do you feel that he monopolizes my time?


Now, Lurch the Nazi, you seem to see Roger everywhere. You

have

a bad comb-over from what was described to me. And all grey
hair. Too bad you dye your eyebrows, but you probably are

vain

like that.

It'd be strange for Roger Wiseman to have a fixation on my

hair and

eyebrows. It would be far more peculiar for you, a person you

claim not

to be Roger Wiseman to have such a fixation--especially when

you worry

that I don't go out enough.


Well, you are strange. Too bad Roger described what you look
like. And the above is all true.

It'd be odd enough for Roger to be fixated on my hair and eyebrows. It
is even more peculiar for a fellow who has never seen me to be fixated
on them. Am I to gather that you and Roger spend a lot of time
discussing my hair and eyebrows?

Are you entering the big Stephen King look-alike contest this

summer?

No, since I don't look like Steven King.

Don't be modest. You're a shoo-in for first prize.


There you go showing your jealousy of Steven King again.

Oh, not at all. He's the Prince of Creepy and you're the King.


Don't you recognize it?


Lying again. You wrote it.

It takes a foolish, foolish man to deny writing something easily seen by
all. You're a foolish, foolish man.



They most certainly are. None of them has material consisting

of vile,

vulgar references to someone's parents, children or spouse.

None of

them depicts filthy acts of homosexuality, incest or

pedophilia.

Yours, on the other hand...


Are not any worse than your filthy posts.

That's been your problem all along. You fail to see the difference.
You're a sociopath.

Your rights end where they infringe upon mine.


You keep that in mind, Nazi.

Why, I've kept that in mind all along.


You see--there's your problem. You assume that everyone

thinks and acts

like you do. You're socially defective.


You're socailly inept. But that trait permeates your entier
life..ineptness. You would qrm Roger if you ran across him on
the air.


That's just lovely coming from the local filth monger.


Oh, such self righeousness, coming fromsomebody who posts filth
like you do.

Proof?

You're one of
the most unbalanced people I've run into in years, UnWiseman.



Since I'm not "UnWiseman" your opinion is valueless, like you
life. And exactly where did you get your Psychology degree...oh,
that's right you don't have one.


You're a problem to amateur radio


I am? Since I'm not Roger Wiseman, how is that possible?

Oh, I forgot, *wink*, *wink*. If you just happened to be Roger Wiseman,
you're a problem to amateur radio.


and a problem to your community.

Hardly.

Your local law enforcement personnel disagree.

You haven't a family.

Wrong as usual.

Right. Roger Wiseman hasn't a family.

But, neither do you, at least your perverted daddy isn't
diddling the altar boys anymore.

See what I mean about your failure to see the difference? You're a
sociopath without a friend in the world. Is that where your anger at
others comes from, Roger?


Sure, sure, Roger--and you've never had troubles with the FCC

and never

had troubles with local law enforcement. You're a regular

model citizen.

No matter how many times you lie, I'm still not Roger.

No matter how many times you repeat, "I'm still not Roger", you're lying.

And Roger's last "troubles" with the FCC was 5 years ago. Onthe
rest, all you offer is hearsay evidence.

Google isn't hearsay.

And from a proven liar like you, well, nobody can believe a liar
like you.

Your big on the accusation of lying but short on "proven".

*Just like* (blah blah blah)


You wrote it, **** for brains.
Deal with it.

Nbot, UnWiseman.

Dave K8MN

Tarapia Tapioco wrote:
In article
k.net
Dave Heil wrote:


Roger is flailing about, grasping for something--anything to

hang on me.

He'll be disappointed.


Nazi Davey is flailing his flabby fat arms about, hoping that if
he lies that Roger is posting, everybody will beleive him
because he is the self-appointed newsgroup moderator.

Why, no, Roger, I've never claimed to be any such thing. Everyone will
believe me because there's no dirt on me. A Google search on me or my
callsign reveals none of the stuff that one on you and your AB8MQ and
KC8JBO incarnations reveals.


It happens all the time. A background check is done. The

marriage is

"blessed" by the Bureau of Diplomatic Security.


But not in your case.

Sure. Right. Uh-huh. OK. Those things happen for everyone else but not
in my case. You're such a babbling moron.

At my last (blah blah blah)


More lies that cannot be substantiated. How typical of Nazi
A--heil.

Those statements are easily substantiated. Go substantiate.
Make it your mission in life. Seek the truth.

Dave K8MN

Fritz Wuehler wrote:
In article
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:


Hate to dissappoint you, but I was licensed long before the VE

system. I

took my test at the FCC field office in front of an examiner

for my

Advanced ticket.


And you were never good or smart enough to get the Extra, were
you?

Have no need for the extra and I don't need it as some status symbol,
but I did take my exam in front of an FCC examiner at an FCC field
office, can you wogie say that? Didn't think so. Has the FCC ever ask me
to retest to keep my license? No...can you wogie say that? Didn't think
so. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!
Poor two-test wogie, the FCC caught him red handed jamming on 20 meters
and made him retest. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So you hold onto an obsolete license......HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!


Obsolete? Can you point out where the FCC has made the Advanced ticket
obsolete? It is still a valid license class until the FCC says
differently.........HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!! Stupid twit.

"A.Melon" wrote in message
news:691c980e97e1420a63721246b66fb3de@melontraffic kers.com...
In article
"George Orwell" Secret wrote:


NOTE: Poster responded (wrong again, fatass. I responded to
you, not to "Roger".)

Note: Poster responded to the name LARDASS!

You lose, Tubby.




The babbling half-deflated Glendale psycho continues struggling
to hold on to reality.
Take your Lithium Unroger. LOL

Anonymous AKA two-test wogie wrote:
In article
Cmd Secret Davey wrote:


Hate to dissappoint you,(whines)


But you were always a disspointment, weren't you? Even to your
parents.

Did you even have parents? Bet they never would admit it.

Who cares how long you have been a ham. Nobody.

But a lot longer than you have, two-test wogie, and I took my exam in
front of an FCC examiner at an FCC field office, not at some license
give away VEC session. In all the years I have been licensed, the FCC
has never had a reason to make me retest to keep my license. Can you say
that two-test wogie? Didn't think
so...HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Poor widdle two-t (poor lisping cocksucking fatass)

Poor potty mouth wogie.


Poor little fatass Davey, he still can't prove the retest letter
had a reason other than:

"The FCC has the authority, pursuant to §97.519(d)(2) of the
rules to readminister any examination element previously
administered by a volunteer examiner."

And still no other reason was given in Roger's retest letter!


Poor widdle two-test wogie, had to retake his amateur exam on orders of
the FCC. The FCC does not make someone retest just for fun, it always
involves some violation of the rules. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!!!!!!!
Wogie still thinks I am Davey, Lloyd and a host of others, poor little
twit, can't figure anything out.

Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer wrote:
In article
Cmd Secret Davey wrote:


Hate to dissappoint you,(whines)


But you were always a disspointment, weren't you? Even to your
parents.

Who cares how long you have been a ham. Nobody.


Poor widdle two-t (poor lisping cocksucking fatass)


Poor little fatass Davey, he still can't prove the retest letter
had a reason other than:

"The FCC has the authority, pursuant to §97.519(d)(2) of the
rules to readminister any examination element previously
administered by a volunteer examiner."

And still no other reason was given in Roger's retest letter!

You should know, you or one of your cronies used an aonymous
remailer to post this:
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 15:50:43 -0600
From: "Public Anonymous_Account"
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address
above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the
remailer administrator at .
Subject: Where'd you retest Wiseman?
Newsgroups: alt.radio.scanner.flame_fest
Message-ID:
Mail-To-News-Contact:
Organization:
Lines: 19

SUBJECT: Amateur Radio license KC8JBO

Dear Mr. Wiseman:

Pursuant to Section 97.519(d)(2) of the Commission’s
Rules, 47 C.F.R. Section 97.519(d)(2), the Commission has the
authority to re-administer any examination element previously
administered by Volunteer Examiners (VE’s). The Commission
may either administer the examination itself, or under the
supervision of a Volunteer Examiner Coordinator (VEC) or VE
designated by the Commission.

Accordingly, we are requiring you to re-take the General Class
Amateur Examination, (Elements 2, 3(A) and 3(B)) under the
supervision of an American Radio Relay League Volunteer Examiner
Coordinator. This examination must be completed on or before
September 11, 2000. The required code speed that you must
demonstrate is 5 words per minute.

---
This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was posted with the use of anonymizing software at
http://anon.xg.nu
---


So, two-test wogie, how many times under different ids do you have to
post the same thing? Can't you get it right the first time? Didn't think so.

George Orwell wrote:
In article
Cmd Buzz Corey SECRET GOPHER FACE wrote:

And you were never good or smart enough to get the Extra,

were

you?

Have no need for the extra and I don't need it as some status

symbol,

Which translates to "Yes, I am too stupid and lazy to try to get
it."


No, it translates to, 'with the limited operating I do keeping skeds
with a few ham friends on 40 meters, I have no use for an extra class
license, nor do I desire an extra class license and I do not need it as
some silly status symbol as two-test wogie does."


but I did take my exam in front of an FCC examiner at an FCC

field

office, can you wogie say that? Didn't think so.


I'm not "Wogie",

There you are in denial again.

But Roger took a commercial license exam in
front of an FCC examiner a long time ago, (mid 1970's or so).

So did I for a First Class Phone, so what does that have to do with the
fact that two-test wogie had to retake the test to keep his ham license
because the FCC caught him red-handed violating FCC regulations? How
long has two-test wogie held a ham license? How many times did wogie
have to test to keep his license? Why did the FCC make wogie retake the
test to keep his license? The FCC doesn't make someone retest just for
the fun of it, it always involves a violation of the rules. I have been
licensed for over forty years and never have I been asked by the FCC to
retest to keep my license. Can two-test wogie say that? Didn't think so.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! Two-test wogie, the
laughing stock of ham radio and the Internet.


Has the FCC ever ask me to retest to keep my license? No...can

you wogie say that? Didn't think

so. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!


And it's a good thing, too, because you wouldn't even get a no
code tech if you had to retest.

I haven't violate any FCC rules like two-test wogie so I don't have to
be retested.



Poor two-test wogie, the FCC caught him red handed jamming on

20 meters

and made him retest.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Poor Gopher face, he got a letter from the FCC telling him not
to jam Roger Wiseman on the air, too.
BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oh? Got some proof of that?


So you hold onto an obsolete license......HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!


Obsolete? Can you point out where the FCC has made the

Advanced ticket

obsolete?


They no longer issue them, except for renewal purposes.

Thus they are not obsolete, you need to educate yourself a bit.


It is still a valid license class until the FCC says
differently.........HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!! Stupid twit.


That why they no longer issue them, except to ones that already
have them?? Dumb ****.

It is still a valid license until the FCC deems otherwise, moronic twit.

George Orwell wrote:
In article
.net
Dave Heil wrote:


Sorry to interrupt a good rant, UnWiseman.

You aren't replying to me.


Then who am I replying to? Can't you follow along ASSHeil?

It beats the hell out of me.

As I've told you, I post as no one but myself.


And you are lying.

Yeah, sure. In your world, everyone but you is lying.

Your mistake is in thinking that because you do something, all

others do the same.

Your mistake in thinking Roger Wiseman has an exclusive hatred
of you.

I don't believe that for a moment. All one has to do is read a few
Roger Post's and it becomes evident that Roger hates everyone, including
himself.


Keep taking your pills and get plenty of rest.


Keep taking your Rogaine for your receding hairline and
antacids.....

Rogaine counteracts antacids?

...maybe your ulcers will with any luck turn into
inoperable cancer.

There's the old Roger, spreading goodwill throughout the world.

Dave K8MN

A.Melon AKA two-test wogie wrote:
In article
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:


No, it translates to, 'with the limited operating I do keeping

skeds

No, it translates to "Yes, I am too stupid and lazy to try to
get it."


with a few ham friends on 40 meters,


And they sure are "few". And when you do converse, it is usually
discussing the overthrow of our government, ot anti-semeticism.

Got some poof of that two-test? Let's hear a tape of such conversations
where I have been involved in discussing the overthrow of our government
or anti-semeticism. Either put up or shut up two-test. Just more of your
retarded ramblings. Amazing you claim to have heard this as you don't
even know my callsign.


I have no use for an extra class license, nor do I (excuses)


Which means "Yes, I am too stupid and lazy to try to get it."

What ever you want to believe in your fantasy world that makes you happy
retard boy. Wogie couldn't have passed the test for Extra except he went
to one of those license give-away VE sessions. He couldn't pass a 20wpm
code test in front of an FCC examiner. In over forty years of being
licensed I have *never* been asked by the FCC to retest to keep my
license. Can wogie boy say that? Didn't think so. Lets see the hands of
all the hams on the group who have been asked by the FCC to retest to
keep their license. Oh, just wogie? What a suprise!!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The FCC doesn't make someone retest just for the fun of it, the
retesting always involves some violation of the FCC rules. Poor two-test
wogie, had to retest on orders of the FCC to keep his license.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!


There you are in denial again.


There you are, talking out of your ignorant ass again.

You seem to have a fetish for other peoples rear ends. Do that suggest
something about your sexual preferences?




I haven't violate any FCC rules like two-test wogie so I don't

have to

be retested.


You sure do violate many grammar rules, though, you illiterate
lazy *******.

But I didn't have to retake my amateur exam to keep my license like poor
retarded wogie did. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! The FCC isn't
concerned about my grammar, but they sure are concerned about wogie's
illegal operating habits, that's why they made him retest to keep his
license. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!


"I haven't violate" You mean "I haven't violated" You sure get
upset, Gopher face. Exspecially when reminded of the fact that
you can't pass the Extra.

That only seems to bother you wogie.

Which by the way, incorporates some of
the same questions as the old Advanced. Looks like your above
statement that the old Advanced pool was better than the current
Extra is based on your complete ignorance.

And the current Extra test contains questions from a question pool,
where the answers are available for any fool, like wogie, to just
memorize, no knowledge required to pass the test. The questions I
answered on my Advanced, which at the time was much harder than the
Extra, were not from any pool of questions with the answers available.
One had to have actual knowledge of the questions to correctly answer
them. Something wogie lacks. Ask wogie about negative SWR.
ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Oh? Got some proof of that?


Hi, Gopher face! I knew it was you jamming Roger. Now get back
to cowering and making excuses why you can't get the Extra class
license.

Like I said, got some proof you can show of that statement? Didn't think
so. I don't jam anyone on the ham bands like wogie did, that's why he
had to retest to keep his license. Poor two-test wogie.


They no longer issue them, except for renewal purposes.

Thus they are not obsolete, you need to educate yourself a bit.


They still don't issue any of them as a new license. They are
obsolete, like you, Gopher face.


That why they no longer issue them, except to ones that

already

have them?? Dumb ****.

It is still a valid license until the FCC deems otherwise,

moronic twit.

They still don't issue any new Advanced, now do they, excuse-
maker.

But it is still a valid license and the fact I obtained it in front of
an FCC examiner is proof I passed the required code test, and answered
questions that were not from a question pool in which the answers were
available for memorization, a test where one had to have actual
knowledge to answer the questions, which wogie can't do.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! Wogie had to get his extra at a
license give-away VE session with test questions from a pool of
questions where the answers are available simply to be memorized, no
knowledge required. Ask wogie about negative swr and RMS voltage.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Poor two-test wogie, had to retake his exam on orders of the FCC to
keep his license. Such action by the FCC is taken because of a violation
of the FCC rules.

I tire of this banter with the mental midget curtains boy of West VA,
it's like sparing with a chimpanzee.

So wogie and you, his altered ego, can believe about me whatever you
want in your mental midget fantasy world, but I sit back and laugh my
rear off every time you (wogie) post as it reminds me of how, because of
wogie's illegal ham radio activities, the FCC caught wogie red-handed
and made wogie retest to keep his license. Something I certainly have
never had to do.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By fool.

Wogie does indeed have a Master's degree. You see, he applied for a job
down at the river at a fishing dock for the job of baiter, helping
people who came to fish, bait their hooks. He started off as a baiter
trainee, after six months moved up to associate baiter, then on to
general baiter. Now after two years he has finally reached the lofty
position of Master Baiter.