RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)
-   -   Social Outcase Assessment (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/69368-social-outcase-assessment.html)

I Am Not Roger April 21st 05 12:01 AM

Social Outcase Assessment
 
What would people call you as they pointed and laughed if your life were to
go downhill. Or, if you are already past that step, let's assess your value
as a SOCIAL OUTCAST!

Well Wogie, here is your chance to do a little self assessment.

http://selectsmart.com/FREE/select.php?client=Outcast



Lloyd April 21st 05 05:00 PM


"I Am Not Roger" wrote in message
...
What would people call you as they pointed and laughed if your life were
to
go downhill. Or, if you are already past that step, let's assess your
value
as a SOCIAL OUTCAST!

Well Wogie, here is your chance to do a little self assessment.

http://selectsmart.com/FREE/select.php?client=Outcast




LOL! Wonder what Wogie will score?

73,

Lloyd




Dave Heil April 21st 05 10:46 PM

"A.Melon" wrote:

In article
"I Am Not Roger" wrote:

What would people call you as they pointed and laughed if

your life were to
go downhill. Or, if you are already past that step, let's

assess your value
as a SOCIAL OUTCAST!

Well Wogie, IKYABWAI


Well, Dave "Nazi" Heil, you must've been looking for the site to
take the assessment in the first place!
After all, you've done NOTHING for amateur radio or the world at
large.


You thought you were responding to me, Roger? I don't have any need to
hide behind anonymous remailers.

You asked sometime ago what I'd done for amateur radio. I provided a
number of items which are easily verified. How about you answering that
same question? We know about your notorious interactions with the FCC.
Why not provide us even a one-liner with the things you've done for and
not to amateur radio? QRMing stations on 20m and getting involved in an
SSB version of the stuff you post here don't count.

Would you care to astound us with your contributions to your community,
county, state or nation? Maybe you could come up with commendations
from some of your many friends. Perhaps you're involved with your
church or a civic organization. Let us know.

Dave K8MN

Cmd Buzz Corey April 22nd 05 12:14 AM

Dave Heil wrote:


Would you care to astound us with your contributions to your community,
county, state or nation? Maybe you could come up with commendations
from some of your many friends. Perhaps you're involved with your
church or a civic organization. Let us know.

Dave K8MN


Wogie thinks having to retest for his ham license because he jammed on
20 meters is contributing to ham radio. Two-test wogie, poor dumb moron.

I Am Not Roger April 22nd 05 12:50 AM


"Dave Heil" wrote in message
...
"A.Melon" wrote:

In article
"I Am Not Roger" wrote:

What would people call you as they pointed and laughed if

your life were to
go downhill. Or, if you are already past that step, let's

assess your value
as a SOCIAL OUTCAST!

Well Wogie, IKYABWAI


Well, Dave "Nazi" Heil, you must've been looking for the site to
take the assessment in the first place!
After all, you've done NOTHING for amateur radio or the world at
large.


You thought you were responding to me, Roger? I don't have any need to
hide behind anonymous remailers.

You asked sometime ago what I'd done for amateur radio. I provided a
number of items which are easily verified. How about you answering that
same question? We know about your notorious interactions with the FCC.
Why not provide us even a one-liner with the things you've done for and
not to amateur radio? QRMing stations on 20m and getting involved in an
SSB version of the stuff you post here don't count.

Would you care to astound us with your contributions to your community,
county, state or nation? Maybe you could come up with commendations
from some of your many friends. Perhaps you're involved with your
church or a civic organization. Let us know.

Dave K8MN

.....

Weeeellll......Roger is the reason the local grade school hired a full time
policeman. I guess you could say that Roger helped create another job????



Lloyd April 22nd 05 01:02 AM


"I Am Not Roger" wrote in message
...

"Dave Heil" wrote in message
...
"A.Melon" wrote:

In article
"I Am Not Roger" wrote:

What would people call you as they pointed and laughed if

your life were to
go downhill. Or, if you are already past that step, let's

assess your value
as a SOCIAL OUTCAST!

Well Wogie, IKYABWAI


Well, Dave "Nazi" Heil, you must've been looking for the site to
take the assessment in the first place!
After all, you've done NOTHING for amateur radio or the world at
large.


You thought you were responding to me, Roger? I don't have any need to
hide behind anonymous remailers.

You asked sometime ago what I'd done for amateur radio. I provided a
number of items which are easily verified. How about you answering that
same question? We know about your notorious interactions with the FCC.
Why not provide us even a one-liner with the things you've done for and
not to amateur radio? QRMing stations on 20m and getting involved in an
SSB version of the stuff you post here don't count.

Would you care to astound us with your contributions to your community,
county, state or nation? Maybe you could come up with commendations
from some of your many friends. Perhaps you're involved with your
church or a civic organization. Let us know.

Dave K8MN

....

Weeeellll......Roger is the reason the local grade school hired a full
time
policeman. I guess you could say that Roger helped create another job????




LOL!

73,

Lloyd




I Ain't Roger Either April 22nd 05 02:07 AM


"George Orwell" wrote in message
...
In article
"Lloyd" wrote:
LOL!


Lardass answers himself! What a loser!


You seem to be dancing to Lloyd's tune, Wascally Wogie...



Dave Heil April 22nd 05 05:06 AM

"Not just A.Melon, but THE Melon" wrote:

In article
Dave Heil wrote:

You thought you were responding to me, Roger? I don't have any need to hide behind anonymous remailers.


You asked sometime ago what I'd done for amateur radio. I provided a
number of items which are easily verified. How about you answering that same question? We know about your notorious interactions with the FCC.


Why not provide us even a one-liner with the things you've done for and not to amateur radio? QRMing stations on 20m and getting involved
in an SSB version of the stuff you post here don't count.


Would you care to astound us with your contributions to your community, county, state or nation? Maybe you could come up with commendations from some of your many friends. Perhaps you're involved with your church or a civic organization. Let us know.


You don't, Nazi. That's why your State Dept. loser job was cut
short.


That is incorrect.

You married a foreign national, so you flushed your
"security clearance" down the toilet.


That's incorrect once again. My wife and I had five Foreign Service
assignments after our marriage.

Along with your wrench turner "job" in the Cashew capital of Africa.


That doesn't quite make it as a sentence or as fact. Care to tell us
what you do for a living?

Since the State Dept. fired you.


Again, you don't quite have a sentence or a fact.

You haven't done anything for your community or amateur radio.


I've outlined what I've done for amateur radio. I'll be happy to
outline what I've done in civic service when you provide a little info,
Roger.

You are a proven liar and imbecile.


That's incorrect yet again, Roger.

That's why you think I am Roger Wiseman, too!


It is certainly one of you inhabiting his body. Which personality are
you? Are you in communication with the others?

Dave K8MN

K4YZ April 22nd 05 12:51 PM


A. Melon wrote:
In article
Dave Heil wrote:

You thought whines


You don't, Nazi. That's why your State Dept. loser job was cut
short. You married a foreign national, so you flushed your
"security clearance" down the toilet.


Absolutely assinine.

I knew dozens of USMC officers marreid to "foreign nationals" who
not only kept their clearances, but went on to higher accomplishments.

Along with your wrench
turner "job" in the Cashew capital of Africa. Since the State
Dept. fired you.


Guess they forgot to stop sending the checks every month, eh
Dave...?!?!~

You haven't done anything for your community or amateur radio.
You are a proven liar and imbecile.


Why do you make such idiotic, easily disproven statements and
accuse others of lying when the very accusation itself is a lie...?!?!

That's why you think I am Roger Wiseman, too!


Even if you're not, one could forgive someone else for not being
able to "seperate" one foul scum from another.

Persoanlly, I'd bet my life on Dave's errors a lot quicker than I
would on your "facts".

Steve, K4YZ


Cmd Buzz Corey April 22nd 05 01:07 PM

George Orwell wrote:
In article
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:


Wogie thinks having to retest for his ham license because he


jammed on

20 meters is contributing to ham radio. Two-test wogie, poor


dumb moron.


Then why didn't his retest letter say that was why he had to
retest, Lardass????
Poor Lardass, he's such a ****ing moron.


You think think the FCC made him retest just for the fun of it? Poor
two-test wogie, dumb moron.

Cmd Buzz Corey April 22nd 05 01:07 PM

George Orwell wrote:
In article
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:


Wogie thinks having to retest for his ham license because he


jammed on

20 meters is contributing to ham radio. Two-test wogie, poor


dumb moron.


Then why didn't his retest letter say that was why he had to
retest, Lardass????
Poor Lardass, he's such a ****ing moron.

Poor two-test wogie, the laughing stock of ham radio and the Internet.

Mark Richards April 22nd 05 01:52 PM


"Dave Heil" wrote in message
...
"Not just A.Melon, but THE Melon" wrote:

In article
Dave Heil wrote:

You thought you were responding to me, Roger? I don't have any need
to hide behind anonymous remailers.


You asked sometime ago what I'd done for amateur radio. I provided a
number of items which are easily verified. How about you answering
that same question? We know about your notorious interactions with
the FCC.


Why not provide us even a one-liner with the things you've done for
and not to amateur radio? QRMing stations on 20m and getting involved
in an SSB version of the stuff you post here don't count.


Would you care to astound us with your contributions to your
community, county, state or nation? Maybe you could come up with
commendations from some of your many friends. Perhaps you're involved
with your church or a civic organization. Let us know.


You don't, Nazi. That's why your State Dept. loser job was cut
short.


That is incorrect.

You married a foreign national, so you flushed your
"security clearance" down the toilet.


That's incorrect once again. My wife and I had five Foreign Service
assignments after our marriage.

Along with your wrench turner "job" in the Cashew capital of Africa.


That doesn't quite make it as a sentence or as fact. Care to tell us
what you do for a living?

Since the State Dept. fired you.


Again, you don't quite have a sentence or a fact.

You haven't done anything for your community or amateur radio.


I've outlined what I've done for amateur radio. I'll be happy to
outline what I've done in civic service when you provide a little info,
Roger.

You are a proven liar and imbecile.


That's incorrect yet again, Roger.

That's why you think I am Roger Wiseman, too!


It is certainly one of you inhabiting his body. Which personality are
you? Are you in communication with the others?

Dave K8MN



One wonders if Roger's various personalites attempt to
QRM each other, similar to the way Roger caused qrm on
20 meters? Perhaps Unroger is envious of Roger, or
visa versa?

Mark





Cmd Buzz Corey April 22nd 05 11:20 PM

George Orwell wrote:
In article
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:


You think think the FCC made him retest just for the fun of


it? Poor

two-test wogie, dumb moron.



What is "You think think?", tubby? Poor Lardass, aka "Butt
Corey", he can't post in English. But you did flunk out of high
school, didn't you?

Why wasn't a reason for Roger's retest given in the retest
letter, moron?


It doesn't matter if a reason was given or not, the fact is you, little
wogie, had to retest. The FCC doesn't make you retest just for the fun
of it. What is this AKA stuff? You don't have a clue who you are
replying to. Typical of poor dumb wogie, the laughing stock of ham radio
and the Internet.

Dave Heil April 23rd 05 04:46 AM

Italy Anonymous Remailer wrote:

In article
Dave Heil the Nazi and liar wrote:

That is incorrect.


I'd say that marrying a foreign national was why they cut it
short.


There is fact. Then there is what you'd say.

That and the poor performance record. But the marriage to a
foreign nation precludes you maintaining a security clearance!


That is totally incorrect. You are ignorant of fact.

That's incorrect once again. My wife and I had five Foreign

Service
assignments after our marriage.


Sure you did,liar.


Yep, you can check back issues of State Magazine, QST, CQ, The DX
Bulletin. Bank on it.

That doesn't quite make it as a sentence or as fact. Care to

tell us
what you do for a living?


Again, you don't quite have a sentence or a fact.


Again, your lies trip you up.


My lies about you putting together a sentence?

I've outlined what I've done for amateur radio. I'll be happy

to
outline what I've done in civic service when you provide a

little info,
Roger.


More lies, Nazi? That's all you can do. And no matter how much
you say it, I'm still not Roger. You are one stupid *******.


You are one pathetic piece of human sludge, hiding behind an anonymous
remailer.

That's incorrect yet again, Roger.


Wrong guess, and learn to punctuate your sentences.


Hint: My sentence (above) uses correct punctuation, professor.

It is certainly one of you inhabiting his body. Which

personality are
you? Are you in communication with the others?


Wrong again, nazi. But you are an expert at being wrong. Now go
tap out some Morse Code, monkey boy. Maybe you can do something
about your bad comb-over, too.


Awwww, shucks. The little troll gives orders. How nice for you.

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil April 23rd 05 04:49 AM

Italy Anonymous Remailer wrote:

In article
Dave Heil the Nazi and liar wrote:

That is incorrect.


I'd say that marrying a foreign national was why they cut it
short.
That and the poor performance record. But the marriage to a
foreign nation precludes you maintaining a security clearance!

That's incorrect once again. My wife and I had five Foreign

Service
assignments after our marriage.


Sure you did,liar.

That doesn't quite make it as a sentence or as fact. Care to

tell us
what you do for a living?


Again, you don't quite have a sentence or a fact.


Again, your lies trip you up.

I've outlined what I've done for amateur radio. I'll be happy

to
outline what I've done in civic service when you provide a

little info,
Roger.


More lies, Nazi? That's all you can do. And no matter how much
you say it, I'm still not Roger. You are one stupid *******.

That's incorrect yet again, Roger.


Wrong guess, and learn to punctuate your sentences.

It is certainly one of you inhabiting his body. Which

personality are
you? Are you in communication with the others?


Wrong again, nazi. But you are an expert at being wrong. Now go
tap out some Morse Code, monkey boy. Maybe you can do something
about your bad comb-over, too.


You seem to be having some problems in your home communications center.
I can help you straighten that out if you like.

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil April 23rd 05 04:51 AM

Userbeam Remailer wrote:

In article
"Mark aka Renee Richards" wrote:

One wonders


One wonders if you are Renee Richards who had plastic suergery
to be a woman, but recently had it changed back so you could be
"Mark".


....and you can be "Space".

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil April 23rd 05 05:03 AM

Italy Anonymous Remailer wrote:

In article
Dave Heil wrote:

You thought you were responding to me, Roger? I don't have

any need to
hide behind anonymous remailers.


No, Nazi, you keep seeing Roger behind every post.


I don't see Roger much at all. I saw him once and he bolted.

And you do
hide behind other accounts, like ones on Altopia. So does Nursie.


That is absolutely false. I post nowhere on the internet other than as
myself. You are the one who seems to see me everywhere.

You asked sometime ago what I'd done for amateur radio. I

provided a
number of items which are easily verified.


You provided lies.


As I said, my statements are easily verified. Here's a task for you,
anonymous one: Come up with verifiable proof to the contrary.

How about you answering that
same question? We know about your notorious interactions with

the FCC.
Why not provide us even a one-liner with the things you've

done for and
not to amateur radio? QRMing stations on 20m and getting

involved in an
SSB version of the stuff you post here don't count.


Roger will have to propvide it, retarded Nazi, he's probably
done more than you really have.


Do an internet search on Roger Wiseman, AB8MQ or KC8JBO. That'll reveal
that Roger is known only for 1) being in hot water with the FCC and 2)
posting filthy rants in newsgroups. He's quite the asset to amateur
radio.

Fromthe official letter that was once posted at Hap's Rain
Report website, no reason was given for Roger's retest letter of
what, 5 years ago, now? And still nothing else heard from the
FCC on his so-called "actions" on 20 meters, if he is such a bad
"qrmer" as you claim, he'd be in the FCC enforcement letters all
the time or worse.


Roger now keeps a very, very, very low profile on the air--for good
reason.

Guess all you whining is just another lie by
the biggest liar on the newsgroup.


"You whining"? Your claim of lies rings quite hollow from one who must
hide behind anonymous remailers. Now if you had the courage of your
convictions, you'd use your name and stand behind your statements.
You can't do that.

Would you care to astound us with your contributions to your

community,
county, state or nation? Maybe you could come up with

commendations
from some of your many friends. Perhaps you're involved with

your
church or a civic organization. Let us know.


Perhaps you'd like to ask somebody who give a f--k about what
you request. I don't have to qualify myself to you or anybody
else, Nazi. Nobody has to give information because you ask for
it, Nazi.


You're absolutely right. Nobody has to do so. You being a stand up
guy, I thought surely you'd want to let us know what you'd done with
your life. That you choose not to do so just makes your claims look like
sad, plaintive cries in the night. Off to the rest of the cockroaches
with you.

Dave K8MN

Dignity Ain't Roger April 23rd 05 06:22 AM


"Dave Heil" wrote in message
...
Italy Anonymous Remailer wrote:

In article
Dave Heil the Nazi and liar wrote:

That is incorrect.


I'd say that marrying a foreign national was why they cut it
short.
That and the poor performance record. But the marriage to a
foreign nation precludes you maintaining a security clearance!

That's incorrect once again. My wife and I had five Foreign

Service
assignments after our marriage.


Sure you did,liar.

That doesn't quite make it as a sentence or as fact. Care to

tell us
what you do for a living?


Again, you don't quite have a sentence or a fact.


Again, your lies trip you up.

I've outlined what I've done for amateur radio. I'll be happy

to
outline what I've done in civic service when you provide a

little info,
Roger.


More lies, Nazi? That's all you can do. And no matter how much
you say it, I'm still not Roger. You are one stupid *******.

That's incorrect yet again, Roger.


Wrong guess, and learn to punctuate your sentences.

It is certainly one of you inhabiting his body. Which

personality are
you? Are you in communication with the others?


Wrong again, nazi. But you are an expert at being wrong. Now go
tap out some Morse Code, monkey boy. Maybe you can do something
about your bad comb-over, too.


You seem to be having some problems in your home communications center.
I can help you straighten that out if you like.

Dave K8MN



Maybe you could give Wogie a primer in Antenna Construction 101.
Show him plans that would help him keep his antennas in his own yard rather
than drooping over the sidewalks.

They didn't cover that at The Devry Mail Order Institute of Higher Learning
and Genuine Degrees.






Mark Richards April 23rd 05 02:25 PM


"Dignity Ain't Roger" wrote in message
...

"Dave Heil" wrote in message
...
Italy Anonymous Remailer wrote:

In article
Dave Heil the Nazi and liar wrote:

That is incorrect.


I'd say that marrying a foreign national was why they cut it
short.
That and the poor performance record. But the marriage to a
foreign nation precludes you maintaining a security clearance!

That's incorrect once again. My wife and I had five Foreign

Service
assignments after our marriage.


Sure you did,liar.

That doesn't quite make it as a sentence or as fact. Care to

tell us
what you do for a living?


Again, you don't quite have a sentence or a fact.


Again, your lies trip you up.

I've outlined what I've done for amateur radio. I'll be happy

to
outline what I've done in civic service when you provide a

little info,
Roger.


More lies, Nazi? That's all you can do. And no matter how much
you say it, I'm still not Roger. You are one stupid *******.

That's incorrect yet again, Roger.


Wrong guess, and learn to punctuate your sentences.

It is certainly one of you inhabiting his body. Which

personality are
you? Are you in communication with the others?


Wrong again, nazi. But you are an expert at being wrong. Now go
tap out some Morse Code, monkey boy. Maybe you can do something
about your bad comb-over, too.


You seem to be having some problems in your home communications center.
I can help you straighten that out if you like.

Dave K8MN



Maybe you could give Wogie a primer in Antenna Construction 101.
Show him plans that would help him keep his antennas in his own yard
rather
than drooping over the sidewalks.

They didn't cover that at The Devry Mail Order Institute of Higher
Learning
and Genuine Degrees.



That "graduate degree" Wogie earned never covered RMS voltage or
negative SWR either.
ROTFLMAO!

Mark




Mark Richards April 23rd 05 02:46 PM


"Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer" wrote
in message ...
In article
Dave Heil wrote:

You thought you were responding to me, Roger? I don't have

any need to
hide behind anonymous remailers.


No, Nazi, you kep seeing Roger behind every post. And you do

^^^^ sp

hide behind other accounts, like ones on Altopia.

^^^^ incorrect possessive
usage
of a pronoun



You asked sometime ago what I'd done for amateur radio. I

provided a
number of items which are easily verified.


You provided lies.

How about you answering that
same question? We know about your notorious interactions with

the FCC.
Why not provide us even a one-liner with the things you've

done for and
not to amateur radio? QRMing stations on 20m and getting

involved in an
SSB version of the stuff you post here don't count.


Roger will have to propvide it, retarded Nazi, he's probably

^^^^^^^^ ^^^
incorrect
conjuntive
usage

done more than you really have.
Fromthe official letter that was once posted at Hap's Rain

^^^^^^^

Report website, no reason was given for Roger's retest letter of
what, 5 years ago, now? And still nothing else heard from the
FCC on his so-called "actions" on 20 meters, if he is such a bad
"qrmer" as you claim, he'd be in the FCC enforcement letters all
the time or worse. Guess all you whining is just another lie by
the biggest liar on the newsgroup.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
paragraph weakly constructed, redo. numerous gramatical
errors



Would you care to astound us with your contributions to your

community,
county, state or nation? Maybe you could come up with

commendations
from some of your many friends. Perhaps you're involved with

your
church or a civic organization. Let us know.


Perhaps you'd like to ask somebody who give a **** about what

^^^^^ ^^^^
weak connuction wrong verb form


you request. I don't have to qualify myself to you or anybody

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
incorrect use of verb &
infinitive

else, Nazi. Nobody has to give information because you ask for
it, Nazi.

^^^^ excessive use of this word,
use alternative description



Instructor Comment: Suggest you obtain and study my
Elements of Style handbook for aspiring writers.

Good luck,

Mark





Mark Richards April 23rd 05 02:59 PM


"Tarapia Tapioco" wrote in message
x.it...
In article
Dave Heil wrote:

I don't see Roger much at all. I saw him once and he bolted.


You are lying again. He left after the meeting ended. And
"Lurch," you still need help with your bad comb-over, from what
he described. Your brain processes seem to mirror that
character's, if nbot your appearance.

That is absolutely false. I post nowhere on the internet

other than as
myself. You are the one who seems to see me everywhere.


Now, you're still lying, but you lie every time you post, under
your own name or not.

As I said, my statements are easily verified. Here's a task

for you,
anonymous one: Come up with verifiable proof to the contrary.


Too bad nobody takes your "assignments," or any orders from you,
Nazi.

Do an internet search on Roger Wiseman, AB8MQ or KC8JBO.

That'll reveal
that Roger is known only for 1) being in hot water with the

FCC and 2)
posting filthy rants in newsgroups. He's quite the asset to

amateur
radio.


I can't be bothered. Since your "opinion" of him carries about
as much weight with me as it does with evberybody else but your
toadies. His "hot water with the FCC" consists of a warning
letter from 1999, which may or may not indicate anything, a
cautionary letter to him and another ham not to carry online
arguments on the air again from 1999, and a retest letter which
Roger passed from 2000, all from 5 years ago. Can't find
anything recent, though, can you? Why is that? If he is such a
"qrmer" as you assert, why hasn't he gotten any more letters?
Your reasoning is flawed, like you.
And his "filthy" posts are not half as bad as your posts, or
others. You sure do like haveing the old Nazi spirit alive,
don't you?

Roger now keeps a very, very, very low profile on the air--for

good
reason.


Not so. You just can't find him on the air. But with work and
other things, he probably has better things to do that stay on
the radio 24/7. Isn't have a balance what is in your amateur
code? You probably spend more time on the radio than with your
family. I can't blame them for encouraging that.

"You whining"?


Typo, Nazi. "Your whining." Is that better for your narrow mind?

Your claim of lies rings quite hollow from one who must
hide behind anonymous remailers. Now if you had the courage

of your
convictions, you'd use your name and stand behind your

statements.
You can't do that.


The only thing ringing hollow is your own pompousity echoing in

^^^^^^^^^^
"pomposity" is the correct form Woger. At least learn the correct
form and usage of these advanced words, if you are going to continue
using them in your psycobabble.



your hollow skull. I stand by my convictions, and others who use
anonimity who agree with you, you have no problem with them
using "anonimity." Are you like Nursie, using a double standard?

You're absolutely right.


I'm glad you can see that, finally.




Dave Heil April 23rd 05 06:01 PM

"A.Melon" wrote:

In article
Dave Heil wrote:

There is fact. Then there is what you'd say.


Funny how that can be applied to you, as well, Nazi.


Sorry, that is incorrect.

That is totally incorrect. You are ignorant of fact.


Says you. But you are a well known liar.


Let's see...there's you saying it. Are you a group of individuals?

Yep, you can check back issues of State Magazine, QST, CQ, The

DX
Bulletin. Bank on it.


Yeah, right. Maybe those are the articles published you refer to
when you post as "Stagger Lee."


What articles would those be?

My lies about you putting together a sentence?


No, stupid, you lies in general. You put together quite a
mangled sentence up there.


"No, stupid, you lies?" Nice job.

You are one pathetic piece of human sludge, hiding behind an

anonymous
remailer.


Oh, heaven forbid that somebody has an opinion other than the
self-appointed newsgroup moderator/ham radio "elite", the self-
righteous, lying hypocrite who wants to supress freedom of
speech. Well, that was the Nazi way. Will you be calling the
Gestapo, or will you handle it yourself?


It boils down to the fact that you don't have the courage of your
convictions. You have to hide. Speak what you like but stand behind
what you say. Anyone can snipe from the cover of an anonymous remailer.


Dave K8MN

herb April 23rd 05 06:18 PM


"Dave Heil" wrote in message
...
"A.Melon" wrote:

In article
Dave Heil wrote:

There is fact. Then there is what you'd say.


Funny how that can be applied to you, as well, Nazi.


Sorry, that is incorrect.

That is totally incorrect. You are ignorant of fact.


Says you. But you are a well known liar.


Let's see...there's you saying it. Are you a group of individuals?

Yep, you can check back issues of State Magazine, QST, CQ, The

DX
Bulletin. Bank on it.


Yeah, right. Maybe those are the articles published you refer to
when you post as "Stagger Lee."


What articles would those be?

My lies about you putting together a sentence?


No, stupid, you lies in general. You put together quite a
mangled sentence up there.


"No, stupid, you lies?" Nice job.

You are one pathetic piece of human sludge, hiding behind an

anonymous
remailer.


Oh, heaven forbid that somebody has an opinion other than the
self-appointed newsgroup moderator/ham radio "elite", the self-
righteous, lying hypocrite who wants to supress freedom of
speech. Well, that was the Nazi way. Will you be calling the
Gestapo, or will you handle it yourself?


It boils down to the fact that you don't have the courage of your
convictions. You have to hide. Speak what you like but stand behind
what you say. Anyone can snipe from the cover of an anonymous remailer.


Dave K8MN



Roger also likes to hide behind curtains.




Dave Heil April 23rd 05 06:34 PM

Tarapia Tapioco wrote:

In article
Dave Heil wrote:

I don't see Roger much at all. I saw him once and he bolted.


You are lying again. He left after the meeting ended.


Sorry, that isn't correct. The meeting ended and a tour of the
communications van ensued. During that period, you bolted, never to be
seen again.

And
"Lurch," you still need help with your bad comb-over, from what
he described.


He must have given one of your other personalities some bum info,
Wiseman/UnWiseman. I have a full head of hair. If you were taller,
you'd know. Why this fascination with my hair, Roger?

Your brain processes seem to mirror that
character's, if nbot your appearance.


Are you entering the big Stephen King look-alike contest this summer?
Nbot?

That is absolutely false. I post nowhere on the internet

other than as
myself. You are the one who seems to see me everywhere.


Now, you're still lying, but you lie every time you post, under
your own name or not.


Offer up some proof.

As I said, my statements are easily verified. Here's a task

for you,
anonymous one: Come up with verifiable proof to the contrary.


Too bad nobody takes your "assignments," or any orders from you,
Nazi.


You made a claim. Offer up some proof.

Do an internet search on Roger Wiseman, AB8MQ or KC8JBO.

That'll reveal
that Roger is known only for 1) being in hot water with the

FCC and 2)
posting filthy rants in newsgroups. He's quite the asset to

amateur
radio.


I can't be bothered.


Hint: I doubted you'd do so. You already know what would be found.

Since your "opinion" of him carries about
as much weight with me as it does with evberybody else but your
toadies.


It has nothing to do with my opinion. It has to do with what a Google
search reveals.

His "hot water with the FCC" consists of a warning
letter from 1999, which may or may not indicate anything...


May or may not reveal anything? Why do you believe you were sent a
warning letter?

...a cautionary letter to him and another ham not to carry online
arguments on the air again from 1999...


Why do you think that one was sent?

and a retest letter which
Roger passed from 2000, all from 5 years ago.


Why do you think the retest was mandated?

Can't find
anything recent, though, can you? Why is that? If he is such a
"qrmer" as you assert, why hasn't he gotten any more letters?


I'd guess he'd have to be a bigger fool than is commonly supposed to
tempt fate, don't you, Roger/UnRoger?

Your reasoning is flawed, like you.


My reasoning in suggesting doing the Google search? Why not offer up a
few of the positive things your good friend Roger has done with his
life?

And his "filthy" posts are not half as bad as your posts, or
others.


Sorry, that is totally incorrect.

You sure do like haveing the old Nazi spirit alive,
don't you?


I have no affiliation with the National Socialists nor AARP.

Roger now keeps a very, very, very low profile on the air--for

good
reason.


Not so.


So.

You just can't find him on the air.


One can't find what isn't there.

But with work and
other things, he probably has better things to do that stay on
the radio 24/7.


I'm sure "he" is long on other things and short on work.

Isn't have a balance what is in your amateur
code?


"Have a balance"? No, I don't find that in "my" amateur code.
I have many interests, UnWiseman. Amateur radio is but one of them.

You probably spend more time on the radio than with your
family.


Then again, you'd have no way of knowing.

I can't blame them for encouraging that.


Then again, you know nothing of them.

"You whining"?


Typo, Nazi. "Your whining." Is that better for your narrow mind?


Just remember it the next time you go on about one of my errors.

Your claim of lies rings quite hollow from one who must
hide behind anonymous remailers. Now if you had the courage

of your
convictions, you'd use your name and stand behind your

statements.
You can't do that.


The only thing ringing hollow is your own pompousity echoing in
your hollow skull.


I stand by my convictions, and others who use
anonimity who agree with you, you have no problem with them
using "anonimity." Are you like Nursie, using a double standard?


If you stood by your convictions, you'd have no need to hide behind
anonymous remailers. You previously used your call as part of your
email address and you got tossed from several ISP's as a result of your
warm and friendly manner.

Your statement (above) is one of the most convoluted pieces of work I've
ever encountered. As to "anonimity", I'd let you slide but one doesn't
often make a typo twice. The word is "anonymity".

You're absolutely right. Nobody has to do so. You being a stand
up guy, I thought surely you'd want to let us know what you'd done
with your life. That you choose not to do so just makes your claims
look like sad, plaintive cries in the night. Off to the rest of the cockroaches with you.


I'm glad you can see that, finally.


I've seen that all along.

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil April 23rd 05 06:39 PM



Tarapia Tapioco wrote:

In article
Dave Heil wrote:

You seem to be having some problems in your home

communications center.
I can help you straighten that out if you like.


Doubtful, Nazi. You can't even figure out you post under other
names when everybody else has.


Everyone else has posted under other names? Really?

Dave K8MN

Cmd Buzz Corey April 23rd 05 10:04 PM

A.Melon wrote:

Perhaps you'd like to ask somebody who give a **** about what
you request. I don't have to qualify myself to you or anybody
else, Nazi. Nobody has to give information because you ask for
it, Nazi.


Poor two-test wogie, had to retake the amateur exam. What a total joke.
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11

George Orwell April 23rd 05 10:36 PM


"Italy Anonymous Remailer" wrote in message
...
In article
Dave Heil the Nazi and liar wrote:

That is incorrect.


I'd say that marrying a foreign national was why they cut it
short.
That and the poor performance record. But the marriage to a
foreign nation precludes you maintaining a security clearance!




Unless you are in this person's supervisory chain-of-command,
you cannot gain access to his performance record. Meaning,
you are full of crap. Source please?

Marriage to a foreign national does not necessarily terminate
one's security clearance. Please cite the regulation you are
basing this statement on? Source please?



That's incorrect once again. My wife and I had five Foreign

Service
assignments after our marriage.


Sure you did,liar.

That doesn't quite make it as a sentence or as fact. Care to

tell us
what you do for a living?


Again, you don't quite have a sentence or a fact.


Again, your lies trip you up.

I've outlined what I've done for amateur radio. I'll be happy

to
outline what I've done in civic service when you provide a

little info,
Roger.


More lies, Nazi? That's all you can do. And no matter how much
you say it, I'm still not Roger. You are one stupid *******.

That's incorrect yet again, Roger.


Wrong guess, and learn to punctuate your sentences.

It is certainly one of you inhabiting his body. Which

personality are
you? Are you in communication with the others?


Wrong again, nazi. But you are an expert at being wrong. Now go
tap out some Morse Code, monkey boy. Maybe you can do something
about your bad comb-over, too.





Dave Heil April 24th 05 12:49 AM

Tarapia Tapioco wrote:
In article
Dave Heil wrote:


Sorry, that is incorrect.



Sorry, but you are in denial.


Denial about what?



Let's see...there's you saying it. Are you a group of


individuals?

Let's see, more than just one person has said it, but you must
have your head stuck up your ass, as usual. Try "GOOGLEing" it.


You know, by golly, you're right. Most of them seem to have names from
various anonymous remailers and are dated very recently. I think you're
on to something. You're a regular self-fulfilling prophecy.


What articles would those be?



"State Magaizine," "QST," "CQ," "The DX Bulletin", that you
claim to have atricles published. Try to keep up.


I didn't claim to have any "atricles" published.


"No, stupid, you lies?" Nice job.



"Your lies." Better, hypocrite?


It is hardly hypocritical to do the very same thing which you do to me
and others. It is actually quite just.


It boils down to the fact that you don't have the courage of your
convictions. You have to hide. Speak what you like but stand behind
what you say. Anyone can snipe from the cover of an anonymous remailer.


It boils down to the fact that you and Nursie are A--HOLES.
Period.


....and you are an fearful cockroach, hiding under the baseboard. You
can't come out unless the lights are off.

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil April 24th 05 01:01 AM

Fritz Wuehler wrote:
In article
"Dignity Ain't Roger" Secret wrote:


Show him plans that would help him keep his antennas in his


own yard rather

than drooping over the sidewalks.



Since a Alpha Delta DX-CC is only 82 feet long, and Roger has it
in an inverted vee configuration, which shortens the space it
takes up quite a bit, none of his antenna goes "over the
sidewalk", dumbass! It never did.


You know, for a guy who isn't Roger Wiseman, you certainly know a great
deal about him. As to "it never did": there's a ham living just out
the road from you who says differently. Two others confirmed it.

Playing cockroach won't work this time, Roger. A wire antenna is rather
noticeable. One which runs out near the street is even more noticeable.
I hear a couple of your antenna supports are bowed like a fishing rod
with a Marlin on the end of the line. Can that be true?

Dave K8MN

Cmd Buzz Corey April 24th 05 01:04 AM

Fritz Wuehler wrote:



They can make you retest at any time, if you were first tested
under the VE system.


Hate to dissappoint you, but I was licensed long before the VE system. I
took my test at the FCC field office in front of an examiner for my
Advanced ticket. Bet wogie can't say that. Well he could as he lies a lot.

Why wasn't a reason given in the FCC letter. It was posted at
the Rain Report at one time, say 5 years ago when it happened?
And all you can think about is what happened 5 years ago, and
you call Roger obsessed?


Poor widdle two-test wogie, had to take the exam all over at the request
of the FCC. The FCC doesn't make someone retest just for the fun of it,
there is a reason behind it, and it nearly always means the person being
retested has violated the rules and got caught, like widdle wogie did.

Dave Heil April 24th 05 01:13 AM

George Orwell wrote:
"Italy Anonymous Remailer" wrote in message
...

In article
Dave Heil the Nazi and liar wrote:


That is incorrect.


I'd say that marrying a foreign national was why they cut it
short.
That and the poor performance record. But the marriage to a
foreign nation precludes you maintaining a security clearance!





Unless you are in this person's supervisory chain-of-command,
you cannot gain access to his performance record. Meaning,
you are full of crap. Source please?


Roger is flailing about, grasping for something--anything to hang on me.
He'll be disappointed.

Marriage to a foreign national does not necessarily terminate
one's security clearance. Please cite the regulation you are
basing this statement on? Source please?


It happens all the time. A background check is done. The marriage is
"blessed" by the Bureau of Diplomatic Security.

At my last post alone, the Deputy Chief of Mission was married to a
Chilean, the General Services Officer was married to a Finn, the
Administrative Officer was married to a Chinese.

In Helsinki (first tour) the Ambassador, Consular Officer, one of my
coworkers and one Political Officer were married to Finns, the Deputy
Chief of Mission to a Chilean.

In Botswana the Deputy Chief of Mission was married to a Swede, the
Administrative Officer to a Portuguese, the Budge and Finance Officer to
a South African, my coworker to a Brit, the Consular Officer to a Thai.

In short, Roger hasn't the foggiest idea what he's talking about.


That's incorrect once again. My wife and I had five Foreign


Service

assignments after our marriage.


Sure you did,liar.


Sure. We did.

Dave K8MN

George Orwell April 24th 05 02:10 AM


"Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer" wrote
in message ...
In article
"herb" wrote:

Roger also likes to hide behind curtains.


And you like to hide behind door safety chains, Davies.



NOTE: Poster responded to the name *Roger*




George Orwell April 24th 05 02:11 AM


"Userbeam Remailer" wrote in message
...
In article
"herb" wrote:

Roger also likes to hide behind curtains.


And you like to hide behind door safety chains, Davies.



NOTE: Poster responded to the name *ROGER*





Dave Heil April 24th 05 04:39 AM

George Orwell wrote:
In article
Dave Heil wrote:


During that period, you bolted, never to be seen again.


I did? When I've never been to one of your "meetings?"


Sure, you have. You were the short fellow with the Stephen King mask.

Besides, you just got caught lying again. And how long would it
take to look over a van?


It took the rest of us some time. Your tour was shorter. You fled.

Guess you don't get out much.


Are you asking me for a date?


I have a full head of hair. If you were taller,
you'd know. Why this fascination with my hair, Roger?


Now, Lurch the Nazi, you seem to see Roger everywhere. You have
a bad comb-over from what was described to me. And all grey
hair. Too bad you dye your eyebrows, but you probably are vain
like that.


It'd be strange for Roger Wiseman to have a fixation on my hair and
eyebrows. It would be far more peculiar for you, a person you claim not
to be Roger Wiseman to have such a fixation--especially when you worry
that I don't go out enough.

Are you entering the big Stephen King look-alike contest this


summer?


No, since I don't look like Steven King.


Don't be modest. You're a shoo-in for first prize.


Nbot?



What's "Nbot"????


Don't you recognize it? You wrote it: "Your brain processes seem to
mirror that character's, if nbot your appearance."



Offer up some proof.


That was my response to:

"Now, you're still lying, but you lie every time you post, under
your own name or not."

You first, liar.


Me first at what, UnWiseman?





His "hot water with the FCC" consists of a warning
letter from 1999, which may or may not indicate anything...


May or may not reveal anything? Why do you believe you were


sent a

warning letter?



I wasn't. Roger was.


Oh, I see.


...a cautionary letter to him and another ham not to carry


online

arguments on the air again from 1999...


Why do you think that one was sent?


Mainly because Roger alerted the FCC to it.


I'm beginning to see a pattern. "Roger" received a cautionary letter
because "Roger" alerted the FCC to it. That makes about as much sense
as anything else you've posted.


and a retest letter which
Roger passed from 2000, all from 5 years ago.


Why do you think the retest was mandated?


Hmmmm?



My reasoning in suggesting doing the Google search? Why not offer up a
few of the positive things your good friend Roger has done with his
life?


Hmmmm?

Sorry, that is totally incorrect.


Your posts are on Google for all to see.


They most certainly are. None of them has material consisting of vile,
vulgar references to someone's parents, children or spouse. None of
them depicts filthy acts of homosexuality, incest or pedophilia.
Yours, on the other hand...

I have no affiliation with the National Socialists nor AARP.



Not "offically", but you sure do embrace the supression of
freedom of speech, Nazi.


Your rights end where they infringe upon mine.

So.



Not so. I imagine Roger gets on the air. You just would try to
qrm him, wouldn't you?


You see--there's your problem. You assume that everyone thinks and acts
like you do. You're socially defective.




I am referencing Paul Segal's "The Amateur's Code" written in
1928.

The Radio Amateur is...
{edit}
Balanced....radio is an avocation, never interfering with duties
owed to a family, job, school,orcommunity.


That's just lovely coming from the local filth monger. You're one of
the most unbalanced people I've run into in years, UnWiseman. You're a
problem to amateur radio and a problem to your community. You haven't a
family.



If you stood by your convictions, you'd have no need to hide behind
anonymous remailers. You previously used your call as part of your
email address and you got tossed from several ISP's as a result of your
warm and friendly manner.


Would you like some cheese with all that whine? I never used "my
call" as part of my email address, Nazi. And I've never gotten
tossed from my ISP, either.


Sure, sure, Roger--and you've never had troubles with the FCC and never
had troubles with local law enforcement. You're a regular model citizen.

Your statement (above) is one of the most convoluted pieces of


work I've

ever encountered.

Sort of like your screw up of "That's incorrect yet again"...or
any number of errors.
Like "Nbot" above.


*Just like* "Nbot" above. You wrote it and even *you* didn't know what
it meant.

You're absolutely right. Nobody has to do so. You being a stand
up guy, I thought surely you'd want to let us know what you'd done
with your life. That you choose not to do so just makes your claims
look like sad, plaintive cries in the night. Off to the rest of the
cockroaches with you.


Dave K8MN




Rabbi Roger April 24th 05 05:04 AM


"Dave Heil" wrote in message
link.net...
George Orwell wrote:
In article
Dave Heil wrote:



Poor Roger. The witless little 49 year old boy is being booted about like a
half-inflated football by all but one user in this group.

Wogie just doesn't get the all too obvious temperament of the posters, does
he? What will it take for Roger to see the significance?

I mean, what is next? Must Wogie be struck on and about his head before he
realizes that he is a persona-non-gratis?



The boy/man is clearly a slow learner.



Small wonder he has no famale companions save for the "pay per" types.



Dave Heil April 24th 05 06:51 AM

Userbeam Remailer wrote:
In article . net
Dave Heil wrote:


You know, for a guy who isn't Roger Wiseman, you certainly


know a great

deal about him.



It's called "e-mailing," Nazi. Perhaps you should keep up.
But not, you, you'd rather be in the dark on a permanent basis.


So you and Roger e-mail each other and he tells you about my hair and
eyebrows along with details of his antenna system along with details of
how it is situated on his tiny lot. Is that correct?


As to "it never did": there's a ham living just out
the road from you who says differently. Two others confirmed


it.

More unsubstantiateed, outright lies.


C'mon, Roger. You know there's only one ham out Echo Valley from you.
You know who I mean. He's a straight shooter.

Playing cockroach won't work this time



I guess you know all baout that since you live in filth.


No, I live near Cameron.

, Roger.



Wrong, again.


Tell him at shift change, when he takes over the body, will you?


A wire antenna is rather noticeable.
One which runs out near the street is even more noticeable.
I hear a couple of your antenna supports are bowed like a
fishing rod with a Marlin on the end of the line. Can that be true?



Hardly, since I don't have one.


I feel badly for you.

Dave K8MN


Stephen King April 24th 05 07:20 AM



I guess you know all baout that since you live in filth.

, Roger.


Wrong, again.

A wire antenna is rather noticeable.


So is your body odor.

One which runs out near the street is even more noticeable.


So is your pointy head.

I hear a couple of your antenna supports are bowed like a

fishing rod
with a Marlin on the end of the line. Can that be true?



Hardly, since I don't have one. Roger has metal antenna
supports. Looks like you are talking out of your ass, as usual.

'''

Hey, Not Roger. Referring to yourself in the third person is a lame ruse.
It is quite obvious to all that your 'third person" routine is but a
childish attempt to mislead those whom you hope are of a similar intellect
as yours. Unfortunately, Not Roger/Roger, your weak attempts are fruitless
and those of us who are you intellectual superiors spend several minutes of
each day laughing at you.

Not with you, Roger At you.

Dave was accurate when he described you as being a psychopath and social
misfit. You really do need help from an outside source.















Tara Kinney April 24th 05 08:19 AM


"Fritz Wuehler" wrote
in message
. theremailer.net...
In article
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:

Hate to dissappoint you, but I was licensed long before the VE

system. I
took my test at the FCC field office in front of an examiner

for my
Advanced ticket.


And you were never good or smart enough to get the Extra, were
you?

So you hold onto an obsolete license......HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!
.................................................. ...........................
........

And you got a new, five words per minute Extra license.
HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

Of course you only had to test twice before Riley cut you off...

HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!





Psychiatrist-To-Hams April 24th 05 01:10 PM


"Userbeam Remailer" wrote in message
...
In article . net
Dave Heil wrote:

You know, for a guy who isn't Roger Wiseman, you certainly

know a great
deal about him.


It's called "e-mailing," Nazi. Perhaps you should keep up.




So, Unroger emails Roger, and Notroger emails the other two?
Fascinating! With three personalities emailing each other, do
they have separate email accounts? Separate computers?
Which one, two, or all three are responsible for the bowed over
antenna support poles?




But not, you, you'd rather be in the dark on a permanent basis.

As to "it never did": there's a ham living just out
the road from you who says differently. Two others confirmed

it.

More unsubstantiateed, outright lies.

Playing cockroach won't work this time


I guess you know all baout that since you live in filth.

, Roger.


Wrong, again.

A wire antenna is rather noticeable.


So is your body odor.

One which runs out near the street is even more noticeable.


So is your pointy head.

I hear a couple of your antenna supports are bowed like a

fishing rod
with a Marlin on the end of the line. Can that be true?



Hardly, since I don't have one. Roger has metal antenna
supports. Looks like you are talking out of your ass, as usual.




Dave Heil April 24th 05 06:17 PM

Anonymous wrote:
In article
Cmd Secret Davey wrote:


Hate to dissappoint you,(whines)



But you were always a disspointment, weren't you? Even to your
parents.


Poor little fatass Davey, he still can't prove the retest letter
had a reason other than:


Sorry to interrupt a good rant, UnWiseman. You aren't replying to me.
As I've told you, I post as no one but myself. Your mistake is in
thinking that because you do something, all others do the same.

Keep taking your pills and get plenty of rest.

Dave K8MN


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com