Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 2nd 05, 03:15 PM
K4YZ
 
Posts: n/a
Default A Not So Private Message to Hans, K0HB

Dear Hans,

You have addressed several e-mails to me over the past few weeks,
and I have responded, relatively civily I believe, to each one.

Yesterday you sent one making some nasty allegations, yet when I
responded, I got your message from Earthlink telling me I am not on
your happy list.

So...It's OK for you to drop letters in my e-mail, yet NOT ok to
respond to you in the same forum...?!?!

Sheeesh! You have the cajones to lambaste ME about "control
freak" issues, Hans...?!?!

I have no problem with you sending mail to me, even when it makes
unfounded allegations. However you owe me the courtesy of allowing me
to respond in the same forum.

Take notice...Any future e-mail sent to me marked "PRIVATE
MESSAGE" that gets a "bounced message" notice when I respond will find
it's entire contents posted to RRAP for reply.

And keep your "control freak" allegations to yourself, Hans...You
have more than ample number of examples of your own "control freak"
issues of your own, this being one of them.


Steve, K4YZ

  #2   Report Post  
Old May 2nd 05, 04:18 PM
KØHB
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"K4YZ" wrote


Take notice...Any future e-mail sent to me marked "PRIVATE
MESSAGE" that gets a "bounced message" notice when I respond will find
it's entire contents posted to RRAP for reply.


I have all 4 of the messages in question available on my computer. I sent them
privately because I prefer not to embarrass you in public, but I can post them
here if that suits your fancy.

Hans, K0HB





  #3   Report Post  
Old May 2nd 05, 07:02 PM
K4YZ
 
Posts: n/a
Default


K=D8HB wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote


Take notice...Any future e-mail sent to me marked "PRIVATE
MESSAGE" that gets a "bounced message" notice when I respond will

find
it's entire contents posted to RRAP for reply.


I have all 4 of the messages in question available on my computer. I

sent them
privately because I prefer not to embarrass you in public, but I can

post them
here if that suits your fancy.


They won't embarrass me, Hans. The POINT is that you drop YOUR
comments to my e-mail then block any reply. You accuse me of "control
issues" in this forum then manifest them in your own actions.

And if you care to do so, post them. I think that you will find
that not all of the "embarrassment" will fall on me, Sir!

Steve, K4YZ

  #4   Report Post  
Old May 2nd 05, 07:22 PM
KØHB
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"K4YZ" wrote

They won't embarrass me, Hans.


I think you're probably right about that, as I examine your record here on rrap.

!!Sigh!!

de Hans, K0HB



  #5   Report Post  
Old May 2nd 05, 07:48 PM
K4YZ
 
Posts: n/a
Default


K=D8HB wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote

They won't embarrass me, Hans.


I think you're probably right about that, as I examine your record

here on rrap.

!!Sigh!!


You forgot some, Hans:

They won't embarrass me, Hans. The POINT is that you drop YOUR
comments to my e-mail then block any reply. You accuse me of

"control
issues" in this forum then manifest them in your own actions.


And if you care to do so, post them. I think that you will find that

not all of the "embarrassment" will fall on me, Sir.

Not all of the "record" is mine, Hans. Don't be shy! Take YOUR
bow!

Steve, K4YZ



  #6   Report Post  
Old May 2nd 05, 10:57 PM
bb
 
Posts: n/a
Default


K4YZ wrote:
Dear Hans,

You have addressed several e-mails to me over the past few

weeks,
and I have responded, relatively civily I believe, to each one.


You opinions on civility are not valid.

Yesterday you sent one making some nasty allegations, yet when I
responded, I got your message from Earthlink telling me I am not on
your happy list.


Whaaaaaaaaaaaaa!

So...It's OK for you to drop letters in my e-mail, yet NOT ok to
respond to you in the same forum...?!?!


Don't send ANYTHING to my email address. Ever!

Sheeesh! You have the cajones to lambaste ME about "control
freak" issues, Hans...?!?!


I couldn't think of a more likely candidate.

I have no problem with you sending mail to me, even when it

makes
unfounded allegations. However you owe me the courtesy of allowing

me
to respond in the same forum.


Or what?

Take notice...Any future e-mail sent to me marked "PRIVATE
MESSAGE" that gets a "bounced message" notice when I respond will

find
it's entire contents posted to RRAP for reply.


Like Todd's problems with his ISP? You posted something from his ISP
without you having been an adressee on it.

And keep your "control freak" allegations to yourself,

Hans...You
have more than ample number of examples of your own "control freak"
issues of your own, this being one of them.


Steve, K4YZ


Control yourself. Get freaky about it.

  #7   Report Post  
Old May 2nd 05, 10:59 PM
bb
 
Posts: n/a
Default


K=D8HB wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote

They won't embarrass me, Hans.


I think you're probably right about that, as I examine your record

here on rrap.
=20
!!Sigh!!
=20
de Hans, K0HB


It's a crying shame.

  #8   Report Post  
Old May 3rd 05, 01:20 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: "bb" on Mon,May 2 2005 2:57 pm

K4YZ wrote:
Dear Hans,

You have addressed several e-mails to me over the past few

weeks,
and I have responded, relatively civily I believe, to each one.


You opinions on civility are not valid.


That's a given in here...QED. :-)

Once a few years ago, my wife was up in Washington state
and we were "talking" using Instant Messaging on AOL.

Steve popped in on the IM session (I had neglected to
reset the privacy controls after upgrading the AOL
software). He wanted to "chat."

He got one very short answer that I was busy.

My wife was trying to IM me about our niece then in
the hospital. Steve couldn't see that part of the
conversation, only that I was on-line at AOL. He
became increasingly insistent on having a "chat" via
IM. I ignored him since I was more concerned about
niece's condition than wanting to "chat" with Stebie.

Stebie got increasingly abusive in his wording to
me via IM. Finally, he made some remarks about my
"being too stuck-up to talk to him." That caused me
to tell my wife what was going on, paused to check
the privacy controls on IM, reset them, and continued
talking to my wife.

Stebie got ALL angry and abusive in public messages
after that...actually more so than usual.

Niece Laurel survived that operation for Crohn's
disease and continues life reasonably well. Stebie
keeps on with his abuse and accusations...he needs
SOME kind of operation... shrug

Yesterday you sent one making some nasty allegations, yet when

I
responded, I got your message from Earthlink telling me I am not on
your happy list.


Whaaaaaaaaaaaaa!


Poor widdle Stebie.

Gosh, I should have saved Stebie's AOL Home Page
special that he manufactured, entitled "Never Trust
Lennie" or words to that effect. Poor guy went
bananas in a vicious fit of LIBEL. I had AOL
check it out and they tossed it.

Tsk. It would have been a cakewalk to win a civil
suit against Stebie just on that AOL Home Page.
Stebie "advertised" it in the newsgroup. Oh, he
wailed and wailed about "freedoms" and stuff...
"freedom" so HE could insult anyone he wanted
WITHOUT any censorship. :-)

Too bad I tossed it into the electron recycling
bin. Was a better "classic" than Stebie's pipe
dreaming over "being back in action and doing a
HALO drop!" [High-Altitude, Low-Opening, a
technique apparently used by SEALs]

So...It's OK for you to drop letters in my e-mail, yet NOT ok

to
respond to you in the same forum...?!?!


Don't send ANYTHING to my email address. Ever!


AOL has nice privacy controls and I'm sure other
browser softwares have them.

Sheeesh! You have the cajones to lambaste ME about

"control
freak" issues, Hans...?!?!


I couldn't think of a more likely candidate.


Nor I...and that covers a LOT of individuals in
here! :-)

I have no problem with you sending mail to me, even when it

makes
unfounded allegations. However you owe me the courtesy of allowing

me
to respond in the same forum.


Or what?


Here's the way Stebie thinks the rules go down:

1. Everyone owes Stebie all kinds of courtesy.

2. Stebie don't own NUTHIN to anyone on courtesy.

It's as simple as that...demonstrated time and
time again.

Take notice...Any future e-mail sent to me marked "PRIVATE
MESSAGE" that gets a "bounced message" notice when I respond will

find
it's entire contents posted to RRAP for reply.


Like Todd's problems with his ISP? You posted something from his ISP
without you having been an adressee on it.


Stebie NEVER does anything wrong...he KNOWS things!

:-)

And keep your "control freak" allegations to yourself,

Hans...You
have more than ample number of examples of your own "control freak"
issues of your own, this being one of them.


Steve, K4YZ


Control yourself. Get freaky about it.


Ho ho! Highly unlikely, Brian. Stebie has a "rep"
to uphold...he wants to be CONSISTENT with his
abuse and accusations and general nastiness to all
who don't agree with him!

He has the "right" to do that, all guaranteed in
the CONSTITUTION OF STEVIELAND...the one on display
inside his head.

Okay...so maybe Stebie DOESN'T need shrink rapping?
Maybe he needs a SKIN SPECIALIST. Yeah, that's it,
he got such a thin skin that almost EVERYTHING
"rubs him the wrong way!" Poor guy, soooooo
sensitive to negativisms of his opinions and
actions. Boo hoo. :-)



  #9   Report Post  
Old May 4th 05, 01:29 AM
bb
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote:
From: "bb" on Mon,May 2 2005 2:57 pm

K4YZ wrote:
Dear Hans,

You have addressed several e-mails to me over the past few

weeks,
and I have responded, relatively civily I believe, to each one.


You opinions on civility are not valid.


That's a given in here...QED. :-)

Once a few years ago, my wife was up in Washington state
and we were "talking" using Instant Messaging on AOL.

Steve popped in on the IM session (I had neglected to
reset the privacy controls after upgrading the AOL
software). He wanted to "chat."

He got one very short answer that I was busy.

My wife was trying to IM me about our niece then in
the hospital. Steve couldn't see that part of the
conversation, only that I was on-line at AOL. He
became increasingly insistent on having a "chat" via
IM. I ignored him since I was more concerned about
niece's condition than wanting to "chat" with Stebie.

Stebie got increasingly abusive in his wording to
me via IM. Finally, he made some remarks about my
"being too stuck-up to talk to him." That caused me
to tell my wife what was going on, paused to check
the privacy controls on IM, reset them, and continued
talking to my wife.

Stebie got ALL angry and abusive in public messages
after that...actually more so than usual.


That's very hard to believe.

Niece Laurel survived that operation for Crohn's
disease and continues life reasonably well. Stebie
keeps on with his abuse and accusations...he needs
SOME kind of operation... shrug


If only the VA would pull Steve's head out of his rectum. "The "POP"
heard round the world!"

Yesterday you sent one making some nasty allegations, yet

when
I
responded, I got your message from Earthlink telling me I am not

on
your happy list.


Whaaaaaaaaaaaaa!


Poor widdle Stebie.

Gosh, I should have saved Stebie's AOL Home Page
special that he manufactured, entitled "Never Trust
Lennie" or words to that effect. Poor guy went
bananas in a vicious fit of LIBEL. I had AOL
check it out and they tossed it.

Tsk. It would have been a cakewalk to win a civil
suit against Stebie just on that AOL Home Page.
Stebie "advertised" it in the newsgroup. Oh, he
wailed and wailed about "freedoms" and stuff...
"freedom" so HE could insult anyone he wanted
WITHOUT any censorship. :-)

Too bad I tossed it into the electron recycling
bin. Was a better "classic" than Stebie's pipe
dreaming over "being back in action and doing a
HALO drop!" [High-Altitude, Low-Opening, a
technique apparently used by SEALs]


The only HALO Steve will ever see is the one shaking the answer "no" to
pass through the pearly gates.

So...It's OK for you to drop letters in my e-mail, yet NOT ok

to
respond to you in the same forum...?!?!


Don't send ANYTHING to my email address. Ever!


AOL has nice privacy controls and I'm sure other
browser softwares have them.

Sheeesh! You have the cajones to lambaste ME about

"control
freak" issues, Hans...?!?!


I couldn't think of a more likely candidate.


Nor I...and that covers a LOT of individuals in
here! :-)

I have no problem with you sending mail to me, even when it

makes
unfounded allegations. However you owe me the courtesy of

allowing
me
to respond in the same forum.


Or what?


Here's the way Stebie thinks the rules go down:

1. Everyone owes Stebie all kinds of courtesy.

2. Stebie don't own NUTHIN to anyone on courtesy.

It's as simple as that...demonstrated time and
time again.

Take notice...Any future e-mail sent to me marked "PRIVATE
MESSAGE" that gets a "bounced message" notice when I respond will

find
it's entire contents posted to RRAP for reply.


Like Todd's problems with his ISP? You posted something from his

ISP
without you having been an adressee on it.


Stebie NEVER does anything wrong...he KNOWS things!

:-)

And keep your "control freak" allegations to yourself,

Hans...You
have more than ample number of examples of your own "control

freak"
issues of your own, this being one of them.


Steve, K4YZ


Control yourself. Get freaky about it.


Ho ho! Highly unlikely, Brian. Stebie has a "rep"
to uphold...he wants to be CONSISTENT with his
abuse and accusations and general nastiness to all
who don't agree with him!

He has the "right" to do that, all guaranteed in
the CONSTITUTION OF STEVIELAND...the one on display
inside his head.

Okay...so maybe Stebie DOESN'T need shrink rapping?
Maybe he needs a SKIN SPECIALIST. Yeah, that's it,
he got such a thin skin that almost EVERYTHING
"rubs him the wrong way!" Poor guy, soooooo
sensitive to negativisms of his opinions and
actions. Boo hoo. :-)



Maybe some Johnson's baby cream will sooth his thin skin.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
JNOS message question Jeff Camp Digital 67 May 26th 16 03:21 AM
money!!! [email protected] Antenna 0 January 3rd 05 10:49 PM
money!!! [email protected] Antenna 0 January 3rd 05 07:07 PM
JNOS message question Jeff Camp Digital 0 October 19th 03 03:39 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017