Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A Not So Private Message to Hans, K0HB
Dear Hans,
You have addressed several e-mails to me over the past few weeks, and I have responded, relatively civily I believe, to each one. Yesterday you sent one making some nasty allegations, yet when I responded, I got your message from Earthlink telling me I am not on your happy list. So...It's OK for you to drop letters in my e-mail, yet NOT ok to respond to you in the same forum...?!?! Sheeesh! You have the cajones to lambaste ME about "control freak" issues, Hans...?!?! I have no problem with you sending mail to me, even when it makes unfounded allegations. However you owe me the courtesy of allowing me to respond in the same forum. Take notice...Any future e-mail sent to me marked "PRIVATE MESSAGE" that gets a "bounced message" notice when I respond will find it's entire contents posted to RRAP for reply. And keep your "control freak" allegations to yourself, Hans...You have more than ample number of examples of your own "control freak" issues of your own, this being one of them. Steve, K4YZ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"K4YZ" wrote Take notice...Any future e-mail sent to me marked "PRIVATE MESSAGE" that gets a "bounced message" notice when I respond will find it's entire contents posted to RRAP for reply. I have all 4 of the messages in question available on my computer. I sent them privately because I prefer not to embarrass you in public, but I can post them here if that suits your fancy. Hans, K0HB |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
K=D8HB wrote: "K4YZ" wrote Take notice...Any future e-mail sent to me marked "PRIVATE MESSAGE" that gets a "bounced message" notice when I respond will find it's entire contents posted to RRAP for reply. I have all 4 of the messages in question available on my computer. I sent them privately because I prefer not to embarrass you in public, but I can post them here if that suits your fancy. They won't embarrass me, Hans. The POINT is that you drop YOUR comments to my e-mail then block any reply. You accuse me of "control issues" in this forum then manifest them in your own actions. And if you care to do so, post them. I think that you will find that not all of the "embarrassment" will fall on me, Sir! Steve, K4YZ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"K4YZ" wrote They won't embarrass me, Hans. I think you're probably right about that, as I examine your record here on rrap. !!Sigh!! de Hans, K0HB |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
K=D8HB wrote: "K4YZ" wrote They won't embarrass me, Hans. I think you're probably right about that, as I examine your record here on rrap. !!Sigh!! You forgot some, Hans: They won't embarrass me, Hans. The POINT is that you drop YOUR comments to my e-mail then block any reply. You accuse me of "control issues" in this forum then manifest them in your own actions. And if you care to do so, post them. I think that you will find that not all of the "embarrassment" will fall on me, Sir. Not all of the "record" is mine, Hans. Don't be shy! Take YOUR bow! Steve, K4YZ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
K4YZ wrote: Dear Hans, You have addressed several e-mails to me over the past few weeks, and I have responded, relatively civily I believe, to each one. You opinions on civility are not valid. Yesterday you sent one making some nasty allegations, yet when I responded, I got your message from Earthlink telling me I am not on your happy list. Whaaaaaaaaaaaaa! So...It's OK for you to drop letters in my e-mail, yet NOT ok to respond to you in the same forum...?!?! Don't send ANYTHING to my email address. Ever! Sheeesh! You have the cajones to lambaste ME about "control freak" issues, Hans...?!?! I couldn't think of a more likely candidate. I have no problem with you sending mail to me, even when it makes unfounded allegations. However you owe me the courtesy of allowing me to respond in the same forum. Or what? Take notice...Any future e-mail sent to me marked "PRIVATE MESSAGE" that gets a "bounced message" notice when I respond will find it's entire contents posted to RRAP for reply. Like Todd's problems with his ISP? You posted something from his ISP without you having been an adressee on it. And keep your "control freak" allegations to yourself, Hans...You have more than ample number of examples of your own "control freak" issues of your own, this being one of them. Steve, K4YZ Control yourself. Get freaky about it. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
K=D8HB wrote: "K4YZ" wrote They won't embarrass me, Hans. I think you're probably right about that, as I examine your record here on rrap. =20 !!Sigh!! =20 de Hans, K0HB It's a crying shame. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
From: "bb" on Mon,May 2 2005 2:57 pm
K4YZ wrote: Dear Hans, You have addressed several e-mails to me over the past few weeks, and I have responded, relatively civily I believe, to each one. You opinions on civility are not valid. That's a given in here...QED. :-) Once a few years ago, my wife was up in Washington state and we were "talking" using Instant Messaging on AOL. Steve popped in on the IM session (I had neglected to reset the privacy controls after upgrading the AOL software). He wanted to "chat." He got one very short answer that I was busy. My wife was trying to IM me about our niece then in the hospital. Steve couldn't see that part of the conversation, only that I was on-line at AOL. He became increasingly insistent on having a "chat" via IM. I ignored him since I was more concerned about niece's condition than wanting to "chat" with Stebie. Stebie got increasingly abusive in his wording to me via IM. Finally, he made some remarks about my "being too stuck-up to talk to him." That caused me to tell my wife what was going on, paused to check the privacy controls on IM, reset them, and continued talking to my wife. Stebie got ALL angry and abusive in public messages after that...actually more so than usual. Niece Laurel survived that operation for Crohn's disease and continues life reasonably well. Stebie keeps on with his abuse and accusations...he needs SOME kind of operation... shrug Yesterday you sent one making some nasty allegations, yet when I responded, I got your message from Earthlink telling me I am not on your happy list. Whaaaaaaaaaaaaa! Poor widdle Stebie. Gosh, I should have saved Stebie's AOL Home Page special that he manufactured, entitled "Never Trust Lennie" or words to that effect. Poor guy went bananas in a vicious fit of LIBEL. I had AOL check it out and they tossed it. Tsk. It would have been a cakewalk to win a civil suit against Stebie just on that AOL Home Page. Stebie "advertised" it in the newsgroup. Oh, he wailed and wailed about "freedoms" and stuff... "freedom" so HE could insult anyone he wanted WITHOUT any censorship. :-) Too bad I tossed it into the electron recycling bin. Was a better "classic" than Stebie's pipe dreaming over "being back in action and doing a HALO drop!" [High-Altitude, Low-Opening, a technique apparently used by SEALs] So...It's OK for you to drop letters in my e-mail, yet NOT ok to respond to you in the same forum...?!?! Don't send ANYTHING to my email address. Ever! AOL has nice privacy controls and I'm sure other browser softwares have them. Sheeesh! You have the cajones to lambaste ME about "control freak" issues, Hans...?!?! I couldn't think of a more likely candidate. Nor I...and that covers a LOT of individuals in here! :-) I have no problem with you sending mail to me, even when it makes unfounded allegations. However you owe me the courtesy of allowing me to respond in the same forum. Or what? Here's the way Stebie thinks the rules go down: 1. Everyone owes Stebie all kinds of courtesy. 2. Stebie don't own NUTHIN to anyone on courtesy. It's as simple as that...demonstrated time and time again. Take notice...Any future e-mail sent to me marked "PRIVATE MESSAGE" that gets a "bounced message" notice when I respond will find it's entire contents posted to RRAP for reply. Like Todd's problems with his ISP? You posted something from his ISP without you having been an adressee on it. Stebie NEVER does anything wrong...he KNOWS things! :-) And keep your "control freak" allegations to yourself, Hans...You have more than ample number of examples of your own "control freak" issues of your own, this being one of them. Steve, K4YZ Control yourself. Get freaky about it. Ho ho! Highly unlikely, Brian. Stebie has a "rep" to uphold...he wants to be CONSISTENT with his abuse and accusations and general nastiness to all who don't agree with him! He has the "right" to do that, all guaranteed in the CONSTITUTION OF STEVIELAND...the one on display inside his head. Okay...so maybe Stebie DOESN'T need shrink rapping? Maybe he needs a SKIN SPECIALIST. Yeah, that's it, he got such a thin skin that almost EVERYTHING "rubs him the wrong way!" Poor guy, soooooo sensitive to negativisms of his opinions and actions. Boo hoo. :-) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
wrote: From: "bb" on Mon,May 2 2005 2:57 pm K4YZ wrote: Dear Hans, You have addressed several e-mails to me over the past few weeks, and I have responded, relatively civily I believe, to each one. You opinions on civility are not valid. That's a given in here...QED. :-) Once a few years ago, my wife was up in Washington state and we were "talking" using Instant Messaging on AOL. Steve popped in on the IM session (I had neglected to reset the privacy controls after upgrading the AOL software). He wanted to "chat." He got one very short answer that I was busy. My wife was trying to IM me about our niece then in the hospital. Steve couldn't see that part of the conversation, only that I was on-line at AOL. He became increasingly insistent on having a "chat" via IM. I ignored him since I was more concerned about niece's condition than wanting to "chat" with Stebie. Stebie got increasingly abusive in his wording to me via IM. Finally, he made some remarks about my "being too stuck-up to talk to him." That caused me to tell my wife what was going on, paused to check the privacy controls on IM, reset them, and continued talking to my wife. Stebie got ALL angry and abusive in public messages after that...actually more so than usual. That's very hard to believe. Niece Laurel survived that operation for Crohn's disease and continues life reasonably well. Stebie keeps on with his abuse and accusations...he needs SOME kind of operation... shrug If only the VA would pull Steve's head out of his rectum. "The "POP" heard round the world!" Yesterday you sent one making some nasty allegations, yet when I responded, I got your message from Earthlink telling me I am not on your happy list. Whaaaaaaaaaaaaa! Poor widdle Stebie. Gosh, I should have saved Stebie's AOL Home Page special that he manufactured, entitled "Never Trust Lennie" or words to that effect. Poor guy went bananas in a vicious fit of LIBEL. I had AOL check it out and they tossed it. Tsk. It would have been a cakewalk to win a civil suit against Stebie just on that AOL Home Page. Stebie "advertised" it in the newsgroup. Oh, he wailed and wailed about "freedoms" and stuff... "freedom" so HE could insult anyone he wanted WITHOUT any censorship. :-) Too bad I tossed it into the electron recycling bin. Was a better "classic" than Stebie's pipe dreaming over "being back in action and doing a HALO drop!" [High-Altitude, Low-Opening, a technique apparently used by SEALs] The only HALO Steve will ever see is the one shaking the answer "no" to pass through the pearly gates. So...It's OK for you to drop letters in my e-mail, yet NOT ok to respond to you in the same forum...?!?! Don't send ANYTHING to my email address. Ever! AOL has nice privacy controls and I'm sure other browser softwares have them. Sheeesh! You have the cajones to lambaste ME about "control freak" issues, Hans...?!?! I couldn't think of a more likely candidate. Nor I...and that covers a LOT of individuals in here! :-) I have no problem with you sending mail to me, even when it makes unfounded allegations. However you owe me the courtesy of allowing me to respond in the same forum. Or what? Here's the way Stebie thinks the rules go down: 1. Everyone owes Stebie all kinds of courtesy. 2. Stebie don't own NUTHIN to anyone on courtesy. It's as simple as that...demonstrated time and time again. Take notice...Any future e-mail sent to me marked "PRIVATE MESSAGE" that gets a "bounced message" notice when I respond will find it's entire contents posted to RRAP for reply. Like Todd's problems with his ISP? You posted something from his ISP without you having been an adressee on it. Stebie NEVER does anything wrong...he KNOWS things! :-) And keep your "control freak" allegations to yourself, Hans...You have more than ample number of examples of your own "control freak" issues of your own, this being one of them. Steve, K4YZ Control yourself. Get freaky about it. Ho ho! Highly unlikely, Brian. Stebie has a "rep" to uphold...he wants to be CONSISTENT with his abuse and accusations and general nastiness to all who don't agree with him! He has the "right" to do that, all guaranteed in the CONSTITUTION OF STEVIELAND...the one on display inside his head. Okay...so maybe Stebie DOESN'T need shrink rapping? Maybe he needs a SKIN SPECIALIST. Yeah, that's it, he got such a thin skin that almost EVERYTHING "rubs him the wrong way!" Poor guy, soooooo sensitive to negativisms of his opinions and actions. Boo hoo. :-) Maybe some Johnson's baby cream will sooth his thin skin. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
JNOS message question | Digital | |||
money!!! | Antenna | |||
money!!! | Antenna | |||
JNOS message question | Digital |