Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
John Kasupski wrote: I think it's worth noting here, the old adage about birds of a feather flocking together. It's been my experience that people join the local ham radio clubs for a variety of reasons, just as they get involved with amateur radio to begin with for a wide variety of reasons. When you bottom-line it, though, a local club remains a sure-fire way for a newcomer to meet others who share at least some of their interests in amateur radio. For many it's a way of introducing themselves to the other hams in their area, sort of like, "I've got my license and I'm here now, so when you hear me on the local repeaters you don't have to worry that I might be a bootlegger." Exactly...And that's where a "national" organization can help...Recruiting materials, media bites, testing/training materials. It should be up to the "locals" to deceide where the focus of the organization is going. When they get to the local clubs and hook up with other newcomers (and the observation that the vast majority of newcomers to the ARS enter via the Technician route is dead on...that's why it's called the "entry-level license class"), they find the other Techs basically doing the only things they're permitted to do, absent any meaningful HF privileges unless they pass a code test - they're doing Skywarn; tactical comms for parades, bike races, marathons; Field Day, etc. "...absent any meaningful HF privileges..." Sounds like a set-up for the "If you don't have HF you're not a Ham" argument, John. Not only are well over 90% of all Amateur allocations above 50Mhz, so are most ACTIVITIES above 50MHz. I went on up to Extra thinking all the activities were on HF only to find I keep pulling back to 50Mhz and up for a lot of my hamming activities. I think the "failure" comes only from thinking that there's "nothing to do" above 50Mhz. That's just wrong. Another old adage: When in Rome, do as the Romans do. Thus, it's no surprise that many new Techs join in these activities. This is the same route I myself took when I entered into the ARS back in '99 and I'm still active in these pursuits now, except it's in a leadership role rather than as one who is learning the ropes, so to speak. And it's in fellowship that we learn more effectively. My only "problem" with clubs is that they often try to be too many things to too many people with too few resources. "That is a good idea. Tactical communications would serve as a good training ground." For what it's worth, I concur. In fact, I think tactical communications is a skill that is too often ignored as many public service and emergency communications groups opt for developing proficiency in formal traffic handling - which is a valuable skill in the right circumstances, but unless a group is located somewhere that circumstances warrant the frequent use of formal traffic handling (like being somewhere that often gets smacked by earthquakes, tornadoes, hurricanes, and other major disasters that result in relatively long relief efforts and a lot of health & Welfare traffic)...well, many groups will only rarely need formal traffic handling skills. Tactical communications skills, on the other hand, are something I think any such group is going to always need, especially if they are doing parades, races, etc. I agree on the use of those skills, John...and those are some roots we shouldn't get too far away from. We've done exactly that here in Tennessee CAP, and now we are "re-energizing" those basic communicator skills along with the techie web-rat things. We're creating a "Communications College" to start from Ground Zero and re-establish basic communicator skills. On this passage, Steve, K4YZ, commented as follows: First of all, there's already flexibility written into the ARES program to allow for it's implementation based upon local needs or concerns. The needs of emergency planners in Plymouth, MN or Winchester, TN are going to be different than those of New York City or Miami, FL. As I see it, Steve, the problem with this is that in many (most?) areas, the local ARES group wears two hats, serving also as the local RACES group, and because FEMA guidelines for RACES call for its implementation at the County level, there's often a lack of ARES/RACES groups having established relationships with local governments (city, town, village, etc.). That is something that, as a result, often falls to the local clubs - but ARRL sees it as an ARES function and local clubs looking for support for their efforts in this area end up getting referred to the local ARES leadership...which is often hesitant to help because they see the clubs' efforts as undermining their own. My experiences here in TN are that all those hats are being worn by ARES now. certainly not in all areas, but RACES as a seperate entity is dwindling. Since the Feds have actually pulled the rug out from under a lot of the RACES regulations the lines have blurred and one hat seems to fit better! Steve continued: I don't see how a nationally directed program could possibly do anything more than appear to be micromanaging. Again, admitting that their is a niche for local groups to be involved at a local level and offering some support to them independent of the ARES (or ARES/RACES) mechanism would not be micromanaging. Often there are entirely different missions involved, and even when the missions overlap, again it does not hurt ARES all that much for the local clubs to have a relationship with a city government's disaster preparedness officials in a county where the ARES group has a relationship with the county's disaster prearedness office. In other words, this would eliminate the "turf war" mentality that often crops up when the local clubs, or other groups independent of ARES, start to actually succeed at what they're doing. I think a lot of this is being answered by having the EC's or DEC's oversee the ARES groups and coordinate the ARES representation with the various EOC's. The folks in the EOC's aren't concerned with where the operators come from or what club sponsors them...Just as long as that cah do what they say they can do. BTW...Part of Tennessee's Homeland Security implementation was to issue a funded mandate that all hospitals within the state have operating Amateur Radio facilites. We have a short tower with the V/UHF antennas installed already. Steve went on... Secondly, the ARRL Special Services Club's program already offers assistance for helping to manage some aspects of club activities, offers of sponsorship, etc. What they (the ARRL) COULD do, without creating a whole new "branch" and field directorship with it, would be to start spending some more money to get more recruiting materials, including TV/Radio "commercials" into the field. They could "regionalize" the materials with pictures of local clubs, landmarks, etc in them to help "identify" them to the target audience. To this I say, "Bingo!" Thanks. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"K4YZ" wrote in message ups.com... John Kasupski wrote: [snip] When they get to the local clubs and hook up with other newcomers (and the observation that the vast majority of newcomers to the ARS enter via the Technician route is dead on...that's why it's called the "entry-level license class"), they find the other Techs basically doing the only things they're permitted to do, absent any meaningful HF privileges unless they pass a code test - they're doing Skywarn; tactical comms for parades, bike races, marathons; Field Day, etc. "...absent any meaningful HF privileges..." Sounds like a set-up for the "If you don't have HF you're not a Ham" argument, John. Not only are well over 90% of all Amateur allocations above 50Mhz, so are most ACTIVITIES above 50MHz. I went on up to Extra thinking all the activities were on HF only to find I keep pulling back to 50Mhz and up for a lot of my hamming activities. I think the "failure" comes only from thinking that there's "nothing to do" above 50Mhz. That's just wrong. Have you noticed how the majority of participants in non-repeater VHF/UHF/and up activities are NOT the Technicians. Just get on during the ARRL VHF contest and count the percentage of stations that are General class and higher that you end up working. My OM is a fan of the VHF realm and has made presentations to the club on what you can do in these area of the hobby. The result? Well maybe 2 out of 100 work satellites and SSB and another couple work FM simplex and SSB. That's it (sigh). Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Dee Flint wrote: "K4YZ" wrote in message ups.com... John Kasupski wrote: [snip] When they get to the local clubs and hook up with other newcomers (and the observation that the vast majority of newcomers to the ARS enter via the Technician route is dead on...that's why it's called the "entry-level license class"), they find the other Techs basically doing the only things they're permitted to do, absent any meaningful HF privileges unless they pass a code test - they're doing Skywarn; tactical comms for parades, bike races, marathons; Field Day, etc. "...absent any meaningful HF privileges..." Sounds like a set-up for the "If you don't have HF you're not a Ham" argument, John. Not only are well over 90% of all Amateur allocations above 50Mhz, so are most ACTIVITIES above 50MHz. I went on up to Extra thinking all the activities were on HF only to find I keep pulling back to 50Mhz and up for a lot of my hamming activities. I think the "failure" comes only from thinking that there's "nothing to do" above 50Mhz. That's just wrong. Have you noticed how the majority of participants in non-repeater VHF/UHF/and up activities are NOT the Technicians. Just get on during the ARRL VHF contest and count the percentage of stations that are General class and higher that you end up working. My OM is a fan of the VHF realm and has made presentations to the club on what you can do in these area of the hobby. The result? Well maybe 2 out of 100 work satellites and SSB and another couple work FM simplex and SSB. That's it (sigh). I guess it's a regional thing, Dee...The bands down here are alive with a lot of stuff, including 2M SSB, etc...And lot's of the NCT's that some other ill-informed individuals suggest have been "chased away"... 73 Steve, K4YZ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Dee Flint" wrote Have you noticed how the majority of participants in non-repeater VHF/UHF/and up activities are NOT the Technicians. The Northern Lights Radio Society here in Minnesota is an organization of operators who are active in weak signal (SSB/CW) work on the VHF, UHF, and Microwave bands. I'm sure your OM has heard of the club. A significant number of the members are Technician licensees. May be different where you live, but in this area the Technicians do a lions share of the work in Skywarn, Grandmas Marathon, Twin Cities Marathon, and a host of public service events. During disaster recovery (floods and tornados) events they are major contributors of time and talent. Contrary to common sentiment, they are extraordinarily engaged in the local ham scene and not just "shack-on-a-belt-repeater-lizards" as some like to characterize them. The sooner ARRL membership has Technicians as members in numbers proportional to their population, the sooner ARRL will truly represent the full spectrum of amateur licensees. My PBI seeks to make that happen. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"KØHB" wrote in message ink.net... "Dee Flint" wrote Have you noticed how the majority of participants in non-repeater VHF/UHF/and up activities are NOT the Technicians. The Northern Lights Radio Society here in Minnesota is an organization of operators who are active in weak signal (SSB/CW) work on the VHF, UHF, and Microwave bands. I'm sure your OM has heard of the club. A significant number of the members are Technician licensees. And half our members are Technicians also. And almost half our officers are Technicians. We've been very successful in getting them engaged in the club. May be different where you live, but in this area the Technicians do a lions share of the work in Skywarn, Grandmas Marathon, Twin Cities Marathon, and a host of public service events. During disaster recovery (floods and tornados) events they are major contributors of time and talent. As they do here. Contrary to common sentiment, they are extraordinarily engaged in the local ham scene and not just "shack-on-a-belt-repeater-lizards" as some like to characterize them. The Technicians here are also quite engaged in all the public service, community, and club activities. What the participation seems to lag here is in the wide range of on air activities. The sooner ARRL membership has Technicians as members in numbers proportional to their population, the sooner ARRL will truly represent the full spectrum of amateur licensees. My PBI seeks to make that happen. I thought that I had seen a statistic where close to half of the ARRL membership were Technicians. If so, then it simply means that the Techs need to get more involved on the management side to make things happen. Afterall there is no reason that a Tech couldn't be President. Perhaps if this PBI were more aimed at expanding the membership at all levels it would be more fruitful. Very little change would be needed to what you propose other than seeking out non-members of all classes. 73, de Hans, K0HB Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Dee Flint wrote:
And half our members are Technicians also. And almost half our officers are Technicians. We've been very successful in getting them engaged in the club. The Technicians have been kicked around by the 'higher class' licensees or some time for some strange reason. There seems to be some elitists attitude among some holding higher class licenses towards the Techs, that they haven't quite attained the status of being a 'real ham' yet. However, it seems that the Techs are doing one of the very things that hams have long been noted for and helps justify our existance, that of using ham radio for public service. They seem to be a class of folk who aren't much interested in setting in front of an HF rig just to chat with someone in the next state or country, but had much rather put their energy into using ham radio to benefit others. Hooray for the Techs. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Dee Flint wrote: "K=D8HB" wrote in message .. . . . The sooner ARRL membership has Technicians as members in numbers proportional to their population, the sooner ARRL will truly represent the full spectrum of amateur licensees. My PBI seeks to make that happen. I thought that I had seen a statistic where close to half of the ARRL membership were Technicians. This thread was started by Hans who stated in so many words that Techs are under-represented by the ARRL because they don't join in the quantities other class licensees join that some changes need to be made, etc., etc. ~Half the hams in this country are Techs. If, as you state, half the Techs are also ARRL members then what's the point to this whole thread?? Or is it me again? If so, then it simply means that the Techs need to get more involved on the management side to make things happen. Afterall there is no reason that a Tech couldn't be President. Perhaps if this PBI were more aimed at expanding the membership at all levels it would be more fruitful. Very little change would be needed to what you propose other than seeking out non-members of all classes. =20 73, de Hans, K0HB =20 Dee D. Flint, N8UZE w3rv |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
wrote: Dee Flint wrote: "Senior moment . . . " This thread was started by Hans who stated in so many words that Techs are under-represented by the ARRL because they don't join in the quantities other class licensees join that some changes need to be made, etc., etc. ~Half the hams in this country are Techs. Change to: If, as you state, *half the ARRL members are Techs* then what's the point to this whole thread?? Or is it me again? w3rv |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message oups.com... wrote: Dee Flint wrote: "Senior moment . . . " This thread was started by Hans who stated in so many words that Techs are under-represented by the ARRL because they don't join in the quantities other class licensees join that some changes need to be made, etc., etc. ~Half the hams in this country are Techs. Change to: If, as you state, *half the ARRL members are Techs* then what's the point to this whole thread?? Or is it me again? w3rv If Hans is correct about the scarcity of Techs in the ARRL membership, he proposes a way to attract them is all. I simply indicated that his original premise may or may not be true. Thus it should be checked. I don't know what the numbers are. I simply thought I saw something on it but haven't checked it. It is my point of view that the ARRL ought to try to get the involvement of more hams of all classes. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
From: "Dee Flint" on Sat,May 7 2005 5:08 am
"K=D8=88B" wrote in message link.net... "Dee Flint" wrote Contrary to common sentiment, they are extraordinarily engaged in the local ham scene and not just "shack-on-a-belt-repeater-lizards" as some like to characterize them. The Technicians here are also quite engaged in all the public service, community, and club activities. What the participation seems to lag here is in the wide range of on air activities. We can be sure some of your best friends are Technicians... The sooner ARRL membership has Technicians as members in numbers proportional to their population, the sooner ARRL will truly represent the full spectrum of amateur licensees. My PBI seeks to make that happen. I thought that I had seen a statistic where close to half of the ARRL membership were Technicians. Whose pipe smoke were you gazing at for that factoid? The ARRL remains silent on demographics of its membership. On the QST "Publisher's Sworn Circulation Statement" [www.arrl.org/ads/circ.html] page marked "last revised 17 March 2005," the ARRL membership as of 31 December 2004 was 151,727. The "individuals who are ARRL members" is given as 138,127. Obvious discrepancy there. ARRL does not clarify what seems to be a glaring error in arithmetic... That's about ALL that is given BY the ARRL on their membership...or any other demographics. According to www.hamdata.com, the total licensees for U.S. radio amateurs was 733,080 on 7 May 2005. Of those, 310,455 were Technician classes...which works out to 42.35% of the total. If the ARRL membership is really as high as 151,727 then that represents only 20.70% of the total number of licensed U.S. radio amateurs. If so, then it simply means that the Techs need to get more involved on the management side to make things happen. Long jump of a conclusion. Tsk, tsk. What would your class say about that? Afterall there is no reason that a Tech couldn't be President. Quite true. The only requirement is that they are natural-born citizens of the United States, are at least 35 years old and been a resident of the United States for at least 14 years. - Article II, Section 1, Constitution of the United States of America Oh, you meant the ARRL? The ARRL laready has TWO Presidents...Sumner and Haynie. Are you suggesting they try for THREE? [incroyable...] Perhaps if this PBI were more aimed at expanding the membership at all levels it would be more fruitful. Very little change would be needed to what you propose other than seeking out non-members of all classes. ARRL membership is dropping. [go look at older BoD Membership reports] Dropping with essentially NO change in their requirements. That is NOT good for the League. What is "seeking out non-members of all classes?" First you say that "half the ARRL membership is Technicians," then you want more attraction for all classes? You aren't being clear in what you are saying. BTW, how DID the cake taste? |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|